Eun-Byeol Lee, Oyama Okimitsu, Jiin Ryu, Tae Ho Lee, Dong-Hyuk Park, Sunghyun Hong, Sang-Hoon Suh, Daehyun Park, Jungsun Han, Sophie Lalande, Hirofumi Tanaka, Minsuk Oh, Justin Y Jeon
{"title":"运动后的过量耗氧量和脂肪用量在做健身操与做与耗氧量相匹配的稳态运动时更大。","authors":"Eun-Byeol Lee, Oyama Okimitsu, Jiin Ryu, Tae Ho Lee, Dong-Hyuk Park, Sunghyun Hong, Sang-Hoon Suh, Daehyun Park, Jungsun Han, Sophie Lalande, Hirofumi Tanaka, Minsuk Oh, Justin Y Jeon","doi":"10.1080/02701367.2024.2410394","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Calisthenics is a form of bodyweight exercise that involves dynamic and rhythmic exercises. The physiological responses during and after calisthenics remain unclear. This study examined whether a bout of full-body calisthenics, a form of circuit resistance exercise that involves bodyweight movements, yields greater excess post-exercise oxygen consumption (EPOC) than steady-state exercise (SSE) at matched oxygen consumption. Twenty-two young adults (age = 22.1 ± 2.4 years; four females) participated in two separate, oxygen consumption (<math><mrow><mover><mi>V</mi><mo>˙</mo></mover></mrow></math>O<sub>2</sub>) matched exercise sessions: full-body calisthenics (nine body weight exercises, 15 reps × 4 sets) and SSE (running on a treadmill at 60-90% of <math><mrow><mover><mi>V</mi><mo>˙</mo></mover></mrow></math>O<sub>2</sub>max). Energy expenditure, substrate utilization, and EPOC were measured during exercise and 60 min of recovery. SSE showed higher peak <math><mrow><mover><mi>V</mi><mo>˙</mo></mover></mrow></math>O<sub>2</sub> and heart rate during exercise than those during calisthenics. However, the post-exercise <math><mrow><mover><mi>V</mi><mo>˙</mo></mover></mrow></math>O<sub>2</sub> and energy expenditure above baseline level during the first 10 min of recovery were significantly higher with calisthenics than with SSE (0-5 min: 1.7 ± 0.5 vs. 1.0 ± 0.6; 6-10 min: 0.5 ± 0.4 vs. 0.1 ± 0.2 kcal/min; 31-60 min recovery: -0.1 ± 0.3 vs. -0.2 ± 0.2; all <i>p</i> < .05). During calisthenics, participants utilized a significantly higher proportion of energy from carbohydrates (85 vs. 73%; <i>p</i> < .01) but after exercise, they used a greater proportion of fat as the energy source (71 vs. 50%; <i>p</i> < .01) compared to SSE. Full-body calisthenics, a circuit-style bodyweight exercise, may be more effective than <math><mrow><mover><mi>V</mi><mo>˙</mo></mover></mrow></math>O<sub>2</sub> matched SSE in triggering greater EPOC and fat metabolism. Further efforts are warranted to demonstrate whether different amounts of skeletal muscle mass groups indeed lead to varying EPOC responses and energy use.</p>","PeriodicalId":94191,"journal":{"name":"Research quarterly for exercise and sport","volume":" ","pages":"1-7"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Greater Excess Post-Exercise Oxygen Consumption and Fat Use Following Calisthenics vs. Oxygen Consumption Matched Steady-State Exercise.\",\"authors\":\"Eun-Byeol Lee, Oyama Okimitsu, Jiin Ryu, Tae Ho Lee, Dong-Hyuk Park, Sunghyun Hong, Sang-Hoon Suh, Daehyun Park, Jungsun Han, Sophie Lalande, Hirofumi Tanaka, Minsuk Oh, Justin Y Jeon\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/02701367.2024.2410394\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Calisthenics is a form of bodyweight exercise that involves dynamic and rhythmic exercises. The physiological responses during and after calisthenics remain unclear. This study examined whether a bout of full-body calisthenics, a form of circuit resistance exercise that involves bodyweight movements, yields greater excess post-exercise oxygen consumption (EPOC) than steady-state exercise (SSE) at matched oxygen consumption. Twenty-two young adults (age = 22.1 ± 2.4 years; four females) participated in two separate, oxygen consumption (<math><mrow><mover><mi>V</mi><mo>˙</mo></mover></mrow></math>O<sub>2</sub>) matched exercise sessions: full-body calisthenics (nine body weight exercises, 15 reps × 4 sets) and SSE (running on a treadmill at 60-90% of <math><mrow><mover><mi>V</mi><mo>˙</mo></mover></mrow></math>O<sub>2</sub>max). Energy expenditure, substrate utilization, and EPOC were measured during exercise and 60 min of recovery. SSE showed higher peak <math><mrow><mover><mi>V</mi><mo>˙</mo></mover></mrow></math>O<sub>2</sub> and heart rate during exercise than those during calisthenics. However, the post-exercise <math><mrow><mover><mi>V</mi><mo>˙</mo></mover></mrow></math>O<sub>2</sub> and energy expenditure above baseline level during the first 10 min of recovery were significantly higher with calisthenics than with SSE (0-5 min: 1.7 ± 0.5 vs. 1.0 ± 0.6; 6-10 min: 0.5 ± 0.4 vs. 0.1 ± 0.2 kcal/min; 31-60 min recovery: -0.1 ± 0.3 vs. -0.2 ± 0.2; all <i>p</i> < .05). During calisthenics, participants utilized a significantly higher proportion of energy from carbohydrates (85 vs. 73%; <i>p</i> < .01) but after exercise, they used a greater proportion of fat as the energy source (71 vs. 50%; <i>p</i> < .01) compared to SSE. Full-body calisthenics, a circuit-style bodyweight exercise, may be more effective than <math><mrow><mover><mi>V</mi><mo>˙</mo></mover></mrow></math>O<sub>2</sub> matched SSE in triggering greater EPOC and fat metabolism. Further efforts are warranted to demonstrate whether different amounts of skeletal muscle mass groups indeed lead to varying EPOC responses and energy use.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":94191,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Research quarterly for exercise and sport\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"1-7\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-10\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Research quarterly for exercise and sport\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/02701367.2024.2410394\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Research quarterly for exercise and sport","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/02701367.2024.2410394","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
健身操是一种涉及动态和有节奏运动的体重锻炼方式。健身操期间和之后的生理反应仍不清楚。本研究探讨了在耗氧量相匹配的情况下,与稳态运动(SSE)相比,进行一次全身热身运动(一种涉及体重运动的循环阻力运动)是否会产生更多的运动后超额耗氧量(EPOC)。22 名年轻成年人(年龄 = 22.1 ± 2.4 岁;4 名女性)分别参加了两个耗氧量(V˙O2)匹配的运动项目:全身健身操(9 个负重练习,15 次 × 4 组)和稳态运动(在跑步机上以 60-90% 的 V˙O2max 速度跑步)。在运动和 60 分钟恢复期间测量了能量消耗、底物利用率和 EPOC。SSE在运动时的峰值V˙O2和心率均高于做健身操时的峰值V˙O2和心率。然而,运动后 V˙O2和恢复期前 10 分钟内超过基线水平的能量消耗,热身运动明显高于自给自足运动(0-5 分钟:1.7 ± 0.5 vs. 1.0 ± 0.6;6-10 分钟:1.7 ± 0.5 vs. 1.0 ± 0.6)。0 ± 0.6;6-10 分钟:0.5 ± 0.4 vs. 0.1 ± 0.2 kcal/min;31-60 分钟恢复:-0.1 ± 0.3 vs. -0.2 ± 0.2;所有 p p p V˙O2在引发更多 EPOC 和脂肪代谢方面与 SSE 相当。我们需要进一步努力证明不同数量的骨骼肌组是否真的会导致不同的 EPOC 反应和能量利用。
Greater Excess Post-Exercise Oxygen Consumption and Fat Use Following Calisthenics vs. Oxygen Consumption Matched Steady-State Exercise.
Calisthenics is a form of bodyweight exercise that involves dynamic and rhythmic exercises. The physiological responses during and after calisthenics remain unclear. This study examined whether a bout of full-body calisthenics, a form of circuit resistance exercise that involves bodyweight movements, yields greater excess post-exercise oxygen consumption (EPOC) than steady-state exercise (SSE) at matched oxygen consumption. Twenty-two young adults (age = 22.1 ± 2.4 years; four females) participated in two separate, oxygen consumption (O2) matched exercise sessions: full-body calisthenics (nine body weight exercises, 15 reps × 4 sets) and SSE (running on a treadmill at 60-90% of O2max). Energy expenditure, substrate utilization, and EPOC were measured during exercise and 60 min of recovery. SSE showed higher peak O2 and heart rate during exercise than those during calisthenics. However, the post-exercise O2 and energy expenditure above baseline level during the first 10 min of recovery were significantly higher with calisthenics than with SSE (0-5 min: 1.7 ± 0.5 vs. 1.0 ± 0.6; 6-10 min: 0.5 ± 0.4 vs. 0.1 ± 0.2 kcal/min; 31-60 min recovery: -0.1 ± 0.3 vs. -0.2 ± 0.2; all p < .05). During calisthenics, participants utilized a significantly higher proportion of energy from carbohydrates (85 vs. 73%; p < .01) but after exercise, they used a greater proportion of fat as the energy source (71 vs. 50%; p < .01) compared to SSE. Full-body calisthenics, a circuit-style bodyweight exercise, may be more effective than O2 matched SSE in triggering greater EPOC and fat metabolism. Further efforts are warranted to demonstrate whether different amounts of skeletal muscle mass groups indeed lead to varying EPOC responses and energy use.