在悬吊式前交叉韧带重建中,股四头肌腱自体移植物的制备和固定对移植物松弛的影响:生物力学分析

IF 2.4 3区 医学 Q2 ORTHOPEDICS
Orthopaedic Journal of Sports Medicine Pub Date : 2024-10-09 eCollection Date: 2024-10-01 DOI:10.1177/23259671241288578
Asheesh Bedi, Benjamin L Smith, Justin J Mitchell, Rachel M Frank, Oliver L Hauck, Coen A Wijdicks
{"title":"在悬吊式前交叉韧带重建中,股四头肌腱自体移植物的制备和固定对移植物松弛的影响:生物力学分析","authors":"Asheesh Bedi, Benjamin L Smith, Justin J Mitchell, Rachel M Frank, Oliver L Hauck, Coen A Wijdicks","doi":"10.1177/23259671241288578","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Favorable collagen fibril density and thickness combined with advances in graft preparation and fixation have significantly increased interest in the quadriceps tendon (QT) autograft for anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction. While various suspensory techniques have been described, the biomechanical profile of these constructs is largely undefined.</p><p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To compare the biomechanics of suspensory techniques for soft tissue QT autograft fixation in an in vitro model of ACL reconstruction.</p><p><strong>Study design: </strong>Controlled laboratory study.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Full-thickness QT grafts were harvested using a 9-mm graft blade. Adjustable-loop devices (ALDs) were secured to the graft (n = 6 per group) with a combination implant containing the ALD and suture tape-reinforced whipstitching (tape-reinforced [TR] group), tethered superficially to the graft with a whipstitch (onlay [OL] group), luggage-tagged through and around the graft (luggage tag [LT] group), or staggered behind superficial suturing (staggered [SG] group). Grafts were tested on an electromechanical testing machine following a validated in vitro reconstruction model of intraoperative workflow and postoperative ACL kinematics, cyclic loading, and load to failure.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The TR group had significantly less postcyclic tension loss (mean, 24%) compared with the OL (56%; <i>P</i> = .002), LT (69%; <i>P</i> < .001), and SG (90%; <i>P</i> < .001) constructs. Cyclic elongation was below the 3.0-mm threshold defined as clinical failure for TR (1.6 mm), but not for OL (3.3 mm), LT (7.9 mm), and SG (11.3 mm). All constructs were within native ACL stiffness limits (220 ± 72 N/mm) without significant differences. Ultimate loads significantly exceeded a normal ACL loading limit of 454 N for TR (739 N; <i>P</i> = .023), OL (547 N; <i>P</i> = .020), and LT (769 N; <i>P</i> = .001), but not for SG (346 N; <i>P</i> = .236).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The TR ALD construct demonstrated the most favorable time-zero biomechanical properties of modern soft tissue QT suspensory constructs, with 32% less tension loss and 52% less cyclic elongation versus the closest construct. Failure loading of all constructs was acceptable with respect to the native ACL except for the SG group, which had suboptimal ultimate load.</p><p><strong>Clinical relevance: </strong>TR ALD implants may protect soft tissue QT autografts before graft-bone healing in ACL reconstruction by minimizing time-zero laxity and fixation failure.</p>","PeriodicalId":19646,"journal":{"name":"Orthopaedic Journal of Sports Medicine","volume":"12 10","pages":"23259671241288578"},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11465362/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Effect of Quadriceps Tendon Autograft Preparation and Fixation on Graft Laxity During Suspensory Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction: A Biomechanical Analysis.\",\"authors\":\"Asheesh Bedi, Benjamin L Smith, Justin J Mitchell, Rachel M Frank, Oliver L Hauck, Coen A Wijdicks\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/23259671241288578\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Favorable collagen fibril density and thickness combined with advances in graft preparation and fixation have significantly increased interest in the quadriceps tendon (QT) autograft for anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction. While various suspensory techniques have been described, the biomechanical profile of these constructs is largely undefined.</p><p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To compare the biomechanics of suspensory techniques for soft tissue QT autograft fixation in an in vitro model of ACL reconstruction.</p><p><strong>Study design: </strong>Controlled laboratory study.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Full-thickness QT grafts were harvested using a 9-mm graft blade. Adjustable-loop devices (ALDs) were secured to the graft (n = 6 per group) with a combination implant containing the ALD and suture tape-reinforced whipstitching (tape-reinforced [TR] group), tethered superficially to the graft with a whipstitch (onlay [OL] group), luggage-tagged through and around the graft (luggage tag [LT] group), or staggered behind superficial suturing (staggered [SG] group). Grafts were tested on an electromechanical testing machine following a validated in vitro reconstruction model of intraoperative workflow and postoperative ACL kinematics, cyclic loading, and load to failure.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The TR group had significantly less postcyclic tension loss (mean, 24%) compared with the OL (56%; <i>P</i> = .002), LT (69%; <i>P</i> < .001), and SG (90%; <i>P</i> < .001) constructs. Cyclic elongation was below the 3.0-mm threshold defined as clinical failure for TR (1.6 mm), but not for OL (3.3 mm), LT (7.9 mm), and SG (11.3 mm). All constructs were within native ACL stiffness limits (220 ± 72 N/mm) without significant differences. Ultimate loads significantly exceeded a normal ACL loading limit of 454 N for TR (739 N; <i>P</i> = .023), OL (547 N; <i>P</i> = .020), and LT (769 N; <i>P</i> = .001), but not for SG (346 N; <i>P</i> = .236).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The TR ALD construct demonstrated the most favorable time-zero biomechanical properties of modern soft tissue QT suspensory constructs, with 32% less tension loss and 52% less cyclic elongation versus the closest construct. Failure loading of all constructs was acceptable with respect to the native ACL except for the SG group, which had suboptimal ultimate load.</p><p><strong>Clinical relevance: </strong>TR ALD implants may protect soft tissue QT autografts before graft-bone healing in ACL reconstruction by minimizing time-zero laxity and fixation failure.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":19646,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Orthopaedic Journal of Sports Medicine\",\"volume\":\"12 10\",\"pages\":\"23259671241288578\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-09\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11465362/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Orthopaedic Journal of Sports Medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/23259671241288578\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/10/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ORTHOPEDICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Orthopaedic Journal of Sports Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/23259671241288578","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/10/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:胶原纤维密度和厚度的增加以及移植物制备和固定技术的进步,大大提高了人们对股四头肌腱(QT)自体移植物用于前交叉韧带(ACL)重建的兴趣。目的:在前交叉韧带重建的体外模型中,比较用于软组织 QT 自体移植物固定的悬吊技术的生物力学:研究设计:实验室对照研究:方法:使用 9 毫米移植物刀片采集全厚 QT 移植物。将可调节环装置(ALD)固定在移植物上(每组6个),使用包含ALD的组合植入物和缝合胶带加固鞭状缝合(胶带加固[TR]组),用鞭状缝合将移植物表面拴住(onlay[OL]组),用行李标签穿过移植物及其周围(行李标签[LT]组),或错开表面缝合(错开[SG]组)。按照经过验证的体外重建模型,在机电试验机上对移植物进行术中工作流程和术后前交叉韧带运动学、循环负荷和失效负荷测试:与 OL(56%;P = .002)、LT(69%;P < .001)和 SG(90%;P < .001)结构相比,TR 组的循环后张力损失明显较小(平均为 24%)。TR(1.6 毫米)的循环伸长低于 3.0 毫米的阈值,而 OL(3.3 毫米)、LT(7.9 毫米)和 SG(11.3 毫米)的循环伸长则低于 3.0 毫米的阈值。所有结构都在原生前交叉韧带刚度范围内(220 ± 72 N/mm),无明显差异。TR(739 N;P = .023)、OL(547 N;P = .020)和 LT(769 N;P = .001)的极限负荷明显超过了 454 N 的正常前交叉韧带负荷限制,但 SG(346 N;P = .236)没有超过:结论:在现代软组织 QT 悬吊结构中,TR ALD 结构具有最有利的零时生物力学特性,与最接近的结构相比,张力损失减少 32%,循环伸长减少 52%。与原生交叉韧带相比,除 SG 组的极限负荷低于最佳值外,其他所有构建物的失效负荷均可接受:TR ALD植入物可在前交叉韧带重建的移植骨愈合前保护软组织QT自体移植物,最大程度地减少零时松弛和固定失败。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Effect of Quadriceps Tendon Autograft Preparation and Fixation on Graft Laxity During Suspensory Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction: A Biomechanical Analysis.

Background: Favorable collagen fibril density and thickness combined with advances in graft preparation and fixation have significantly increased interest in the quadriceps tendon (QT) autograft for anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction. While various suspensory techniques have been described, the biomechanical profile of these constructs is largely undefined.

Purpose: To compare the biomechanics of suspensory techniques for soft tissue QT autograft fixation in an in vitro model of ACL reconstruction.

Study design: Controlled laboratory study.

Methods: Full-thickness QT grafts were harvested using a 9-mm graft blade. Adjustable-loop devices (ALDs) were secured to the graft (n = 6 per group) with a combination implant containing the ALD and suture tape-reinforced whipstitching (tape-reinforced [TR] group), tethered superficially to the graft with a whipstitch (onlay [OL] group), luggage-tagged through and around the graft (luggage tag [LT] group), or staggered behind superficial suturing (staggered [SG] group). Grafts were tested on an electromechanical testing machine following a validated in vitro reconstruction model of intraoperative workflow and postoperative ACL kinematics, cyclic loading, and load to failure.

Results: The TR group had significantly less postcyclic tension loss (mean, 24%) compared with the OL (56%; P = .002), LT (69%; P < .001), and SG (90%; P < .001) constructs. Cyclic elongation was below the 3.0-mm threshold defined as clinical failure for TR (1.6 mm), but not for OL (3.3 mm), LT (7.9 mm), and SG (11.3 mm). All constructs were within native ACL stiffness limits (220 ± 72 N/mm) without significant differences. Ultimate loads significantly exceeded a normal ACL loading limit of 454 N for TR (739 N; P = .023), OL (547 N; P = .020), and LT (769 N; P = .001), but not for SG (346 N; P = .236).

Conclusion: The TR ALD construct demonstrated the most favorable time-zero biomechanical properties of modern soft tissue QT suspensory constructs, with 32% less tension loss and 52% less cyclic elongation versus the closest construct. Failure loading of all constructs was acceptable with respect to the native ACL except for the SG group, which had suboptimal ultimate load.

Clinical relevance: TR ALD implants may protect soft tissue QT autografts before graft-bone healing in ACL reconstruction by minimizing time-zero laxity and fixation failure.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Orthopaedic Journal of Sports Medicine
Orthopaedic Journal of Sports Medicine Medicine-Orthopedics and Sports Medicine
CiteScore
4.30
自引率
7.70%
发文量
876
审稿时长
12 weeks
期刊介绍: The Orthopaedic Journal of Sports Medicine (OJSM), developed by the American Orthopaedic Society for Sports Medicine (AOSSM), is a global, peer-reviewed, open access journal that combines the interests of researchers and clinical practitioners across orthopaedic sports medicine, arthroscopy, and knee arthroplasty. Topics include original research in the areas of: -Orthopaedic Sports Medicine, including surgical and nonsurgical treatment of orthopaedic sports injuries -Arthroscopic Surgery (Shoulder/Elbow/Wrist/Hip/Knee/Ankle/Foot) -Relevant translational research -Sports traumatology/epidemiology -Knee and shoulder arthroplasty The OJSM also publishes relevant systematic reviews and meta-analyses. This journal is a member of the Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE).
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信