Inmaculada Carmen Lara-Palomo, Ana María Capel-Alcaraz, Héctor García-López, Adelaida María Castro-Sánchez, María de Los Ángeles Querol-Zaldívar, Manuel Fernández-Sánchez
{"title":"单极射频热疗结合运动对慢性腰背痛患者的疗效:随机临床试验。","authors":"Inmaculada Carmen Lara-Palomo, Ana María Capel-Alcaraz, Héctor García-López, Adelaida María Castro-Sánchez, María de Los Ángeles Querol-Zaldívar, Manuel Fernández-Sánchez","doi":"10.3233/BMR-240118","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Chronic low back pain can severely affect quality of life. While several treatments are available, the combination of therapies often results in better outcomes.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study delves into the comparative effectiveness of combining monopolar dielectric diathermy radiofrequency (MDR) with supervised therapeutic exercise against the latter treatment alone.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A randomized single-blind controlled trial was conducted. The intervention group (n= 30) received MDR with supervised therapeutic exercises for eight weekly sessions for four weeks. The control group (n= 30) received only the same exercise protocol. The following self-report measures were assessed before the first treatment session, at four, and 12 weeks: disability, pain, kinesiophobia, quality of life, sleep quality, emotional distress, isometric trunk strength, and trunk flexion range.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Repeated ANOVA measures revealed significant time*group interactions for the McQuade test (p= 0.003), the physical role (p= 0.011), vitality (p= 0.023), social function (p= 0.006), and mental health subscales (p= 0.042). Between-group analyses showed significant differences for all outcomes at each follow-up: RMDQ (post-treatment, p= 0.040), ODI (post-treatment and 12-week, p= 0.040), VAS (p< 0.001), TSK (p< 0.001), and McQuade Test (p< 0.020).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The combination of diathermy radiofrequency with supervised therapeutic exercise significantly surpasses the efficacy of supervised therapeutic exercise alone, showcasing improvements in pain, disability, kinesiophobia, lumbar mobility in flexion, and overall quality of life in patients with chronic low back pain.</p>","PeriodicalId":15129,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Back and Musculoskeletal Rehabilitation","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Effectiveness of monopolar diathermy by radiofrequency combined with exercise in patients with chronic low back pain: A randomized clinical trial.\",\"authors\":\"Inmaculada Carmen Lara-Palomo, Ana María Capel-Alcaraz, Héctor García-López, Adelaida María Castro-Sánchez, María de Los Ángeles Querol-Zaldívar, Manuel Fernández-Sánchez\",\"doi\":\"10.3233/BMR-240118\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Chronic low back pain can severely affect quality of life. While several treatments are available, the combination of therapies often results in better outcomes.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study delves into the comparative effectiveness of combining monopolar dielectric diathermy radiofrequency (MDR) with supervised therapeutic exercise against the latter treatment alone.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A randomized single-blind controlled trial was conducted. The intervention group (n= 30) received MDR with supervised therapeutic exercises for eight weekly sessions for four weeks. The control group (n= 30) received only the same exercise protocol. The following self-report measures were assessed before the first treatment session, at four, and 12 weeks: disability, pain, kinesiophobia, quality of life, sleep quality, emotional distress, isometric trunk strength, and trunk flexion range.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Repeated ANOVA measures revealed significant time*group interactions for the McQuade test (p= 0.003), the physical role (p= 0.011), vitality (p= 0.023), social function (p= 0.006), and mental health subscales (p= 0.042). Between-group analyses showed significant differences for all outcomes at each follow-up: RMDQ (post-treatment, p= 0.040), ODI (post-treatment and 12-week, p= 0.040), VAS (p< 0.001), TSK (p< 0.001), and McQuade Test (p< 0.020).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The combination of diathermy radiofrequency with supervised therapeutic exercise significantly surpasses the efficacy of supervised therapeutic exercise alone, showcasing improvements in pain, disability, kinesiophobia, lumbar mobility in flexion, and overall quality of life in patients with chronic low back pain.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":15129,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Back and Musculoskeletal Rehabilitation\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-13\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Back and Musculoskeletal Rehabilitation\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3233/BMR-240118\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"ORTHOPEDICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Back and Musculoskeletal Rehabilitation","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3233/BMR-240118","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
Effectiveness of monopolar diathermy by radiofrequency combined with exercise in patients with chronic low back pain: A randomized clinical trial.
Background: Chronic low back pain can severely affect quality of life. While several treatments are available, the combination of therapies often results in better outcomes.
Objective: This study delves into the comparative effectiveness of combining monopolar dielectric diathermy radiofrequency (MDR) with supervised therapeutic exercise against the latter treatment alone.
Methods: A randomized single-blind controlled trial was conducted. The intervention group (n= 30) received MDR with supervised therapeutic exercises for eight weekly sessions for four weeks. The control group (n= 30) received only the same exercise protocol. The following self-report measures were assessed before the first treatment session, at four, and 12 weeks: disability, pain, kinesiophobia, quality of life, sleep quality, emotional distress, isometric trunk strength, and trunk flexion range.
Results: Repeated ANOVA measures revealed significant time*group interactions for the McQuade test (p= 0.003), the physical role (p= 0.011), vitality (p= 0.023), social function (p= 0.006), and mental health subscales (p= 0.042). Between-group analyses showed significant differences for all outcomes at each follow-up: RMDQ (post-treatment, p= 0.040), ODI (post-treatment and 12-week, p= 0.040), VAS (p< 0.001), TSK (p< 0.001), and McQuade Test (p< 0.020).
Conclusion: The combination of diathermy radiofrequency with supervised therapeutic exercise significantly surpasses the efficacy of supervised therapeutic exercise alone, showcasing improvements in pain, disability, kinesiophobia, lumbar mobility in flexion, and overall quality of life in patients with chronic low back pain.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Back and Musculoskeletal Rehabilitation is a journal whose main focus is to present relevant information about the interdisciplinary approach to musculoskeletal rehabilitation for clinicians who treat patients with back and musculoskeletal pain complaints. It will provide readers with both 1) a general fund of knowledge on the assessment and management of specific problems and 2) new information considered to be state-of-the-art in the field. The intended audience is multidisciplinary as well as multi-specialty.
In each issue clinicians can find information which they can use in their patient setting the very next day.