与免疫检查点抑制剂相关的胃肠道不良事件:EudraVigilance 和 VigiAccess 数据库的药物警戒分析。

IF 3 3区 医学 Q2 PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY
Syed Arman Rabbani, Atul Khurana, Mohamed El-Tanani, Mandeep Kumar Arora, Shrestha Sharma, Sathvik B Sridhar, Harikesh Dubey
{"title":"与免疫检查点抑制剂相关的胃肠道不良事件:EudraVigilance 和 VigiAccess 数据库的药物警戒分析。","authors":"Syed Arman Rabbani, Atul Khurana, Mohamed El-Tanani, Mandeep Kumar Arora, Shrestha Sharma, Sathvik B Sridhar, Harikesh Dubey","doi":"10.1080/14740338.2024.2416539","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>This study aimed to provide an overview of gastrointestinal (GI) adverse events associated with immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) using two pharmacovigilance databases, EudraVigilance and VigiAccess.</p><p><strong>Research design and methods: </strong>Data was collected from the date of ICI's marketing authorization until 30 November 2023. Reporting odds ratio (ROR) was used as a measure of ADR reporting disproportionality for signal detection.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Overall, across both databases, EudraVigilance and VigiAccess, a total of 76,606 ADR reports were analyzed. In EudraVigilance, colitis (12,581) and diarrhea (12,108) were the most reported GI adverse events, with similar findings in VigiAccess. Furthermore, in both databases, the most ADR reports were associated with nivolumab and pembrolizumab. Durvalumab (ROR:3.96,95%CI:3.65-4.28), ipilimumab (ROR:1.95,95%CI:1.89-2.01), nivolumab (ROR:1.05,95%CI:1.02-1.07), and atezolizumab (ROR:1.04,95%CI:1.01-1.07) demonstrated higher risks of GI events compared to other ICIs. EudraVigilance analysis identified dysphagia, ascites, hematochezia, and gastroesophageal reflux disease as potential signals associated with ICI therapy. Majority of ADR reports (87.2%) comprised serious GI adverse events, a portion of which was associated with fatal outcomes (14.5%). Atezolizumab (14.9%) and pembrolizumab (11.9%) were linked to a higher incidence of fatal outcomes compared to other ICIs.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The differential risk profiles of ICIs-associated-GI adverse events underscore the importance of personalized therapy in oncology.</p>","PeriodicalId":12232,"journal":{"name":"Expert Opinion on Drug Safety","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Gastrointestinal adverse events associated with immune checkpoint inhibitors: a pharmacovigilance analysis of the EudraVigilance and VigiAccess databases.\",\"authors\":\"Syed Arman Rabbani, Atul Khurana, Mohamed El-Tanani, Mandeep Kumar Arora, Shrestha Sharma, Sathvik B Sridhar, Harikesh Dubey\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/14740338.2024.2416539\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>This study aimed to provide an overview of gastrointestinal (GI) adverse events associated with immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) using two pharmacovigilance databases, EudraVigilance and VigiAccess.</p><p><strong>Research design and methods: </strong>Data was collected from the date of ICI's marketing authorization until 30 November 2023. Reporting odds ratio (ROR) was used as a measure of ADR reporting disproportionality for signal detection.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Overall, across both databases, EudraVigilance and VigiAccess, a total of 76,606 ADR reports were analyzed. In EudraVigilance, colitis (12,581) and diarrhea (12,108) were the most reported GI adverse events, with similar findings in VigiAccess. Furthermore, in both databases, the most ADR reports were associated with nivolumab and pembrolizumab. Durvalumab (ROR:3.96,95%CI:3.65-4.28), ipilimumab (ROR:1.95,95%CI:1.89-2.01), nivolumab (ROR:1.05,95%CI:1.02-1.07), and atezolizumab (ROR:1.04,95%CI:1.01-1.07) demonstrated higher risks of GI events compared to other ICIs. EudraVigilance analysis identified dysphagia, ascites, hematochezia, and gastroesophageal reflux disease as potential signals associated with ICI therapy. Majority of ADR reports (87.2%) comprised serious GI adverse events, a portion of which was associated with fatal outcomes (14.5%). Atezolizumab (14.9%) and pembrolizumab (11.9%) were linked to a higher incidence of fatal outcomes compared to other ICIs.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The differential risk profiles of ICIs-associated-GI adverse events underscore the importance of personalized therapy in oncology.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":12232,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Expert Opinion on Drug Safety\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-11\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Expert Opinion on Drug Safety\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/14740338.2024.2416539\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Expert Opinion on Drug Safety","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/14740338.2024.2416539","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

研究背景本研究旨在利用两个药物警戒数据库(EudraVigilance和VigiAccess)概述与免疫检查点抑制剂(ICIs)相关的胃肠道(GI)不良事件:数据收集时间为 ICI 获批上市之日起至 2023 年 11 月 30 日。报告几率比(ROR)被用来衡量ADR报告与信号检测的不相称性:总体而言,EudraVigilance 和 VigiAccess 两个数据库共分析了 76,606 份 ADR 报告。在 EudraVigilance 中,结肠炎(12,581 例)和腹泻(12,108 例)是报告最多的消化道不良事件,在 VigiAccess 中也有类似的结果。此外,在这两个数据库中,最多的 ADR 报告与 nivolumab 和 pembrolizumab 有关。与其他 ICIs 相比,Durvalumab(ROR:3.96,95%CI:3.65-4.28)、ipilimumab(ROR:1.95,95%CI:1.89-2.01)、nivolumab(ROR:1.05,95%CI:1.02-1.07)和 atezolizumab(ROR:1.04,95%CI:1.01-1.07)发生消化道事件的风险较高。EudraVigilance分析发现,吞咽困难、腹水、血尿和胃食管反流病是与ICI治疗相关的潜在信号。大部分 ADR 报告(87.2%)包括严重的消化道不良事件,其中一部分与死亡结果有关(14.5%)。与其他 ICIs 相比,Atezolizumab(14.9%)和 pembrolizumab(11.9%)的致命后果发生率更高:ICIs相关GI不良事件的不同风险特征凸显了肿瘤个性化治疗的重要性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Gastrointestinal adverse events associated with immune checkpoint inhibitors: a pharmacovigilance analysis of the EudraVigilance and VigiAccess databases.

Background: This study aimed to provide an overview of gastrointestinal (GI) adverse events associated with immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) using two pharmacovigilance databases, EudraVigilance and VigiAccess.

Research design and methods: Data was collected from the date of ICI's marketing authorization until 30 November 2023. Reporting odds ratio (ROR) was used as a measure of ADR reporting disproportionality for signal detection.

Results: Overall, across both databases, EudraVigilance and VigiAccess, a total of 76,606 ADR reports were analyzed. In EudraVigilance, colitis (12,581) and diarrhea (12,108) were the most reported GI adverse events, with similar findings in VigiAccess. Furthermore, in both databases, the most ADR reports were associated with nivolumab and pembrolizumab. Durvalumab (ROR:3.96,95%CI:3.65-4.28), ipilimumab (ROR:1.95,95%CI:1.89-2.01), nivolumab (ROR:1.05,95%CI:1.02-1.07), and atezolizumab (ROR:1.04,95%CI:1.01-1.07) demonstrated higher risks of GI events compared to other ICIs. EudraVigilance analysis identified dysphagia, ascites, hematochezia, and gastroesophageal reflux disease as potential signals associated with ICI therapy. Majority of ADR reports (87.2%) comprised serious GI adverse events, a portion of which was associated with fatal outcomes (14.5%). Atezolizumab (14.9%) and pembrolizumab (11.9%) were linked to a higher incidence of fatal outcomes compared to other ICIs.

Conclusion: The differential risk profiles of ICIs-associated-GI adverse events underscore the importance of personalized therapy in oncology.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.90
自引率
3.20%
发文量
97
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Expert Opinion on Drug Safety ranks #62 of 216 in the Pharmacology & Pharmacy category in the 2008 ISI Journal Citation Reports. Expert Opinion on Drug Safety (ISSN 1474-0338 [print], 1744-764X [electronic]) is a MEDLINE-indexed, peer-reviewed, international journal publishing review articles on all aspects of drug safety and original papers on the clinical implications of drug treatment safety issues, providing expert opinion on the scope for future development.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信