艾滋病、肝炎和其他抗病毒药物临床药理学国际研讨会摘要。

IF 3.1 3区 医学 Q2 PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY
{"title":"艾滋病、肝炎和其他抗病毒药物临床药理学国际研讨会摘要。","authors":"","doi":"10.1111/bcp.16290","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><b>11</b></p><p><b>Estimation of ganciclovir exposure by machine learning</b></p><p>Jean Woillard, Hamza Sayadi, Yeleen Fromage and Selim Arraki Zava</p><p><i>Inserm U1248, Univ Limoges, Chu Limoges</i></p><p><b>Background:</b> Valganciclovir, an oral prodrug of ganciclovir (GCV), is prescribed to prevent cytomegalovirus infection following transplantation. Dosing adjustments are often based solely on creatinine clearance to achieve a target GCV AUC<sub>0–24 h</sub> of 40–50 mg.h/L. However, this approach can result in significant overexposure or underexposure to the drug, potentially compromising efficacy or increasing toxicity. This study aimed to develop and validate machine learning (ML) algorithms capable of accurately estimating GCV AUC, thereby improving dosing precision.</p><p><b>Methods:</b> We simulated 5000 patients for each dosing regimen using two published population pharmacokinetic models (Lalagkas et al., Veniza et al.). These simulated patients were split into training (75%) and testing (25%) datasets. To further evaluate generalizability, an additional validation dataset of 200 patients per regimen was created using two distinct models (Caldés et al., Chen et al.). We developed three ML algorithm configurations using creatinine clearance in combination with either two or three drug concentrations sampled between T0 and T12h and three concentrations restricted between T0 and T6h. The performance of these ML configurations was assessed in both the testing and validation datasets and compared to maximum a posteriori Bayesian estimation (MAP-BE) applied to the Lalagkas et al. and Veniza et al. models within the validation datasets.</p><p><b>Results:</b> Among the ML algorithms evaluated, XGBoost consistently demonstrated the lowest root mean square error (RMSE) during a 10-fold cross-validation, indicating superior predictive accuracy. Models incorporating three blood samples yielded the most precise GCV AUC predictions. In the testing dataset, these models exhibited a relative bias ranging from −0.02% to 1.5% and a relative RMSE between 2.6% and 8.5%. In the validation dataset, the models achieved a relative bias of 1.5% to 5.8% and 8.9% to 16.5%, with a relative RMSE of 8.5% to 9.6% and 10.7% to 19.7% for the Caldés et al. and Chen et al. models, respectively. Notably, the ML algorithm predictions of AUC were significantly more accurate compared to those obtained through the MAP-BE method.</p><p><b>Conclusions:</b> The XGBoost machine learning models provided highly accurate estimates of GCV AUC from as few as two or three blood samples in combination with creatinine clearance. This approach represents a robust limited sampling strategy that can optimize therapeutic drug monitoring, potentially enhancing the clinical management of patients undergoing valganciclovir therapy by reducing the risks associated with drug overexposure and underexposure.</p>","PeriodicalId":9251,"journal":{"name":"British journal of clinical pharmacology","volume":"90 S1","pages":"10"},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/bcp.16290","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Estimation of ganciclovir exposure by machine learning\",\"authors\":\"\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/bcp.16290\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><b>11</b></p><p><b>Estimation of ganciclovir exposure by machine learning</b></p><p>Jean Woillard, Hamza Sayadi, Yeleen Fromage and Selim Arraki Zava</p><p><i>Inserm U1248, Univ Limoges, Chu Limoges</i></p><p><b>Background:</b> Valganciclovir, an oral prodrug of ganciclovir (GCV), is prescribed to prevent cytomegalovirus infection following transplantation. Dosing adjustments are often based solely on creatinine clearance to achieve a target GCV AUC<sub>0–24 h</sub> of 40–50 mg.h/L. However, this approach can result in significant overexposure or underexposure to the drug, potentially compromising efficacy or increasing toxicity. This study aimed to develop and validate machine learning (ML) algorithms capable of accurately estimating GCV AUC, thereby improving dosing precision.</p><p><b>Methods:</b> We simulated 5000 patients for each dosing regimen using two published population pharmacokinetic models (Lalagkas et al., Veniza et al.). These simulated patients were split into training (75%) and testing (25%) datasets. To further evaluate generalizability, an additional validation dataset of 200 patients per regimen was created using two distinct models (Caldés et al., Chen et al.). We developed three ML algorithm configurations using creatinine clearance in combination with either two or three drug concentrations sampled between T0 and T12h and three concentrations restricted between T0 and T6h. The performance of these ML configurations was assessed in both the testing and validation datasets and compared to maximum a posteriori Bayesian estimation (MAP-BE) applied to the Lalagkas et al. and Veniza et al. models within the validation datasets.</p><p><b>Results:</b> Among the ML algorithms evaluated, XGBoost consistently demonstrated the lowest root mean square error (RMSE) during a 10-fold cross-validation, indicating superior predictive accuracy. Models incorporating three blood samples yielded the most precise GCV AUC predictions. In the testing dataset, these models exhibited a relative bias ranging from −0.02% to 1.5% and a relative RMSE between 2.6% and 8.5%. In the validation dataset, the models achieved a relative bias of 1.5% to 5.8% and 8.9% to 16.5%, with a relative RMSE of 8.5% to 9.6% and 10.7% to 19.7% for the Caldés et al. and Chen et al. models, respectively. Notably, the ML algorithm predictions of AUC were significantly more accurate compared to those obtained through the MAP-BE method.</p><p><b>Conclusions:</b> The XGBoost machine learning models provided highly accurate estimates of GCV AUC from as few as two or three blood samples in combination with creatinine clearance. This approach represents a robust limited sampling strategy that can optimize therapeutic drug monitoring, potentially enhancing the clinical management of patients undergoing valganciclovir therapy by reducing the risks associated with drug overexposure and underexposure.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":9251,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"British journal of clinical pharmacology\",\"volume\":\"90 S1\",\"pages\":\"10\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-10\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/bcp.16290\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"British journal of clinical pharmacology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/bcp.16290\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"British journal of clinical pharmacology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/bcp.16290","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

11通过机器学习估计更昔洛韦的暴露量Jean Woillard、Hamza Sayadi、Yeleen Fromage 和 Selim Arraki ZavaInserm U1248、Univ Limoges、Chu Limoges背景:缬更昔洛韦是更昔洛韦(GCV)的口服原药,用于预防移植后巨细胞病毒感染。通常仅根据肌酐清除率调整剂量,以达到 40-50 mg.h/L 的 GCV AUC0-24 h 目标值。然而,这种方法可能会导致药物严重暴露过度或暴露不足,从而可能影响疗效或增加毒性。本研究旨在开发和验证能够准确估算 GCV AUC 的机器学习(ML)算法,从而提高用药精准度:我们使用两种已发表的群体药代动力学模型(Lalagkas 等人,Veniza 等人)为每种给药方案模拟了 5000 名患者。这些模拟患者被分成训练数据集(75%)和测试数据集(25%)。为了进一步评估普适性,我们使用两个不同的模型(Caldés 等人,Chen 等人)创建了一个额外的验证数据集,每个疗程包含 200 名患者。我们开发了三种 ML 算法配置,分别使用肌酐清除率结合在 T0 至 T12h 之间采样的两种或三种药物浓度,以及限制在 T0 至 T6h 之间采样的三种药物浓度。在测试数据集和验证数据集中评估了这些 ML 配置的性能,并与验证数据集中应用于 Lalagkas 等人和 Veniza 等人模型的最大后验贝叶斯估计(MAP-BE)进行了比较:结果:在所评估的 ML 算法中,XGBoost 在 10 倍交叉验证过程中的均方根误差 (RMSE) 一直最低,这表明其预测准确性更高。包含三个血液样本的模型能得出最精确的 GCV AUC 预测结果。在测试数据集中,这些模型的相对偏差在-0.02%到1.5%之间,相对有效值误差在2.6%到8.5%之间。在验证数据集中,Caldés 等人的模型和 Chen 等人的模型的相对偏差分别为 1.5% 至 5.8% 和 8.9% 至 16.5%,相对均方根误差分别为 8.5% 至 9.6% 和 10.7% 至 19.7%。值得注意的是,与 MAP-BE 方法相比,ML 算法对 AUC 的预测要准确得多:结论:XGBoost 机器学习模型结合肌酐清除率,只需两三个血样就能高度准确地估计 GCV AUC。这种方法是一种稳健的有限采样策略,可以优化治疗药物监测,通过降低药物暴露过度和暴露不足的相关风险,改善接受缬更昔洛韦治疗的患者的临床管理。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Estimation of ganciclovir exposure by machine learning

11

Estimation of ganciclovir exposure by machine learning

Jean Woillard, Hamza Sayadi, Yeleen Fromage and Selim Arraki Zava

Inserm U1248, Univ Limoges, Chu Limoges

Background: Valganciclovir, an oral prodrug of ganciclovir (GCV), is prescribed to prevent cytomegalovirus infection following transplantation. Dosing adjustments are often based solely on creatinine clearance to achieve a target GCV AUC0–24 h of 40–50 mg.h/L. However, this approach can result in significant overexposure or underexposure to the drug, potentially compromising efficacy or increasing toxicity. This study aimed to develop and validate machine learning (ML) algorithms capable of accurately estimating GCV AUC, thereby improving dosing precision.

Methods: We simulated 5000 patients for each dosing regimen using two published population pharmacokinetic models (Lalagkas et al., Veniza et al.). These simulated patients were split into training (75%) and testing (25%) datasets. To further evaluate generalizability, an additional validation dataset of 200 patients per regimen was created using two distinct models (Caldés et al., Chen et al.). We developed three ML algorithm configurations using creatinine clearance in combination with either two or three drug concentrations sampled between T0 and T12h and three concentrations restricted between T0 and T6h. The performance of these ML configurations was assessed in both the testing and validation datasets and compared to maximum a posteriori Bayesian estimation (MAP-BE) applied to the Lalagkas et al. and Veniza et al. models within the validation datasets.

Results: Among the ML algorithms evaluated, XGBoost consistently demonstrated the lowest root mean square error (RMSE) during a 10-fold cross-validation, indicating superior predictive accuracy. Models incorporating three blood samples yielded the most precise GCV AUC predictions. In the testing dataset, these models exhibited a relative bias ranging from −0.02% to 1.5% and a relative RMSE between 2.6% and 8.5%. In the validation dataset, the models achieved a relative bias of 1.5% to 5.8% and 8.9% to 16.5%, with a relative RMSE of 8.5% to 9.6% and 10.7% to 19.7% for the Caldés et al. and Chen et al. models, respectively. Notably, the ML algorithm predictions of AUC were significantly more accurate compared to those obtained through the MAP-BE method.

Conclusions: The XGBoost machine learning models provided highly accurate estimates of GCV AUC from as few as two or three blood samples in combination with creatinine clearance. This approach represents a robust limited sampling strategy that can optimize therapeutic drug monitoring, potentially enhancing the clinical management of patients undergoing valganciclovir therapy by reducing the risks associated with drug overexposure and underexposure.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.30
自引率
8.80%
发文量
419
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: Published on behalf of the British Pharmacological Society, the British Journal of Clinical Pharmacology features papers and reports on all aspects of drug action in humans: review articles, mini review articles, original papers, commentaries, editorials and letters. The Journal enjoys a wide readership, bridging the gap between the medical profession, clinical research and the pharmaceutical industry. It also publishes research on new methods, new drugs and new approaches to treatment. The Journal is recognised as one of the leading publications in its field. It is online only, publishes open access research through its OnlineOpen programme and is published monthly.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信