{"title":"艾滋病、肝炎和其他抗病毒药物临床药理学国际研讨会摘要。","authors":"","doi":"10.1111/bcp.16290","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><b>11</b></p><p><b>Estimation of ganciclovir exposure by machine learning</b></p><p>Jean Woillard, Hamza Sayadi, Yeleen Fromage and Selim Arraki Zava</p><p><i>Inserm U1248, Univ Limoges, Chu Limoges</i></p><p><b>Background:</b> Valganciclovir, an oral prodrug of ganciclovir (GCV), is prescribed to prevent cytomegalovirus infection following transplantation. Dosing adjustments are often based solely on creatinine clearance to achieve a target GCV AUC<sub>0–24 h</sub> of 40–50 mg.h/L. However, this approach can result in significant overexposure or underexposure to the drug, potentially compromising efficacy or increasing toxicity. This study aimed to develop and validate machine learning (ML) algorithms capable of accurately estimating GCV AUC, thereby improving dosing precision.</p><p><b>Methods:</b> We simulated 5000 patients for each dosing regimen using two published population pharmacokinetic models (Lalagkas et al., Veniza et al.). These simulated patients were split into training (75%) and testing (25%) datasets. To further evaluate generalizability, an additional validation dataset of 200 patients per regimen was created using two distinct models (Caldés et al., Chen et al.). We developed three ML algorithm configurations using creatinine clearance in combination with either two or three drug concentrations sampled between T0 and T12h and three concentrations restricted between T0 and T6h. The performance of these ML configurations was assessed in both the testing and validation datasets and compared to maximum a posteriori Bayesian estimation (MAP-BE) applied to the Lalagkas et al. and Veniza et al. models within the validation datasets.</p><p><b>Results:</b> Among the ML algorithms evaluated, XGBoost consistently demonstrated the lowest root mean square error (RMSE) during a 10-fold cross-validation, indicating superior predictive accuracy. Models incorporating three blood samples yielded the most precise GCV AUC predictions. In the testing dataset, these models exhibited a relative bias ranging from −0.02% to 1.5% and a relative RMSE between 2.6% and 8.5%. In the validation dataset, the models achieved a relative bias of 1.5% to 5.8% and 8.9% to 16.5%, with a relative RMSE of 8.5% to 9.6% and 10.7% to 19.7% for the Caldés et al. and Chen et al. models, respectively. Notably, the ML algorithm predictions of AUC were significantly more accurate compared to those obtained through the MAP-BE method.</p><p><b>Conclusions:</b> The XGBoost machine learning models provided highly accurate estimates of GCV AUC from as few as two or three blood samples in combination with creatinine clearance. This approach represents a robust limited sampling strategy that can optimize therapeutic drug monitoring, potentially enhancing the clinical management of patients undergoing valganciclovir therapy by reducing the risks associated with drug overexposure and underexposure.</p>","PeriodicalId":9251,"journal":{"name":"British journal of clinical pharmacology","volume":"90 S1","pages":"10"},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/bcp.16290","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Estimation of ganciclovir exposure by machine learning\",\"authors\":\"\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/bcp.16290\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><b>11</b></p><p><b>Estimation of ganciclovir exposure by machine learning</b></p><p>Jean Woillard, Hamza Sayadi, Yeleen Fromage and Selim Arraki Zava</p><p><i>Inserm U1248, Univ Limoges, Chu Limoges</i></p><p><b>Background:</b> Valganciclovir, an oral prodrug of ganciclovir (GCV), is prescribed to prevent cytomegalovirus infection following transplantation. Dosing adjustments are often based solely on creatinine clearance to achieve a target GCV AUC<sub>0–24 h</sub> of 40–50 mg.h/L. However, this approach can result in significant overexposure or underexposure to the drug, potentially compromising efficacy or increasing toxicity. This study aimed to develop and validate machine learning (ML) algorithms capable of accurately estimating GCV AUC, thereby improving dosing precision.</p><p><b>Methods:</b> We simulated 5000 patients for each dosing regimen using two published population pharmacokinetic models (Lalagkas et al., Veniza et al.). These simulated patients were split into training (75%) and testing (25%) datasets. To further evaluate generalizability, an additional validation dataset of 200 patients per regimen was created using two distinct models (Caldés et al., Chen et al.). We developed three ML algorithm configurations using creatinine clearance in combination with either two or three drug concentrations sampled between T0 and T12h and three concentrations restricted between T0 and T6h. The performance of these ML configurations was assessed in both the testing and validation datasets and compared to maximum a posteriori Bayesian estimation (MAP-BE) applied to the Lalagkas et al. and Veniza et al. models within the validation datasets.</p><p><b>Results:</b> Among the ML algorithms evaluated, XGBoost consistently demonstrated the lowest root mean square error (RMSE) during a 10-fold cross-validation, indicating superior predictive accuracy. Models incorporating three blood samples yielded the most precise GCV AUC predictions. In the testing dataset, these models exhibited a relative bias ranging from −0.02% to 1.5% and a relative RMSE between 2.6% and 8.5%. In the validation dataset, the models achieved a relative bias of 1.5% to 5.8% and 8.9% to 16.5%, with a relative RMSE of 8.5% to 9.6% and 10.7% to 19.7% for the Caldés et al. and Chen et al. models, respectively. Notably, the ML algorithm predictions of AUC were significantly more accurate compared to those obtained through the MAP-BE method.</p><p><b>Conclusions:</b> The XGBoost machine learning models provided highly accurate estimates of GCV AUC from as few as two or three blood samples in combination with creatinine clearance. This approach represents a robust limited sampling strategy that can optimize therapeutic drug monitoring, potentially enhancing the clinical management of patients undergoing valganciclovir therapy by reducing the risks associated with drug overexposure and underexposure.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":9251,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"British journal of clinical pharmacology\",\"volume\":\"90 S1\",\"pages\":\"10\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-10\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/bcp.16290\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"British journal of clinical pharmacology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/bcp.16290\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"British journal of clinical pharmacology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/bcp.16290","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Estimation of ganciclovir exposure by machine learning
11
Estimation of ganciclovir exposure by machine learning
Jean Woillard, Hamza Sayadi, Yeleen Fromage and Selim Arraki Zava
Inserm U1248, Univ Limoges, Chu Limoges
Background: Valganciclovir, an oral prodrug of ganciclovir (GCV), is prescribed to prevent cytomegalovirus infection following transplantation. Dosing adjustments are often based solely on creatinine clearance to achieve a target GCV AUC0–24 h of 40–50 mg.h/L. However, this approach can result in significant overexposure or underexposure to the drug, potentially compromising efficacy or increasing toxicity. This study aimed to develop and validate machine learning (ML) algorithms capable of accurately estimating GCV AUC, thereby improving dosing precision.
Methods: We simulated 5000 patients for each dosing regimen using two published population pharmacokinetic models (Lalagkas et al., Veniza et al.). These simulated patients were split into training (75%) and testing (25%) datasets. To further evaluate generalizability, an additional validation dataset of 200 patients per regimen was created using two distinct models (Caldés et al., Chen et al.). We developed three ML algorithm configurations using creatinine clearance in combination with either two or three drug concentrations sampled between T0 and T12h and three concentrations restricted between T0 and T6h. The performance of these ML configurations was assessed in both the testing and validation datasets and compared to maximum a posteriori Bayesian estimation (MAP-BE) applied to the Lalagkas et al. and Veniza et al. models within the validation datasets.
Results: Among the ML algorithms evaluated, XGBoost consistently demonstrated the lowest root mean square error (RMSE) during a 10-fold cross-validation, indicating superior predictive accuracy. Models incorporating three blood samples yielded the most precise GCV AUC predictions. In the testing dataset, these models exhibited a relative bias ranging from −0.02% to 1.5% and a relative RMSE between 2.6% and 8.5%. In the validation dataset, the models achieved a relative bias of 1.5% to 5.8% and 8.9% to 16.5%, with a relative RMSE of 8.5% to 9.6% and 10.7% to 19.7% for the Caldés et al. and Chen et al. models, respectively. Notably, the ML algorithm predictions of AUC were significantly more accurate compared to those obtained through the MAP-BE method.
Conclusions: The XGBoost machine learning models provided highly accurate estimates of GCV AUC from as few as two or three blood samples in combination with creatinine clearance. This approach represents a robust limited sampling strategy that can optimize therapeutic drug monitoring, potentially enhancing the clinical management of patients undergoing valganciclovir therapy by reducing the risks associated with drug overexposure and underexposure.
期刊介绍:
Published on behalf of the British Pharmacological Society, the British Journal of Clinical Pharmacology features papers and reports on all aspects of drug action in humans: review articles, mini review articles, original papers, commentaries, editorials and letters. The Journal enjoys a wide readership, bridging the gap between the medical profession, clinical research and the pharmaceutical industry. It also publishes research on new methods, new drugs and new approaches to treatment. The Journal is recognised as one of the leading publications in its field. It is online only, publishes open access research through its OnlineOpen programme and is published monthly.