无症状与有症状结直肠癌患者的循环肿瘤 DNA 与复发风险。

IF 6.4 1区 医学 Q1 ONCOLOGY
Nadia Øgaard, Sarah Østrup Jensen, Mai-Britt Worm Ørntoft, Christina Demuth, Mads Heilskov Rasmussen, Tenna Vesterman Henriksen, Jesper Nors, Amanda Frydendahl, Iben Lyskjær, Marijana Nesic, Christina Therkildsen, Jakob Kleif, Mikail Gögenur, Lars Nannestad Jørgensen, Jesper Vilandt, Jakob Benedict Seidelin, Kåre Anderson Gotschalck, Claudia Jaensch, Berit Andersen, Uffe Schou Løve, Ole Thorlacius-Ussing, Per Vadgaard Andersen, Thomas Kolbro, Alessio Monti, Jeppe Kildsig, Peter Bondeven, Nis Hallundbæk Schlesinger, Lene Hjerrild Iversen, Morten Rasmussen, Ismail Gögenur, Jesper Bertram Bramsen, Claus Lindbjerg Andersen
{"title":"无症状与有症状结直肠癌患者的循环肿瘤 DNA 与复发风险。","authors":"Nadia Øgaard, Sarah Østrup Jensen, Mai-Britt Worm Ørntoft, Christina Demuth, Mads Heilskov Rasmussen, Tenna Vesterman Henriksen, Jesper Nors, Amanda Frydendahl, Iben Lyskjær, Marijana Nesic, Christina Therkildsen, Jakob Kleif, Mikail Gögenur, Lars Nannestad Jørgensen, Jesper Vilandt, Jakob Benedict Seidelin, Kåre Anderson Gotschalck, Claudia Jaensch, Berit Andersen, Uffe Schou Løve, Ole Thorlacius-Ussing, Per Vadgaard Andersen, Thomas Kolbro, Alessio Monti, Jeppe Kildsig, Peter Bondeven, Nis Hallundbæk Schlesinger, Lene Hjerrild Iversen, Morten Rasmussen, Ismail Gögenur, Jesper Bertram Bramsen, Claus Lindbjerg Andersen","doi":"10.1038/s41416-024-02867-5","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Multiple initiatives aim to develop circulating tumour DNA (ctDNA) tests for early cancer detection in asymptomatic individuals. The few studies describing ctDNA-testing in both asymptomatic and symptomatic patients report lower ctDNA detection in the asymptomatic patients. Here, we explore if asymptomatic patients differ from symptomatic patients e.g. by including a ‘low-ctDNA-shedding’ and ‘less-aggressive’ subgroup. ctDNA assessment was performed in two independent cohorts of consecutively recruited patients with asymptomatic colorectal cancer (CRC) (Cohort#1: n = 215, Cohort#2: n = 368) and symptomatic CRC (Cohort#1: n = 117, Cohort#2: n = 722). After adjusting for tumour stage and size, the odds of ctDNA detection was significantly lower in asymptomatic patients compared to symptomatic patients (Cohort#1: OR: 0.4, 95%CI: 0.2–0.8, Cohort#2: OR: 0.7, 95%CI: 0.5–0.9). Further, the recurrence risk was lower in asymptomatic patients (Cohort#1: sHR: 0.6, 95%CI: 0.3–1.2, Cohort#2: sHR: 0.6, 95%CI: 0.4–1.0). Notably, ctDNA-negative asymptomatic patients had the lowest recurrence risk compared to the symptomatic patients (Cohort#1: sHR: 0.2, 95%CI: 0.1–0.6, Cohort#2: sHR: 0.3, 95%CI: 0.2–0.6). Our study suggests that asymptomatic patients are enriched for a ‘low-ctDNA-shedding-low-recurrence-risk’ subgroup. Such insights are needed to guide ctDNA-based early-detection initiatives and should prompt discussions about de-escalation of therapy and follow-up for ctDNA-negative asymptomatic CRC patients.","PeriodicalId":9243,"journal":{"name":"British Journal of Cancer","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":6.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.nature.com/articles/s41416-024-02867-5.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Circulating tumour DNA and risk of recurrence in patients with asymptomatic versus symptomatic colorectal cancer\",\"authors\":\"Nadia Øgaard, Sarah Østrup Jensen, Mai-Britt Worm Ørntoft, Christina Demuth, Mads Heilskov Rasmussen, Tenna Vesterman Henriksen, Jesper Nors, Amanda Frydendahl, Iben Lyskjær, Marijana Nesic, Christina Therkildsen, Jakob Kleif, Mikail Gögenur, Lars Nannestad Jørgensen, Jesper Vilandt, Jakob Benedict Seidelin, Kåre Anderson Gotschalck, Claudia Jaensch, Berit Andersen, Uffe Schou Løve, Ole Thorlacius-Ussing, Per Vadgaard Andersen, Thomas Kolbro, Alessio Monti, Jeppe Kildsig, Peter Bondeven, Nis Hallundbæk Schlesinger, Lene Hjerrild Iversen, Morten Rasmussen, Ismail Gögenur, Jesper Bertram Bramsen, Claus Lindbjerg Andersen\",\"doi\":\"10.1038/s41416-024-02867-5\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Multiple initiatives aim to develop circulating tumour DNA (ctDNA) tests for early cancer detection in asymptomatic individuals. The few studies describing ctDNA-testing in both asymptomatic and symptomatic patients report lower ctDNA detection in the asymptomatic patients. Here, we explore if asymptomatic patients differ from symptomatic patients e.g. by including a ‘low-ctDNA-shedding’ and ‘less-aggressive’ subgroup. ctDNA assessment was performed in two independent cohorts of consecutively recruited patients with asymptomatic colorectal cancer (CRC) (Cohort#1: n = 215, Cohort#2: n = 368) and symptomatic CRC (Cohort#1: n = 117, Cohort#2: n = 722). After adjusting for tumour stage and size, the odds of ctDNA detection was significantly lower in asymptomatic patients compared to symptomatic patients (Cohort#1: OR: 0.4, 95%CI: 0.2–0.8, Cohort#2: OR: 0.7, 95%CI: 0.5–0.9). Further, the recurrence risk was lower in asymptomatic patients (Cohort#1: sHR: 0.6, 95%CI: 0.3–1.2, Cohort#2: sHR: 0.6, 95%CI: 0.4–1.0). Notably, ctDNA-negative asymptomatic patients had the lowest recurrence risk compared to the symptomatic patients (Cohort#1: sHR: 0.2, 95%CI: 0.1–0.6, Cohort#2: sHR: 0.3, 95%CI: 0.2–0.6). Our study suggests that asymptomatic patients are enriched for a ‘low-ctDNA-shedding-low-recurrence-risk’ subgroup. Such insights are needed to guide ctDNA-based early-detection initiatives and should prompt discussions about de-escalation of therapy and follow-up for ctDNA-negative asymptomatic CRC patients.\",\"PeriodicalId\":9243,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"British Journal of Cancer\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":6.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-10\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.nature.com/articles/s41416-024-02867-5.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"British Journal of Cancer\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.nature.com/articles/s41416-024-02867-5\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ONCOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"British Journal of Cancer","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.nature.com/articles/s41416-024-02867-5","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:多项研究旨在开发循环肿瘤 DNA(ctDNA)检测方法,用于无症状人群的早期癌症检测。对无症状和有症状患者进行ctDNA检测的少数研究报告显示,无症状患者的ctDNA检测率较低。在此,我们探讨了无症状患者与有症状患者是否存在差异,例如是否包括 "低ctDNA脱落 "和 "侵袭性较低 "的亚组。方法:对连续招募的无症状结直肠癌(CRC)(Cohort#1:n = 215,Cohort#2:n = 368)和有症状结直肠癌(CRC)(Cohort#1:n = 117,Cohort#2:n = 722)患者的两个独立队列进行ctDNA评估:调整肿瘤分期和大小后,无症状患者检测到ctDNA的几率明显低于有症状患者(队列#1:OR:0.4,95%CI:0.2-0.8;队列#2:OR:0.7,95%CI:0.5-0.9)。此外,无症状患者的复发风险较低(队列#1:sHR:0.6,95%CI:0.3-1.2;队列#2:sHR:0.6,95%CI:0.4-1.0)。值得注意的是,与无症状患者相比,ctDNA阴性的无症状患者复发风险最低(队列#1:sHR:0.2,95%CI:0.1-0.6;队列#2:sHR:0.3,95%CI:0.2-0.6):我们的研究表明,无症状患者中富含 "低ctDNA脱落-低复发风险 "亚群。我们的研究表明,无症状患者中富含 "低ctDNA脱落、低复发风险 "亚群,需要这样的见解来指导基于ctDNA的早期检测措施,并应促使对ctDNA阴性的无症状CRC患者进行降级治疗和随访的讨论。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Circulating tumour DNA and risk of recurrence in patients with asymptomatic versus symptomatic colorectal cancer

Circulating tumour DNA and risk of recurrence in patients with asymptomatic versus symptomatic colorectal cancer
Multiple initiatives aim to develop circulating tumour DNA (ctDNA) tests for early cancer detection in asymptomatic individuals. The few studies describing ctDNA-testing in both asymptomatic and symptomatic patients report lower ctDNA detection in the asymptomatic patients. Here, we explore if asymptomatic patients differ from symptomatic patients e.g. by including a ‘low-ctDNA-shedding’ and ‘less-aggressive’ subgroup. ctDNA assessment was performed in two independent cohorts of consecutively recruited patients with asymptomatic colorectal cancer (CRC) (Cohort#1: n = 215, Cohort#2: n = 368) and symptomatic CRC (Cohort#1: n = 117, Cohort#2: n = 722). After adjusting for tumour stage and size, the odds of ctDNA detection was significantly lower in asymptomatic patients compared to symptomatic patients (Cohort#1: OR: 0.4, 95%CI: 0.2–0.8, Cohort#2: OR: 0.7, 95%CI: 0.5–0.9). Further, the recurrence risk was lower in asymptomatic patients (Cohort#1: sHR: 0.6, 95%CI: 0.3–1.2, Cohort#2: sHR: 0.6, 95%CI: 0.4–1.0). Notably, ctDNA-negative asymptomatic patients had the lowest recurrence risk compared to the symptomatic patients (Cohort#1: sHR: 0.2, 95%CI: 0.1–0.6, Cohort#2: sHR: 0.3, 95%CI: 0.2–0.6). Our study suggests that asymptomatic patients are enriched for a ‘low-ctDNA-shedding-low-recurrence-risk’ subgroup. Such insights are needed to guide ctDNA-based early-detection initiatives and should prompt discussions about de-escalation of therapy and follow-up for ctDNA-negative asymptomatic CRC patients.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
British Journal of Cancer
British Journal of Cancer 医学-肿瘤学
CiteScore
15.10
自引率
1.10%
发文量
383
审稿时长
6 months
期刊介绍: The British Journal of Cancer is one of the most-cited general cancer journals, publishing significant advances in translational and clinical cancer research.It also publishes high-quality reviews and thought-provoking comment on all aspects of cancer prevention,diagnosis and treatment.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信