眼动追踪能否帮助创建一种新的类风湿性关节炎患者 X 射线分析方法,包括关节分割和评分方法?

PLOS digital health Pub Date : 2024-10-07 eCollection Date: 2024-10-01 DOI:10.1371/journal.pdig.0000616
Baptiste Quéré, Léonie Méneur, Nathan Foulquier, Hugo Pensec, Valérie Devauchelle-Pensec, Florent Garrigues, Alain Saraux
{"title":"眼动追踪能否帮助创建一种新的类风湿性关节炎患者 X 射线分析方法,包括关节分割和评分方法?","authors":"Baptiste Quéré, Léonie Méneur, Nathan Foulquier, Hugo Pensec, Valérie Devauchelle-Pensec, Florent Garrigues, Alain Saraux","doi":"10.1371/journal.pdig.0000616","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Reading hand and foot X-rays in rheumatoid arthritis patients is difficult and time-consuming. In research, physicians use the modified Sharp van der Heijde Sharp (mvdH) score by reading of hand and foot radiographs. The aim of this study was to create a new method of determining the mvdH via eye tracking and to study its concordance with the mvdH score. We created a new method of quantifying the mvdH score based on reading time of a reader monitored via eye tracking (Tobii Pro Lab software) after training with the aid of a metronome. Radiographs were read twice by the trained eye-tracking reader and once by an experienced reference radiologist. A total of 440 joints were selected; 416 could be interpreted for erosion, and 396 could be interpreted for joint space narrowing (JSN) when read by eye tracking (eye tracking could not measure the time spent when two pathological joints were too close together). The agreement between eye tracking mvdH Sharp score and classical mvdH Sharp score yes (at least one erosion or JSN) versus no (no erosion or no JSN) was excellent for both erosions (kappa 0.97; 95% CI: 0.96-0.99) and JSN (kappa: 0.95; 95% CI: 0.93-0.097). This agreement by class (0 to 10) remained excellent for both erosions (kappa 0.82; 95% CI: 0.79-0.0.85) and JSN (kappa: 0.68; 95% CI: 0.65-0.0.71). To conclude, eye-tracking reading correlates strongly with classical mvdH-Sharp and is useful for assessing severity, segmenting joints and establishing a rapid score for lesions.</p>","PeriodicalId":74465,"journal":{"name":"PLOS digital health","volume":"3 10","pages":"e0000616"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11458192/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Can eye-tracking help to create a new method for X-ray analysis of rheumatoid arthritis patients, including joint segmentation and scoring methods?\",\"authors\":\"Baptiste Quéré, Léonie Méneur, Nathan Foulquier, Hugo Pensec, Valérie Devauchelle-Pensec, Florent Garrigues, Alain Saraux\",\"doi\":\"10.1371/journal.pdig.0000616\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Reading hand and foot X-rays in rheumatoid arthritis patients is difficult and time-consuming. In research, physicians use the modified Sharp van der Heijde Sharp (mvdH) score by reading of hand and foot radiographs. The aim of this study was to create a new method of determining the mvdH via eye tracking and to study its concordance with the mvdH score. We created a new method of quantifying the mvdH score based on reading time of a reader monitored via eye tracking (Tobii Pro Lab software) after training with the aid of a metronome. Radiographs were read twice by the trained eye-tracking reader and once by an experienced reference radiologist. A total of 440 joints were selected; 416 could be interpreted for erosion, and 396 could be interpreted for joint space narrowing (JSN) when read by eye tracking (eye tracking could not measure the time spent when two pathological joints were too close together). The agreement between eye tracking mvdH Sharp score and classical mvdH Sharp score yes (at least one erosion or JSN) versus no (no erosion or no JSN) was excellent for both erosions (kappa 0.97; 95% CI: 0.96-0.99) and JSN (kappa: 0.95; 95% CI: 0.93-0.097). This agreement by class (0 to 10) remained excellent for both erosions (kappa 0.82; 95% CI: 0.79-0.0.85) and JSN (kappa: 0.68; 95% CI: 0.65-0.0.71). To conclude, eye-tracking reading correlates strongly with classical mvdH-Sharp and is useful for assessing severity, segmenting joints and establishing a rapid score for lesions.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":74465,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"PLOS digital health\",\"volume\":\"3 10\",\"pages\":\"e0000616\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-07\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11458192/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"PLOS digital health\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pdig.0000616\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/10/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"PLOS digital health","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pdig.0000616","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/10/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

阅读类风湿性关节炎患者的手部和足部 X 光片既困难又费时。在研究中,医生通过阅读手部和足部X光片使用改良的夏普-范-德-海德-夏普(mvdH)评分法。本研究旨在创建一种通过眼动追踪确定 mvdH 的新方法,并研究其与 mvdH 评分的一致性。在节拍器的辅助下进行训练后,我们根据眼动仪(Tobii Pro Lab 软件)监测的读片者的读片时间创建了一种量化 mvdH 评分的新方法。经过培训的眼动仪读片员和经验丰富的参考放射科医生各读片一次。共选取了 440 个关节,其中 416 个关节可通过眼动仪判读为侵蚀,396 个关节可通过眼动仪判读为关节间隙变窄(JSN)(眼动仪无法测量两个病理关节距离过近时所花费的时间)。对于侵蚀(kappa:0.97;95% CI:0.96-0.99)和JSN(kappa:0.95;95% CI:0.93-0.097),眼动追踪mvdH Sharp评分和经典mvdH Sharp评分 "是"(至少一个侵蚀或JSN)与 "否"(无侵蚀或无JSN)之间的一致性非常好。对于糜烂(kappa 0.82;95% CI:0.79-0.0.85)和 JSN(kappa:0.68;95% CI:0.65-0.0.71),按等级(0 至 10)划分的一致性仍然非常好。总之,眼动追踪阅读与经典的 mvdH-Sharp 有很强的相关性,可用于评估严重程度、分割关节和建立病变的快速评分。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Can eye-tracking help to create a new method for X-ray analysis of rheumatoid arthritis patients, including joint segmentation and scoring methods?

Reading hand and foot X-rays in rheumatoid arthritis patients is difficult and time-consuming. In research, physicians use the modified Sharp van der Heijde Sharp (mvdH) score by reading of hand and foot radiographs. The aim of this study was to create a new method of determining the mvdH via eye tracking and to study its concordance with the mvdH score. We created a new method of quantifying the mvdH score based on reading time of a reader monitored via eye tracking (Tobii Pro Lab software) after training with the aid of a metronome. Radiographs were read twice by the trained eye-tracking reader and once by an experienced reference radiologist. A total of 440 joints were selected; 416 could be interpreted for erosion, and 396 could be interpreted for joint space narrowing (JSN) when read by eye tracking (eye tracking could not measure the time spent when two pathological joints were too close together). The agreement between eye tracking mvdH Sharp score and classical mvdH Sharp score yes (at least one erosion or JSN) versus no (no erosion or no JSN) was excellent for both erosions (kappa 0.97; 95% CI: 0.96-0.99) and JSN (kappa: 0.95; 95% CI: 0.93-0.097). This agreement by class (0 to 10) remained excellent for both erosions (kappa 0.82; 95% CI: 0.79-0.0.85) and JSN (kappa: 0.68; 95% CI: 0.65-0.0.71). To conclude, eye-tracking reading correlates strongly with classical mvdH-Sharp and is useful for assessing severity, segmenting joints and establishing a rapid score for lesions.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信