胫骨远端髓内钉术前 CT 扫描不会改变治疗决策或手术结果。

IF 2.6 2区 医学 Q1 ORTHOPEDICS
Shea M Comadoll, Thomas Z Paull, Sydney Boike, Riley Swenson, Robert D Wojahn, Mai P Nguyen
{"title":"胫骨远端髓内钉术前 CT 扫描不会改变治疗决策或手术结果。","authors":"Shea M Comadoll, Thomas Z Paull, Sydney Boike, Riley Swenson, Robert D Wojahn, Mai P Nguyen","doi":"10.5435/JAAOS-D-24-00600","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Distal tibia shaft fractures have a high association with posterior malleolar fractures (PMFs); hence, a preoperative ankle CT scan is commonly obtained. The purpose of this study was to determine whether a CT scan for distal third tibia shaft fractures is associated with differences in recognition of a posterior malleolus fracture (PMF), treatment of an identified PMF, outcomes, and postoperative complications.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We retrospectively reviewed cases of adult patients with distal third tibia shaft fractures treated with an intramedullary nail between 2018 and 2020. Patients were divided into 2 groups based on whether they received a preoperative ankle CT scan. Outcomes included surgical time, the rate of missed PMFs or postoperative PMF displacement, the treatment of the PMFs, postoperative weight-bearing restrictions, Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System Global-10 (PROMIS Global-10) scores, and unplanned revision surgeries.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>124 patients (age 45 ± 18 years; 39.5% female) with distal third tibia shaft fractures treated with intramedullary nailing and with minimum 6 months of follow-up were reviewed. 26 patients received preoperative CT scans, and 98 patients did not have CT scans. The rate of detected PMF was 69.2% (N = 18) in patients with CT and 55.1% (N = 54) in patients without CT (P = 0.19). No significant differences were observed in all outcomes between the 2 groups (P > 0.05). 3 PMFs not visible on radiographs were identified on CT, and they did not require fixation and did not displace. PMFs that were greater than one-third of the joint surface were more likely to have a preoperative CT (P < 0.01).</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>Preoperative CT scans for distal third tibia shaft fractures may be useful in characterizing large PMFs; however, this knowledge does not translate into shorter surgical time, increased fixation rates, decreased unplanned revision surgery, or improved patient-reported outcomes. Discovery of PMFs did not always lead to fixation, and PMFs without fixation did not become further displaced.</p>","PeriodicalId":51098,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Preoperative CT Scans Prior to Distal Tibial Intramedullary Nailing Do not Change Treatment Decisions or Surgical Outcomes.\",\"authors\":\"Shea M Comadoll, Thomas Z Paull, Sydney Boike, Riley Swenson, Robert D Wojahn, Mai P Nguyen\",\"doi\":\"10.5435/JAAOS-D-24-00600\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Distal tibia shaft fractures have a high association with posterior malleolar fractures (PMFs); hence, a preoperative ankle CT scan is commonly obtained. The purpose of this study was to determine whether a CT scan for distal third tibia shaft fractures is associated with differences in recognition of a posterior malleolus fracture (PMF), treatment of an identified PMF, outcomes, and postoperative complications.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We retrospectively reviewed cases of adult patients with distal third tibia shaft fractures treated with an intramedullary nail between 2018 and 2020. Patients were divided into 2 groups based on whether they received a preoperative ankle CT scan. Outcomes included surgical time, the rate of missed PMFs or postoperative PMF displacement, the treatment of the PMFs, postoperative weight-bearing restrictions, Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System Global-10 (PROMIS Global-10) scores, and unplanned revision surgeries.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>124 patients (age 45 ± 18 years; 39.5% female) with distal third tibia shaft fractures treated with intramedullary nailing and with minimum 6 months of follow-up were reviewed. 26 patients received preoperative CT scans, and 98 patients did not have CT scans. The rate of detected PMF was 69.2% (N = 18) in patients with CT and 55.1% (N = 54) in patients without CT (P = 0.19). No significant differences were observed in all outcomes between the 2 groups (P > 0.05). 3 PMFs not visible on radiographs were identified on CT, and they did not require fixation and did not displace. PMFs that were greater than one-third of the joint surface were more likely to have a preoperative CT (P < 0.01).</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>Preoperative CT scans for distal third tibia shaft fractures may be useful in characterizing large PMFs; however, this knowledge does not translate into shorter surgical time, increased fixation rates, decreased unplanned revision surgery, or improved patient-reported outcomes. Discovery of PMFs did not always lead to fixation, and PMFs without fixation did not become further displaced.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":51098,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5435/JAAOS-D-24-00600\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ORTHOPEDICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5435/JAAOS-D-24-00600","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

简介胫骨远端轴骨折与后踝骨折(PMF)的关联度很高;因此,术前通常会进行踝关节 CT 扫描。本研究旨在确定胫骨远端第三节骨折的 CT 扫描是否与后踝骨骨折(PMF)的识别、已识别 PMF 的治疗、预后和术后并发症的差异有关:我们回顾性分析了2018年至2020年间使用髓内钉治疗胫骨远端第三轴骨折的成年患者病例。根据患者术前是否接受踝关节 CT 扫描将其分为 2 组。研究结果包括手术时间、PMF漏诊率或术后PMF移位率、PMF的治疗、术后负重限制、患者报告结果测量信息系统Global-10(PROMIS Global-10)评分以及计划外翻修手术:对124名接受髓内钉治疗且随访至少6个月的胫骨远端第三轴骨折患者(年龄45 ± 18岁;39.5%为女性)进行了复查。26 名患者接受了术前 CT 扫描,98 名患者未接受 CT 扫描。接受CT扫描的患者中,PMF的检出率为69.2%(N = 18),未接受CT扫描的患者中,PMF的检出率为55.1%(N = 54)(P = 0.19)。两组患者的所有结果均无明显差异(P > 0.05)。3个在X光片上看不到的PMF在CT上被发现,它们不需要固定,也没有移位。大于关节表面三分之一的PMF更有可能在术前进行CT检查(P < 0.01):讨论:胫骨远端第三节骨折的术前CT扫描可能有助于确定大的PMF的特征;但这一知识并不能转化为更短的手术时间、更高的固定率、更少的非计划翻修手术或更好的患者报告结果。PMF的发现并不总是导致固定,而没有固定的PMF也不会进一步移位。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Preoperative CT Scans Prior to Distal Tibial Intramedullary Nailing Do not Change Treatment Decisions or Surgical Outcomes.

Introduction: Distal tibia shaft fractures have a high association with posterior malleolar fractures (PMFs); hence, a preoperative ankle CT scan is commonly obtained. The purpose of this study was to determine whether a CT scan for distal third tibia shaft fractures is associated with differences in recognition of a posterior malleolus fracture (PMF), treatment of an identified PMF, outcomes, and postoperative complications.

Methods: We retrospectively reviewed cases of adult patients with distal third tibia shaft fractures treated with an intramedullary nail between 2018 and 2020. Patients were divided into 2 groups based on whether they received a preoperative ankle CT scan. Outcomes included surgical time, the rate of missed PMFs or postoperative PMF displacement, the treatment of the PMFs, postoperative weight-bearing restrictions, Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System Global-10 (PROMIS Global-10) scores, and unplanned revision surgeries.

Results: 124 patients (age 45 ± 18 years; 39.5% female) with distal third tibia shaft fractures treated with intramedullary nailing and with minimum 6 months of follow-up were reviewed. 26 patients received preoperative CT scans, and 98 patients did not have CT scans. The rate of detected PMF was 69.2% (N = 18) in patients with CT and 55.1% (N = 54) in patients without CT (P = 0.19). No significant differences were observed in all outcomes between the 2 groups (P > 0.05). 3 PMFs not visible on radiographs were identified on CT, and they did not require fixation and did not displace. PMFs that were greater than one-third of the joint surface were more likely to have a preoperative CT (P < 0.01).

Discussion: Preoperative CT scans for distal third tibia shaft fractures may be useful in characterizing large PMFs; however, this knowledge does not translate into shorter surgical time, increased fixation rates, decreased unplanned revision surgery, or improved patient-reported outcomes. Discovery of PMFs did not always lead to fixation, and PMFs without fixation did not become further displaced.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.10
自引率
6.20%
发文量
529
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons was established in the fall of 1993 by the Academy in response to its membership’s demand for a clinical review journal. Two issues were published the first year, followed by six issues yearly from 1994 through 2004. In September 2005, JAAOS began publishing monthly issues. Each issue includes richly illustrated peer-reviewed articles focused on clinical diagnosis and management. Special features in each issue provide commentary on developments in pharmacotherapeutics, materials and techniques, and computer applications.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信