在日本的药品审查和处方信息中评估免疫原性。

IF 5 3区 医学 Q1 PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY
Mitsuru Ishibai, Megumi Kai, Hirokazu Wakuda, Ichiro Oikawa, Naoto Uemura
{"title":"在日本的药品审查和处方信息中评估免疫原性。","authors":"Mitsuru Ishibai, Megumi Kai, Hirokazu Wakuda, Ichiro Oikawa, Naoto Uemura","doi":"10.1208/s12248-024-00980-0","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Anti-drug antibodies (ADAs) generated in response to biopharmaceuticals can significantly impact pharmacokinetics (PK) and overall drug efficacy. Thus, the ICH M4 guidelines mandate summarizing immunogenicity data from clinical trials in drug approval applications. However, following the approval of the first antibody drug in Japan in 2001, no cross-sectional investigation has focused on immunogenicity during the regulatory review process. Therefore, this study aims to examine the review reports and prescribing information of antibody drugs approved in Japan to identify key points related to immunogenicity evaluation. We conducted a cross-sectional analysis of review reports for antibody drugs approved between June 2001 and July 2022 by the Japanese regulatory authority. Specifically, we evaluated the ADA positivity rate, presence of neutralizing antibodies, antibody titers, and effects of ADA on PK, efficacy, and safety. We also compared this information with that provided in the prescribing information. Our analysis revealed that the ADA positivity rate and its effects on PK, efficacy, and safety were critical aspects of the review process. The emphasis on these factors varied depending on the number of applications and disease area. The information presented in the prescribing information was largely consistent with that discussed in the review reports. Overall, this study provides the first cross-sectional evaluation of immunogenicity considerations in the regulatory review of antibody drugs in Japan. Our findings can contribute to the efficiency of clinical trial planning and preparation of approval applications, to potentially improve the overall drug development process and address the drug loss problem in Japan.</p>","PeriodicalId":50934,"journal":{"name":"AAPS Journal","volume":"26 6","pages":"109"},"PeriodicalIF":5.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Assessing Immunogenicity in Drug Reviews and Prescribing Information in Japan.\",\"authors\":\"Mitsuru Ishibai, Megumi Kai, Hirokazu Wakuda, Ichiro Oikawa, Naoto Uemura\",\"doi\":\"10.1208/s12248-024-00980-0\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Anti-drug antibodies (ADAs) generated in response to biopharmaceuticals can significantly impact pharmacokinetics (PK) and overall drug efficacy. Thus, the ICH M4 guidelines mandate summarizing immunogenicity data from clinical trials in drug approval applications. However, following the approval of the first antibody drug in Japan in 2001, no cross-sectional investigation has focused on immunogenicity during the regulatory review process. Therefore, this study aims to examine the review reports and prescribing information of antibody drugs approved in Japan to identify key points related to immunogenicity evaluation. We conducted a cross-sectional analysis of review reports for antibody drugs approved between June 2001 and July 2022 by the Japanese regulatory authority. Specifically, we evaluated the ADA positivity rate, presence of neutralizing antibodies, antibody titers, and effects of ADA on PK, efficacy, and safety. We also compared this information with that provided in the prescribing information. Our analysis revealed that the ADA positivity rate and its effects on PK, efficacy, and safety were critical aspects of the review process. The emphasis on these factors varied depending on the number of applications and disease area. The information presented in the prescribing information was largely consistent with that discussed in the review reports. Overall, this study provides the first cross-sectional evaluation of immunogenicity considerations in the regulatory review of antibody drugs in Japan. Our findings can contribute to the efficiency of clinical trial planning and preparation of approval applications, to potentially improve the overall drug development process and address the drug loss problem in Japan.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":50934,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"AAPS Journal\",\"volume\":\"26 6\",\"pages\":\"109\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":5.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-08\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"AAPS Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1208/s12248-024-00980-0\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"AAPS Journal","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1208/s12248-024-00980-0","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

生物制药产生的抗药抗体(ADA)会对药代动力学(PK)和药物的整体疗效产生重大影响。因此,ICH M4 指南要求在药物审批申请中总结临床试验的免疫原性数据。然而,自 2001 年日本批准首个抗体药物以来,在监管审查过程中还没有针对免疫原性的横向调查。因此,本研究旨在研究日本批准的抗体药物的审评报告和处方信息,以确定与免疫原性评估相关的关键点。我们对 2001 年 6 月至 2022 年 7 月期间日本监管机构批准的抗体药物审查报告进行了横向分析。具体来说,我们评估了 ADA 阳性率、是否存在中和抗体、抗体滴度以及 ADA 对 PK、疗效和安全性的影响。我们还将这些信息与处方信息中提供的信息进行了比较。我们的分析表明,ADA 阳性率及其对 PK、疗效和安全性的影响是审查过程中的关键因素。对这些因素的重视程度因申请数量和疾病领域而异。处方信息中提供的信息与审评报告中讨论的信息基本一致。总之,本研究首次对日本抗体药物监管审查中的免疫原性考虑因素进行了横向评估。我们的研究结果有助于提高临床试验规划和审批申请准备工作的效率,从而有可能改善整个药物开发过程并解决日本的药物流失问题。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Assessing Immunogenicity in Drug Reviews and Prescribing Information in Japan.

Anti-drug antibodies (ADAs) generated in response to biopharmaceuticals can significantly impact pharmacokinetics (PK) and overall drug efficacy. Thus, the ICH M4 guidelines mandate summarizing immunogenicity data from clinical trials in drug approval applications. However, following the approval of the first antibody drug in Japan in 2001, no cross-sectional investigation has focused on immunogenicity during the regulatory review process. Therefore, this study aims to examine the review reports and prescribing information of antibody drugs approved in Japan to identify key points related to immunogenicity evaluation. We conducted a cross-sectional analysis of review reports for antibody drugs approved between June 2001 and July 2022 by the Japanese regulatory authority. Specifically, we evaluated the ADA positivity rate, presence of neutralizing antibodies, antibody titers, and effects of ADA on PK, efficacy, and safety. We also compared this information with that provided in the prescribing information. Our analysis revealed that the ADA positivity rate and its effects on PK, efficacy, and safety were critical aspects of the review process. The emphasis on these factors varied depending on the number of applications and disease area. The information presented in the prescribing information was largely consistent with that discussed in the review reports. Overall, this study provides the first cross-sectional evaluation of immunogenicity considerations in the regulatory review of antibody drugs in Japan. Our findings can contribute to the efficiency of clinical trial planning and preparation of approval applications, to potentially improve the overall drug development process and address the drug loss problem in Japan.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
AAPS Journal
AAPS Journal 医学-药学
CiteScore
7.80
自引率
4.40%
发文量
109
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: The AAPS Journal, an official journal of the American Association of Pharmaceutical Scientists (AAPS), publishes novel and significant findings in the various areas of pharmaceutical sciences impacting human and veterinary therapeutics, including: · Drug Design and Discovery · Pharmaceutical Biotechnology · Biopharmaceutics, Formulation, and Drug Delivery · Metabolism and Transport · Pharmacokinetics, Pharmacodynamics, and Pharmacometrics · Translational Research · Clinical Evaluations and Therapeutic Outcomes · Regulatory Science We invite submissions under the following article types: · Original Research Articles · Reviews and Mini-reviews · White Papers, Commentaries, and Editorials · Meeting Reports · Brief/Technical Reports and Rapid Communications · Regulatory Notes · Tutorials · Protocols in the Pharmaceutical Sciences In addition, The AAPS Journal publishes themes, organized by guest editors, which are focused on particular areas of current interest to our field.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信