非住院手术中心与门诊医院:颈椎前路切除术和融合术患者的报销比较。

IF 4.9 1区 医学 Q1 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Michael Herrera, Brittany Sacks, Charles Laurore, Wasil Ahmed, Justin Tiao, James Meyers, Brocha Z Stern, Jashvant Poeran, Saad Chaudhary
{"title":"非住院手术中心与门诊医院:颈椎前路切除术和融合术患者的报销比较。","authors":"Michael Herrera, Brittany Sacks, Charles Laurore, Wasil Ahmed, Justin Tiao, James Meyers, Brocha Z Stern, Jashvant Poeran, Saad Chaudhary","doi":"10.1016/j.spinee.2024.09.032","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background context: </strong>While some studies have demonstrated that ambulatory surgery centers (ASCs) are associated with reduced costs of orthopedic procedures, there is no consensus in the current literature as to the impact of ASCs versus hospital-based outpatient departments (HOPDs) on anterior cervical discectomies and fusions (ACDFs).</p><p><strong>Purpose: </strong>This study sought to (1) compare immediate procedure reimbursements, patient out-of-pocket expenditures, and surgeon reimbursements for ACDFs performed at ASCs versus HOPDs and (2) identify factors predicting facility utilization.</p><p><strong>Study design: </strong>Retrospective cross-sectional study.</p><p><strong>Patient sample: </strong>We identified ACDF procedures performed at an ASC or HOPD in commercially-insured patients aged 18 to 64.</p><p><strong>Outcome measures: </strong>Payment variables were calculated from claims within 3 days preoperatively and postoperatively.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Multivariable regression models assessed (1) associations between the surgery setting and payment variables and (2) factors associated with the surgery setting.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We included 18,191 ACDFs (14.8% ASC, 85.2% HOPD). In multivariable analyses, ACDFs performed in an ASC (versus HOPD) were associated with 9.8% higher immediate procedure reimbursements (95% CI:7.5%-12.2%), 17.2% higher patient out-of-pocket expenditures (95% CI:11.8-22.8), and 11.7% higher surgeon reimbursements (95% CI:9.18-14.2; all p<.01) (all p<.001). Surgery setting utilization varied by region, insurance-related factors, comorbidities, and procedural complexity.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>We found that ASCs had significantly higher reimbursements compared to HOPDs. Regional variations in ASC utilization imply there are opportunities for standardization of care.</p><p><strong>Level of evidence: 3: </strong></p>","PeriodicalId":49484,"journal":{"name":"Spine Journal","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Ambulatory surgery center versus outpatient hospitals: a comparison of reimbursements for patients undergoing anterior cervical discectomy and fusion.\",\"authors\":\"Michael Herrera, Brittany Sacks, Charles Laurore, Wasil Ahmed, Justin Tiao, James Meyers, Brocha Z Stern, Jashvant Poeran, Saad Chaudhary\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.spinee.2024.09.032\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background context: </strong>While some studies have demonstrated that ambulatory surgery centers (ASCs) are associated with reduced costs of orthopedic procedures, there is no consensus in the current literature as to the impact of ASCs versus hospital-based outpatient departments (HOPDs) on anterior cervical discectomies and fusions (ACDFs).</p><p><strong>Purpose: </strong>This study sought to (1) compare immediate procedure reimbursements, patient out-of-pocket expenditures, and surgeon reimbursements for ACDFs performed at ASCs versus HOPDs and (2) identify factors predicting facility utilization.</p><p><strong>Study design: </strong>Retrospective cross-sectional study.</p><p><strong>Patient sample: </strong>We identified ACDF procedures performed at an ASC or HOPD in commercially-insured patients aged 18 to 64.</p><p><strong>Outcome measures: </strong>Payment variables were calculated from claims within 3 days preoperatively and postoperatively.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Multivariable regression models assessed (1) associations between the surgery setting and payment variables and (2) factors associated with the surgery setting.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We included 18,191 ACDFs (14.8% ASC, 85.2% HOPD). In multivariable analyses, ACDFs performed in an ASC (versus HOPD) were associated with 9.8% higher immediate procedure reimbursements (95% CI:7.5%-12.2%), 17.2% higher patient out-of-pocket expenditures (95% CI:11.8-22.8), and 11.7% higher surgeon reimbursements (95% CI:9.18-14.2; all p<.01) (all p<.001). Surgery setting utilization varied by region, insurance-related factors, comorbidities, and procedural complexity.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>We found that ASCs had significantly higher reimbursements compared to HOPDs. Regional variations in ASC utilization imply there are opportunities for standardization of care.</p><p><strong>Level of evidence: 3: </strong></p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":49484,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Spine Journal\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-05\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Spine Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.spinee.2024.09.032\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Spine Journal","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.spinee.2024.09.032","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景情况:目的:本研究旨在:1)比较在非卧床手术中心(ASC)和医院门诊部(HOPD)进行的颈椎前路椎间盘切除和融合术(ACDF)的即时程序报销、患者自付支出和外科医生报销;2)确定预测设施利用率的因素:研究设计:回顾性横断面研究:研究设计:回顾性横断面研究。患者样本:我们确定了在 ASC 或 HOPD 进行 ACDF 手术的 18-64 岁商业保险患者:结果测量:根据术前和术后 3 天内的索赔计算支付变量:多变量回归模型评估了 a) 手术环境与支付变量之间的关系,以及 b) 与手术环境相关的因素:我们纳入了 18,191 例 ACDF(14.8% ASC,85.2% HOPD)。在多变量分析中,在 ASC(相对于 HOPD)进行的 ACDF 与以下因素相关:即时手术报销率高 9.8%(95% CI:7.5-12.2%),患者自付支出高 17.2%(95% CI:11.8-22.8),外科医生报销率高 11.7%(95% CI:9.18-14.2;均为 PC):我们发现,与住院部相比,住院部的报销额度要高得多。各地区在使用 ASC 方面存在差异,这意味着有机会实现护理标准化。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Ambulatory surgery center versus outpatient hospitals: a comparison of reimbursements for patients undergoing anterior cervical discectomy and fusion.

Background context: While some studies have demonstrated that ambulatory surgery centers (ASCs) are associated with reduced costs of orthopedic procedures, there is no consensus in the current literature as to the impact of ASCs versus hospital-based outpatient departments (HOPDs) on anterior cervical discectomies and fusions (ACDFs).

Purpose: This study sought to (1) compare immediate procedure reimbursements, patient out-of-pocket expenditures, and surgeon reimbursements for ACDFs performed at ASCs versus HOPDs and (2) identify factors predicting facility utilization.

Study design: Retrospective cross-sectional study.

Patient sample: We identified ACDF procedures performed at an ASC or HOPD in commercially-insured patients aged 18 to 64.

Outcome measures: Payment variables were calculated from claims within 3 days preoperatively and postoperatively.

Methods: Multivariable regression models assessed (1) associations between the surgery setting and payment variables and (2) factors associated with the surgery setting.

Results: We included 18,191 ACDFs (14.8% ASC, 85.2% HOPD). In multivariable analyses, ACDFs performed in an ASC (versus HOPD) were associated with 9.8% higher immediate procedure reimbursements (95% CI:7.5%-12.2%), 17.2% higher patient out-of-pocket expenditures (95% CI:11.8-22.8), and 11.7% higher surgeon reimbursements (95% CI:9.18-14.2; all p<.01) (all p<.001). Surgery setting utilization varied by region, insurance-related factors, comorbidities, and procedural complexity.

Conclusions: We found that ASCs had significantly higher reimbursements compared to HOPDs. Regional variations in ASC utilization imply there are opportunities for standardization of care.

Level of evidence: 3:

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Spine Journal
Spine Journal 医学-临床神经学
CiteScore
8.20
自引率
6.70%
发文量
680
审稿时长
13.1 weeks
期刊介绍: The Spine Journal, the official journal of the North American Spine Society, is an international and multidisciplinary journal that publishes original, peer-reviewed articles on research and treatment related to the spine and spine care, including basic science and clinical investigations. It is a condition of publication that manuscripts submitted to The Spine Journal have not been published, and will not be simultaneously submitted or published elsewhere. The Spine Journal also publishes major reviews of specific topics by acknowledged authorities, technical notes, teaching editorials, and other special features, Letters to the Editor-in-Chief are encouraged.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信