Michael Herrera, Brittany Sacks, Charles Laurore, Wasil Ahmed, Justin Tiao, James Meyers, Brocha Z Stern, Jashvant Poeran, Saad Chaudhary
{"title":"非住院手术中心与门诊医院:颈椎前路切除术和融合术患者的报销比较。","authors":"Michael Herrera, Brittany Sacks, Charles Laurore, Wasil Ahmed, Justin Tiao, James Meyers, Brocha Z Stern, Jashvant Poeran, Saad Chaudhary","doi":"10.1016/j.spinee.2024.09.032","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background context: </strong>While some studies have demonstrated that ambulatory surgery centers (ASCs) are associated with reduced costs of orthopedic procedures, there is no consensus in the current literature as to the impact of ASCs versus hospital-based outpatient departments (HOPDs) on anterior cervical discectomies and fusions (ACDFs).</p><p><strong>Purpose: </strong>This study sought to (1) compare immediate procedure reimbursements, patient out-of-pocket expenditures, and surgeon reimbursements for ACDFs performed at ASCs versus HOPDs and (2) identify factors predicting facility utilization.</p><p><strong>Study design: </strong>Retrospective cross-sectional study.</p><p><strong>Patient sample: </strong>We identified ACDF procedures performed at an ASC or HOPD in commercially-insured patients aged 18 to 64.</p><p><strong>Outcome measures: </strong>Payment variables were calculated from claims within 3 days preoperatively and postoperatively.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Multivariable regression models assessed (1) associations between the surgery setting and payment variables and (2) factors associated with the surgery setting.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We included 18,191 ACDFs (14.8% ASC, 85.2% HOPD). In multivariable analyses, ACDFs performed in an ASC (versus HOPD) were associated with 9.8% higher immediate procedure reimbursements (95% CI:7.5%-12.2%), 17.2% higher patient out-of-pocket expenditures (95% CI:11.8-22.8), and 11.7% higher surgeon reimbursements (95% CI:9.18-14.2; all p<.01) (all p<.001). Surgery setting utilization varied by region, insurance-related factors, comorbidities, and procedural complexity.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>We found that ASCs had significantly higher reimbursements compared to HOPDs. Regional variations in ASC utilization imply there are opportunities for standardization of care.</p><p><strong>Level of evidence: 3: </strong></p>","PeriodicalId":49484,"journal":{"name":"Spine Journal","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Ambulatory surgery center versus outpatient hospitals: a comparison of reimbursements for patients undergoing anterior cervical discectomy and fusion.\",\"authors\":\"Michael Herrera, Brittany Sacks, Charles Laurore, Wasil Ahmed, Justin Tiao, James Meyers, Brocha Z Stern, Jashvant Poeran, Saad Chaudhary\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.spinee.2024.09.032\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background context: </strong>While some studies have demonstrated that ambulatory surgery centers (ASCs) are associated with reduced costs of orthopedic procedures, there is no consensus in the current literature as to the impact of ASCs versus hospital-based outpatient departments (HOPDs) on anterior cervical discectomies and fusions (ACDFs).</p><p><strong>Purpose: </strong>This study sought to (1) compare immediate procedure reimbursements, patient out-of-pocket expenditures, and surgeon reimbursements for ACDFs performed at ASCs versus HOPDs and (2) identify factors predicting facility utilization.</p><p><strong>Study design: </strong>Retrospective cross-sectional study.</p><p><strong>Patient sample: </strong>We identified ACDF procedures performed at an ASC or HOPD in commercially-insured patients aged 18 to 64.</p><p><strong>Outcome measures: </strong>Payment variables were calculated from claims within 3 days preoperatively and postoperatively.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Multivariable regression models assessed (1) associations between the surgery setting and payment variables and (2) factors associated with the surgery setting.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We included 18,191 ACDFs (14.8% ASC, 85.2% HOPD). In multivariable analyses, ACDFs performed in an ASC (versus HOPD) were associated with 9.8% higher immediate procedure reimbursements (95% CI:7.5%-12.2%), 17.2% higher patient out-of-pocket expenditures (95% CI:11.8-22.8), and 11.7% higher surgeon reimbursements (95% CI:9.18-14.2; all p<.01) (all p<.001). Surgery setting utilization varied by region, insurance-related factors, comorbidities, and procedural complexity.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>We found that ASCs had significantly higher reimbursements compared to HOPDs. Regional variations in ASC utilization imply there are opportunities for standardization of care.</p><p><strong>Level of evidence: 3: </strong></p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":49484,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Spine Journal\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-05\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Spine Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.spinee.2024.09.032\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Spine Journal","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.spinee.2024.09.032","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Ambulatory surgery center versus outpatient hospitals: a comparison of reimbursements for patients undergoing anterior cervical discectomy and fusion.
Background context: While some studies have demonstrated that ambulatory surgery centers (ASCs) are associated with reduced costs of orthopedic procedures, there is no consensus in the current literature as to the impact of ASCs versus hospital-based outpatient departments (HOPDs) on anterior cervical discectomies and fusions (ACDFs).
Purpose: This study sought to (1) compare immediate procedure reimbursements, patient out-of-pocket expenditures, and surgeon reimbursements for ACDFs performed at ASCs versus HOPDs and (2) identify factors predicting facility utilization.
Study design: Retrospective cross-sectional study.
Patient sample: We identified ACDF procedures performed at an ASC or HOPD in commercially-insured patients aged 18 to 64.
Outcome measures: Payment variables were calculated from claims within 3 days preoperatively and postoperatively.
Methods: Multivariable regression models assessed (1) associations between the surgery setting and payment variables and (2) factors associated with the surgery setting.
Results: We included 18,191 ACDFs (14.8% ASC, 85.2% HOPD). In multivariable analyses, ACDFs performed in an ASC (versus HOPD) were associated with 9.8% higher immediate procedure reimbursements (95% CI:7.5%-12.2%), 17.2% higher patient out-of-pocket expenditures (95% CI:11.8-22.8), and 11.7% higher surgeon reimbursements (95% CI:9.18-14.2; all p<.01) (all p<.001). Surgery setting utilization varied by region, insurance-related factors, comorbidities, and procedural complexity.
Conclusions: We found that ASCs had significantly higher reimbursements compared to HOPDs. Regional variations in ASC utilization imply there are opportunities for standardization of care.
期刊介绍:
The Spine Journal, the official journal of the North American Spine Society, is an international and multidisciplinary journal that publishes original, peer-reviewed articles on research and treatment related to the spine and spine care, including basic science and clinical investigations. It is a condition of publication that manuscripts submitted to The Spine Journal have not been published, and will not be simultaneously submitted or published elsewhere. The Spine Journal also publishes major reviews of specific topics by acknowledged authorities, technical notes, teaching editorials, and other special features, Letters to the Editor-in-Chief are encouraged.