Rushi Patel, Aman M Patel, Lucy Revercomb, Amy Patel, Christopher C Tseng, Richard Chan Woo Park
{"title":"口腔和口咽部 cT3/T4 粘液表皮样癌的颈部切除术","authors":"Rushi Patel, Aman M Patel, Lucy Revercomb, Amy Patel, Christopher C Tseng, Richard Chan Woo Park","doi":"10.1007/s12070-024-04808-3","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Previous research has reported high occult nodal metastases rates for T3/T4 mucoepidermoid carcinoma (MEC) of the oropharynx (OP) and oral cavity (OC). Our study evaluates if there is a benefit of neck dissection (ND) in these patients. The 2004-2016 National Cancer Database was queried for cases of adult MEC of the OC and OP. Patients with clinical T3/T4 disease were included while those with metastatic disease were excluded. Patients were divided into two cohorts: those treated with and without ND. Univariate chi-square, Kaplan-Meier, and multivariable Cox regression analyses were implemented. A total of 243 patients met inclusion criteria, of which 79 (32.5%) underwent ND. The majority of patients were less than 60 years old (60.1%), White (76.2%), and male (53.5%). 92 (37.9%) patients had clinically node-positive (cN+) disease. ND patients had higher rates of cN + disease (53.2% vs. 30.5%, <i>p</i> = 0.002). Of patients undergoing ND, 35 (44.3%) had cN0 disease while 42 (53.2%) had cN + disease. ND patients more commonly had grade III/IV tumors (45.1% vs. 23.4%, <i>p</i> = 0.002). Upon examination of dissected nodes, 20.3% of cN0 patients undergoing ND were found to have occult nodal metastases. There was no significant difference in 5-year overall survival between patients with and without ND (61.8% vs. 53.6%, <i>p</i> = 0.610), even on multivariable Cox analysis (hazard ratio: 1.52, 95% confidence interval: 0.73-3.18, <i>p</i> = 0.269). Our study found patients with cN0 MEC of the OC and OP have a high rate (20.3%) of occult nodal metastasis. In this cohort, patients with ND were not found to have improved survival, possibly due to statistical underpowering. Further research is needed to evaluate the indications and benefit of ND for this rare tumor presentation.</p>","PeriodicalId":49190,"journal":{"name":"Indian Journal of Otolaryngology and Head and Neck Surgery","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11456000/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Neck Dissection in cT3/T4 Mucoepidermoid Carcinoma of the Oral Cavity and Oropharynx.\",\"authors\":\"Rushi Patel, Aman M Patel, Lucy Revercomb, Amy Patel, Christopher C Tseng, Richard Chan Woo Park\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s12070-024-04808-3\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Previous research has reported high occult nodal metastases rates for T3/T4 mucoepidermoid carcinoma (MEC) of the oropharynx (OP) and oral cavity (OC). Our study evaluates if there is a benefit of neck dissection (ND) in these patients. The 2004-2016 National Cancer Database was queried for cases of adult MEC of the OC and OP. Patients with clinical T3/T4 disease were included while those with metastatic disease were excluded. Patients were divided into two cohorts: those treated with and without ND. Univariate chi-square, Kaplan-Meier, and multivariable Cox regression analyses were implemented. A total of 243 patients met inclusion criteria, of which 79 (32.5%) underwent ND. The majority of patients were less than 60 years old (60.1%), White (76.2%), and male (53.5%). 92 (37.9%) patients had clinically node-positive (cN+) disease. ND patients had higher rates of cN + disease (53.2% vs. 30.5%, <i>p</i> = 0.002). Of patients undergoing ND, 35 (44.3%) had cN0 disease while 42 (53.2%) had cN + disease. ND patients more commonly had grade III/IV tumors (45.1% vs. 23.4%, <i>p</i> = 0.002). Upon examination of dissected nodes, 20.3% of cN0 patients undergoing ND were found to have occult nodal metastases. There was no significant difference in 5-year overall survival between patients with and without ND (61.8% vs. 53.6%, <i>p</i> = 0.610), even on multivariable Cox analysis (hazard ratio: 1.52, 95% confidence interval: 0.73-3.18, <i>p</i> = 0.269). Our study found patients with cN0 MEC of the OC and OP have a high rate (20.3%) of occult nodal metastasis. In this cohort, patients with ND were not found to have improved survival, possibly due to statistical underpowering. Further research is needed to evaluate the indications and benefit of ND for this rare tumor presentation.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":49190,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Indian Journal of Otolaryngology and Head and Neck Surgery\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11456000/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Indian Journal of Otolaryngology and Head and Neck Surgery\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s12070-024-04808-3\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/6/27 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"SURGERY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Indian Journal of Otolaryngology and Head and Neck Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s12070-024-04808-3","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/6/27 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Neck Dissection in cT3/T4 Mucoepidermoid Carcinoma of the Oral Cavity and Oropharynx.
Previous research has reported high occult nodal metastases rates for T3/T4 mucoepidermoid carcinoma (MEC) of the oropharynx (OP) and oral cavity (OC). Our study evaluates if there is a benefit of neck dissection (ND) in these patients. The 2004-2016 National Cancer Database was queried for cases of adult MEC of the OC and OP. Patients with clinical T3/T4 disease were included while those with metastatic disease were excluded. Patients were divided into two cohorts: those treated with and without ND. Univariate chi-square, Kaplan-Meier, and multivariable Cox regression analyses were implemented. A total of 243 patients met inclusion criteria, of which 79 (32.5%) underwent ND. The majority of patients were less than 60 years old (60.1%), White (76.2%), and male (53.5%). 92 (37.9%) patients had clinically node-positive (cN+) disease. ND patients had higher rates of cN + disease (53.2% vs. 30.5%, p = 0.002). Of patients undergoing ND, 35 (44.3%) had cN0 disease while 42 (53.2%) had cN + disease. ND patients more commonly had grade III/IV tumors (45.1% vs. 23.4%, p = 0.002). Upon examination of dissected nodes, 20.3% of cN0 patients undergoing ND were found to have occult nodal metastases. There was no significant difference in 5-year overall survival between patients with and without ND (61.8% vs. 53.6%, p = 0.610), even on multivariable Cox analysis (hazard ratio: 1.52, 95% confidence interval: 0.73-3.18, p = 0.269). Our study found patients with cN0 MEC of the OC and OP have a high rate (20.3%) of occult nodal metastasis. In this cohort, patients with ND were not found to have improved survival, possibly due to statistical underpowering. Further research is needed to evaluate the indications and benefit of ND for this rare tumor presentation.
期刊介绍:
Indian Journal of Otolaryngology and Head & Neck Surgery was founded as Indian Journal of Otolaryngology in 1949 as a scientific Journal published by the Association of Otolaryngologists of India and was later rechristened as IJOHNS to incorporate the changes and progress.
IJOHNS, undoubtedly one of the oldest Journals in India, is the official publication of the Association of Otolaryngologists of India and is about to publish it is 67th Volume in 2015. The Journal published quarterly accepts articles in general Oto-Rhino-Laryngology and various subspecialities such as Otology, Rhinology, Laryngology and Phonosurgery, Neurotology, Head and Neck Surgery etc.
The Journal acts as a window to showcase and project the clinical and research work done by Otolaryngologists community in India and around the world. It is a continued source of useful clinical information with peer review by eminent Otolaryngologists of repute in their respective fields. The Journal accepts articles pertaining to clinical reports, Clinical studies, Research articles in basic and applied Otolaryngology, short Communications, Clinical records reporting unusual presentations or lesions and new surgical techniques. The journal acts as a catalyst and mirrors the Indian Otolaryngologist’s active interests and pursuits. The Journal also invites articles from senior and experienced authors on interesting topics in Otolaryngology and allied sciences from all over the world.
The print version is distributed free to about 4000 members of Association of Otolaryngologists of India and the e-Journal shortly going to make its appearance on the Springer Board can be accessed by all the members.
Association of Otolaryngologists of India and M/s Springer India group have come together to co-publish IJOHNS from January 2007 and this bondage is going to provide an impetus to the Journal in terms of international presence and global exposure.