ECCO2R 还有用武之地吗?

IF 1.3 4区 医学 Q2 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL
Thomas Staudinger
{"title":"ECCO2R 还有用武之地吗?","authors":"Thomas Staudinger","doi":"10.1007/s00063-024-01197-x","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The therapeutic target of extracorporeal carbon dioxide removal (ECCO<sub>2</sub>R) is the elimination of carbon dioxide (CO<sub>2</sub>) from the blood across a gas exchange membrane without influencing oxygenation to a clinically relevant extent. In acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS), ECCO<sub>2</sub>R has been used to reduce tidal volume, plateau pressure, and driving pressure (\"ultraprotective ventilation\"). Despite achieving these goals, no benefits in outcome could be shown. Thus, in ARDS, the use of ECCO<sub>2</sub>R to achieve ultraprotective ventilation can no longer be recommended. Furthermore, ECCO<sub>2</sub>R has also been used to avoid intubation or facilitate weaning in obstructive lung failure as well as to avoid mechanical ventilation in patients during bridging to lung transplantation. Although these goals can be achieved in many patients, the effects on outcome still remain unclear due to lack of evidence. Despite involving less blood flow, smaller cannulas, and smaller gas exchange membranes compared with extracorporeal membrane oxygenation, ECCO<sub>2</sub>R bears a comparable risk of complications, especially bleeding. Trials to define indications and analyze the risk-benefit balance are needed prior to implementation of ECCO<sub>2</sub>R as a standard therapy. Consequently, until then, ECCO<sub>2</sub>R should be used in clinical studies and experienced centers only. This article is freely available.</p>","PeriodicalId":49019,"journal":{"name":"Medizinische Klinik-Intensivmedizin Und Notfallmedizin","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Is there still a place for ECCO<sub>2</sub>R?\",\"authors\":\"Thomas Staudinger\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s00063-024-01197-x\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>The therapeutic target of extracorporeal carbon dioxide removal (ECCO<sub>2</sub>R) is the elimination of carbon dioxide (CO<sub>2</sub>) from the blood across a gas exchange membrane without influencing oxygenation to a clinically relevant extent. In acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS), ECCO<sub>2</sub>R has been used to reduce tidal volume, plateau pressure, and driving pressure (\\\"ultraprotective ventilation\\\"). Despite achieving these goals, no benefits in outcome could be shown. Thus, in ARDS, the use of ECCO<sub>2</sub>R to achieve ultraprotective ventilation can no longer be recommended. Furthermore, ECCO<sub>2</sub>R has also been used to avoid intubation or facilitate weaning in obstructive lung failure as well as to avoid mechanical ventilation in patients during bridging to lung transplantation. Although these goals can be achieved in many patients, the effects on outcome still remain unclear due to lack of evidence. Despite involving less blood flow, smaller cannulas, and smaller gas exchange membranes compared with extracorporeal membrane oxygenation, ECCO<sub>2</sub>R bears a comparable risk of complications, especially bleeding. Trials to define indications and analyze the risk-benefit balance are needed prior to implementation of ECCO<sub>2</sub>R as a standard therapy. Consequently, until then, ECCO<sub>2</sub>R should be used in clinical studies and experienced centers only. This article is freely available.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":49019,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Medizinische Klinik-Intensivmedizin Und Notfallmedizin\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-09\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Medizinische Klinik-Intensivmedizin Und Notfallmedizin\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00063-024-01197-x\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Medizinische Klinik-Intensivmedizin Und Notfallmedizin","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00063-024-01197-x","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

体外二氧化碳排出术(ECCO2R)的治疗目标是通过气体交换膜排出血液中的二氧化碳(CO2),同时不影响临床相关程度的氧合。在急性呼吸窘迫综合征(ARDS)中,ECCO2R 被用于减少潮气量、平台压和驱动压("超保护通气")。尽管实现了这些目标,但并没有显示出对预后的益处。因此,在 ARDS 中,不再推荐使用 ECCO2R 实现超保护通气。此外,ECCO2R 还被用于避免插管或促进阻塞性肺衰患者的断流,以及避免肺移植桥接期患者的机械通气。虽然许多患者都能实现这些目标,但由于缺乏证据,对预后的影响仍不明确。尽管与体外膜肺氧合相比,ECCO2R 需要更少的血流量、更小的插管和更小的气体交换膜,但其并发症风险相当,尤其是出血。在将 ECCO2R 作为标准疗法实施之前,需要进行试验以确定适应症并分析风险与收益之间的平衡。因此,在此之前,ECCO2R 只应在临床研究和经验丰富的中心使用。本文可免费获取。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Is there still a place for ECCO2R?

The therapeutic target of extracorporeal carbon dioxide removal (ECCO2R) is the elimination of carbon dioxide (CO2) from the blood across a gas exchange membrane without influencing oxygenation to a clinically relevant extent. In acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS), ECCO2R has been used to reduce tidal volume, plateau pressure, and driving pressure ("ultraprotective ventilation"). Despite achieving these goals, no benefits in outcome could be shown. Thus, in ARDS, the use of ECCO2R to achieve ultraprotective ventilation can no longer be recommended. Furthermore, ECCO2R has also been used to avoid intubation or facilitate weaning in obstructive lung failure as well as to avoid mechanical ventilation in patients during bridging to lung transplantation. Although these goals can be achieved in many patients, the effects on outcome still remain unclear due to lack of evidence. Despite involving less blood flow, smaller cannulas, and smaller gas exchange membranes compared with extracorporeal membrane oxygenation, ECCO2R bears a comparable risk of complications, especially bleeding. Trials to define indications and analyze the risk-benefit balance are needed prior to implementation of ECCO2R as a standard therapy. Consequently, until then, ECCO2R should be used in clinical studies and experienced centers only. This article is freely available.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.60
自引率
9.10%
发文量
93
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Medizinische Klinik – Intensivmedizin und Notfallmedizin is an internationally respected interdisciplinary journal. It is intended for physicians, nurses, respiratory and physical therapists active in intensive care and accident/emergency units, but also for internists, anesthesiologists, surgeons, neurologists, and pediatricians with special interest in intensive care medicine. Comprehensive reviews describe the most recent advances in the field of internal medicine with special focus on intensive care problems. Freely submitted original articles present important studies in this discipline and promote scientific exchange, while articles in the category Photo essay feature interesting cases and aim at optimizing diagnostic and therapeutic strategies. In the rubric journal club well-respected experts comment on outstanding international publications. Review articles under the rubric "Continuing Medical Education" present verified results of scientific research and their integration into daily practice. The rubrics "Nursing practice" and "Physical therapy" round out the information.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信