{"title":"ECCO2R 还有用武之地吗?","authors":"Thomas Staudinger","doi":"10.1007/s00063-024-01197-x","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The therapeutic target of extracorporeal carbon dioxide removal (ECCO<sub>2</sub>R) is the elimination of carbon dioxide (CO<sub>2</sub>) from the blood across a gas exchange membrane without influencing oxygenation to a clinically relevant extent. In acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS), ECCO<sub>2</sub>R has been used to reduce tidal volume, plateau pressure, and driving pressure (\"ultraprotective ventilation\"). Despite achieving these goals, no benefits in outcome could be shown. Thus, in ARDS, the use of ECCO<sub>2</sub>R to achieve ultraprotective ventilation can no longer be recommended. Furthermore, ECCO<sub>2</sub>R has also been used to avoid intubation or facilitate weaning in obstructive lung failure as well as to avoid mechanical ventilation in patients during bridging to lung transplantation. Although these goals can be achieved in many patients, the effects on outcome still remain unclear due to lack of evidence. Despite involving less blood flow, smaller cannulas, and smaller gas exchange membranes compared with extracorporeal membrane oxygenation, ECCO<sub>2</sub>R bears a comparable risk of complications, especially bleeding. Trials to define indications and analyze the risk-benefit balance are needed prior to implementation of ECCO<sub>2</sub>R as a standard therapy. Consequently, until then, ECCO<sub>2</sub>R should be used in clinical studies and experienced centers only. This article is freely available.</p>","PeriodicalId":49019,"journal":{"name":"Medizinische Klinik-Intensivmedizin Und Notfallmedizin","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Is there still a place for ECCO<sub>2</sub>R?\",\"authors\":\"Thomas Staudinger\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s00063-024-01197-x\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>The therapeutic target of extracorporeal carbon dioxide removal (ECCO<sub>2</sub>R) is the elimination of carbon dioxide (CO<sub>2</sub>) from the blood across a gas exchange membrane without influencing oxygenation to a clinically relevant extent. In acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS), ECCO<sub>2</sub>R has been used to reduce tidal volume, plateau pressure, and driving pressure (\\\"ultraprotective ventilation\\\"). Despite achieving these goals, no benefits in outcome could be shown. Thus, in ARDS, the use of ECCO<sub>2</sub>R to achieve ultraprotective ventilation can no longer be recommended. Furthermore, ECCO<sub>2</sub>R has also been used to avoid intubation or facilitate weaning in obstructive lung failure as well as to avoid mechanical ventilation in patients during bridging to lung transplantation. Although these goals can be achieved in many patients, the effects on outcome still remain unclear due to lack of evidence. Despite involving less blood flow, smaller cannulas, and smaller gas exchange membranes compared with extracorporeal membrane oxygenation, ECCO<sub>2</sub>R bears a comparable risk of complications, especially bleeding. Trials to define indications and analyze the risk-benefit balance are needed prior to implementation of ECCO<sub>2</sub>R as a standard therapy. Consequently, until then, ECCO<sub>2</sub>R should be used in clinical studies and experienced centers only. This article is freely available.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":49019,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Medizinische Klinik-Intensivmedizin Und Notfallmedizin\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-09\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Medizinische Klinik-Intensivmedizin Und Notfallmedizin\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00063-024-01197-x\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Medizinische Klinik-Intensivmedizin Und Notfallmedizin","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00063-024-01197-x","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
The therapeutic target of extracorporeal carbon dioxide removal (ECCO2R) is the elimination of carbon dioxide (CO2) from the blood across a gas exchange membrane without influencing oxygenation to a clinically relevant extent. In acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS), ECCO2R has been used to reduce tidal volume, plateau pressure, and driving pressure ("ultraprotective ventilation"). Despite achieving these goals, no benefits in outcome could be shown. Thus, in ARDS, the use of ECCO2R to achieve ultraprotective ventilation can no longer be recommended. Furthermore, ECCO2R has also been used to avoid intubation or facilitate weaning in obstructive lung failure as well as to avoid mechanical ventilation in patients during bridging to lung transplantation. Although these goals can be achieved in many patients, the effects on outcome still remain unclear due to lack of evidence. Despite involving less blood flow, smaller cannulas, and smaller gas exchange membranes compared with extracorporeal membrane oxygenation, ECCO2R bears a comparable risk of complications, especially bleeding. Trials to define indications and analyze the risk-benefit balance are needed prior to implementation of ECCO2R as a standard therapy. Consequently, until then, ECCO2R should be used in clinical studies and experienced centers only. This article is freely available.
期刊介绍:
Medizinische Klinik – Intensivmedizin und Notfallmedizin is an internationally respected interdisciplinary journal. It is intended for physicians, nurses, respiratory and physical therapists active in intensive care and accident/emergency units, but also for internists, anesthesiologists, surgeons, neurologists, and pediatricians with special interest in intensive care medicine.
Comprehensive reviews describe the most recent advances in the field of internal medicine with special focus on intensive care problems. Freely submitted original articles present important studies in this discipline and promote scientific exchange, while articles in the category Photo essay feature interesting cases and aim at optimizing diagnostic and therapeutic strategies. In the rubric journal club well-respected experts comment on outstanding international publications. Review articles under the rubric "Continuing Medical Education" present verified results of scientific research and their integration into daily practice. The rubrics "Nursing practice" and "Physical therapy" round out the information.