探索阿拉伯联合酋长国社区药剂师对药物不良反应及其报告的认识、态度和做法:一项基于调查的横断面研究。

IF 3.4 3区 医学 Q2 PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY
Therapeutic Advances in Drug Safety Pub Date : 2024-10-07 eCollection Date: 2024-01-01 DOI:10.1177/20420986241285930
Javedh Shareef, Sathvik Belagodu Sridhar, Mullaicharam Bhupathyraaj, Atiqulla Shariff, Sabin Thomas
{"title":"探索阿拉伯联合酋长国社区药剂师对药物不良反应及其报告的认识、态度和做法:一项基于调查的横断面研究。","authors":"Javedh Shareef, Sathvik Belagodu Sridhar, Mullaicharam Bhupathyraaj, Atiqulla Shariff, Sabin Thomas","doi":"10.1177/20420986241285930","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Adverse drug reactions (ADRs) contribute significant clinical and economic burden to the country's healthcare system globally. Prompt reporting of ADRs by the community pharmacist is essential to the active pharmacovigilance program.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>This study assesses private community pharmacists' knowledge, attitude, and practice (KAP) about ADRs and reporting.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>A cross-sectional, qualitative study was performed using a pre-validated self-administered questionnaire.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This self-administered questionnaire was conducted at community pharmacies between March and July 2022. The data collected were analyzed using the Mann-Whitney and Kruskal-Wallis tests to examine the differences in overall KAP scores with a subgroup of sociodemographic characteristics of the study participants. Logistic regression analysis was used to analyze the predictors of practice.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In total, 156 fully completed questionnaires were collected by the community pharmacists. A positive association between the designation, qualification, and work experience with the total scores of the respondents was observed (<i>p</i> < 0.05). Among the predictors of ADR reporting practice, a significant association was observed with knowledge score (⩾6, <i>p</i> = 0.0219), designation (pharmacists, <i>p</i> = 0.0102), qualification (masters, <i>p</i> = 0.0002), and work experience (⩾11 years, <i>p</i> = 0.0184). Most community pharmacists had good knowledge and attitude but poor practice toward reporting ADRs. Uncertainty of how and where to report, lack of training, lack of reporting forms, and insufficient clinical knowledge were the practice-based barriers in the ADR reporting process.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Though the study found sufficient understanding and favorable views on ADR reporting, participants reported poor practices and barriers to reporting ADR. Therefore, structured continuing professional development programs for community pharmacists are needed to overcome the barriers and enhance the practice of ADR reporting.</p>","PeriodicalId":23012,"journal":{"name":"Therapeutic Advances in Drug Safety","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11459486/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Exploring the community pharmacist's knowledge, attitude, and practices regarding adverse drug reactions and its reporting in the United Arab Emirates: a survey-based cross-sectional study.\",\"authors\":\"Javedh Shareef, Sathvik Belagodu Sridhar, Mullaicharam Bhupathyraaj, Atiqulla Shariff, Sabin Thomas\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/20420986241285930\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Adverse drug reactions (ADRs) contribute significant clinical and economic burden to the country's healthcare system globally. Prompt reporting of ADRs by the community pharmacist is essential to the active pharmacovigilance program.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>This study assesses private community pharmacists' knowledge, attitude, and practice (KAP) about ADRs and reporting.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>A cross-sectional, qualitative study was performed using a pre-validated self-administered questionnaire.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This self-administered questionnaire was conducted at community pharmacies between March and July 2022. The data collected were analyzed using the Mann-Whitney and Kruskal-Wallis tests to examine the differences in overall KAP scores with a subgroup of sociodemographic characteristics of the study participants. Logistic regression analysis was used to analyze the predictors of practice.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In total, 156 fully completed questionnaires were collected by the community pharmacists. A positive association between the designation, qualification, and work experience with the total scores of the respondents was observed (<i>p</i> < 0.05). Among the predictors of ADR reporting practice, a significant association was observed with knowledge score (⩾6, <i>p</i> = 0.0219), designation (pharmacists, <i>p</i> = 0.0102), qualification (masters, <i>p</i> = 0.0002), and work experience (⩾11 years, <i>p</i> = 0.0184). Most community pharmacists had good knowledge and attitude but poor practice toward reporting ADRs. Uncertainty of how and where to report, lack of training, lack of reporting forms, and insufficient clinical knowledge were the practice-based barriers in the ADR reporting process.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Though the study found sufficient understanding and favorable views on ADR reporting, participants reported poor practices and barriers to reporting ADR. Therefore, structured continuing professional development programs for community pharmacists are needed to overcome the barriers and enhance the practice of ADR reporting.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":23012,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Therapeutic Advances in Drug Safety\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-07\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11459486/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Therapeutic Advances in Drug Safety\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/20420986241285930\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Therapeutic Advances in Drug Safety","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/20420986241285930","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:在全球范围内,药物不良反应(ADRs)给国家医疗保健系统造成了巨大的临床和经济负担。社区药剂师及时报告 ADR 对积极开展药物警戒计划至关重要:本研究评估了私营社区药剂师对药物不良反应和报告的认识、态度和实践 (KAP):设计:采用预先验证的自填式问卷进行横断面定性研究:该自填问卷于 2022 年 3 月至 7 月期间在社区药房进行。采用曼-惠特尼检验(Mann-Whitney)和克鲁斯卡尔-瓦利斯检验(Kruskal-Wallis)对收集到的数据进行分析,以检验KAP总分与研究参与者的社会人口学特征分组之间的差异。逻辑回归分析用于分析实践的预测因素:社区药剂师共收回了 156 份填写完整的问卷。观察到受访者的职称、学历和工作经验与总分呈正相关(p p = 0.0219),职称(药剂师,p = 0.0102)、学历(硕士,p = 0.0002)和工作经验(⩾11 年,p = 0.0184)呈正相关。大多数社区药剂师在报告 ADR 方面具有良好的知识和态度,但实践能力较差。不确定如何报告和在哪里报告、缺乏培训、缺乏报告表格以及临床知识不足是 ADR 报告过程中的实践障碍:尽管研究发现,参与者对 ADR 报告有足够的了解和良好的看法,但他们报告的 ADR 报告实践不佳且存在障碍。因此,有必要为社区药剂师提供结构化的持续职业发展计划,以克服障碍并加强 ADR 报告的实践。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Exploring the community pharmacist's knowledge, attitude, and practices regarding adverse drug reactions and its reporting in the United Arab Emirates: a survey-based cross-sectional study.

Background: Adverse drug reactions (ADRs) contribute significant clinical and economic burden to the country's healthcare system globally. Prompt reporting of ADRs by the community pharmacist is essential to the active pharmacovigilance program.

Objectives: This study assesses private community pharmacists' knowledge, attitude, and practice (KAP) about ADRs and reporting.

Design: A cross-sectional, qualitative study was performed using a pre-validated self-administered questionnaire.

Methods: This self-administered questionnaire was conducted at community pharmacies between March and July 2022. The data collected were analyzed using the Mann-Whitney and Kruskal-Wallis tests to examine the differences in overall KAP scores with a subgroup of sociodemographic characteristics of the study participants. Logistic regression analysis was used to analyze the predictors of practice.

Results: In total, 156 fully completed questionnaires were collected by the community pharmacists. A positive association between the designation, qualification, and work experience with the total scores of the respondents was observed (p < 0.05). Among the predictors of ADR reporting practice, a significant association was observed with knowledge score (⩾6, p = 0.0219), designation (pharmacists, p = 0.0102), qualification (masters, p = 0.0002), and work experience (⩾11 years, p = 0.0184). Most community pharmacists had good knowledge and attitude but poor practice toward reporting ADRs. Uncertainty of how and where to report, lack of training, lack of reporting forms, and insufficient clinical knowledge were the practice-based barriers in the ADR reporting process.

Conclusion: Though the study found sufficient understanding and favorable views on ADR reporting, participants reported poor practices and barriers to reporting ADR. Therefore, structured continuing professional development programs for community pharmacists are needed to overcome the barriers and enhance the practice of ADR reporting.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Therapeutic Advances in Drug Safety
Therapeutic Advances in Drug Safety Medicine-Pharmacology (medical)
CiteScore
6.70
自引率
4.50%
发文量
31
审稿时长
9 weeks
期刊介绍: Therapeutic Advances in Drug Safety delivers the highest quality peer-reviewed articles, reviews, and scholarly comment on pioneering efforts and innovative studies pertaining to the safe use of drugs in patients. The journal has a strong clinical and pharmacological focus and is aimed at clinicians and researchers in drug safety, providing a forum in print and online for publishing the highest quality articles in this area. The editors welcome articles of current interest on research across all areas of drug safety, including therapeutic drug monitoring, pharmacoepidemiology, adverse drug reactions, drug interactions, pharmacokinetics, pharmacovigilance, medication/prescribing errors, risk management, ethics and regulation.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信