在重症监护病房对患者进行镇静和机械通气断奶期间的家庭指导。

IF 2.4 4区 医学 Q2 CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE
Anmol Shahid, Corson Johnstone, Bonnie G Sept, Shelly Kupsch, Jon Pryznyk, Charissa Elton-LaCasse, Joanna Everson, Andrea Soo, Natalia Jaworska, Kirsten M Fiest, Henry T Stelfox
{"title":"在重症监护病房对患者进行镇静和机械通气断奶期间的家庭指导。","authors":"Anmol Shahid, Corson Johnstone, Bonnie G Sept, Shelly Kupsch, Jon Pryznyk, Charissa Elton-LaCasse, Joanna Everson, Andrea Soo, Natalia Jaworska, Kirsten M Fiest, Henry T Stelfox","doi":"10.4187/respcare.11780","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>ICU patients are weaned from sedation and mechanical ventilation through spontaneous awakening trials (SATs) and spontaneous breathing trials (SBTs). Weaning can be distressing for patients and their families. Family-led coaching could reassure patients and reduce stress for families by engaging them in patient care. This study developed and piloted a family-led coaching tool to support patients undergoing SATs/SBTs.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Patient and family member dyads were recruited from 2 medical-surgical ICUs in Calgary, Canada (February 3-August 1, 2023). Surveys were administered to collect family (1) demographics, (2) anxiety and satisfaction with ICU care, (3) feedback on the tool, and (4) attitudes about family presence during SATs/SBTs (also collected from clinicians). Tool feasibility was determined by calculating the proportions of (1) eligible patients who were recommended for participation in the study by clinicians and (2) families approached who consented to participate in the study.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>One thousand one hundred fifty patients were admitted to the study ICUs during the study period of which 819 received mechanical ventilation, and 42 were recommended by bedside clinicians for participation in the study. Twenty-five dyads were approached, 21 dyads consented to participate, and one withdrew consent before data collection. Of the enrolled families, 12 (60%) reported the coaching tool to be useful, and 5 (25%) recommended minor suggestions such as \"shortening\" the tool. Fourteen (70%) families reported positive experiences (through open-ended feedback) with being present for the SAT/SBT. State-Trait Anxiety Inventory (Y1) scores (scale range 20-80 points) significantly decreased in families from the first (pre coaching) to the second (post coaching) measures (mean decrease 8.2 points, SD 10.3, <i>P</i> = .001). All clinicians indicated they were comfortable with family presence and/or coaching during SATs/SBTs.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Family-led coaching of patients during SATs/SBTs appears to be feasible, favorably perceived by families and clinicians, and potentially associated with lower family anxiety.</p>","PeriodicalId":21125,"journal":{"name":"Respiratory care","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Family-Led Coaching of Patients During Weaning From Sedation and Mechanical Ventilation in the ICU.\",\"authors\":\"Anmol Shahid, Corson Johnstone, Bonnie G Sept, Shelly Kupsch, Jon Pryznyk, Charissa Elton-LaCasse, Joanna Everson, Andrea Soo, Natalia Jaworska, Kirsten M Fiest, Henry T Stelfox\",\"doi\":\"10.4187/respcare.11780\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>ICU patients are weaned from sedation and mechanical ventilation through spontaneous awakening trials (SATs) and spontaneous breathing trials (SBTs). Weaning can be distressing for patients and their families. Family-led coaching could reassure patients and reduce stress for families by engaging them in patient care. This study developed and piloted a family-led coaching tool to support patients undergoing SATs/SBTs.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Patient and family member dyads were recruited from 2 medical-surgical ICUs in Calgary, Canada (February 3-August 1, 2023). Surveys were administered to collect family (1) demographics, (2) anxiety and satisfaction with ICU care, (3) feedback on the tool, and (4) attitudes about family presence during SATs/SBTs (also collected from clinicians). Tool feasibility was determined by calculating the proportions of (1) eligible patients who were recommended for participation in the study by clinicians and (2) families approached who consented to participate in the study.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>One thousand one hundred fifty patients were admitted to the study ICUs during the study period of which 819 received mechanical ventilation, and 42 were recommended by bedside clinicians for participation in the study. Twenty-five dyads were approached, 21 dyads consented to participate, and one withdrew consent before data collection. Of the enrolled families, 12 (60%) reported the coaching tool to be useful, and 5 (25%) recommended minor suggestions such as \\\"shortening\\\" the tool. Fourteen (70%) families reported positive experiences (through open-ended feedback) with being present for the SAT/SBT. State-Trait Anxiety Inventory (Y1) scores (scale range 20-80 points) significantly decreased in families from the first (pre coaching) to the second (post coaching) measures (mean decrease 8.2 points, SD 10.3, <i>P</i> = .001). All clinicians indicated they were comfortable with family presence and/or coaching during SATs/SBTs.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Family-led coaching of patients during SATs/SBTs appears to be feasible, favorably perceived by families and clinicians, and potentially associated with lower family anxiety.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":21125,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Respiratory care\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-08\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Respiratory care\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4187/respcare.11780\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Respiratory care","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4187/respcare.11780","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:重症监护室患者通过自发唤醒试验(SAT)和自发呼吸试验(SBT)从镇静和机械通气中断奶。断奶会给患者及其家属带来痛苦。以家庭为主导的指导可以安抚患者,并通过让家属参与患者护理来减轻家属的压力。本研究开发并试用了一种以家庭为主导的指导工具,为接受 SATs/SBTs 的患者提供支持:从加拿大卡尔加里的 2 个内外科重症监护病房招募了患者和家属二人组(2023 年 2 月 3 日至 8 月 1 日)。调查内容包括:(1) 家属的人口统计学特征;(2) 焦虑程度和对重症监护室护理的满意度;(3) 对工具的反馈意见;(4) 对 SAT/SBT 期间家属在场的态度(也从临床医生处收集)。通过计算(1)临床医生推荐参加研究的符合条件的患者的比例和(2)所接触的同意参加研究的家属的比例来确定工具的可行性:研究期间,研究对象的重症监护病房共收治了 1500 名患者,其中 819 人接受了机械通气,42 人由床边临床医生推荐参与研究。研究人员与 25 个家庭进行了接触,21 个家庭同意参与,1 个家庭在数据收集前撤回同意书。在参与研究的家庭中,12 个家庭(60%)表示辅导工具很有用,5 个家庭(25%)提出了一些小建议,如 "缩短 "工具。14个家庭(70%)通过开放式反馈报告了参加 SAT/SBT 考试的积极经历。从第一次(辅导前)到第二次(辅导后)的测量中,家庭的状态-特质焦虑量表(Y1)得分(量表范围 20-80 分)明显下降(平均下降 8.2 分,标准差 10.3,P = .001)。所有临床医生都表示,在 SAT/SBT 过程中,他们对家属在场和/或辅导感到满意:结论:在 SAT/SBT 过程中对患者进行由家属主导的辅导似乎是可行的,家属和临床医生都对此表示赞同,并且有可能降低家属的焦虑。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Family-Led Coaching of Patients During Weaning From Sedation and Mechanical Ventilation in the ICU.

Background: ICU patients are weaned from sedation and mechanical ventilation through spontaneous awakening trials (SATs) and spontaneous breathing trials (SBTs). Weaning can be distressing for patients and their families. Family-led coaching could reassure patients and reduce stress for families by engaging them in patient care. This study developed and piloted a family-led coaching tool to support patients undergoing SATs/SBTs.

Methods: Patient and family member dyads were recruited from 2 medical-surgical ICUs in Calgary, Canada (February 3-August 1, 2023). Surveys were administered to collect family (1) demographics, (2) anxiety and satisfaction with ICU care, (3) feedback on the tool, and (4) attitudes about family presence during SATs/SBTs (also collected from clinicians). Tool feasibility was determined by calculating the proportions of (1) eligible patients who were recommended for participation in the study by clinicians and (2) families approached who consented to participate in the study.

Results: One thousand one hundred fifty patients were admitted to the study ICUs during the study period of which 819 received mechanical ventilation, and 42 were recommended by bedside clinicians for participation in the study. Twenty-five dyads were approached, 21 dyads consented to participate, and one withdrew consent before data collection. Of the enrolled families, 12 (60%) reported the coaching tool to be useful, and 5 (25%) recommended minor suggestions such as "shortening" the tool. Fourteen (70%) families reported positive experiences (through open-ended feedback) with being present for the SAT/SBT. State-Trait Anxiety Inventory (Y1) scores (scale range 20-80 points) significantly decreased in families from the first (pre coaching) to the second (post coaching) measures (mean decrease 8.2 points, SD 10.3, P = .001). All clinicians indicated they were comfortable with family presence and/or coaching during SATs/SBTs.

Conclusion: Family-led coaching of patients during SATs/SBTs appears to be feasible, favorably perceived by families and clinicians, and potentially associated with lower family anxiety.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Respiratory care
Respiratory care 医学-呼吸系统
CiteScore
4.70
自引率
16.00%
发文量
209
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: RESPIRATORY CARE is the official monthly science journal of the American Association for Respiratory Care. It is indexed in PubMed and included in ISI''s Web of Science.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信