Silvia Salvalaggio, Simone Gambazza, Martina Ando', Ilaria Parrotta, Francesca Burgio, Laura Danesin, Pierpaolo Busan, Sara Zago, Dante Mantini, Daniela D'Imperio, Marco Zorzi, Nicola Filippini, Andrea Turolla
{"title":"中风后上肢康复诱导恢复模型:注意力作为临床混杂因素的作用","authors":"Silvia Salvalaggio, Simone Gambazza, Martina Ando', Ilaria Parrotta, Francesca Burgio, Laura Danesin, Pierpaolo Busan, Sara Zago, Dante Mantini, Daniela D'Imperio, Marco Zorzi, Nicola Filippini, Andrea Turolla","doi":"10.1093/ptj/pzae148","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>People who have survived stroke may have motor and cognitive impairments. High dose of motor rehabilitation was found to provide clinically relevant improvement to upper limb (UL) motor function. Besides, mounting evidence suggests that clinical, neural, and neurophysiological features are associated with spontaneous recovery. However, the association between these features and rehabilitation-induced, rather than spontaneous, recovery has never been fully investigated.The objective was to explore the association between rehabilitation dose and UL motor outcome after stroke, as well as to identify which variables can be considered potential candidate predictors of motor recovery.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>People who survived stroke were assessed before and after a period of rehabilitation using motor, cognitive, neuroanatomical, and neurophysiological measures. We investigated the association between dose of rehabilitation and UL response (ie, Fugl-Meyer Assessment for upper extremity [FMA-UE]), using ordinary least squares regression as the primary analysis. To obtain unbiased estimates, adjusting covariates were selected using a directed acyclic graph.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Baseline FMA-UE was the only factor associated with motor recovery (b = 0.99; 95% CI = 0.83 to 1.15 points). Attention emerged as a confounder of the association between rehabilitation and final FMA-UE (b = 5.5; 95% CI = -0.8 to 11.9 points), influencing both rehabilitation and UL response.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Preserved attention in people who have survived stroke might lead to greater UL motor recovery, albeit estimates have high levels of variability. Moreover, the increase in the dose of rehabilitation can lead to 5.5 points improvement on the FMA-UE, a nonsignificant but potentially meaningful finding. The approach described here discloses a new framework for investigating the effect of rehabilitation treatment as a potential driver of recovery.</p><p><strong>Impact: </strong>Attentional resources could play a key role in UL motor recovery. There is a potential association between amount of UL recovery and dose of rehabilitation delivered, needing further exploration. Preserved attention and rehabilitation dose are candidate predictors of UL motor recovery.</p>","PeriodicalId":20093,"journal":{"name":"Physical Therapy","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Modeling Upper Limb Rehabilitation-Induced Recovery after Stroke: The Role of Attention as a Clinical Confounder.\",\"authors\":\"Silvia Salvalaggio, Simone Gambazza, Martina Ando', Ilaria Parrotta, Francesca Burgio, Laura Danesin, Pierpaolo Busan, Sara Zago, Dante Mantini, Daniela D'Imperio, Marco Zorzi, Nicola Filippini, Andrea Turolla\",\"doi\":\"10.1093/ptj/pzae148\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>People who have survived stroke may have motor and cognitive impairments. High dose of motor rehabilitation was found to provide clinically relevant improvement to upper limb (UL) motor function. Besides, mounting evidence suggests that clinical, neural, and neurophysiological features are associated with spontaneous recovery. However, the association between these features and rehabilitation-induced, rather than spontaneous, recovery has never been fully investigated.The objective was to explore the association between rehabilitation dose and UL motor outcome after stroke, as well as to identify which variables can be considered potential candidate predictors of motor recovery.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>People who survived stroke were assessed before and after a period of rehabilitation using motor, cognitive, neuroanatomical, and neurophysiological measures. We investigated the association between dose of rehabilitation and UL response (ie, Fugl-Meyer Assessment for upper extremity [FMA-UE]), using ordinary least squares regression as the primary analysis. To obtain unbiased estimates, adjusting covariates were selected using a directed acyclic graph.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Baseline FMA-UE was the only factor associated with motor recovery (b = 0.99; 95% CI = 0.83 to 1.15 points). Attention emerged as a confounder of the association between rehabilitation and final FMA-UE (b = 5.5; 95% CI = -0.8 to 11.9 points), influencing both rehabilitation and UL response.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Preserved attention in people who have survived stroke might lead to greater UL motor recovery, albeit estimates have high levels of variability. Moreover, the increase in the dose of rehabilitation can lead to 5.5 points improvement on the FMA-UE, a nonsignificant but potentially meaningful finding. The approach described here discloses a new framework for investigating the effect of rehabilitation treatment as a potential driver of recovery.</p><p><strong>Impact: </strong>Attentional resources could play a key role in UL motor recovery. There is a potential association between amount of UL recovery and dose of rehabilitation delivered, needing further exploration. Preserved attention and rehabilitation dose are candidate predictors of UL motor recovery.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":20093,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Physical Therapy\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-10\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Physical Therapy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1093/ptj/pzae148\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ORTHOPEDICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Physical Therapy","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/ptj/pzae148","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
目的中风后幸存者可能存在运动和认知障碍。研究发现,大剂量的运动康复训练可在临床上改善上肢(UL)的运动功能。此外,越来越多的证据表明,临床、神经和神经生理学特征与自发康复有关。本研究旨在探讨康复剂量与脑卒中后上肢运动结果之间的关系,并确定哪些变量可被视为运动恢复的潜在候选预测因子:方法:对脑卒中幸存者进行康复治疗前后的运动、认知、神经解剖和神经生理学评估。我们使用普通最小二乘法回归作为主要分析方法,研究了康复剂量与 UL 反应(即上肢 Fugl-Meyer 评估 [FMA-UE])之间的关系。为获得无偏估计值,使用有向无环图选择调整协变量:结果:基线 FMA-UE 是与运动恢复相关的唯一因素(b = 0.99;95% CI = 0.83 至 1.15 分)。注意力是影响康复和最终FMA-UE之间关系的混淆因素(b = 5.5;95% CI = -0.8至11.9分),同时影响康复和UL反应:结论:中风后遗症患者保持注意力可能会导致更大的超能力运动恢复,尽管估计值存在很大的变异性。此外,康复剂量的增加可使 FMA-UE 提高 5.5 分,这一结果并不显著,但可能很有意义。本文所描述的方法为研究康复治疗作为康复潜在驱动力的效果提供了一个新的框架:影响:注意力资源可能在 UL 运动康复中发挥关键作用。UL恢复量与康复剂量之间存在潜在联系,需要进一步探讨。保持注意力和康复剂量是UL运动康复的候选预测因素。
Modeling Upper Limb Rehabilitation-Induced Recovery after Stroke: The Role of Attention as a Clinical Confounder.
Objective: People who have survived stroke may have motor and cognitive impairments. High dose of motor rehabilitation was found to provide clinically relevant improvement to upper limb (UL) motor function. Besides, mounting evidence suggests that clinical, neural, and neurophysiological features are associated with spontaneous recovery. However, the association between these features and rehabilitation-induced, rather than spontaneous, recovery has never been fully investigated.The objective was to explore the association between rehabilitation dose and UL motor outcome after stroke, as well as to identify which variables can be considered potential candidate predictors of motor recovery.
Methods: People who survived stroke were assessed before and after a period of rehabilitation using motor, cognitive, neuroanatomical, and neurophysiological measures. We investigated the association between dose of rehabilitation and UL response (ie, Fugl-Meyer Assessment for upper extremity [FMA-UE]), using ordinary least squares regression as the primary analysis. To obtain unbiased estimates, adjusting covariates were selected using a directed acyclic graph.
Results: Baseline FMA-UE was the only factor associated with motor recovery (b = 0.99; 95% CI = 0.83 to 1.15 points). Attention emerged as a confounder of the association between rehabilitation and final FMA-UE (b = 5.5; 95% CI = -0.8 to 11.9 points), influencing both rehabilitation and UL response.
Conclusion: Preserved attention in people who have survived stroke might lead to greater UL motor recovery, albeit estimates have high levels of variability. Moreover, the increase in the dose of rehabilitation can lead to 5.5 points improvement on the FMA-UE, a nonsignificant but potentially meaningful finding. The approach described here discloses a new framework for investigating the effect of rehabilitation treatment as a potential driver of recovery.
Impact: Attentional resources could play a key role in UL motor recovery. There is a potential association between amount of UL recovery and dose of rehabilitation delivered, needing further exploration. Preserved attention and rehabilitation dose are candidate predictors of UL motor recovery.
期刊介绍:
Physical Therapy (PTJ) engages and inspires an international readership on topics related to physical therapy. As the leading international journal for research in physical therapy and related fields, PTJ publishes innovative and highly relevant content for both clinicians and scientists and uses a variety of interactive approaches to communicate that content, with the expressed purpose of improving patient care. PTJ"s circulation in 2008 is more than 72,000. Its 2007 impact factor was 2.152. The mean time from submission to first decision is 58 days. Time from acceptance to publication online is less than or equal to 3 months and from acceptance to publication in print is less than or equal to 5 months.