基于模型的商业剂量计算算法在模拟六槽方向调制近距离治疗串联涂抹器时的剂量测定精度。

IF 3.3 3区 医学 Q2 ENGINEERING, BIOMEDICAL
Moeen Meftahi, William Y Song
{"title":"基于模型的商业剂量计算算法在模拟六槽方向调制近距离治疗串联涂抹器时的剂量测定精度。","authors":"Moeen Meftahi, William Y Song","doi":"10.1088/1361-6560/ad84b6","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><i>Objective.</i>With advancements in high-dose rate brachytherapy, the clinical translation of intensity modulated brachytherapy (IMBT) innovations necessitates utilization of model-based dose calculation algorithms (MBDCA) for accurate and rapid dose calculations. This study uniquely benchmarks a commercial MBDCA, BrachyVision ACUROS<sup>TM</sup>(BVA), against Monte Carlo (MC) simulations, evaluating dose distributions for a novel IMBT applicator, termed as the<i>six-groove</i>Direction Modulated Brachytherapy (DMBT) tandem, expanding beyond previous focus on partially shielded vaginal cylinder applicators, through a novel methodology.<i>Approach.</i>The DMBT tandem applicator, made of a tungsten alloy with six evenly spaced grooves, was simulated using the GEANT4 MC code. Subsequently, two main scenarios were created using the BVA and reproduced by the MC simulations: '<i>Source at the Center of the Water Phantom (SACWP)</i>' and '<i>Source at the Middle of the Applicator (SAMA)</i>' for three cubical virtual water phantoms (20 cm)<sup>3</sup>, (30 cm)<sup>3</sup>, and (40 cm)<sup>3</sup>. A track length estimator was utilized for dose calculation and 2D/3D scoring were performed. The difference in isodose surfaces/lines (i.e. coverage) at each voxel,<i>ΔD</i><sub>Isodose Levels/Lines</sub>, was thus calculated for relevant normalization points (<i>r</i><sub>ref</sub>).<i>Results.</i>The coverage was comparable, based on 2D scoring, between the BVA and MC isodose surfaces/lines for the region of clinical relevance, (i.e. within 5 cm radius from the source) with<i>ΔD</i><sub>Isodose Lines</sub>(<i>r</i><sub>ref</sub>: 1 cm from the source) falling within 2% for the two scenarios for all phantom sizes. For the phantom (20 cm)<sup>3</sup>,<i>ΔD</i><sub>Isodose Levels</sub>(3D scoring) recorded the range [-3.0% +6.5%] ([-7.4% +7.3%]) for 95% of the voxels of the same scoring volume for the SACWP (SAMA) scenario.<i>Significance.</i>The results indicated that the BVA could render comparable coverage as compared to the MC simulations in the region of clinical relevance for different phantom sizes.<i>ΔD</i><sub>Isodose Lines</sub>may offer an advantageous metric for evaluation of MBDCAs in clinical setting.</p>","PeriodicalId":20185,"journal":{"name":"Physics in medicine and biology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The dosimetric accuracy of a commercial model-based dose calculation algorithm in modeling a six-groove direction modulated brachytherapy tandem applicator.\",\"authors\":\"Moeen Meftahi, William Y Song\",\"doi\":\"10.1088/1361-6560/ad84b6\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p><i>Objective.</i>With advancements in high-dose rate brachytherapy, the clinical translation of intensity modulated brachytherapy (IMBT) innovations necessitates utilization of model-based dose calculation algorithms (MBDCA) for accurate and rapid dose calculations. This study uniquely benchmarks a commercial MBDCA, BrachyVision ACUROS<sup>TM</sup>(BVA), against Monte Carlo (MC) simulations, evaluating dose distributions for a novel IMBT applicator, termed as the<i>six-groove</i>Direction Modulated Brachytherapy (DMBT) tandem, expanding beyond previous focus on partially shielded vaginal cylinder applicators, through a novel methodology.<i>Approach.</i>The DMBT tandem applicator, made of a tungsten alloy with six evenly spaced grooves, was simulated using the GEANT4 MC code. Subsequently, two main scenarios were created using the BVA and reproduced by the MC simulations: '<i>Source at the Center of the Water Phantom (SACWP)</i>' and '<i>Source at the Middle of the Applicator (SAMA)</i>' for three cubical virtual water phantoms (20 cm)<sup>3</sup>, (30 cm)<sup>3</sup>, and (40 cm)<sup>3</sup>. A track length estimator was utilized for dose calculation and 2D/3D scoring were performed. The difference in isodose surfaces/lines (i.e. coverage) at each voxel,<i>ΔD</i><sub>Isodose Levels/Lines</sub>, was thus calculated for relevant normalization points (<i>r</i><sub>ref</sub>).<i>Results.</i>The coverage was comparable, based on 2D scoring, between the BVA and MC isodose surfaces/lines for the region of clinical relevance, (i.e. within 5 cm radius from the source) with<i>ΔD</i><sub>Isodose Lines</sub>(<i>r</i><sub>ref</sub>: 1 cm from the source) falling within 2% for the two scenarios for all phantom sizes. For the phantom (20 cm)<sup>3</sup>,<i>ΔD</i><sub>Isodose Levels</sub>(3D scoring) recorded the range [-3.0% +6.5%] ([-7.4% +7.3%]) for 95% of the voxels of the same scoring volume for the SACWP (SAMA) scenario.<i>Significance.</i>The results indicated that the BVA could render comparable coverage as compared to the MC simulations in the region of clinical relevance for different phantom sizes.<i>ΔD</i><sub>Isodose Lines</sub>may offer an advantageous metric for evaluation of MBDCAs in clinical setting.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":20185,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Physics in medicine and biology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-23\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Physics in medicine and biology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"5\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1088/1361-6560/ad84b6\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ENGINEERING, BIOMEDICAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Physics in medicine and biology","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1088/1361-6560/ad84b6","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, BIOMEDICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的: 随着高剂量率近距离放射治疗技术的发展,强度调制近距离放射治疗(IMBT)创新技术的临床应用需要利用基于模型的剂量计算算法(MBDCA)来进行准确、快速的剂量计算。本研究独辟蹊径,将商用 MBDCA(BrachyVision ACUROSTM,BVA)与蒙特卡罗(MI)模拟进行比对,评估新型 IMBT 治疗器(称为六槽方向调制近距离治疗串联器,DMBT)的剂量分布,通过一种新颖的方法,超越了之前对部分屏蔽阴道圆筒治疗器的关注。 方法: 使用 GEANT4 MC 代码模拟了 DMBT 串联涂抹器,该涂抹器由钨合金制成,具有六个均匀分布的凹槽。随后,使用 BVA 创建了两种主要情况,并通过 MC 模拟进行了再现:针对三个立方体虚拟水模型(20 厘米3、30 厘米3 和 40 厘米3),分别采用了 "水模型中心水源(SACWP)"和 "涂抹器中间水源(SAMA)"。利用轨迹长度估算器计算剂量,并进行二维/三维评分。因此,针对相关归一化点(rref)计算了每个体素的等剂量面/线差异(即覆盖率),即 ∆DIsodose Levels/Lines、ΔDIsodose线(rref:距放射源1厘米)的覆盖率在2%以内。对于模型(20 厘米)3,在 SACWP(SAMA)方案中,∆DIsodose Level(三维评分)在同一评分体积的 95% 的体素中记录的范围为 [-3.0% +6.5%] ([-7.4% +7.3%])。∆DIsodose Lines 可为在临床环境中评估 MBDCAs 提供一个有利的指标。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The dosimetric accuracy of a commercial model-based dose calculation algorithm in modeling a six-groove direction modulated brachytherapy tandem applicator.

Objective.With advancements in high-dose rate brachytherapy, the clinical translation of intensity modulated brachytherapy (IMBT) innovations necessitates utilization of model-based dose calculation algorithms (MBDCA) for accurate and rapid dose calculations. This study uniquely benchmarks a commercial MBDCA, BrachyVision ACUROSTM(BVA), against Monte Carlo (MC) simulations, evaluating dose distributions for a novel IMBT applicator, termed as thesix-grooveDirection Modulated Brachytherapy (DMBT) tandem, expanding beyond previous focus on partially shielded vaginal cylinder applicators, through a novel methodology.Approach.The DMBT tandem applicator, made of a tungsten alloy with six evenly spaced grooves, was simulated using the GEANT4 MC code. Subsequently, two main scenarios were created using the BVA and reproduced by the MC simulations: 'Source at the Center of the Water Phantom (SACWP)' and 'Source at the Middle of the Applicator (SAMA)' for three cubical virtual water phantoms (20 cm)3, (30 cm)3, and (40 cm)3. A track length estimator was utilized for dose calculation and 2D/3D scoring were performed. The difference in isodose surfaces/lines (i.e. coverage) at each voxel,ΔDIsodose Levels/Lines, was thus calculated for relevant normalization points (rref).Results.The coverage was comparable, based on 2D scoring, between the BVA and MC isodose surfaces/lines for the region of clinical relevance, (i.e. within 5 cm radius from the source) withΔDIsodose Lines(rref: 1 cm from the source) falling within 2% for the two scenarios for all phantom sizes. For the phantom (20 cm)3,ΔDIsodose Levels(3D scoring) recorded the range [-3.0% +6.5%] ([-7.4% +7.3%]) for 95% of the voxels of the same scoring volume for the SACWP (SAMA) scenario.Significance.The results indicated that the BVA could render comparable coverage as compared to the MC simulations in the region of clinical relevance for different phantom sizes.ΔDIsodose Linesmay offer an advantageous metric for evaluation of MBDCAs in clinical setting.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Physics in medicine and biology
Physics in medicine and biology 医学-工程:生物医学
CiteScore
6.50
自引率
14.30%
发文量
409
审稿时长
2 months
期刊介绍: The development and application of theoretical, computational and experimental physics to medicine, physiology and biology. Topics covered are: therapy physics (including ionizing and non-ionizing radiation); biomedical imaging (e.g. x-ray, magnetic resonance, ultrasound, optical and nuclear imaging); image-guided interventions; image reconstruction and analysis (including kinetic modelling); artificial intelligence in biomedical physics and analysis; nanoparticles in imaging and therapy; radiobiology; radiation protection and patient dose monitoring; radiation dosimetry
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信