用于剂量测定应用的非晶硅 1200 电子门成像装置的长期性能监测。

IF 2 4区 医学 Q3 RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING
Ivan Kutuzov, Ryan Rivest, Eric VanUytven, Boyd McCurdy
{"title":"用于剂量测定应用的非晶硅 1200 电子门成像装置的长期性能监测。","authors":"Ivan Kutuzov, Ryan Rivest, Eric VanUytven, Boyd McCurdy","doi":"10.1002/acm2.14551","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Recently, dosimetri applications of the electronic portal imaging device (EPID) in radiotherapy have gained popularity. Confidence in the robust and reliable dosimetric performance of EPID detectors is essential for their clinical use. This study aimed to evaluate the dosimetric performance of the a-Si 1200 EPID and assess the long-term stability of its response.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Weekly measurements were performed on two clinically used TrueBeam linear accelerators (linacs) equipped with a-Si 1200 EPID detectors over a 2-year period. They included dark and flood calibration fields, and EPID response to an open field corrected for the long-term machine output drift measured with the secondary absolute dosimeters: an ion chamber and an ion chamber array. All measurements were performed using five photon beam energies and two imaging modes: continuous and dosimetry. The measurements were analyzed for constancy and the presence of long-term trends. Comparisons were made between the two linacs for each beam energy. Pixel sensitivity matrices (PSM) were determined semi-annually and analyzed for long-term constancy for both treatment machines.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The long-term variation of the dark and flood field signals, integrated across the EPID plane, over the entire observation period did not exceed 0.17% and 0.79%, respectively. The output-corrected EPID response showed long-term variation from 0.28% to 0.36%, depending on beam energy, while the short-term variation was 0.04%-0.07% for EPID and 0.02%-0.06% for secondary dosimeters. The long-term variation of secondary dosimeters was 0.2%-0.3%. PSMs were found to be stable to within 1% for 97.8% of pixels and 2% for 100% of pixels.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Techniques to monitor and assess the long-term performance of the a-Si 1200 EPID as a dosimeter were developed and implemented using two TrueBeam linacs. The long-term variation of the EPID response was within clinical tolerance indicated in AAPM TG-142 report, and the detector was shown to be stable and reproducible for routine clinical dosimetry.</p>","PeriodicalId":14989,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Applied Clinical Medical Physics","volume":" ","pages":"e14551"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Long-term performance monitoring of a-Si 1200 electronic portal imaging device for dosimetric applications.\",\"authors\":\"Ivan Kutuzov, Ryan Rivest, Eric VanUytven, Boyd McCurdy\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/acm2.14551\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Recently, dosimetri applications of the electronic portal imaging device (EPID) in radiotherapy have gained popularity. Confidence in the robust and reliable dosimetric performance of EPID detectors is essential for their clinical use. This study aimed to evaluate the dosimetric performance of the a-Si 1200 EPID and assess the long-term stability of its response.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Weekly measurements were performed on two clinically used TrueBeam linear accelerators (linacs) equipped with a-Si 1200 EPID detectors over a 2-year period. They included dark and flood calibration fields, and EPID response to an open field corrected for the long-term machine output drift measured with the secondary absolute dosimeters: an ion chamber and an ion chamber array. All measurements were performed using five photon beam energies and two imaging modes: continuous and dosimetry. The measurements were analyzed for constancy and the presence of long-term trends. Comparisons were made between the two linacs for each beam energy. Pixel sensitivity matrices (PSM) were determined semi-annually and analyzed for long-term constancy for both treatment machines.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The long-term variation of the dark and flood field signals, integrated across the EPID plane, over the entire observation period did not exceed 0.17% and 0.79%, respectively. The output-corrected EPID response showed long-term variation from 0.28% to 0.36%, depending on beam energy, while the short-term variation was 0.04%-0.07% for EPID and 0.02%-0.06% for secondary dosimeters. The long-term variation of secondary dosimeters was 0.2%-0.3%. PSMs were found to be stable to within 1% for 97.8% of pixels and 2% for 100% of pixels.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Techniques to monitor and assess the long-term performance of the a-Si 1200 EPID as a dosimeter were developed and implemented using two TrueBeam linacs. The long-term variation of the EPID response was within clinical tolerance indicated in AAPM TG-142 report, and the detector was shown to be stable and reproducible for routine clinical dosimetry.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":14989,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Applied Clinical Medical Physics\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"e14551\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-07\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Applied Clinical Medical Physics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1002/acm2.14551\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Applied Clinical Medical Physics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/acm2.14551","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:最近,放射治疗中的电子门户成像装置(EPID)剂量测定应用越来越受欢迎。相信 EPID 探测器具有稳健可靠的剂量测定性能对其临床应用至关重要。本研究旨在评估 a-Si 1200 EPID 的剂量测定性能,并评估其响应的长期稳定性:方法:在两年时间内,对两台临床使用的配备了 a-Si 1200 EPID 探测器的 TrueBeam 直线加速器(linacs)进行了每周测量。测量包括暗场和泛光校准场,以及EPID对空场的响应,并对使用辅助绝对剂量计(离子室和离子室阵列)测量的长期机器输出漂移进行了校正。所有测量均使用五种光子束能量和两种成像模式进行:连续模式和剂量测定模式。对测量结果的恒定性和长期趋势进行了分析。对每种光束能量的两台直列加速器进行了比较。每半年确定一次像素灵敏度矩阵(PSM),并分析两台治疗机的长期稳定性:结果:在整个观测期间,暗场和泛场信号在整个 EPID 平面上的长期变化分别不超过 0.17% 和 0.79%。输出校正 EPID 响应的长期变化在 0.28% 至 0.36% 之间,具体取决于光束能量,而 EPID 的短期变化在 0.04% 至 0.07% 之间,二次剂量计的短期变化在 0.02% 至 0.06% 之间。二次剂量计的长期变化为 0.2%-0.3%。97.8%的像素的 PSM 稳定在 1%以内,100%的像素的 PSM 稳定在 2%以内:利用两台TrueBeam直列加速器开发并实施了监测和评估作为剂量计的非晶硅1200 EPID的长期性能的技术。EPID 响应的长期变化在 AAPM TG-142 报告中指出的临床容许范围内,而且该探测器在常规临床剂量测定中表现稳定、可重现。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Long-term performance monitoring of a-Si 1200 electronic portal imaging device for dosimetric applications.

Purpose: Recently, dosimetri applications of the electronic portal imaging device (EPID) in radiotherapy have gained popularity. Confidence in the robust and reliable dosimetric performance of EPID detectors is essential for their clinical use. This study aimed to evaluate the dosimetric performance of the a-Si 1200 EPID and assess the long-term stability of its response.

Methods: Weekly measurements were performed on two clinically used TrueBeam linear accelerators (linacs) equipped with a-Si 1200 EPID detectors over a 2-year period. They included dark and flood calibration fields, and EPID response to an open field corrected for the long-term machine output drift measured with the secondary absolute dosimeters: an ion chamber and an ion chamber array. All measurements were performed using five photon beam energies and two imaging modes: continuous and dosimetry. The measurements were analyzed for constancy and the presence of long-term trends. Comparisons were made between the two linacs for each beam energy. Pixel sensitivity matrices (PSM) were determined semi-annually and analyzed for long-term constancy for both treatment machines.

Results: The long-term variation of the dark and flood field signals, integrated across the EPID plane, over the entire observation period did not exceed 0.17% and 0.79%, respectively. The output-corrected EPID response showed long-term variation from 0.28% to 0.36%, depending on beam energy, while the short-term variation was 0.04%-0.07% for EPID and 0.02%-0.06% for secondary dosimeters. The long-term variation of secondary dosimeters was 0.2%-0.3%. PSMs were found to be stable to within 1% for 97.8% of pixels and 2% for 100% of pixels.

Conclusion: Techniques to monitor and assess the long-term performance of the a-Si 1200 EPID as a dosimeter were developed and implemented using two TrueBeam linacs. The long-term variation of the EPID response was within clinical tolerance indicated in AAPM TG-142 report, and the detector was shown to be stable and reproducible for routine clinical dosimetry.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.60
自引率
19.00%
发文量
331
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: Journal of Applied Clinical Medical Physics is an international Open Access publication dedicated to clinical medical physics. JACMP welcomes original contributions dealing with all aspects of medical physics from scientists working in the clinical medical physics around the world. JACMP accepts only online submission. JACMP will publish: -Original Contributions: Peer-reviewed, investigations that represent new and significant contributions to the field. Recommended word count: up to 7500. -Review Articles: Reviews of major areas or sub-areas in the field of clinical medical physics. These articles may be of any length and are peer reviewed. -Technical Notes: These should be no longer than 3000 words, including key references. -Letters to the Editor: Comments on papers published in JACMP or on any other matters of interest to clinical medical physics. These should not be more than 1250 (including the literature) and their publication is only based on the decision of the editor, who occasionally asks experts on the merit of the contents. -Book Reviews: The editorial office solicits Book Reviews. -Announcements of Forthcoming Meetings: The Editor may provide notice of forthcoming meetings, course offerings, and other events relevant to clinical medical physics. -Parallel Opposed Editorial: We welcome topics relevant to clinical practice and medical physics profession. The contents can be controversial debate or opposed aspects of an issue. One author argues for the position and the other against. Each side of the debate contains an opening statement up to 800 words, followed by a rebuttal up to 500 words. Readers interested in participating in this series should contact the moderator with a proposed title and a short description of the topic
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信