Jan Biegus, Alexander Mebazaa, Marco Metra, Matteo Pagnesi, Ovidiu Chioncel, Beth Davison, Gerasimos Filippatos, Agnieszka Tycińska, Maria Novosadova, Gaurav Gulati, Marianela Barros, Maria Luz Diaz, Carlos Guardia, Robert Zymliński, Piotr Gajewski, Piotr Ponikowski, Phillip Simmons, Steven Simonson, Gad Cotter
{"title":"心源性休克前期患者使用长达 60 小时的伊沙洛肟的安全性和有效性:SEISMiC试验的设计。","authors":"Jan Biegus, Alexander Mebazaa, Marco Metra, Matteo Pagnesi, Ovidiu Chioncel, Beth Davison, Gerasimos Filippatos, Agnieszka Tycińska, Maria Novosadova, Gaurav Gulati, Marianela Barros, Maria Luz Diaz, Carlos Guardia, Robert Zymliński, Piotr Gajewski, Piotr Ponikowski, Phillip Simmons, Steven Simonson, Gad Cotter","doi":"10.1002/ehf2.15102","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aims: </strong>Cardiogenic shock (CS) is linked to high morbidity and mortality rates, posing a challenge for clinicians. Interventions to improve tissue perfusion and blood pressure are crucial to prevent further deterioration. Unfortunately, current inotropes, which act through adrenergic receptor stimulation, are associated with malignant arrhythmias and poorer outcomes. Due to its unique mechanism of action, istaroxime should improve haemodynamics without adrenergic overactivation. The SEISMiC study is designed to examine the safety and efficacy (haemodynamic effect) of istaroxime administrated in pre-CS patients.</p><p><strong>Methods and results: </strong>The SEISMiC study is a multinational, multicentre, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled safety and efficacy study with two parts (A and B). The study enrols patients hospitalized for decompensated heart failure (pre-CS, not related to myocardial ischaemia) with persistent hypotension [systolic blood pressure (SBP) 70-100 mmHg for at least 2 h] and clinically confirmed congestion, NT-proBNP ≥1400 pg/mL, and LVEF≤40%. Subjects must not have taken intravenous (iv) vasopressors, inotropes or digoxin in the past 6 h. Eligible patients are randomized to receive IV infusion of istaroxime (different doses and regimens in Parts A and B) or placebo for up to 60 h. Central haemodynamics, ECG Holter monitoring, cardiac ultrasound and biomarkers are recorded at predefined time points during the trial. The study's primary efficacy endpoint is the SBP area under the curve from baseline curve from baseline to 6 and 24 h in the combined SEISMiC Parts A and B population. Key secondary efficacy endpoints include haemodynamic, laboratory and clinical measures in SEISMiC B alone in the combined SEISMiC A and B studies.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The study results will contribute to our understanding of the role of istaroxime in pre-CS patients and potentially provide insight into the drug's haemodynamic effects and safety in this population.</p>","PeriodicalId":11864,"journal":{"name":"ESC Heart Failure","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Safety and efficacy of up to 60 h of iv istaroxime in pre-cardiogenic shock patients: Design of the SEISMiC trial.\",\"authors\":\"Jan Biegus, Alexander Mebazaa, Marco Metra, Matteo Pagnesi, Ovidiu Chioncel, Beth Davison, Gerasimos Filippatos, Agnieszka Tycińska, Maria Novosadova, Gaurav Gulati, Marianela Barros, Maria Luz Diaz, Carlos Guardia, Robert Zymliński, Piotr Gajewski, Piotr Ponikowski, Phillip Simmons, Steven Simonson, Gad Cotter\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/ehf2.15102\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Aims: </strong>Cardiogenic shock (CS) is linked to high morbidity and mortality rates, posing a challenge for clinicians. Interventions to improve tissue perfusion and blood pressure are crucial to prevent further deterioration. Unfortunately, current inotropes, which act through adrenergic receptor stimulation, are associated with malignant arrhythmias and poorer outcomes. Due to its unique mechanism of action, istaroxime should improve haemodynamics without adrenergic overactivation. The SEISMiC study is designed to examine the safety and efficacy (haemodynamic effect) of istaroxime administrated in pre-CS patients.</p><p><strong>Methods and results: </strong>The SEISMiC study is a multinational, multicentre, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled safety and efficacy study with two parts (A and B). The study enrols patients hospitalized for decompensated heart failure (pre-CS, not related to myocardial ischaemia) with persistent hypotension [systolic blood pressure (SBP) 70-100 mmHg for at least 2 h] and clinically confirmed congestion, NT-proBNP ≥1400 pg/mL, and LVEF≤40%. Subjects must not have taken intravenous (iv) vasopressors, inotropes or digoxin in the past 6 h. Eligible patients are randomized to receive IV infusion of istaroxime (different doses and regimens in Parts A and B) or placebo for up to 60 h. Central haemodynamics, ECG Holter monitoring, cardiac ultrasound and biomarkers are recorded at predefined time points during the trial. The study's primary efficacy endpoint is the SBP area under the curve from baseline curve from baseline to 6 and 24 h in the combined SEISMiC Parts A and B population. Key secondary efficacy endpoints include haemodynamic, laboratory and clinical measures in SEISMiC B alone in the combined SEISMiC A and B studies.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The study results will contribute to our understanding of the role of istaroxime in pre-CS patients and potentially provide insight into the drug's haemodynamic effects and safety in this population.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":11864,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"ESC Heart Failure\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-07\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"ESC Heart Failure\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1002/ehf2.15102\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ESC Heart Failure","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/ehf2.15102","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
目的:心源性休克(CS)与高发病率和高死亡率有关,给临床医生带来了挑战。改善组织灌注和血压的干预措施对于防止病情进一步恶化至关重要。遗憾的是,目前通过刺激肾上腺素能受体发挥作用的肌力药物与恶性心律失常和较差的预后有关。由于其独特的作用机制,伊塔肟应能在不过度激活肾上腺素能的情况下改善血液动力学。SEISMiC 研究旨在检查伊沙洛肟在先心病患者中应用的安全性和有效性(血流动力学效应):SEISMiC 研究是一项多国、多中心、随机、双盲、安慰剂对照的安全性和有效性研究,分为两部分(A 和 B)。研究对象为因失代偿性心力衰竭(CS 前,与心肌缺血无关)住院、持续低血压[收缩压 (SBP) 70-100 mmHg 至少持续 2 小时]、临床证实充血、NT-proBNP ≥1400 pg/mL、LVEF≤40% 的患者。符合条件的患者将随机接受伊沙洛肟静脉输注(A 部分和 B 部分采用不同剂量和方案)或安慰剂治疗长达 60 小时。在试验期间的预定时间点记录中心血流动力学、心电图 Holter 监测、心脏超声和生物标志物。研究的主要疗效终点是 SEISMiC A 部分和 B 部分合并人群从基线到 6 小时和 24 小时的 SBP 曲线下面积。主要次要疗效终点包括 SEISMiC A 和 B 联合研究中 SEISMiC B 单项的血流动力学、实验室和临床指标:研究结果将有助于我们了解伊沙洛肟在CS前期患者中的作用,并有可能让我们深入了解该药物在这一人群中的血流动力学效应和安全性。
Safety and efficacy of up to 60 h of iv istaroxime in pre-cardiogenic shock patients: Design of the SEISMiC trial.
Aims: Cardiogenic shock (CS) is linked to high morbidity and mortality rates, posing a challenge for clinicians. Interventions to improve tissue perfusion and blood pressure are crucial to prevent further deterioration. Unfortunately, current inotropes, which act through adrenergic receptor stimulation, are associated with malignant arrhythmias and poorer outcomes. Due to its unique mechanism of action, istaroxime should improve haemodynamics without adrenergic overactivation. The SEISMiC study is designed to examine the safety and efficacy (haemodynamic effect) of istaroxime administrated in pre-CS patients.
Methods and results: The SEISMiC study is a multinational, multicentre, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled safety and efficacy study with two parts (A and B). The study enrols patients hospitalized for decompensated heart failure (pre-CS, not related to myocardial ischaemia) with persistent hypotension [systolic blood pressure (SBP) 70-100 mmHg for at least 2 h] and clinically confirmed congestion, NT-proBNP ≥1400 pg/mL, and LVEF≤40%. Subjects must not have taken intravenous (iv) vasopressors, inotropes or digoxin in the past 6 h. Eligible patients are randomized to receive IV infusion of istaroxime (different doses and regimens in Parts A and B) or placebo for up to 60 h. Central haemodynamics, ECG Holter monitoring, cardiac ultrasound and biomarkers are recorded at predefined time points during the trial. The study's primary efficacy endpoint is the SBP area under the curve from baseline curve from baseline to 6 and 24 h in the combined SEISMiC Parts A and B population. Key secondary efficacy endpoints include haemodynamic, laboratory and clinical measures in SEISMiC B alone in the combined SEISMiC A and B studies.
Conclusions: The study results will contribute to our understanding of the role of istaroxime in pre-CS patients and potentially provide insight into the drug's haemodynamic effects and safety in this population.
期刊介绍:
ESC Heart Failure is the open access journal of the Heart Failure Association of the European Society of Cardiology dedicated to the advancement of knowledge in the field of heart failure. The journal aims to improve the understanding, prevention, investigation and treatment of heart failure. Molecular and cellular biology, pathology, physiology, electrophysiology, pharmacology, as well as the clinical, social and population sciences all form part of the discipline that is heart failure. Accordingly, submission of manuscripts on basic, translational, clinical and population sciences is invited. Original contributions on nursing, care of the elderly, primary care, health economics and other specialist fields related to heart failure are also welcome, as are case reports that highlight interesting aspects of heart failure care and treatment.