对卫生工作者的投资:对南部非洲服务回国补助金领取者群体的成本回顾分析。

IF 7.1 2区 医学 Q1 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH
Sikhumbuzo A Mabunda, Andrea Durbach, Wezile W Chitha, Hawor Phiri, Mahlane Phalane, Sibusiso C Nomatshila, Rohina Joshi, Blake Angell
{"title":"对卫生工作者的投资:对南部非洲服务回国补助金领取者群体的成本回顾分析。","authors":"Sikhumbuzo A Mabunda, Andrea Durbach, Wezile W Chitha, Hawor Phiri, Mahlane Phalane, Sibusiso C Nomatshila, Rohina Joshi, Blake Angell","doi":"10.1136/bmjgh-2023-013740","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Return-of-service (RoS) schemes are investment strategies that governments use to increase the pool of health professionals through the issuing of bursaries and scholarships to health sciences students in return for service after graduation. Despite using these schemes for many years, Eswatini, South Africa, Botswana and Lesotho have not assessed the costs and return on investment of these schemes. This study aimed to assess the costs and relative rates of contract defaulting in these four Southern African countries.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A retrospective cohort study was carried out by reviewing databases of RoS beneficiaries for selected health sciences programmes who were funded between 2000 and 2010. Costs of the schemes were assessed by country, degree type and whether bursary holders completed their required service or defaulted on their public service obligations.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of the 5616 beneficiaries who studied between 1995 and 2019 in the four countries, 1225 (21.8%) beneficiaries from 2/9 South African provinces and Eswatini were presented in the final analysis. Only Eswatini had data on debt recovery or financial repayments. Beneficiaries were mostly medical students and slightly biased towards males. Medical students benefited from 56.7% and 81.3% of the disbursement in Eswatini (~US$2 million) and South Africa (~US$57 million), respectively. Each South African medical student studying in Cuba cost more than five times the rate of medical students who studied in South Africa. Of the total expenditure, 47.7% and 39.3% of the total disbursement is spent on individuals who default the RoS scheme in South Africa and Eswatini, respectively.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>RoS schemes in these countries have loss of return on investment due to poor monitoring. The schemes are costly, ineffective and have never been evaluated. There are poor mechanisms for identifying beneficiaries who exit their contracts prematurely and inadequate debt recovery processes.</p>","PeriodicalId":9137,"journal":{"name":"BMJ Global Health","volume":"9 10","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":7.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11459328/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Investing in health workers: a retrospective cost analysis of a cohort of return-of-service bursary recipients in Southern Africa.\",\"authors\":\"Sikhumbuzo A Mabunda, Andrea Durbach, Wezile W Chitha, Hawor Phiri, Mahlane Phalane, Sibusiso C Nomatshila, Rohina Joshi, Blake Angell\",\"doi\":\"10.1136/bmjgh-2023-013740\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Return-of-service (RoS) schemes are investment strategies that governments use to increase the pool of health professionals through the issuing of bursaries and scholarships to health sciences students in return for service after graduation. Despite using these schemes for many years, Eswatini, South Africa, Botswana and Lesotho have not assessed the costs and return on investment of these schemes. This study aimed to assess the costs and relative rates of contract defaulting in these four Southern African countries.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A retrospective cohort study was carried out by reviewing databases of RoS beneficiaries for selected health sciences programmes who were funded between 2000 and 2010. Costs of the schemes were assessed by country, degree type and whether bursary holders completed their required service or defaulted on their public service obligations.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of the 5616 beneficiaries who studied between 1995 and 2019 in the four countries, 1225 (21.8%) beneficiaries from 2/9 South African provinces and Eswatini were presented in the final analysis. Only Eswatini had data on debt recovery or financial repayments. Beneficiaries were mostly medical students and slightly biased towards males. Medical students benefited from 56.7% and 81.3% of the disbursement in Eswatini (~US$2 million) and South Africa (~US$57 million), respectively. Each South African medical student studying in Cuba cost more than five times the rate of medical students who studied in South Africa. Of the total expenditure, 47.7% and 39.3% of the total disbursement is spent on individuals who default the RoS scheme in South Africa and Eswatini, respectively.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>RoS schemes in these countries have loss of return on investment due to poor monitoring. The schemes are costly, ineffective and have never been evaluated. There are poor mechanisms for identifying beneficiaries who exit their contracts prematurely and inadequate debt recovery processes.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":9137,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"BMJ Global Health\",\"volume\":\"9 10\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":7.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-07\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11459328/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"BMJ Global Health\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjgh-2023-013740\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMJ Global Health","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjgh-2023-013740","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:服务回报(RoS)计划是各国政府通过向卫生科学专业学生发放助学金和奖学金,以换取他们毕业后提供服务的方式,来增加卫生专业人才库的投资策略。尽管这些计划已使用多年,但埃斯瓦提尼、南非、博茨瓦纳和莱索托尚未对这些计划的成本和投资回报进行评估。本研究旨在评估这四个南部非洲国家的成本和相对违约率:方法:通过审查 2000 年至 2010 年间获得资助的部分健康科学计划的 RoS 受益人数据库,开展了一项回顾性队列研究。按照国家、学位类型以及助学金持有者是否完成了规定的服务或未履行公共服务义务对计划的成本进行了评估:在四个国家 1995 年至 2019 年间学习的 5616 名受益人中,来自南非 2/9 省和埃斯瓦提尼的 1225 名(21.8%)受益人被纳入最终分析。只有埃斯瓦提尼有关于债务回收或资金偿还的数据。受益者多为医科学生,且略微偏向男性。医科学生分别受益于斯威士兰(约 200 万美元)和南非(约 5700 万美元)56.7% 和 81.3%的付款。每名在古巴学习的南非医科学生的费用是在南非学习的医科学生的五倍多。在总支出中,47.7%和 39.3%分别用于南非和埃斯瓦提尼拖欠学费的个人:这些国家的 RoS 计划由于监管不力而导致投资回报损失。这些计划成本高、效果差,而且从未进行过评估。识别过早退出合同的受益人的机制不健全,债务追偿程序不完善。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Investing in health workers: a retrospective cost analysis of a cohort of return-of-service bursary recipients in Southern Africa.

Background: Return-of-service (RoS) schemes are investment strategies that governments use to increase the pool of health professionals through the issuing of bursaries and scholarships to health sciences students in return for service after graduation. Despite using these schemes for many years, Eswatini, South Africa, Botswana and Lesotho have not assessed the costs and return on investment of these schemes. This study aimed to assess the costs and relative rates of contract defaulting in these four Southern African countries.

Methods: A retrospective cohort study was carried out by reviewing databases of RoS beneficiaries for selected health sciences programmes who were funded between 2000 and 2010. Costs of the schemes were assessed by country, degree type and whether bursary holders completed their required service or defaulted on their public service obligations.

Results: Of the 5616 beneficiaries who studied between 1995 and 2019 in the four countries, 1225 (21.8%) beneficiaries from 2/9 South African provinces and Eswatini were presented in the final analysis. Only Eswatini had data on debt recovery or financial repayments. Beneficiaries were mostly medical students and slightly biased towards males. Medical students benefited from 56.7% and 81.3% of the disbursement in Eswatini (~US$2 million) and South Africa (~US$57 million), respectively. Each South African medical student studying in Cuba cost more than five times the rate of medical students who studied in South Africa. Of the total expenditure, 47.7% and 39.3% of the total disbursement is spent on individuals who default the RoS scheme in South Africa and Eswatini, respectively.

Conclusions: RoS schemes in these countries have loss of return on investment due to poor monitoring. The schemes are costly, ineffective and have never been evaluated. There are poor mechanisms for identifying beneficiaries who exit their contracts prematurely and inadequate debt recovery processes.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
BMJ Global Health
BMJ Global Health Medicine-Health Policy
CiteScore
11.40
自引率
4.90%
发文量
429
审稿时长
18 weeks
期刊介绍: BMJ Global Health is an online Open Access journal from BMJ that focuses on publishing high-quality peer-reviewed content pertinent to individuals engaged in global health, including policy makers, funders, researchers, clinicians, and frontline healthcare workers. The journal encompasses all facets of global health, with a special emphasis on submissions addressing underfunded areas such as non-communicable diseases (NCDs). It welcomes research across all study phases and designs, from study protocols to phase I trials to meta-analyses, including small or specialized studies. The journal also encourages opinionated discussions on controversial topics.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信