桥接 RT 在接受 CAR-T 疗法的复发/难治弥漫大 B 细胞淋巴瘤中的作用:一项多中心研究。

IF 4.5 2区 医学 Q1 HEMATOLOGY
Stefania Bramanti, Daniele Mannina, Annalisa Chiappella, Beatrice Casadei, Chiara De Philippis, Laura Giordano, Pierina Navarria, Pietro Mancosu, Daniela Taurino, Marta Scorsetti, Carmelo Carlo-Stella, Pierluigi Zinzani, Armando Santoro, Paolo Corradini
{"title":"桥接 RT 在接受 CAR-T 疗法的复发/难治弥漫大 B 细胞淋巴瘤中的作用:一项多中心研究。","authors":"Stefania Bramanti, Daniele Mannina, Annalisa Chiappella, Beatrice Casadei, Chiara De Philippis, Laura Giordano, Pierina Navarria, Pietro Mancosu, Daniela Taurino, Marta Scorsetti, Carmelo Carlo-Stella, Pierluigi Zinzani, Armando Santoro, Paolo Corradini","doi":"10.1038/s41409-024-02427-8","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The optimization of bridging regimen before chimeric antigen receptor (CAR)-T cell therapy in diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) may impact CAR-T efficacy and outcome. This retrospective study evaluates CAR-T outcome after bridging with radiotherapy (RT) and other bridging strategies. Among 148 patients with relapsed/refractory DLBCL who underwent leukapheresis for CAR-T manufacturing, 31 received RT-bridging, 84 chemotherapy (CT), 33 no-bridging or steroid-only. CAR-T cell were infused in 96.8% of RT-group, 89.2% of CT-group and 78.8% of no-bridge-group (p = 0.079). Response to bridging was generally poor, but patients receiving RT had a significant reduction in LDH levels between pre- and post-bridging (p = 0.05). The one-year PFS was 51.2% in the RT-group, 28.2% in the CT-group, and 47.6% in the no-bridge-group (p = 0.044, CT-bridging vs RT-bridging); 1-year OS was 86.7% in the RT-group, 52.7% in the CT-group and 69% in the no-bridge-group (p = 0.025, CT-bridging vs RT-bridging). We observed a higher incidence of ICANS in patients who received CT than in others (20.0% CT-group, 3.3% RT-group, 7.7% no-bridge group; p = 0.05). In conclusion, RT-bridging is associated with lower drop-out rate and CAR-T toxicity, and it might be preferred to other bridging strategies for patients with localized disease or for those with one prevalent symptomatic site.</p>","PeriodicalId":9126,"journal":{"name":"Bone Marrow Transplantation","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Role of bridging RT in relapsed/refractory diffuse large B-cell lymphoma undergoing CAR-T therapy: a multicenter study.\",\"authors\":\"Stefania Bramanti, Daniele Mannina, Annalisa Chiappella, Beatrice Casadei, Chiara De Philippis, Laura Giordano, Pierina Navarria, Pietro Mancosu, Daniela Taurino, Marta Scorsetti, Carmelo Carlo-Stella, Pierluigi Zinzani, Armando Santoro, Paolo Corradini\",\"doi\":\"10.1038/s41409-024-02427-8\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>The optimization of bridging regimen before chimeric antigen receptor (CAR)-T cell therapy in diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) may impact CAR-T efficacy and outcome. This retrospective study evaluates CAR-T outcome after bridging with radiotherapy (RT) and other bridging strategies. Among 148 patients with relapsed/refractory DLBCL who underwent leukapheresis for CAR-T manufacturing, 31 received RT-bridging, 84 chemotherapy (CT), 33 no-bridging or steroid-only. CAR-T cell were infused in 96.8% of RT-group, 89.2% of CT-group and 78.8% of no-bridge-group (p = 0.079). Response to bridging was generally poor, but patients receiving RT had a significant reduction in LDH levels between pre- and post-bridging (p = 0.05). The one-year PFS was 51.2% in the RT-group, 28.2% in the CT-group, and 47.6% in the no-bridge-group (p = 0.044, CT-bridging vs RT-bridging); 1-year OS was 86.7% in the RT-group, 52.7% in the CT-group and 69% in the no-bridge-group (p = 0.025, CT-bridging vs RT-bridging). We observed a higher incidence of ICANS in patients who received CT than in others (20.0% CT-group, 3.3% RT-group, 7.7% no-bridge group; p = 0.05). In conclusion, RT-bridging is associated with lower drop-out rate and CAR-T toxicity, and it might be preferred to other bridging strategies for patients with localized disease or for those with one prevalent symptomatic site.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":9126,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Bone Marrow Transplantation\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-09\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Bone Marrow Transplantation\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1038/s41409-024-02427-8\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"HEMATOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Bone Marrow Transplantation","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1038/s41409-024-02427-8","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"HEMATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

嵌合抗原受体(CAR)-T 细胞治疗弥漫性大 B 细胞淋巴瘤(DLBCL)前桥接方案的优化可能会影响 CAR-T 的疗效和结局。这项回顾性研究评估了与放疗(RT)和其他桥接策略桥接后的CAR-T疗效。在148例复发/难治性DLBCL患者中,有31例接受了RT桥接,84例接受了化疗(CT),33例未接受桥接或仅接受类固醇治疗。96.8%的RT组、89.2%的CT组和78.8%的无桥接组都输注了CAR-T细胞(P = 0.079)。桥接反应普遍较差,但接受RT治疗的患者在桥接前和桥接后的LDH水平显著下降(p = 0.05)。RT组的1年PFS为51.2%,CT组为28.2%,无桥组为47.6%(P = 0.044,CT桥接与RT桥接对比);RT组的1年OS为86.7%,CT组为52.7%,无桥组为69%(P = 0.025,CT桥接与RT桥接对比)。我们观察到,接受 CT 治疗的患者 ICANS 发生率高于其他患者(CT 组 20.0%,RT 组 3.3%,无桥组 7.7%;P = 0.05)。总之,RT桥接与较低的退出率和CAR-T毒性相关,对于局部疾病患者或只有一个症状部位的患者,RT桥接可能比其他桥接策略更适合。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Role of bridging RT in relapsed/refractory diffuse large B-cell lymphoma undergoing CAR-T therapy: a multicenter study.

The optimization of bridging regimen before chimeric antigen receptor (CAR)-T cell therapy in diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) may impact CAR-T efficacy and outcome. This retrospective study evaluates CAR-T outcome after bridging with radiotherapy (RT) and other bridging strategies. Among 148 patients with relapsed/refractory DLBCL who underwent leukapheresis for CAR-T manufacturing, 31 received RT-bridging, 84 chemotherapy (CT), 33 no-bridging or steroid-only. CAR-T cell were infused in 96.8% of RT-group, 89.2% of CT-group and 78.8% of no-bridge-group (p = 0.079). Response to bridging was generally poor, but patients receiving RT had a significant reduction in LDH levels between pre- and post-bridging (p = 0.05). The one-year PFS was 51.2% in the RT-group, 28.2% in the CT-group, and 47.6% in the no-bridge-group (p = 0.044, CT-bridging vs RT-bridging); 1-year OS was 86.7% in the RT-group, 52.7% in the CT-group and 69% in the no-bridge-group (p = 0.025, CT-bridging vs RT-bridging). We observed a higher incidence of ICANS in patients who received CT than in others (20.0% CT-group, 3.3% RT-group, 7.7% no-bridge group; p = 0.05). In conclusion, RT-bridging is associated with lower drop-out rate and CAR-T toxicity, and it might be preferred to other bridging strategies for patients with localized disease or for those with one prevalent symptomatic site.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Bone Marrow Transplantation
Bone Marrow Transplantation 医学-免疫学
CiteScore
8.40
自引率
8.30%
发文量
337
审稿时长
6 months
期刊介绍: Bone Marrow Transplantation publishes high quality, peer reviewed original research that addresses all aspects of basic biology and clinical use of haemopoietic stem cell transplantation. The broad scope of the journal thus encompasses topics such as stem cell biology, e.g., kinetics and cytokine control, transplantation immunology e.g., HLA and matching techniques, translational research, and clinical results of specific transplant protocols. Bone Marrow Transplantation publishes 24 issues a year.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信