伊朗护士工作场所尊严量表:翻译和心理测量学评估。

IF 2.7 3区 医学 Q2 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
MohammadHossein Khorasanizadeh, Zahra Tagharrobi, Mohammad Zare
{"title":"伊朗护士工作场所尊严量表:翻译和心理测量学评估。","authors":"MohammadHossein Khorasanizadeh, Zahra Tagharrobi, Mohammad Zare","doi":"10.1186/s12913-024-11703-8","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Workplace dignity is defined as a person's perception of respect and trust, equal and fair treatment, valuing the person, independence, freedom of expression, and decision-making enjoyed by the employee in the workplace. Therefore, this study aimed to develop the Workplace Dignity Scale (WDS) and evaluate its psychometric properties.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In this methodological study, WDS was translated based on Beaton et al. Guideline. After assessing face and content validity (using CVI, CVR, modified kappa, and item impact), 250 nurses were selected by random sampling from Kashan hospitals in 2023. Then, WDS was assessed through expletory factor analysis (EFA), known-groups comparison, internal consistency, and stability. The ceiling and floor effects were also examined. Data were analyzed using SPSS v16 by Kruskal-Wallis test, Cronbach's alpha, McDonald's Omega, interclass correlation coefficient (ICC), standard error of measurement (SEM), and minimum detectable changes (MDC).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The scale's CVI, CVR, and modified kappa were above 0.79. Item impact was higher than 1.5. EFA extracted three factors, including \"general dignity, respect, and indignity\", that could explain 70.6% of the total variance in scale. WDS could differentiate between the three groups in terms of occupation satisfaction status. Cronbach's alpha, McDonald's Omega, ICC, SEM, and STC of scale were 0.949, 0.950, 0.970, 2.793, and 7.742, respectively.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The Persian version of the WDS has shown validity and reliability for measuring workplace dignity among nurses in the Iranian context.</p>","PeriodicalId":9012,"journal":{"name":"BMC Health Services Research","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11457349/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Workplace dignity scale in Iranian nurses: translation and psychometric evaluation.\",\"authors\":\"MohammadHossein Khorasanizadeh, Zahra Tagharrobi, Mohammad Zare\",\"doi\":\"10.1186/s12913-024-11703-8\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Workplace dignity is defined as a person's perception of respect and trust, equal and fair treatment, valuing the person, independence, freedom of expression, and decision-making enjoyed by the employee in the workplace. Therefore, this study aimed to develop the Workplace Dignity Scale (WDS) and evaluate its psychometric properties.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In this methodological study, WDS was translated based on Beaton et al. Guideline. After assessing face and content validity (using CVI, CVR, modified kappa, and item impact), 250 nurses were selected by random sampling from Kashan hospitals in 2023. Then, WDS was assessed through expletory factor analysis (EFA), known-groups comparison, internal consistency, and stability. The ceiling and floor effects were also examined. Data were analyzed using SPSS v16 by Kruskal-Wallis test, Cronbach's alpha, McDonald's Omega, interclass correlation coefficient (ICC), standard error of measurement (SEM), and minimum detectable changes (MDC).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The scale's CVI, CVR, and modified kappa were above 0.79. Item impact was higher than 1.5. EFA extracted three factors, including \\\"general dignity, respect, and indignity\\\", that could explain 70.6% of the total variance in scale. WDS could differentiate between the three groups in terms of occupation satisfaction status. Cronbach's alpha, McDonald's Omega, ICC, SEM, and STC of scale were 0.949, 0.950, 0.970, 2.793, and 7.742, respectively.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The Persian version of the WDS has shown validity and reliability for measuring workplace dignity among nurses in the Iranian context.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":9012,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"BMC Health Services Research\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-07\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11457349/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"BMC Health Services Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12913-024-11703-8\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMC Health Services Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12913-024-11703-8","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:职场尊严被定义为一个人对工作场所中员工所享有的尊重和信任、平等和公平待遇、重视个人、独立、表达自由和决策的感知。因此,本研究旨在编制工作场所尊严量表(WDS),并评估其心理测量特性:在这项方法研究中,WDS 是根据 Beaton 等人的指南翻译的。在对面效和内容效度(使用 CVI、CVR、修正卡帕和项目影响)进行评估后,2023 年从卡尚医院随机抽样选取了 250 名护士。然后,通过扩展因子分析(EFA)、已知组比较、内部一致性和稳定性对 WDS 进行了评估。此外,还考察了上限和下限效应。数据采用 SPSS v16 进行分析,包括 Kruskal-Wallis 检验、Cronbach's alpha、McDonald's Omega、类间相关系数(ICC)、测量标准误差(SEM)和最小可检测变化(MDC):结果:量表的 CVI、CVR 和修正卡帕均高于 0.79。项目影响高于 1.5。EFA 提取了三个因子,包括 "一般尊严、尊重和侮辱",可解释量表总方差的 70.6%。在职业满意度方面,WDS 可以区分三个组别。量表的 Cronbach's alpha、McDonald's Omega、ICC、SEM 和 STC 分别为 0.949、0.950、0.970、2.793 和 7.742:波斯语版的工作场所尊严量表在测量伊朗护士的工作场所尊严方面具有有效性和可靠性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Workplace dignity scale in Iranian nurses: translation and psychometric evaluation.

Background: Workplace dignity is defined as a person's perception of respect and trust, equal and fair treatment, valuing the person, independence, freedom of expression, and decision-making enjoyed by the employee in the workplace. Therefore, this study aimed to develop the Workplace Dignity Scale (WDS) and evaluate its psychometric properties.

Methods: In this methodological study, WDS was translated based on Beaton et al. Guideline. After assessing face and content validity (using CVI, CVR, modified kappa, and item impact), 250 nurses were selected by random sampling from Kashan hospitals in 2023. Then, WDS was assessed through expletory factor analysis (EFA), known-groups comparison, internal consistency, and stability. The ceiling and floor effects were also examined. Data were analyzed using SPSS v16 by Kruskal-Wallis test, Cronbach's alpha, McDonald's Omega, interclass correlation coefficient (ICC), standard error of measurement (SEM), and minimum detectable changes (MDC).

Results: The scale's CVI, CVR, and modified kappa were above 0.79. Item impact was higher than 1.5. EFA extracted three factors, including "general dignity, respect, and indignity", that could explain 70.6% of the total variance in scale. WDS could differentiate between the three groups in terms of occupation satisfaction status. Cronbach's alpha, McDonald's Omega, ICC, SEM, and STC of scale were 0.949, 0.950, 0.970, 2.793, and 7.742, respectively.

Conclusion: The Persian version of the WDS has shown validity and reliability for measuring workplace dignity among nurses in the Iranian context.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
BMC Health Services Research
BMC Health Services Research 医学-卫生保健
CiteScore
4.40
自引率
7.10%
发文量
1372
审稿时长
6 months
期刊介绍: BMC Health Services Research is an open access, peer-reviewed journal that considers articles on all aspects of health services research, including delivery of care, management of health services, assessment of healthcare needs, measurement of outcomes, allocation of healthcare resources, evaluation of different health markets and health services organizations, international comparative analysis of health systems, health economics and the impact of health policies and regulations.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信