Rebecca K Hoffman, Stacy M Post, Tonya Dodge, Michelle L Stock
{"title":"以人为本的语言对肥胖污名化的影响","authors":"Rebecca K Hoffman, Stacy M Post, Tonya Dodge, Michelle L Stock","doi":"10.1177/08901171241284551","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To test the assumption that person-first language (PFL) reduces obesity stigma, mediated by perceived personal responsibility for obesity.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Cross-sectional, experimental.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>Online, United States.</p><p><strong>Participants: </strong>299 young adults.</p><p><strong>Measures: </strong>Participants read a vignette using PFL or identity-first language (IFL) or about someone without obesity. Participants reported perceived personal responsibility for obesity, and 3 operationalizations of obesity stigma: prejudice, stereotypes, and support for punitive policies. Mediation analyses were used to test if the manipulation affected obesity stigma, through perceived personal responsibility.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>There was no indirect effect of PFL vs IFL on the 3 outcomes (95% CIs contained zero). However, the indirect effects of PFL vs no-obesity condition were significant (prejudice: <i>β</i> = -0.10, <i>SE</i> = 0.05, 95% CI [-0.22, -0.01]; stereotypes: (<i>β</i> = 0.07, <i>SE</i> = 0.03, 95% CI [0.01, 0.14]); punitive punishment: (<i>β</i> = -0.06, <i>SE</i> = 0.04, 95% CI [-0.15, -0.01]). Also, the indirect effects of IFL vs no-obesity condition on stereotypes (<i>β</i> = 0.07, <i>SE</i> = 0.04, 95% CI [0.0003, 0.15]) and punitive punishment (<i>β</i> = -0.06, <i>SE</i> = 0.04, 95% CI [-0.15, -0.0002]) were significant.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>PFL may not affect obesity stigma as it does in the context of other marginalized groups. The effect of PFL and IFL, compared to the no-obesity condition, suggests future routes for intervention.</p>","PeriodicalId":7481,"journal":{"name":"American Journal of Health Promotion","volume":" ","pages":"8901171241284551"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Effect of Person-First Language on Obesity Stigma.\",\"authors\":\"Rebecca K Hoffman, Stacy M Post, Tonya Dodge, Michelle L Stock\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/08901171241284551\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To test the assumption that person-first language (PFL) reduces obesity stigma, mediated by perceived personal responsibility for obesity.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Cross-sectional, experimental.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>Online, United States.</p><p><strong>Participants: </strong>299 young adults.</p><p><strong>Measures: </strong>Participants read a vignette using PFL or identity-first language (IFL) or about someone without obesity. Participants reported perceived personal responsibility for obesity, and 3 operationalizations of obesity stigma: prejudice, stereotypes, and support for punitive policies. Mediation analyses were used to test if the manipulation affected obesity stigma, through perceived personal responsibility.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>There was no indirect effect of PFL vs IFL on the 3 outcomes (95% CIs contained zero). However, the indirect effects of PFL vs no-obesity condition were significant (prejudice: <i>β</i> = -0.10, <i>SE</i> = 0.05, 95% CI [-0.22, -0.01]; stereotypes: (<i>β</i> = 0.07, <i>SE</i> = 0.03, 95% CI [0.01, 0.14]); punitive punishment: (<i>β</i> = -0.06, <i>SE</i> = 0.04, 95% CI [-0.15, -0.01]). Also, the indirect effects of IFL vs no-obesity condition on stereotypes (<i>β</i> = 0.07, <i>SE</i> = 0.04, 95% CI [0.0003, 0.15]) and punitive punishment (<i>β</i> = -0.06, <i>SE</i> = 0.04, 95% CI [-0.15, -0.0002]) were significant.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>PFL may not affect obesity stigma as it does in the context of other marginalized groups. The effect of PFL and IFL, compared to the no-obesity condition, suggests future routes for intervention.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":7481,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"American Journal of Health Promotion\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"8901171241284551\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-08\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"American Journal of Health Promotion\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/08901171241284551\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American Journal of Health Promotion","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/08901171241284551","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
目的：检验 "以人为本的语言"（PFL）是否能减少肥胖症耻辱感，而肥胖症的个人责任感是否能起到中介作用：设计：横断面实验：参与者：299 名年轻人：参与者阅读一段使用 PFL 或身份优先语言（IFL）或关于没有肥胖症的人的小故事。参与者报告了个人对肥胖的责任感，以及肥胖污名化的三种操作方式：偏见、刻板印象和对惩罚性政策的支持。我们使用了中介分析来检验操纵是否会通过感知到的个人责任影响肥胖成见：结果：PFL 与 IFL 对 3 个结果没有间接影响（95% CIs 为零）。但是，PFL 与无肥胖条件的间接效应显著（偏见：β = -0.10，SE = 0.05，95% CI [-0.22，-0.01]；刻板印象：（β = 0.07，SE = 0.03，95% CI [0.01，0.14]）；惩罚性惩罚：（β = -0.06，SE = 0.04，95% CI [-0.15，-0.01]）。此外，IFL 与无肥胖条件对刻板印象（β = 0.07，SE = 0.04，95% CI [0.0003，0.15]）和惩罚性惩罚（β = -0.06，SE = 0.04，95% CI [-0.15，-0.0002]）的间接影响也很显著：PFL可能不会像在其他边缘群体中那样影响肥胖耻辱感。与没有肥胖的情况相比，PFL 和 IFL 的效果提示了未来的干预途径。
The Effect of Person-First Language on Obesity Stigma.
Purpose: To test the assumption that person-first language (PFL) reduces obesity stigma, mediated by perceived personal responsibility for obesity.
Design: Cross-sectional, experimental.
Setting: Online, United States.
Participants: 299 young adults.
Measures: Participants read a vignette using PFL or identity-first language (IFL) or about someone without obesity. Participants reported perceived personal responsibility for obesity, and 3 operationalizations of obesity stigma: prejudice, stereotypes, and support for punitive policies. Mediation analyses were used to test if the manipulation affected obesity stigma, through perceived personal responsibility.
Results: There was no indirect effect of PFL vs IFL on the 3 outcomes (95% CIs contained zero). However, the indirect effects of PFL vs no-obesity condition were significant (prejudice: β = -0.10, SE = 0.05, 95% CI [-0.22, -0.01]; stereotypes: (β = 0.07, SE = 0.03, 95% CI [0.01, 0.14]); punitive punishment: (β = -0.06, SE = 0.04, 95% CI [-0.15, -0.01]). Also, the indirect effects of IFL vs no-obesity condition on stereotypes (β = 0.07, SE = 0.04, 95% CI [0.0003, 0.15]) and punitive punishment (β = -0.06, SE = 0.04, 95% CI [-0.15, -0.0002]) were significant.
Conclusion: PFL may not affect obesity stigma as it does in the context of other marginalized groups. The effect of PFL and IFL, compared to the no-obesity condition, suggests future routes for intervention.
期刊介绍：
The editorial goal of the American Journal of Health Promotion is to provide a forum for exchange among the many disciplines involved in health promotion and an interface between researchers and practitioners.
求助内容：
应助结果提醒方式：
京公网安备 11010802042870号
