预定重复 CT 扫描在脑外伤中的作用:前瞻性观察研究。

Surgical neurology international Pub Date : 2024-09-06 eCollection Date: 2024-01-01 DOI:10.25259/SNI_376_2024
Saurabh Beedkar, G Lakshmi Prasad, Girish Menon
{"title":"预定重复 CT 扫描在脑外伤中的作用:前瞻性观察研究。","authors":"Saurabh Beedkar, G Lakshmi Prasad, Girish Menon","doi":"10.25259/SNI_376_2024","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Scheduled CT scan is a routine practice at many centers after traumatic brain injury (TBI), but it has been questioned by few authors. The majority of the studies are reported in mild TBI; however, no specific data exist for the same in moderate and severe TBI.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This was a single-center and 1-year prospective study. All cases with TBI who underwent scheduled repeat scans were included in the study. Patients who underwent emergency surgery after first computed tomography (CT) and those who expired before repeat CT were excluded from the study. Data included demographics, Glasgow coma scale (GCS) score, initial head CT findings, findings of repeat CT, and the need for any intervention (medical/surgical).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 231 cases were analyzed. The mean time interval for the repeat CT was 7.8 h. One hundred and seventy-one patients underwent scheduled repeat CT (Group 1), 53 patients with GCS >13 were discharged from emergency before the repeat scan (Group 2), and seven cases underwent repeat CT before the scheduled time in view of clinical deterioration (Group 3). The mean age and gender did not vary significantly between the three groups. Mixed lesions predominated in all; however, the proportion significantly differed between groups. In Group 1, two patients required surgery; in Group 3, all patients required a significant change in treatment, whereas none deteriorated or required a repeat scan in Group 2.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>In our study, the yield of routine repeat CT scans requiring surgery was 3.5%. Based on the results of our study and the observations from previous studies, we have proposed a few general working statements regarding indications for repeat CT scans in TBI.</p>","PeriodicalId":94217,"journal":{"name":"Surgical neurology international","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11450495/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Role of scheduled repeat CT scan in traumatic brain injuries: A prospective observational study.\",\"authors\":\"Saurabh Beedkar, G Lakshmi Prasad, Girish Menon\",\"doi\":\"10.25259/SNI_376_2024\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Scheduled CT scan is a routine practice at many centers after traumatic brain injury (TBI), but it has been questioned by few authors. The majority of the studies are reported in mild TBI; however, no specific data exist for the same in moderate and severe TBI.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This was a single-center and 1-year prospective study. All cases with TBI who underwent scheduled repeat scans were included in the study. Patients who underwent emergency surgery after first computed tomography (CT) and those who expired before repeat CT were excluded from the study. Data included demographics, Glasgow coma scale (GCS) score, initial head CT findings, findings of repeat CT, and the need for any intervention (medical/surgical).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 231 cases were analyzed. The mean time interval for the repeat CT was 7.8 h. One hundred and seventy-one patients underwent scheduled repeat CT (Group 1), 53 patients with GCS >13 were discharged from emergency before the repeat scan (Group 2), and seven cases underwent repeat CT before the scheduled time in view of clinical deterioration (Group 3). The mean age and gender did not vary significantly between the three groups. Mixed lesions predominated in all; however, the proportion significantly differed between groups. In Group 1, two patients required surgery; in Group 3, all patients required a significant change in treatment, whereas none deteriorated or required a repeat scan in Group 2.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>In our study, the yield of routine repeat CT scans requiring surgery was 3.5%. Based on the results of our study and the observations from previous studies, we have proposed a few general working statements regarding indications for repeat CT scans in TBI.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":94217,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Surgical neurology international\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-06\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11450495/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Surgical neurology international\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.25259/SNI_376_2024\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Surgical neurology international","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.25259/SNI_376_2024","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:预定 CT 扫描是许多中心在创伤性脑损伤(TBI)后的常规做法,但很少有学者对此提出质疑。大多数研究都是针对轻度创伤性脑损伤的,但对于中度和重度创伤性脑损伤却没有具体数据:这是一项为期一年的单中心前瞻性研究。所有接受预定重复扫描的创伤性脑损伤病例均纳入研究。在首次接受计算机断层扫描(CT)后接受急诊手术的患者和在重复 CT 扫描前死亡的患者不在研究范围内。数据包括人口统计学、格拉斯哥昏迷量表(GCS)评分、首次头部CT结果、重复CT结果以及是否需要任何干预措施(内科/外科):结果:共分析了 231 个病例。171例患者按计划接受了重复CT检查(第1组),53例GCS>13的患者在重复扫描前已从急诊出院(第2组),7例因临床病情恶化在预定时间前接受了重复CT检查(第3组)。三组患者的平均年龄和性别无明显差异。所有病例均以混合性病变为主,但各组之间的比例有明显差异。在第 1 组中,有两名患者需要手术治疗;在第 3 组中,所有患者的治疗方法都有重大改变,而在第 2 组中,没有一名患者病情恶化或需要重复扫描:在我们的研究中,需要手术的常规重复 CT 扫描的比例为 3.5%。根据我们的研究结果和以往研究的观察结果,我们就创伤性脑损伤患者重复 CT 扫描的适应症提出了一些一般性的工作声明。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Role of scheduled repeat CT scan in traumatic brain injuries: A prospective observational study.

Background: Scheduled CT scan is a routine practice at many centers after traumatic brain injury (TBI), but it has been questioned by few authors. The majority of the studies are reported in mild TBI; however, no specific data exist for the same in moderate and severe TBI.

Methods: This was a single-center and 1-year prospective study. All cases with TBI who underwent scheduled repeat scans were included in the study. Patients who underwent emergency surgery after first computed tomography (CT) and those who expired before repeat CT were excluded from the study. Data included demographics, Glasgow coma scale (GCS) score, initial head CT findings, findings of repeat CT, and the need for any intervention (medical/surgical).

Results: A total of 231 cases were analyzed. The mean time interval for the repeat CT was 7.8 h. One hundred and seventy-one patients underwent scheduled repeat CT (Group 1), 53 patients with GCS >13 were discharged from emergency before the repeat scan (Group 2), and seven cases underwent repeat CT before the scheduled time in view of clinical deterioration (Group 3). The mean age and gender did not vary significantly between the three groups. Mixed lesions predominated in all; however, the proportion significantly differed between groups. In Group 1, two patients required surgery; in Group 3, all patients required a significant change in treatment, whereas none deteriorated or required a repeat scan in Group 2.

Conclusion: In our study, the yield of routine repeat CT scans requiring surgery was 3.5%. Based on the results of our study and the observations from previous studies, we have proposed a few general working statements regarding indications for repeat CT scans in TBI.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信