超声引导下针刀松解治疗屈指肌腱膜狭窄性腱鞘炎:一项前瞻性随机对照试验。

Zhengliang Li, Yahong Guo, Linfeng Chen, Wenyan Xue
{"title":"超声引导下针刀松解治疗屈指肌腱膜狭窄性腱鞘炎:一项前瞻性随机对照试验。","authors":"Zhengliang Li, Yahong Guo, Linfeng Chen, Wenyan Xue","doi":"10.1016/j.hansur.2024.101786","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of ultrasound-guided needle knife release in the treatment of stenosing tenosynovitis of the flexor pollicis longus.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In this prospective trial, 60 patients with clinically and ultrasonographically confirmed stenosing tenosynovitis of the flexor pollicis longus were randomly allocated to 1 of 3 groups: ultrasound-guided needle knife release (n = 20), traditional conservative treatment (n = 20), and open surgery (n = 20). The primary outcome measure was the Quinnell grade of triggering severity. Secondary outcomes comprised pain intensity (on visual analog scale), satisfaction (5-point Likert scale), and complications. Outcomes were evaluated at baseline, 1 week, 1 month and 3 months post-intervention by blinded assessors.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>At all follow-up time points, the needle knife release group demonstrated significantly lower Quinnell grades (p < 0.05) and pain scores (p < 0.001) than the conservative treatment group; satisfaction was greater in the needle knife release group compared to the conservative treatment group at 1 month (p = 0.002) and 3 months (p < 0.001). There were no significant differences in outcomes between the needle knife release group and the open surgery group. The overall complications rate was 5% in the needle knife release group, 10% in the conservative treatment group, and 15% in the open surgery group (p = 0.574).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Ultrasound-guided needle knife release is an effective and safe treatment for stenosing tenosynovitis of the flexor pollicis longus, with outcomes that are better than with traditional conservative treatment and similar to those of open surgery.</p>","PeriodicalId":94023,"journal":{"name":"Hand surgery & rehabilitation","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Ultrasound-guided needle knife release for stenosing tenosynovitis of the flexor pollicis longus: a prospective randomized controlled trial.\",\"authors\":\"Zhengliang Li, Yahong Guo, Linfeng Chen, Wenyan Xue\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.hansur.2024.101786\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of ultrasound-guided needle knife release in the treatment of stenosing tenosynovitis of the flexor pollicis longus.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In this prospective trial, 60 patients with clinically and ultrasonographically confirmed stenosing tenosynovitis of the flexor pollicis longus were randomly allocated to 1 of 3 groups: ultrasound-guided needle knife release (n = 20), traditional conservative treatment (n = 20), and open surgery (n = 20). The primary outcome measure was the Quinnell grade of triggering severity. Secondary outcomes comprised pain intensity (on visual analog scale), satisfaction (5-point Likert scale), and complications. Outcomes were evaluated at baseline, 1 week, 1 month and 3 months post-intervention by blinded assessors.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>At all follow-up time points, the needle knife release group demonstrated significantly lower Quinnell grades (p < 0.05) and pain scores (p < 0.001) than the conservative treatment group; satisfaction was greater in the needle knife release group compared to the conservative treatment group at 1 month (p = 0.002) and 3 months (p < 0.001). There were no significant differences in outcomes between the needle knife release group and the open surgery group. The overall complications rate was 5% in the needle knife release group, 10% in the conservative treatment group, and 15% in the open surgery group (p = 0.574).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Ultrasound-guided needle knife release is an effective and safe treatment for stenosing tenosynovitis of the flexor pollicis longus, with outcomes that are better than with traditional conservative treatment and similar to those of open surgery.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":94023,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Hand surgery & rehabilitation\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-05\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Hand surgery & rehabilitation\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hansur.2024.101786\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Hand surgery & rehabilitation","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hansur.2024.101786","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:本研究旨在评估超声引导下针刀松解术治疗屈指肌腱膜狭窄性腱鞘炎的有效性和安全性:在这项前瞻性试验中,60名经临床和超声波检查证实患有屈指肌腱膜狭窄性腱鞘炎的患者被随机分配到3组中的1组:超声引导下针刀松解术组(20人)、传统保守治疗组(20人)和开放手术组(20人)。主要结果是奎内尔触发严重程度分级。次要结果包括疼痛强度(视觉模拟量表)、满意度(5 点 Likert 量表)和并发症。干预后基线、1周、1个月和3个月的结果由盲人评估员进行评估:结果:在所有随访时间点上,针刀松解组的 Quinnell 分级都明显较低(P 结论:针刀松解组的并发症发生率明显低于针刀松解组:超声引导下针刀松解术是治疗屈指肌腱膜狭窄性腱鞘炎的一种有效而安全的方法,其疗效优于传统的保守治疗,与开放性手术疗效相似。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Ultrasound-guided needle knife release for stenosing tenosynovitis of the flexor pollicis longus: a prospective randomized controlled trial.

Purpose: This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of ultrasound-guided needle knife release in the treatment of stenosing tenosynovitis of the flexor pollicis longus.

Methods: In this prospective trial, 60 patients with clinically and ultrasonographically confirmed stenosing tenosynovitis of the flexor pollicis longus were randomly allocated to 1 of 3 groups: ultrasound-guided needle knife release (n = 20), traditional conservative treatment (n = 20), and open surgery (n = 20). The primary outcome measure was the Quinnell grade of triggering severity. Secondary outcomes comprised pain intensity (on visual analog scale), satisfaction (5-point Likert scale), and complications. Outcomes were evaluated at baseline, 1 week, 1 month and 3 months post-intervention by blinded assessors.

Results: At all follow-up time points, the needle knife release group demonstrated significantly lower Quinnell grades (p < 0.05) and pain scores (p < 0.001) than the conservative treatment group; satisfaction was greater in the needle knife release group compared to the conservative treatment group at 1 month (p = 0.002) and 3 months (p < 0.001). There were no significant differences in outcomes between the needle knife release group and the open surgery group. The overall complications rate was 5% in the needle knife release group, 10% in the conservative treatment group, and 15% in the open surgery group (p = 0.574).

Conclusion: Ultrasound-guided needle knife release is an effective and safe treatment for stenosing tenosynovitis of the flexor pollicis longus, with outcomes that are better than with traditional conservative treatment and similar to those of open surgery.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信