评估食管切除术强化恢复方案的患者满意度:同步定量和定性分析。

IF 2.6 3区 医学
Johnny Moons, Hanne Declerck, Eveline Gijbels, Marleen Jans, Eva Puttevils, Toni Lerut, Philippe Nafteux, Theo Van Achterberg
{"title":"评估食管切除术强化恢复方案的患者满意度:同步定量和定性分析。","authors":"Johnny Moons, Hanne Declerck, Eveline Gijbels, Marleen Jans, Eva Puttevils, Toni Lerut, Philippe Nafteux, Theo Van Achterberg","doi":"10.1093/dote/doae079","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Patient satisfaction during hospitalization for esophagectomy has been little studied. The aim of this study was to evaluate patients' satisfaction with a newly introduced enhanced recovery protocol (ERP) for esophagectomy. At hospital discharge, patients were invited to complete a questionnaire. This pseudonymized questionnaire contained 5-point Likert scales regarding items on multidisciplinary care (n = 7), information/communication (n = 7), length of stay (n = 1), and specific adaptations of care in the ERP (n = 11). One open question asked for patient experiences and suggestions for improving the ERP. Between May 2017 and December 2021, 521 patients were included in the ERP after esophagectomy. Of them, 327 patients (63%) completed the questionnaire. Response rates were evenly distributed between genders and slightly higher in younger patients (<60 years; 68%) as compared to elderly patients (>70 years; 60%). Quantitative analysis revealed high satisfaction rates for multidisciplinary care (86.8%), information/communication (84.9%), and ERP adaptations (82.2%), and length of stay was considered optimal in 80%. There were no significant differences in satisfaction observed between gender nor age groups. For the qualitative analysis, there were 108 open answers, resulting in 268 statements. Sentiments expressed in these statements were evaluated as negative, positive, or unspecified. Negative sentiments were attributable to alimentation, organizational factors, and communication. Positive sentiments were attributed to interpersonal relations, multidisciplinary care, and ERP. Overall, patients are very satisfied with the ERP for esophagectomy during hospitalization. By incorporating qualitative data, the results of this quantitative analysis are expanded and elucidated, showing areas where improvements to our ERP are possible to increase patient satisfaction.</p>","PeriodicalId":54277,"journal":{"name":"Diseases of the Esophagus","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Evaluation of patient satisfaction with an enhanced recovery protocol for esophageal resections: a concurrent quantitative and qualitative analysis.\",\"authors\":\"Johnny Moons, Hanne Declerck, Eveline Gijbels, Marleen Jans, Eva Puttevils, Toni Lerut, Philippe Nafteux, Theo Van Achterberg\",\"doi\":\"10.1093/dote/doae079\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Patient satisfaction during hospitalization for esophagectomy has been little studied. The aim of this study was to evaluate patients' satisfaction with a newly introduced enhanced recovery protocol (ERP) for esophagectomy. At hospital discharge, patients were invited to complete a questionnaire. This pseudonymized questionnaire contained 5-point Likert scales regarding items on multidisciplinary care (n = 7), information/communication (n = 7), length of stay (n = 1), and specific adaptations of care in the ERP (n = 11). One open question asked for patient experiences and suggestions for improving the ERP. Between May 2017 and December 2021, 521 patients were included in the ERP after esophagectomy. Of them, 327 patients (63%) completed the questionnaire. Response rates were evenly distributed between genders and slightly higher in younger patients (<60 years; 68%) as compared to elderly patients (>70 years; 60%). Quantitative analysis revealed high satisfaction rates for multidisciplinary care (86.8%), information/communication (84.9%), and ERP adaptations (82.2%), and length of stay was considered optimal in 80%. There were no significant differences in satisfaction observed between gender nor age groups. For the qualitative analysis, there were 108 open answers, resulting in 268 statements. Sentiments expressed in these statements were evaluated as negative, positive, or unspecified. Negative sentiments were attributable to alimentation, organizational factors, and communication. Positive sentiments were attributed to interpersonal relations, multidisciplinary care, and ERP. Overall, patients are very satisfied with the ERP for esophagectomy during hospitalization. By incorporating qualitative data, the results of this quantitative analysis are expanded and elucidated, showing areas where improvements to our ERP are possible to increase patient satisfaction.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":54277,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Diseases of the Esophagus\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-28\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Diseases of the Esophagus\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1093/dote/doae079\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Diseases of the Esophagus","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/dote/doae079","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

关于食管切除术住院期间患者满意度的研究很少。本研究旨在评估患者对食管切除术新引入的强化恢复方案(ERP)的满意度。出院时,患者受邀填写了一份问卷。这份化名问卷包含有关多学科护理(n = 7)、信息/沟通(n = 7)、住院时间(n = 1)和ERP护理的具体调整(n = 11)等项目的5点李克特量表。一个开放性问题询问了患者的经验和对改进 ERP 的建议。2017年5月至2021年12月期间,521名食管切除术后患者被纳入了ERP。其中,327 名患者(63%)完成了问卷调查。男女患者的回复率分布均匀,年轻患者的回复率略高(70 岁;60%)。定量分析显示,患者对多学科护理(86.8%)、信息/沟通(84.9%)和 ERP 适应性(82.2%)的满意度较高,80%的患者认为住院时间最长。不同性别和年龄组之间的满意度没有明显差异。在定性分析中,有 108 个开放式答案,共 268 项陈述。在这些陈述中表达的情绪被评估为消极、积极或不明确。负面情绪可归因于饮食、组织因素和沟通。人际关系、多学科护理和机构资源规划则是积极因素。总体而言,患者对住院期间食管切除术的 ERP 非常满意。通过纳入定性数据,这一定量分析的结果得到了扩展和阐释,显示了我们的 ERP 在哪些方面可以改进,以提高患者的满意度。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Evaluation of patient satisfaction with an enhanced recovery protocol for esophageal resections: a concurrent quantitative and qualitative analysis.

Patient satisfaction during hospitalization for esophagectomy has been little studied. The aim of this study was to evaluate patients' satisfaction with a newly introduced enhanced recovery protocol (ERP) for esophagectomy. At hospital discharge, patients were invited to complete a questionnaire. This pseudonymized questionnaire contained 5-point Likert scales regarding items on multidisciplinary care (n = 7), information/communication (n = 7), length of stay (n = 1), and specific adaptations of care in the ERP (n = 11). One open question asked for patient experiences and suggestions for improving the ERP. Between May 2017 and December 2021, 521 patients were included in the ERP after esophagectomy. Of them, 327 patients (63%) completed the questionnaire. Response rates were evenly distributed between genders and slightly higher in younger patients (<60 years; 68%) as compared to elderly patients (>70 years; 60%). Quantitative analysis revealed high satisfaction rates for multidisciplinary care (86.8%), information/communication (84.9%), and ERP adaptations (82.2%), and length of stay was considered optimal in 80%. There were no significant differences in satisfaction observed between gender nor age groups. For the qualitative analysis, there were 108 open answers, resulting in 268 statements. Sentiments expressed in these statements were evaluated as negative, positive, or unspecified. Negative sentiments were attributable to alimentation, organizational factors, and communication. Positive sentiments were attributed to interpersonal relations, multidisciplinary care, and ERP. Overall, patients are very satisfied with the ERP for esophagectomy during hospitalization. By incorporating qualitative data, the results of this quantitative analysis are expanded and elucidated, showing areas where improvements to our ERP are possible to increase patient satisfaction.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Diseases of the Esophagus
Diseases of the Esophagus Medicine-Gastroenterology
自引率
7.70%
发文量
568
期刊介绍: Diseases of the Esophagus covers all aspects of the esophagus - etiology, investigation and diagnosis, and both medical and surgical treatment.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信