一家大型学术医疗系统在肿瘤学领域使用远程医疗与下游利用之间的关联。

IF 3.5 3区 医学 Q1 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
Preeti Kakani, Adam E Singer, Manying Cui, Chad W Villaflores, Sitaram Vangala, Miguel A Cuevas, Maria Han, Cheryl L Damberg, John N Mafi, Catherine A Sarkisian
{"title":"一家大型学术医疗系统在肿瘤学领域使用远程医疗与下游利用之间的关联。","authors":"Preeti Kakani, Adam E Singer, Manying Cui, Chad W Villaflores, Sitaram Vangala, Miguel A Cuevas, Maria Han, Cheryl L Damberg, John N Mafi, Catherine A Sarkisian","doi":"10.1177/1357633X241282820","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>While telemedicine has been beneficial in oncology by reducing infectious exposure and improving access for patients with poor functional status, it also has intrinsic limitations, including the inability to perform a physical exam, which could lead to increased downstream utilization in this population at high risk of medical decompensation. We conducted a retrospective cohort study investigating the relationship between telemedicine use in oncology and subsequent outpatient oncology encounters, emergency department (ED) visits, and hospitalizations.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We included outpatient oncology encounters, including telemedicine and in-person visits, occurring between 1 January 2018 and 31 December 2022 at a large academic health system. Unadjusted descriptive statistics and multiple linear regressions were used to estimate subsequent outpatient oncology visits, ED visits, and hospitalizations within 30 days of an index visit based on modality (telemedicine versus in-person). The multiple regressions were adjusted for various demographic and clinical characteristics, including palliative care visits, baseline utilization, recent chemotherapy, and comorbidities.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Our cohort included 63,722 patients with 689,356 outpatient encounters, of which 639,217 (92.7%) were in-person and 50,139 (7.3%) were telemedicine visits. Patients on average had 0.91 outpatient oncology visits, 0.04 ED visits, and 0.05 hospitalizations within 30 days following an index encounter. In our adjusted analyses, telemedicine was associated with 13.7 fewer downstream outpatient oncology visits (95% CI 12.5-14.9; <i>p</i> < 0.001) per 100 index encounters, 0.7 fewer ED visits (95% CI 0.4-1.0; <i>p</i> < 0.001) per 100 index encounters and 0.9 fewer hospitalizations (95% CI 0.6-1.3; <i>p</i> < 0.001) per 100 index encounters compared to in-person visits.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Contrary to our hypothesis, oncology patients who had a telemedicine visit had fewer follow-up outpatient oncology encounters, ED visits and hospitalizations after 30 days than those with in-person visits. Future studies should further investigate the efficacy of telemedicine in oncology and outline specific scenarios for appropriate use in this and other populations.</p>","PeriodicalId":50024,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Telemedicine and Telecare","volume":" ","pages":"1357633X241282820"},"PeriodicalIF":3.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Association between telehealth use in oncology and downstream utilization at a large academic health system.\",\"authors\":\"Preeti Kakani, Adam E Singer, Manying Cui, Chad W Villaflores, Sitaram Vangala, Miguel A Cuevas, Maria Han, Cheryl L Damberg, John N Mafi, Catherine A Sarkisian\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/1357633X241282820\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>While telemedicine has been beneficial in oncology by reducing infectious exposure and improving access for patients with poor functional status, it also has intrinsic limitations, including the inability to perform a physical exam, which could lead to increased downstream utilization in this population at high risk of medical decompensation. We conducted a retrospective cohort study investigating the relationship between telemedicine use in oncology and subsequent outpatient oncology encounters, emergency department (ED) visits, and hospitalizations.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We included outpatient oncology encounters, including telemedicine and in-person visits, occurring between 1 January 2018 and 31 December 2022 at a large academic health system. Unadjusted descriptive statistics and multiple linear regressions were used to estimate subsequent outpatient oncology visits, ED visits, and hospitalizations within 30 days of an index visit based on modality (telemedicine versus in-person). The multiple regressions were adjusted for various demographic and clinical characteristics, including palliative care visits, baseline utilization, recent chemotherapy, and comorbidities.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Our cohort included 63,722 patients with 689,356 outpatient encounters, of which 639,217 (92.7%) were in-person and 50,139 (7.3%) were telemedicine visits. Patients on average had 0.91 outpatient oncology visits, 0.04 ED visits, and 0.05 hospitalizations within 30 days following an index encounter. In our adjusted analyses, telemedicine was associated with 13.7 fewer downstream outpatient oncology visits (95% CI 12.5-14.9; <i>p</i> < 0.001) per 100 index encounters, 0.7 fewer ED visits (95% CI 0.4-1.0; <i>p</i> < 0.001) per 100 index encounters and 0.9 fewer hospitalizations (95% CI 0.6-1.3; <i>p</i> < 0.001) per 100 index encounters compared to in-person visits.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Contrary to our hypothesis, oncology patients who had a telemedicine visit had fewer follow-up outpatient oncology encounters, ED visits and hospitalizations after 30 days than those with in-person visits. Future studies should further investigate the efficacy of telemedicine in oncology and outline specific scenarios for appropriate use in this and other populations.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":50024,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Telemedicine and Telecare\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"1357633X241282820\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-07\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Telemedicine and Telecare\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/1357633X241282820\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Telemedicine and Telecare","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/1357633X241282820","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:虽然远程医疗通过减少感染机会和改善功能状况不佳患者的就医机会而对肿瘤学有所裨益,但它也有其内在的局限性,包括无法进行体格检查,这可能会导致这一医疗失调高风险人群的下游利用率增加。我们开展了一项回顾性队列研究,调查肿瘤科使用远程医疗与后续肿瘤科门诊就诊、急诊科就诊和住院之间的关系:我们纳入了一家大型学术医疗系统在 2018 年 1 月 1 日至 2022 年 12 月 31 日期间发生的肿瘤门诊就诊情况,包括远程医疗和现场就诊。我们使用未经调整的描述性统计和多重线性回归来估算基于模式(远程医疗与面对面就诊)的肿瘤门诊就诊、急诊室就诊和指标就诊后 30 天内的住院情况。多重回归对各种人口统计学和临床特征进行了调整,包括姑息治疗就诊、基线使用、近期化疗和合并症:我们的队列包括 63,722 名患者,共 689,356 次门诊就诊,其中 639,217 次(92.7%)为面对面就诊,50,139 次(7.3%)为远程医疗就诊。患者在就诊后 30 天内平均有 0.91 次肿瘤门诊就诊、0.04 次急诊就诊和 0.05 次住院治疗。在我们的调整分析中,远程医疗与下游肿瘤门诊就诊次数减少 13.7 次相关(95% CI 12.5-14.9; p p p 结论:与我们的假设相反,接受远程医疗就诊的肿瘤患者在 30 天后的后续肿瘤门诊就诊次数、急诊室就诊次数和住院次数均少于接受现场就诊的患者。未来的研究应进一步调查远程医疗在肿瘤学中的疗效,并概述在该人群和其他人群中适当使用远程医疗的具体场景。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Association between telehealth use in oncology and downstream utilization at a large academic health system.

Background: While telemedicine has been beneficial in oncology by reducing infectious exposure and improving access for patients with poor functional status, it also has intrinsic limitations, including the inability to perform a physical exam, which could lead to increased downstream utilization in this population at high risk of medical decompensation. We conducted a retrospective cohort study investigating the relationship between telemedicine use in oncology and subsequent outpatient oncology encounters, emergency department (ED) visits, and hospitalizations.

Methods: We included outpatient oncology encounters, including telemedicine and in-person visits, occurring between 1 January 2018 and 31 December 2022 at a large academic health system. Unadjusted descriptive statistics and multiple linear regressions were used to estimate subsequent outpatient oncology visits, ED visits, and hospitalizations within 30 days of an index visit based on modality (telemedicine versus in-person). The multiple regressions were adjusted for various demographic and clinical characteristics, including palliative care visits, baseline utilization, recent chemotherapy, and comorbidities.

Results: Our cohort included 63,722 patients with 689,356 outpatient encounters, of which 639,217 (92.7%) were in-person and 50,139 (7.3%) were telemedicine visits. Patients on average had 0.91 outpatient oncology visits, 0.04 ED visits, and 0.05 hospitalizations within 30 days following an index encounter. In our adjusted analyses, telemedicine was associated with 13.7 fewer downstream outpatient oncology visits (95% CI 12.5-14.9; p < 0.001) per 100 index encounters, 0.7 fewer ED visits (95% CI 0.4-1.0; p < 0.001) per 100 index encounters and 0.9 fewer hospitalizations (95% CI 0.6-1.3; p < 0.001) per 100 index encounters compared to in-person visits.

Conclusions: Contrary to our hypothesis, oncology patients who had a telemedicine visit had fewer follow-up outpatient oncology encounters, ED visits and hospitalizations after 30 days than those with in-person visits. Future studies should further investigate the efficacy of telemedicine in oncology and outline specific scenarios for appropriate use in this and other populations.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
14.10
自引率
10.60%
发文量
174
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Journal of Telemedicine and Telecare provides excellent peer reviewed coverage of developments in telemedicine and e-health and is now widely recognised as the leading journal in its field. Contributions from around the world provide a unique perspective on how different countries and health systems are using new technology in health care. Sections within the journal include technology updates, editorials, original articles, research tutorials, educational material, review articles and reports from various telemedicine organisations. A subscription to this journal will help you to stay up-to-date in this fast moving and growing area of medicine.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信