医院在实施剖宫产术后强化恢复方案后阿片类药物使用和方案遵守情况的综合回顾。

Laura Senn, Sulekha Anand
{"title":"医院在实施剖宫产术后强化恢复方案后阿片类药物使用和方案遵守情况的综合回顾。","authors":"Laura Senn, Sulekha Anand","doi":"10.1016/j.nwh.2024.05.004","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To evaluate the enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) protocols used and amount of opioids administered during hospitalization for cesarean birth after the ERAS protocols were implemented.</p><p><strong>Data sources: </strong>A search was conducted in CINAHL Complete, Scopus, and PubMed for sources published in English between January 2018 and December 2023. Search terms were cesarean AND opioid∗ AND eras OR erac OR enhanced recovery.</p><p><strong>Study selection: </strong>Eligible studies were conducted in the United States, used key pain management components from the ERAS guidelines, and reported results for in-patient postsurgical opioid use.</p><p><strong>Data extraction: </strong>Data obtained were for post-ERAS implementation only and included authors, date, sample size, study location, participant inclusion and exclusion criteria, methods, interventions used (ERAS guideline components), and morphine milligram equivalents (MME) used during the hospital stay.</p><p><strong>Data synthesis: </strong>Weighted averages were calculated for results reported as means and percentages. Descriptive summaries were used for the remainder of the results.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Twenty-six studies were found, accounting for 19,961 individuals' post-ERAS experiences. Although 30% of participants experienced a scheduled cesarean birth, 70% experienced all types of cesarean births, including scheduled, urgent, or emergent. There was substantial heterogeneity of the data reported, especially for how opioid use was measured and analyzed and time frames for opioid use. In 11 studies that reported MME as means, the weighted average for in-patient opioid use was 54 MME per stay. In only 17 studies, researchers reported the number of women who experienced an opioid-free recovery, which averaged 40% of the women.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>While implementation of key components of the ERAS protocol is associated with reduced opioid exposure for women experiencing scheduled and nonscheduled cesarean births, a benchmark for the amount of in-patient opioid use was not established. Still, this review offers evidence regarding best practices, lessons learned, and outcome analysis strategies. These findings can support perinatal teams who are considering implementing ERAS for cesarean birth, or those looking for further improvements.</p>","PeriodicalId":39985,"journal":{"name":"Nursing for Women''s Health","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Integrative Review of Opioid Use and Protocol Adherence in Hospitals After Implementing Enhanced Recovery After Surgery Protocols for Cesarean Birth.\",\"authors\":\"Laura Senn, Sulekha Anand\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.nwh.2024.05.004\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To evaluate the enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) protocols used and amount of opioids administered during hospitalization for cesarean birth after the ERAS protocols were implemented.</p><p><strong>Data sources: </strong>A search was conducted in CINAHL Complete, Scopus, and PubMed for sources published in English between January 2018 and December 2023. Search terms were cesarean AND opioid∗ AND eras OR erac OR enhanced recovery.</p><p><strong>Study selection: </strong>Eligible studies were conducted in the United States, used key pain management components from the ERAS guidelines, and reported results for in-patient postsurgical opioid use.</p><p><strong>Data extraction: </strong>Data obtained were for post-ERAS implementation only and included authors, date, sample size, study location, participant inclusion and exclusion criteria, methods, interventions used (ERAS guideline components), and morphine milligram equivalents (MME) used during the hospital stay.</p><p><strong>Data synthesis: </strong>Weighted averages were calculated for results reported as means and percentages. Descriptive summaries were used for the remainder of the results.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Twenty-six studies were found, accounting for 19,961 individuals' post-ERAS experiences. Although 30% of participants experienced a scheduled cesarean birth, 70% experienced all types of cesarean births, including scheduled, urgent, or emergent. There was substantial heterogeneity of the data reported, especially for how opioid use was measured and analyzed and time frames for opioid use. In 11 studies that reported MME as means, the weighted average for in-patient opioid use was 54 MME per stay. In only 17 studies, researchers reported the number of women who experienced an opioid-free recovery, which averaged 40% of the women.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>While implementation of key components of the ERAS protocol is associated with reduced opioid exposure for women experiencing scheduled and nonscheduled cesarean births, a benchmark for the amount of in-patient opioid use was not established. Still, this review offers evidence regarding best practices, lessons learned, and outcome analysis strategies. These findings can support perinatal teams who are considering implementing ERAS for cesarean birth, or those looking for further improvements.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":39985,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Nursing for Women''s Health\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-04\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Nursing for Women''s Health\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nwh.2024.05.004\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Nursing for Women''s Health","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nwh.2024.05.004","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的评估术后恢复强化方案(ERAS)的使用情况,以及ERAS方案实施后剖宫产住院期间阿片类药物的用量:在 CINAHL Complete、Scopus 和 PubMed 中检索了 2018 年 1 月至 2023 年 12 月间发表的英文资料。搜索关键词为剖宫产、阿片类药物∗、ERAS OR ERAC OR 增强恢复:符合条件的研究均在美国进行,使用了ERAS指南中的关键疼痛管理内容,并报告了住院患者术后阿片类药物使用的结果:数据提取:仅针对ERAS实施后的数据,包括作者、日期、样本大小、研究地点、参与者纳入和排除标准、方法、使用的干预措施(ERAS指南内容)以及住院期间使用的吗啡毫克当量:对以均值和百分比报告的结果计算加权平均值。其余结果采用描述性总结:结果:共发现 26 项研究,涉及 19,961 人在实施 ERAS 后的经历。尽管 30% 的参与者只经历过计划剖宫产,但 70% 的参与者经历过所有类型的剖宫产,包括计划剖宫产、紧急剖宫产或急诊剖宫产。所报告的数据存在很大的异质性,尤其是阿片类药物的使用和时间范围。在 11 项报告平均值的研究中,阿片类药物使用的加权平均值为每次住院 54 吗啡毫克当量。在 17 项研究中,研究人员报告了经历无阿片类药物康复的妇女人数,平均占妇女人数的 40%:结论:在美国医院实施以 ERAS 指南为基础的标准化医嘱,可减少计划内和计划外剖宫产产妇的阿片类药物用量,同时保持足够的镇痛效果。本综述提供的证据可为正在考虑采用 ERAS 进行剖宫产或寻求进一步改进的围产团队提供支持。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Integrative Review of Opioid Use and Protocol Adherence in Hospitals After Implementing Enhanced Recovery After Surgery Protocols for Cesarean Birth.

Objective: To evaluate the enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) protocols used and amount of opioids administered during hospitalization for cesarean birth after the ERAS protocols were implemented.

Data sources: A search was conducted in CINAHL Complete, Scopus, and PubMed for sources published in English between January 2018 and December 2023. Search terms were cesarean AND opioid∗ AND eras OR erac OR enhanced recovery.

Study selection: Eligible studies were conducted in the United States, used key pain management components from the ERAS guidelines, and reported results for in-patient postsurgical opioid use.

Data extraction: Data obtained were for post-ERAS implementation only and included authors, date, sample size, study location, participant inclusion and exclusion criteria, methods, interventions used (ERAS guideline components), and morphine milligram equivalents (MME) used during the hospital stay.

Data synthesis: Weighted averages were calculated for results reported as means and percentages. Descriptive summaries were used for the remainder of the results.

Results: Twenty-six studies were found, accounting for 19,961 individuals' post-ERAS experiences. Although 30% of participants experienced a scheduled cesarean birth, 70% experienced all types of cesarean births, including scheduled, urgent, or emergent. There was substantial heterogeneity of the data reported, especially for how opioid use was measured and analyzed and time frames for opioid use. In 11 studies that reported MME as means, the weighted average for in-patient opioid use was 54 MME per stay. In only 17 studies, researchers reported the number of women who experienced an opioid-free recovery, which averaged 40% of the women.

Conclusion: While implementation of key components of the ERAS protocol is associated with reduced opioid exposure for women experiencing scheduled and nonscheduled cesarean births, a benchmark for the amount of in-patient opioid use was not established. Still, this review offers evidence regarding best practices, lessons learned, and outcome analysis strategies. These findings can support perinatal teams who are considering implementing ERAS for cesarean birth, or those looking for further improvements.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Nursing for Women''s Health
Nursing for Women''s Health Nursing-Nursing (all)
CiteScore
2.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
90
期刊介绍: Nursing for Women"s Health publishes the most recent and compelling health care information on women"s health, newborn care and professional nursing issues. As a refereed, clinical practice journal, it provides professionals involved in providing optimum nursing care for women and their newborns with health care trends and everyday issues in a concise, practical, and easy-to-read format.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信