Man Soo Kim, Keun Young Choi, Ryu Kyoung Cho, Hyuk Jin Jang, Dong Ho Kwak, Sung Cheol Yang, Seung Taek Oh, Yong In
{"title":"对于膝关节软骨缺损,胶原增生软骨技术的软骨修复效果优于微骨折,且不受年龄限制。","authors":"Man Soo Kim, Keun Young Choi, Ryu Kyoung Cho, Hyuk Jin Jang, Dong Ho Kwak, Sung Cheol Yang, Seung Taek Oh, Yong In","doi":"10.1002/ksa.12500","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>This study investigated whether age affects clinical outcomes and cartilage repair quality in patients who underwent collagen-augmented chondrogenesis.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The study included patients who underwent either the collagen-augmented chondrogenesis technique or microfracture for cartilage defects of the knee joint of International Cartilage Repair Society grade 3 or 4. Patients were categorised according to an age threshold of 50 years and the treatment method, whether collagen-augmented chondrogenesis technique or microfracture. Group 1 comprised 31 patients aged 50 years or older who received the collagen-augmented chondrogenesis technique, Group 2 consisted of 32 patients under the age of 50 years who received the collagen-augmented chondrogenesis technique and Group 3 included 243 patients aged 50 years or older who received microfracture. Clinical outcomes were assessed using the walking visual analogue scale (VAS) for pain and the Western Ontario McMaster University Osteoarthritis Index scale score (WOMAC) two years after surgery. For patients with magnetic resonance imaging results 1 year postoperatively (Group 1: 30 patients; Group 2: 31 patients; and Group 3: 31 patients), Magnetic Resonance Observation of Cartilage Repair Tissue (MOCART) assessment was used to evaluate repaired cartilage lesions.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>There were no significant differences in the VAS and WOMAC scores between the three groups 2 years after surgery (all n.s.). The MOCART score in patients who underwent MRI at 1 year postoperatively showed significant differences in the degree of defect repair, integration with the border zone, surface of the repaired tissue, adhesion and total score among the three groups (all p < 0.05). Post hoc analysis revealed no difference in the total MOCART scores between Groups 1 and 2. However, Groups 1 and 2 had significantly higher MOCART scores than Group 3 1 year after surgery (all p < 0.05).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The collagen-augmented chondrogenesis technique group showed improved quality of cartilage repair compared to the microfracture group, regardless of patient age. Compared with simple microfracture treatment, there were no differences in clinical outcomes between the patient groups, related to age.</p><p><strong>Level of evidence: </strong>Level Ⅲ.</p>","PeriodicalId":3,"journal":{"name":"ACS Applied Electronic Materials","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The collagen-augmented chondrogenesis technique demonstrates superior cartilage repair compared to microfracture for cartilage defects of the knee joint, regardless of age.\",\"authors\":\"Man Soo Kim, Keun Young Choi, Ryu Kyoung Cho, Hyuk Jin Jang, Dong Ho Kwak, Sung Cheol Yang, Seung Taek Oh, Yong In\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/ksa.12500\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>This study investigated whether age affects clinical outcomes and cartilage repair quality in patients who underwent collagen-augmented chondrogenesis.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The study included patients who underwent either the collagen-augmented chondrogenesis technique or microfracture for cartilage defects of the knee joint of International Cartilage Repair Society grade 3 or 4. Patients were categorised according to an age threshold of 50 years and the treatment method, whether collagen-augmented chondrogenesis technique or microfracture. Group 1 comprised 31 patients aged 50 years or older who received the collagen-augmented chondrogenesis technique, Group 2 consisted of 32 patients under the age of 50 years who received the collagen-augmented chondrogenesis technique and Group 3 included 243 patients aged 50 years or older who received microfracture. Clinical outcomes were assessed using the walking visual analogue scale (VAS) for pain and the Western Ontario McMaster University Osteoarthritis Index scale score (WOMAC) two years after surgery. For patients with magnetic resonance imaging results 1 year postoperatively (Group 1: 30 patients; Group 2: 31 patients; and Group 3: 31 patients), Magnetic Resonance Observation of Cartilage Repair Tissue (MOCART) assessment was used to evaluate repaired cartilage lesions.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>There were no significant differences in the VAS and WOMAC scores between the three groups 2 years after surgery (all n.s.). The MOCART score in patients who underwent MRI at 1 year postoperatively showed significant differences in the degree of defect repair, integration with the border zone, surface of the repaired tissue, adhesion and total score among the three groups (all p < 0.05). Post hoc analysis revealed no difference in the total MOCART scores between Groups 1 and 2. However, Groups 1 and 2 had significantly higher MOCART scores than Group 3 1 year after surgery (all p < 0.05).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The collagen-augmented chondrogenesis technique group showed improved quality of cartilage repair compared to the microfracture group, regardless of patient age. Compared with simple microfracture treatment, there were no differences in clinical outcomes between the patient groups, related to age.</p><p><strong>Level of evidence: </strong>Level Ⅲ.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":3,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"ACS Applied Electronic Materials\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-06\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"ACS Applied Electronic Materials\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1002/ksa.12500\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"材料科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ENGINEERING, ELECTRICAL & ELECTRONIC\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ACS Applied Electronic Materials","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/ksa.12500","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"材料科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, ELECTRICAL & ELECTRONIC","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
目的:本研究探讨了年龄是否会影响胶原增生软骨技术患者的临床疗效和软骨修复质量:研究纳入了接受胶原增生软骨技术或微骨折术治疗膝关节软骨缺损(国际软骨修复协会分级为3级或4级)的患者。患者根据年龄(50 岁)和治疗方法(胶原增生软骨技术或微骨折)进行分类。第一组包括31名接受胶原增生软骨技术的50岁以上患者,第二组包括32名接受胶原增生软骨技术的50岁以下患者,第三组包括243名接受微骨折术的50岁以上患者。手术两年后,采用步行疼痛视觉模拟量表(VAS)和西安大略麦克马斯特大学骨关节炎指数量表(WOMAC)对临床效果进行评估。对于术后一年有磁共振成像结果的患者(第一组:30例;第二组:31例;第三组:31例),采用软骨修复组织磁共振观察(MOCART)评估来评价修复的软骨病变:结果:三组患者术后 2 年的 VAS 和 WOMAC 评分无明显差异(均为 n.s.)。术后1年接受核磁共振成像检查的患者的MOCART评分显示,三组患者在缺损修复程度、与边界区的融合度、修复组织的表面、粘连度和总分方面存在显著差异(均为P 结论:三组患者术后1年的MOCART评分显示,三组患者在缺损修复程度、与边界区的融合度、修复组织的表面、粘连度和总分方面存在显著差异:与微骨折组相比,胶原增生软骨技术组的软骨修复质量更高,与患者年龄无关。与简单的微骨折治疗相比,各组患者的临床结果与年龄无关:证据等级:Ⅲ级。
The collagen-augmented chondrogenesis technique demonstrates superior cartilage repair compared to microfracture for cartilage defects of the knee joint, regardless of age.
Purpose: This study investigated whether age affects clinical outcomes and cartilage repair quality in patients who underwent collagen-augmented chondrogenesis.
Methods: The study included patients who underwent either the collagen-augmented chondrogenesis technique or microfracture for cartilage defects of the knee joint of International Cartilage Repair Society grade 3 or 4. Patients were categorised according to an age threshold of 50 years and the treatment method, whether collagen-augmented chondrogenesis technique or microfracture. Group 1 comprised 31 patients aged 50 years or older who received the collagen-augmented chondrogenesis technique, Group 2 consisted of 32 patients under the age of 50 years who received the collagen-augmented chondrogenesis technique and Group 3 included 243 patients aged 50 years or older who received microfracture. Clinical outcomes were assessed using the walking visual analogue scale (VAS) for pain and the Western Ontario McMaster University Osteoarthritis Index scale score (WOMAC) two years after surgery. For patients with magnetic resonance imaging results 1 year postoperatively (Group 1: 30 patients; Group 2: 31 patients; and Group 3: 31 patients), Magnetic Resonance Observation of Cartilage Repair Tissue (MOCART) assessment was used to evaluate repaired cartilage lesions.
Results: There were no significant differences in the VAS and WOMAC scores between the three groups 2 years after surgery (all n.s.). The MOCART score in patients who underwent MRI at 1 year postoperatively showed significant differences in the degree of defect repair, integration with the border zone, surface of the repaired tissue, adhesion and total score among the three groups (all p < 0.05). Post hoc analysis revealed no difference in the total MOCART scores between Groups 1 and 2. However, Groups 1 and 2 had significantly higher MOCART scores than Group 3 1 year after surgery (all p < 0.05).
Conclusion: The collagen-augmented chondrogenesis technique group showed improved quality of cartilage repair compared to the microfracture group, regardless of patient age. Compared with simple microfracture treatment, there were no differences in clinical outcomes between the patient groups, related to age.