根据土耳其文化改编健康素养调查19-Europe-Q12:心理测量研究。

IF 2.1 4区 医学 Q3 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
Handan Terzi, Ayşegül Akca, Sultan Ayaz-Alkaya
{"title":"根据土耳其文化改编健康素养调查19-Europe-Q12:心理测量研究。","authors":"Handan Terzi, Ayşegül Akca, Sultan Ayaz-Alkaya","doi":"10.1111/jep.14161","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Rationale: </strong>Misinformation can lead to adverse outcomes on the health beliefs and behaviors of individuals. Therefore, health literacy skills are needed as a central competency to recognize the trustfulness of health-related knowledge in any resources. To ensure this, a time-efficient, skill-oriented psychometric tools are needed to measure the comprehensive general health literacy level of communities.</p><p><strong>Aims and objectives: </strong>This research was conducted to evaluate the psychometric properties of the 12-item Health Literacy Survey-Europe (HLS<sub>19</sub>-Q12) regarding Turkish culture.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>A methodological design was adopted. The population consisted of adult individuals registered to two family health centers in Ankara. The sample was determined based on 5-10 times the number of scale items rule (n<sub>total</sub> = 192). A questionnaire and Health Literacy Survey-Europe-Q12 were used to collect data. Language, content and construct validities and internal consistency reliability tests were performed through IBM-SPSS 25.0 and AMOS 24.0 programs. The content validity was determined via the Davis technique. The construct validity was examined by exploratory (EFA) (n<sub>1</sub> = 120) and confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) (n<sub>2</sub> = 72). Internal consistency was evaluated using Cronbach's alpha coefficient. Time invariance was evaluated by test-retest method (n<sub>retest</sub> = 32) 4 weeks later.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The mean age was 30.17 ± 10.37 (min. 18-max. 61). The Kaiser-Meyer Olkin test result was 0.898, and the Bartlett's Test of Sphericity result was 604.889 (p < 0.001). The model-fit indices showed good fit. The difference between the first and the second measurements was statistically insignificant (t = -1.659, p = 0.107). The Cronbach's alpha was 0.88.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The HLS<sub>19</sub>-Q12-TR was a valid and reliable measurement tool in determining the health literacy level of the Turkish adult population. As one of the social determinants of health, easy measurement and generating a general health literacy map of the population is considered a necessity.</p>","PeriodicalId":15997,"journal":{"name":"Journal of evaluation in clinical practice","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Adaptation of the health literacy survey<sub>19</sub>-Europe-Q12 into Turkish culture: A psychometric study.\",\"authors\":\"Handan Terzi, Ayşegül Akca, Sultan Ayaz-Alkaya\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/jep.14161\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Rationale: </strong>Misinformation can lead to adverse outcomes on the health beliefs and behaviors of individuals. Therefore, health literacy skills are needed as a central competency to recognize the trustfulness of health-related knowledge in any resources. To ensure this, a time-efficient, skill-oriented psychometric tools are needed to measure the comprehensive general health literacy level of communities.</p><p><strong>Aims and objectives: </strong>This research was conducted to evaluate the psychometric properties of the 12-item Health Literacy Survey-Europe (HLS<sub>19</sub>-Q12) regarding Turkish culture.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>A methodological design was adopted. The population consisted of adult individuals registered to two family health centers in Ankara. The sample was determined based on 5-10 times the number of scale items rule (n<sub>total</sub> = 192). A questionnaire and Health Literacy Survey-Europe-Q12 were used to collect data. Language, content and construct validities and internal consistency reliability tests were performed through IBM-SPSS 25.0 and AMOS 24.0 programs. The content validity was determined via the Davis technique. The construct validity was examined by exploratory (EFA) (n<sub>1</sub> = 120) and confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) (n<sub>2</sub> = 72). Internal consistency was evaluated using Cronbach's alpha coefficient. Time invariance was evaluated by test-retest method (n<sub>retest</sub> = 32) 4 weeks later.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The mean age was 30.17 ± 10.37 (min. 18-max. 61). The Kaiser-Meyer Olkin test result was 0.898, and the Bartlett's Test of Sphericity result was 604.889 (p < 0.001). The model-fit indices showed good fit. The difference between the first and the second measurements was statistically insignificant (t = -1.659, p = 0.107). The Cronbach's alpha was 0.88.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The HLS<sub>19</sub>-Q12-TR was a valid and reliable measurement tool in determining the health literacy level of the Turkish adult population. As one of the social determinants of health, easy measurement and generating a general health literacy map of the population is considered a necessity.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":15997,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of evaluation in clinical practice\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-07\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of evaluation in clinical practice\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1111/jep.14161\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of evaluation in clinical practice","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/jep.14161","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

理由错误的信息会对个人的健康信念和行为造成不良影响。因此,健康素养技能是识别任何资源中健康相关知识可信度的核心能力。为了确保这一点,需要一种省时高效、以技能为导向的心理测量工具来衡量社区的综合健康素养水平:本研究旨在评估 12 个项目的欧洲健康素养调查(HLS19-Q12)在土耳其文化方面的心理测量特性:方法:采用方法学设计。研究对象包括在安卡拉两家家庭保健中心登记的成年人。样本根据量表项目规则数的 5-10 倍(ntotal = 192)确定。收集数据时使用了调查问卷和欧洲健康素养调查-Q12。通过 IBM-SPSS 25.0 和 AMOS 24.0 程序进行了语言、内容和结构效度以及内部一致性可靠性测试。内容效度是通过戴维斯技术确定的。构造效度通过探索性因子分析(EFA)(n1 = 120)和确认性因子分析(CFA)(n2 = 72)进行检验。内部一致性采用 Cronbach's alpha 系数进行评估。4 周后采用重测法评估时间不变性(nretest = 32):平均年龄为 30.17 ± 10.37(最小 18 岁,最大 61 岁)。Kaiser-Meyer Olkin 检验结果为 0.898,Bartlett's Sphericity 检验结果为 604.889(p 结论:HLS19-Q12-TR 和 HLS19-Meyer Olkin 检验结果一致:HLS19-Q12-TR 是确定土耳其成年人健康素养水平的有效、可靠的测量工具。作为健康的社会决定因素之一,方便测量和生成人口总体健康素养地图被认为是必要的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Adaptation of the health literacy survey19-Europe-Q12 into Turkish culture: A psychometric study.

Rationale: Misinformation can lead to adverse outcomes on the health beliefs and behaviors of individuals. Therefore, health literacy skills are needed as a central competency to recognize the trustfulness of health-related knowledge in any resources. To ensure this, a time-efficient, skill-oriented psychometric tools are needed to measure the comprehensive general health literacy level of communities.

Aims and objectives: This research was conducted to evaluate the psychometric properties of the 12-item Health Literacy Survey-Europe (HLS19-Q12) regarding Turkish culture.

Method: A methodological design was adopted. The population consisted of adult individuals registered to two family health centers in Ankara. The sample was determined based on 5-10 times the number of scale items rule (ntotal = 192). A questionnaire and Health Literacy Survey-Europe-Q12 were used to collect data. Language, content and construct validities and internal consistency reliability tests were performed through IBM-SPSS 25.0 and AMOS 24.0 programs. The content validity was determined via the Davis technique. The construct validity was examined by exploratory (EFA) (n1 = 120) and confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) (n2 = 72). Internal consistency was evaluated using Cronbach's alpha coefficient. Time invariance was evaluated by test-retest method (nretest = 32) 4 weeks later.

Results: The mean age was 30.17 ± 10.37 (min. 18-max. 61). The Kaiser-Meyer Olkin test result was 0.898, and the Bartlett's Test of Sphericity result was 604.889 (p < 0.001). The model-fit indices showed good fit. The difference between the first and the second measurements was statistically insignificant (t = -1.659, p = 0.107). The Cronbach's alpha was 0.88.

Conclusions: The HLS19-Q12-TR was a valid and reliable measurement tool in determining the health literacy level of the Turkish adult population. As one of the social determinants of health, easy measurement and generating a general health literacy map of the population is considered a necessity.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.80
自引率
4.20%
发文量
143
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice aims to promote the evaluation and development of clinical practice across medicine, nursing and the allied health professions. All aspects of health services research and public health policy analysis and debate are of interest to the Journal whether studied from a population-based or individual patient-centred perspective. Of particular interest to the Journal are submissions on all aspects of clinical effectiveness and efficiency including evidence-based medicine, clinical practice guidelines, clinical decision making, clinical services organisation, implementation and delivery, health economic evaluation, health process and outcome measurement and new or improved methods (conceptual and statistical) for systematic inquiry into clinical practice. Papers may take a classical quantitative or qualitative approach to investigation (or may utilise both techniques) or may take the form of learned essays, structured/systematic reviews and critiques.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信