政策、系统和服务设计对临终慢性阻塞性气道疾病患者、其支持者和医疗专业人员的医疗保健不平等的影响。

IF 2.7 3区 医学 Q2 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
Amanda Landers, Suzanne G Pitama, Suetonia C Green, Lutz Beckert
{"title":"政策、系统和服务设计对临终慢性阻塞性气道疾病患者、其支持者和医疗专业人员的医疗保健不平等的影响。","authors":"Amanda Landers, Suzanne G Pitama, Suetonia C Green, Lutz Beckert","doi":"10.1186/s12913-024-11705-6","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>People with end-of-life chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) experience debilitating physical limitations, with a high mortality rate. Our research has shown health system design and delivery leads to inequitable outcomes. Enabling people with end-of-life COPD, their support people, and health professionals to partner in setting the agenda for resource allocation may inform health service improvement.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Qualitative methodology utilising focus groups including patients, family, friends, informal support people, health care workers and professionals.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The analysis, utilising critical theory and Actor-Network theory, positioned people with severe COPD, their support people and health professionals as experts in end-of-life care. Analyses triangulated these perspectives, and were reviewed by the research investigators and an expert reference group.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Participants (n=74) in seven focus groups reported their experiences of inequity within the healthcare system. Equity was an overarching phenomenon identified by participants, with three specific themes being described: policy design, system design, and service design.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Experiences of patients, their support people and health professionals as experts in end-of-life COPD care can inform health systems and health service design to address current inequities in funding and delivery of care for end-of-life COPD.</p>","PeriodicalId":9012,"journal":{"name":"BMC Health Services Research","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11457488/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Policy, system and service design influence on healthcare inequities for people with end-of-life chronic obstructive airways disease, their support people and health professionals.\",\"authors\":\"Amanda Landers, Suzanne G Pitama, Suetonia C Green, Lutz Beckert\",\"doi\":\"10.1186/s12913-024-11705-6\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>People with end-of-life chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) experience debilitating physical limitations, with a high mortality rate. Our research has shown health system design and delivery leads to inequitable outcomes. Enabling people with end-of-life COPD, their support people, and health professionals to partner in setting the agenda for resource allocation may inform health service improvement.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Qualitative methodology utilising focus groups including patients, family, friends, informal support people, health care workers and professionals.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The analysis, utilising critical theory and Actor-Network theory, positioned people with severe COPD, their support people and health professionals as experts in end-of-life care. Analyses triangulated these perspectives, and were reviewed by the research investigators and an expert reference group.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Participants (n=74) in seven focus groups reported their experiences of inequity within the healthcare system. Equity was an overarching phenomenon identified by participants, with three specific themes being described: policy design, system design, and service design.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Experiences of patients, their support people and health professionals as experts in end-of-life COPD care can inform health systems and health service design to address current inequities in funding and delivery of care for end-of-life COPD.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":9012,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"BMC Health Services Research\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-07\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11457488/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"BMC Health Services Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12913-024-11705-6\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMC Health Services Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12913-024-11705-6","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:患有慢性阻塞性肺病(COPD)的临终患者会因身体受限而变得衰弱,死亡率也很高。我们的研究表明,医疗系统的设计和提供导致了不公平的结果。让慢性阻塞性肺病临终患者、他们的支持者和医疗专业人员合作制定资源分配议程,可为改善医疗服务提供参考:设计:定性方法,利用焦点小组,包括患者、家人、朋友、非正式支持者、医护人员和专业人员:方法:利用批判理论和行动者-网络理论进行分析,将严重慢性阻塞性肺病患者、其支持者和医护人员定位为临终关怀专家。分析对这些观点进行了三角测量,并由研究调查人员和专家参考小组进行了审查:七个焦点小组的参与者(n=74)报告了他们在医疗保健系统中的不公平经历。公平是参与者发现的一个总体现象,并描述了三个具体主题:政策设计、系统设计和服务设计:作为慢性阻塞性肺病临终关怀专家,患者、其支持者和医疗专业人员的经历可为医疗系统和医疗服务设计提供信息,以解决目前慢性阻塞性肺病临终关怀在资金和服务提供方面的不公平现象。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Policy, system and service design influence on healthcare inequities for people with end-of-life chronic obstructive airways disease, their support people and health professionals.

Background: People with end-of-life chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) experience debilitating physical limitations, with a high mortality rate. Our research has shown health system design and delivery leads to inequitable outcomes. Enabling people with end-of-life COPD, their support people, and health professionals to partner in setting the agenda for resource allocation may inform health service improvement.

Design: Qualitative methodology utilising focus groups including patients, family, friends, informal support people, health care workers and professionals.

Methods: The analysis, utilising critical theory and Actor-Network theory, positioned people with severe COPD, their support people and health professionals as experts in end-of-life care. Analyses triangulated these perspectives, and were reviewed by the research investigators and an expert reference group.

Results: Participants (n=74) in seven focus groups reported their experiences of inequity within the healthcare system. Equity was an overarching phenomenon identified by participants, with three specific themes being described: policy design, system design, and service design.

Conclusion: Experiences of patients, their support people and health professionals as experts in end-of-life COPD care can inform health systems and health service design to address current inequities in funding and delivery of care for end-of-life COPD.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
BMC Health Services Research
BMC Health Services Research 医学-卫生保健
CiteScore
4.40
自引率
7.10%
发文量
1372
审稿时长
6 months
期刊介绍: BMC Health Services Research is an open access, peer-reviewed journal that considers articles on all aspects of health services research, including delivery of care, management of health services, assessment of healthcare needs, measurement of outcomes, allocation of healthcare resources, evaluation of different health markets and health services organizations, international comparative analysis of health systems, health economics and the impact of health policies and regulations.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信