组织沉默对工作场所排斥与护士拖延行为之间关系的影响:结构方程模型

IF 3.8 3区 医学 Q1 NURSING
Ahmed Abdelwahab Ibrahim El-Sayed, Mohamed Saad Saleh Ali, Noura Mohamed Fadl Abdel Razek, Sally Mohammed Farghaly Abdelaliem, Maha Gamal Ramadan Asal
{"title":"组织沉默对工作场所排斥与护士拖延行为之间关系的影响:结构方程模型","authors":"Ahmed Abdelwahab Ibrahim El-Sayed, Mohamed Saad Saleh Ali, Noura Mohamed Fadl Abdel Razek, Sally Mohammed Farghaly Abdelaliem, Maha Gamal Ramadan Asal","doi":"10.1111/inr.13050","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aim: </strong>This study aims to assess the relationship between workplace ostracism and the procrastination behavior of nurses, as well as examine the effect of organizational silence on this relationship.</p><p><strong>Background: </strong>Controlling workplace ostracism and eradicating time wasters, especially procrastination behavior among nurses, are key strategies that add value to organizational effectiveness. In addition, remaining silent about significant issues facing nurses is a devastating approach to the success of both healthcare organizations and the nursing profession.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>A cross-sectional descriptive correlational exploratory research design was used to conduct the study. Data were collected from 352 nurses recruited from three large university hospitals in Alexandria, Egypt. Four instruments, namely, the Workplace Ostracism Questionnaire, the Organizational Silence Scale, the Active Procrastination Scale, and the Unintentional Procrastination Scale, were used. Structural equation modeling was used to test the hypothesized relationships among the variables.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The findings demonstrated a significant positive and moderate association between workplace ostracism and both active and passive procrastination behaviors among nurses. Moreover, there was a strong positive and significant correlation between organizational silence and workplace ostracism. The results of mediation revealed that the indirect effect of workplace ostracism on both active and passive procrastination behavior through organizational silence was statistically significant, suggesting that organizational silence partially mediated this relationship.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The study highlighted the ongoing challenges posed by toxic workplace issues, such as organizational ostracism and silence, as significant factors contributing to nurses' procrastination behaviors. Not only do these factors directly impact nurses' productivity, but they also interact to exacerbate negative outcomes in nursing care. Addressing these toxic dynamics is critical to improving nurse performance and ensuring quality care in healthcare settings.</p><p><strong>Implications for nursing and health policy: </strong>This study offers new insights for navigating toxicity and upgrading nursing productivity in healthcare organizations through fostering a more inclusive and communicative work environment. Promoting team cohesion and ensuring that all staff members feel valued and included can reduce feelings of isolation that may lead to procrastination. Also, creating safe spaces for nurses to voice concerns without fear of reprisal could significantly diminish passive procrastination, which ultimately enhances overall patient care quality and organizational efficiency.</p>","PeriodicalId":54931,"journal":{"name":"International Nursing Review","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The effect of organizational silence on the relationship between workplace ostracism and nurses' procrastination behavior: A structural equation modeling.\",\"authors\":\"Ahmed Abdelwahab Ibrahim El-Sayed, Mohamed Saad Saleh Ali, Noura Mohamed Fadl Abdel Razek, Sally Mohammed Farghaly Abdelaliem, Maha Gamal Ramadan Asal\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/inr.13050\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Aim: </strong>This study aims to assess the relationship between workplace ostracism and the procrastination behavior of nurses, as well as examine the effect of organizational silence on this relationship.</p><p><strong>Background: </strong>Controlling workplace ostracism and eradicating time wasters, especially procrastination behavior among nurses, are key strategies that add value to organizational effectiveness. In addition, remaining silent about significant issues facing nurses is a devastating approach to the success of both healthcare organizations and the nursing profession.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>A cross-sectional descriptive correlational exploratory research design was used to conduct the study. Data were collected from 352 nurses recruited from three large university hospitals in Alexandria, Egypt. Four instruments, namely, the Workplace Ostracism Questionnaire, the Organizational Silence Scale, the Active Procrastination Scale, and the Unintentional Procrastination Scale, were used. Structural equation modeling was used to test the hypothesized relationships among the variables.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The findings demonstrated a significant positive and moderate association between workplace ostracism and both active and passive procrastination behaviors among nurses. Moreover, there was a strong positive and significant correlation between organizational silence and workplace ostracism. The results of mediation revealed that the indirect effect of workplace ostracism on both active and passive procrastination behavior through organizational silence was statistically significant, suggesting that organizational silence partially mediated this relationship.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The study highlighted the ongoing challenges posed by toxic workplace issues, such as organizational ostracism and silence, as significant factors contributing to nurses' procrastination behaviors. Not only do these factors directly impact nurses' productivity, but they also interact to exacerbate negative outcomes in nursing care. Addressing these toxic dynamics is critical to improving nurse performance and ensuring quality care in healthcare settings.</p><p><strong>Implications for nursing and health policy: </strong>This study offers new insights for navigating toxicity and upgrading nursing productivity in healthcare organizations through fostering a more inclusive and communicative work environment. Promoting team cohesion and ensuring that all staff members feel valued and included can reduce feelings of isolation that may lead to procrastination. Also, creating safe spaces for nurses to voice concerns without fear of reprisal could significantly diminish passive procrastination, which ultimately enhances overall patient care quality and organizational efficiency.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":54931,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Nursing Review\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-05\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Nursing Review\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1111/inr.13050\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"NURSING\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Nursing Review","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/inr.13050","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:本研究旨在评估工作场所排斥与护士拖延行为之间的关系,并探讨组织沉默对这种关系的影响:背景:控制工作场所排斥和消除时间浪费,尤其是护士的拖延行为,是提高组织效率的关键策略。此外,对护士面临的重大问题保持沉默对医疗机构和护理行业的成功都是一种毁灭性的做法:本研究采用横截面描述性相关探索性研究设计。从埃及亚历山大三所大型大学医院招聘的 352 名护士中收集了数据。研究使用了四种工具,即工作场所排斥问卷、组织沉默量表、主动拖延量表和无意拖延量表。采用结构方程模型来检验变量之间的假设关系:研究结果表明,工作场所排斥与护士的主动和被动拖延行为之间存在明显的正相关和中度相关。此外,组织沉默与工作场所排斥之间也存在显著的正相关。调解结果显示,工作场所排斥通过组织沉默对主动和被动拖延行为的间接影响具有统计学意义,表明组织沉默部分调解了这一关系:这项研究强调了有毒工作场所问题带来的持续挑战,如组织排斥和沉默,是导致护士拖延行为的重要因素。这些因素不仅直接影响了护士的工作效率,而且还相互作用,加剧了护理工作的负面结果。解决这些有毒的动态因素对于提高护士的绩效和确保医疗机构的护理质量至关重要:本研究为医疗机构通过营造更具包容性和沟通性的工作环境来克服毒性和提高护理工作效率提供了新的见解。促进团队凝聚力,确保所有工作人员都能感受到自己的价值和被包容,可以减少可能导致拖延的孤独感。此外,为护士们创造安全的空间,让他们在不必担心报复的情况下表达自己的担忧,也能大大减少被动拖延的情况,最终提高患者护理的整体质量和组织效率。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The effect of organizational silence on the relationship between workplace ostracism and nurses' procrastination behavior: A structural equation modeling.

Aim: This study aims to assess the relationship between workplace ostracism and the procrastination behavior of nurses, as well as examine the effect of organizational silence on this relationship.

Background: Controlling workplace ostracism and eradicating time wasters, especially procrastination behavior among nurses, are key strategies that add value to organizational effectiveness. In addition, remaining silent about significant issues facing nurses is a devastating approach to the success of both healthcare organizations and the nursing profession.

Method: A cross-sectional descriptive correlational exploratory research design was used to conduct the study. Data were collected from 352 nurses recruited from three large university hospitals in Alexandria, Egypt. Four instruments, namely, the Workplace Ostracism Questionnaire, the Organizational Silence Scale, the Active Procrastination Scale, and the Unintentional Procrastination Scale, were used. Structural equation modeling was used to test the hypothesized relationships among the variables.

Results: The findings demonstrated a significant positive and moderate association between workplace ostracism and both active and passive procrastination behaviors among nurses. Moreover, there was a strong positive and significant correlation between organizational silence and workplace ostracism. The results of mediation revealed that the indirect effect of workplace ostracism on both active and passive procrastination behavior through organizational silence was statistically significant, suggesting that organizational silence partially mediated this relationship.

Conclusion: The study highlighted the ongoing challenges posed by toxic workplace issues, such as organizational ostracism and silence, as significant factors contributing to nurses' procrastination behaviors. Not only do these factors directly impact nurses' productivity, but they also interact to exacerbate negative outcomes in nursing care. Addressing these toxic dynamics is critical to improving nurse performance and ensuring quality care in healthcare settings.

Implications for nursing and health policy: This study offers new insights for navigating toxicity and upgrading nursing productivity in healthcare organizations through fostering a more inclusive and communicative work environment. Promoting team cohesion and ensuring that all staff members feel valued and included can reduce feelings of isolation that may lead to procrastination. Also, creating safe spaces for nurses to voice concerns without fear of reprisal could significantly diminish passive procrastination, which ultimately enhances overall patient care quality and organizational efficiency.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.90
自引率
7.30%
发文量
72
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: International Nursing Review is a key resource for nurses world-wide. Articles are encouraged that reflect the ICN"s five key values: flexibility, inclusiveness, partnership, achievement and visionary leadership. Authors are encouraged to identify the relevance of local issues for the global community and to describe their work and to document their experience.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信