稳定期慢性阻塞性肺病患者的手握力与小气道疾病之间的关系。

IF 4.3 3区 材料科学 Q1 ENGINEERING, ELECTRICAL & ELECTRONIC
Thanapon Keawon, Narongkorn Saiphoklang
{"title":"稳定期慢性阻塞性肺病患者的手握力与小气道疾病之间的关系。","authors":"Thanapon Keawon, Narongkorn Saiphoklang","doi":"10.1177/17534666241281675","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) is associated with airflow limitation resulting from a combination of small airway disease (SAD) and parenchymal destruction. Although various diagnostic methods for SAD exist, access to these tools can be limited.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>This study aimed to explore the correlation between handgrip strength (HGS) and SAD in COPD patients.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Cross-sectional prospective study.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>HGS was measured using a hand dynamometer. SAD was evaluated using impulse oscillometry, with results reported as the difference between respiratory resistance at 5 and 20 Hz (R5-R20). SAD was defined as R5-R20 ⩾0.07 kPa/L/s. The receiver operator characteristic (ROC) curves, sensitivity, and specificity values were calculated to determine the optimal cutoff value of HGS for predicting SAD.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Sixty-four patients (90.6% male) were included. The average age was 72.1 ± 8.3 years, and body mass index was 23.4 ± 4.2 kg/m<sup>2</sup>. FEV<sub>1</sub> was 71.6 ± 21.3%, and HGS was 30.2 ± 8.1 kg. R5-R20 was 0.11 ± 0.08 kPa/L/s. SAD was found in 64.1% of patients. A negative correlation between HGS and R5-R20 was observed (<i>r</i> = -0.332, <i>p</i> = 0.007). The best cutoff value for HGS in detecting SAD was determined to be 28.25 kg, with a sensitivity of 73.9%, specificity of 65.9%, and an area under ROC curve of 0.685 (95% CI 0.550-0.819, <i>p</i> = 0.015).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>SAD is common in COPD patients, and HGS is significantly negatively correlated with SAD. This tool might serve as an alternative or adjunctive assessment for small airway dysfunction in COPD patients.</p><p><strong>Registration: </strong>This study was registered with ClinicalTrials.gov with number NCT06223139.</p>","PeriodicalId":3,"journal":{"name":"ACS Applied Electronic Materials","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11457192/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Association between handgrip strength and small airway disease in patients with stable chronic obstructive pulmonary disease.\",\"authors\":\"Thanapon Keawon, Narongkorn Saiphoklang\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/17534666241281675\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) is associated with airflow limitation resulting from a combination of small airway disease (SAD) and parenchymal destruction. Although various diagnostic methods for SAD exist, access to these tools can be limited.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>This study aimed to explore the correlation between handgrip strength (HGS) and SAD in COPD patients.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Cross-sectional prospective study.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>HGS was measured using a hand dynamometer. SAD was evaluated using impulse oscillometry, with results reported as the difference between respiratory resistance at 5 and 20 Hz (R5-R20). SAD was defined as R5-R20 ⩾0.07 kPa/L/s. The receiver operator characteristic (ROC) curves, sensitivity, and specificity values were calculated to determine the optimal cutoff value of HGS for predicting SAD.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Sixty-four patients (90.6% male) were included. The average age was 72.1 ± 8.3 years, and body mass index was 23.4 ± 4.2 kg/m<sup>2</sup>. FEV<sub>1</sub> was 71.6 ± 21.3%, and HGS was 30.2 ± 8.1 kg. R5-R20 was 0.11 ± 0.08 kPa/L/s. SAD was found in 64.1% of patients. A negative correlation between HGS and R5-R20 was observed (<i>r</i> = -0.332, <i>p</i> = 0.007). The best cutoff value for HGS in detecting SAD was determined to be 28.25 kg, with a sensitivity of 73.9%, specificity of 65.9%, and an area under ROC curve of 0.685 (95% CI 0.550-0.819, <i>p</i> = 0.015).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>SAD is common in COPD patients, and HGS is significantly negatively correlated with SAD. This tool might serve as an alternative or adjunctive assessment for small airway dysfunction in COPD patients.</p><p><strong>Registration: </strong>This study was registered with ClinicalTrials.gov with number NCT06223139.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":3,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"ACS Applied Electronic Materials\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11457192/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"ACS Applied Electronic Materials\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/17534666241281675\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"材料科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ENGINEERING, ELECTRICAL & ELECTRONIC\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ACS Applied Electronic Materials","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/17534666241281675","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"材料科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, ELECTRICAL & ELECTRONIC","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:慢性阻塞性肺疾病(COPD)与小气道疾病(SAD)和实质破坏共同导致的气流受限有关。虽然有多种 SAD 诊断方法,但获得这些工具的途径可能有限:本研究旨在探讨 COPD 患者手握力(HGS)与 SAD 之间的相关性:方法:使用手部测力计测量 HGS。使用脉冲振荡计评估 SAD,结果以 5 赫兹和 20 赫兹呼吸阻力之差(R5-R20)报告。SAD 的定义是 R5-R20 ⩾0.07 kPa/L/s。通过计算接收器操作者特征(ROC)曲线、灵敏度和特异性值,确定了预测 SAD 的最佳 HGS 临界值:共纳入 64 名患者(90.6% 为男性)。平均年龄为 72.1 ± 8.3 岁,体重指数为 23.4 ± 4.2 kg/m2。FEV1 为 71.6 ± 21.3%,HGS 为 30.2 ± 8.1 kg。R5-R20 为 0.11 ± 0.08 kPa/L/s。64.1%的患者存在 SAD。HGS 和 R5-R20 之间呈负相关(r = -0.332,p = 0.007)。HGS 检测 SAD 的最佳临界值为 28.25 千克,灵敏度为 73.9%,特异度为 65.9%,ROC 曲线下面积为 0.685 (95% CI 0.550-0.819, p = 0.015):结论:SAD在慢性阻塞性肺病患者中很常见,而HGS与SAD呈显著负相关。结论:SAD 在慢性阻塞性肺病患者中很常见,而 HGS 与 SAD 呈明显负相关,该工具可作为慢性阻塞性肺病患者小气道功能障碍的替代或辅助评估工具:本研究已在 ClinicalTrials.gov 注册,注册号为 NCT06223139。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Association between handgrip strength and small airway disease in patients with stable chronic obstructive pulmonary disease.

Background: Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) is associated with airflow limitation resulting from a combination of small airway disease (SAD) and parenchymal destruction. Although various diagnostic methods for SAD exist, access to these tools can be limited.

Objectives: This study aimed to explore the correlation between handgrip strength (HGS) and SAD in COPD patients.

Design: Cross-sectional prospective study.

Methods: HGS was measured using a hand dynamometer. SAD was evaluated using impulse oscillometry, with results reported as the difference between respiratory resistance at 5 and 20 Hz (R5-R20). SAD was defined as R5-R20 ⩾0.07 kPa/L/s. The receiver operator characteristic (ROC) curves, sensitivity, and specificity values were calculated to determine the optimal cutoff value of HGS for predicting SAD.

Results: Sixty-four patients (90.6% male) were included. The average age was 72.1 ± 8.3 years, and body mass index was 23.4 ± 4.2 kg/m2. FEV1 was 71.6 ± 21.3%, and HGS was 30.2 ± 8.1 kg. R5-R20 was 0.11 ± 0.08 kPa/L/s. SAD was found in 64.1% of patients. A negative correlation between HGS and R5-R20 was observed (r = -0.332, p = 0.007). The best cutoff value for HGS in detecting SAD was determined to be 28.25 kg, with a sensitivity of 73.9%, specificity of 65.9%, and an area under ROC curve of 0.685 (95% CI 0.550-0.819, p = 0.015).

Conclusion: SAD is common in COPD patients, and HGS is significantly negatively correlated with SAD. This tool might serve as an alternative or adjunctive assessment for small airway dysfunction in COPD patients.

Registration: This study was registered with ClinicalTrials.gov with number NCT06223139.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.20
自引率
4.30%
发文量
567
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信