A Comparison of Treatment Practices for Newborn Seizure Management Across Level II and III Neonatal Intensive Care Units in the United States

Background

Neonatal seizures (NS) represent an important clinical manifestation among critically ill infants and are often the first sign of underlying brain injury. Early recognition and treatment are essential to reduce morbidity and mortality. The present study investigated the NS management and treatment approaches employed by level II/III neonatal intensive care units (NICUs) across the United States to identify areas of consensus and variability.

Methods

Personnel associated with level II/III NICUs were directly surveyed with an electronic questionnaire. Access to neurology specialists, on-site electroencephalography (EEG) monitoring, and use of antiseizure medications was directly queried. A total of 51 NICUs participated in this survey.

Results

Twenty-five percent of the surveyed NICUs reported having an established clinical practice pathway available for treating NS. Twenty-four percent endorsed having written guidelines that provided a formal definition for the concept of “neonatal seizures.” Although the majority of NICUs reported having phenobarbital available for rapid seizure management, most NICUs lacked access to additional antiseizure medications for treatment escalation. Twenty-four percent of the surveyed NICUs had no access to EEG monitoring available to them on-site. Daytime and overnight access to neurology consultants was limited and variable.

Conclusions

Findings were consistent with a lack of equitable access for NS treatment. Areas of potential improvement include development and implementation of a protocol for rapidly treating NS that emphasizes enhanced access to EEG and rapid neurology consultation, acknowledging and improving upon resource limitations. These developments may eventually provide earlier detection, evaluation, and treatment of seizures in newborns, contributing to improved long-term outcomes.