Belinda G O'Sullivan, Patrick Giddings, Ronda Gurney, Matthew R McGrail, Tiana Gurney
{"title":"农村和偏远地区全科医生培训的整体支持框架:对 RVTS 模式的现实主义评估。","authors":"Belinda G O'Sullivan, Patrick Giddings, Ronda Gurney, Matthew R McGrail, Tiana Gurney","doi":"10.5694/mja2.52447","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Objective</h3>\n \n <p>To develop theory about how and why the supervision and support model used by the Remote Vocational Training Scheme (RVTS) addresses the professional and non-professional needs of doctors (including many international medical graduates) who are training towards general practice or rural generalist fellowship while based in the same rural or remote practice.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Design, setting, participants</h3>\n \n <p>We conducted a realist evaluation based on the RAMESES II protocol. The initial theory was based on situated learning theory, networked ecological systems theory, cultural theory and geographical narcissism theory. The theory was developed by collecting empirical data through interviews with 27 RVTS stakeholders, including supervisors, participants and RVTS staff. The theory was refined using a project reference and a stakeholder advisory group and confirmed using individual meetings with experts.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Main outcomes measures</h3>\n \n <p>Theory about how the contexts of person, place and program interacted to address professional and non-professional needs.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>The RVTS program offers remote access to knowledgeable and caring supervisors, real-time tailored advice, quality resources and regular professional networking opportunities, including breaks from the community. It worked well because it triggered five mechanisms: comfort, confidence, competence, belonging and bonding. These mechanisms collectively fostered resilience, skills, professional identity and improved status; they effectively counteracted the potential effects of complex and relatively isolated work settings.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusion</h3>\n \n <p>This theory depicts how a remotely delivered supervision and support model addresses the place and practice challenges faced by different doctors, meeting their professional and non-professional needs. The participants felt valued as part of a special professional group delivering essential primary health care services in challenging locations. The theory could be adapted and applied to support other rural and remote doctors.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":18214,"journal":{"name":"Medical Journal of Australia","volume":"221 S7","pages":"S16-S22"},"PeriodicalIF":6.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.5694/mja2.52447","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Holistic support framework for doctors training as rural and remote general practitioners: a realist evaluation of the RVTS model\",\"authors\":\"Belinda G O'Sullivan, Patrick Giddings, Ronda Gurney, Matthew R McGrail, Tiana Gurney\",\"doi\":\"10.5694/mja2.52447\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div>\\n \\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Objective</h3>\\n \\n <p>To develop theory about how and why the supervision and support model used by the Remote Vocational Training Scheme (RVTS) addresses the professional and non-professional needs of doctors (including many international medical graduates) who are training towards general practice or rural generalist fellowship while based in the same rural or remote practice.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Design, setting, participants</h3>\\n \\n <p>We conducted a realist evaluation based on the RAMESES II protocol. The initial theory was based on situated learning theory, networked ecological systems theory, cultural theory and geographical narcissism theory. The theory was developed by collecting empirical data through interviews with 27 RVTS stakeholders, including supervisors, participants and RVTS staff. The theory was refined using a project reference and a stakeholder advisory group and confirmed using individual meetings with experts.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Main outcomes measures</h3>\\n \\n <p>Theory about how the contexts of person, place and program interacted to address professional and non-professional needs.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Results</h3>\\n \\n <p>The RVTS program offers remote access to knowledgeable and caring supervisors, real-time tailored advice, quality resources and regular professional networking opportunities, including breaks from the community. It worked well because it triggered five mechanisms: comfort, confidence, competence, belonging and bonding. These mechanisms collectively fostered resilience, skills, professional identity and improved status; they effectively counteracted the potential effects of complex and relatively isolated work settings.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Conclusion</h3>\\n \\n <p>This theory depicts how a remotely delivered supervision and support model addresses the place and practice challenges faced by different doctors, meeting their professional and non-professional needs. The participants felt valued as part of a special professional group delivering essential primary health care services in challenging locations. The theory could be adapted and applied to support other rural and remote doctors.</p>\\n </section>\\n </div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":18214,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Medical Journal of Australia\",\"volume\":\"221 S7\",\"pages\":\"S16-S22\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":6.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-06\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.5694/mja2.52447\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Medical Journal of Australia\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.5694/mja2.52447\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Medical Journal of Australia","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.5694/mja2.52447","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
目的就远程职业培训计划(RVTS)所采用的监督和支持模式如何以及为何能够满足在同一农村或偏远地区执业的医生(包括许多国际医学毕业生)的专业和非专业需求展开理论研究:我们根据 RAMESES II 方案进行了一次现实主义评估。最初的理论基于情景学习理论、网络化生态系统理论、文化理论和地域自恋理论。该理论是通过对 27 名房车培训计划利益相关者(包括主管、参与者和房车培训计划工作人员)的访谈收集经验数据而形成的。通过项目参考资料和利益相关者咨询小组对理论进行了完善,并通过与专家的个别会谈对理论进行了确认:关于个人、地点和项目背景如何相互作用以满足专业和非专业需求的理论:RVTS 计划提供了远程访问知识渊博、关怀备至的督导、实时定制建议、优质资源和定期专业交流机会,包括社区休息时间。该计划之所以效果良好,是因为它触发了五种机制:舒适、自信、能力、归属感和联系。这些机制共同促进了复原力、技能、职业认同感和地位的提高;它们有效地抵消了复杂和相对孤立的工作环境的潜在影响:该理论描述了远程监督和支持模式如何解决不同医生在工作场所和实践中面临的挑战,满足他们的专业和非专业需求。作为在具有挑战性的地点提供基本初级卫生保健服务的特殊专业群体的一部分,参与者感到自己很有价值。该理论可加以调整和应用,以支持其他农村和偏远地区的医生。
Holistic support framework for doctors training as rural and remote general practitioners: a realist evaluation of the RVTS model
Objective
To develop theory about how and why the supervision and support model used by the Remote Vocational Training Scheme (RVTS) addresses the professional and non-professional needs of doctors (including many international medical graduates) who are training towards general practice or rural generalist fellowship while based in the same rural or remote practice.
Design, setting, participants
We conducted a realist evaluation based on the RAMESES II protocol. The initial theory was based on situated learning theory, networked ecological systems theory, cultural theory and geographical narcissism theory. The theory was developed by collecting empirical data through interviews with 27 RVTS stakeholders, including supervisors, participants and RVTS staff. The theory was refined using a project reference and a stakeholder advisory group and confirmed using individual meetings with experts.
Main outcomes measures
Theory about how the contexts of person, place and program interacted to address professional and non-professional needs.
Results
The RVTS program offers remote access to knowledgeable and caring supervisors, real-time tailored advice, quality resources and regular professional networking opportunities, including breaks from the community. It worked well because it triggered five mechanisms: comfort, confidence, competence, belonging and bonding. These mechanisms collectively fostered resilience, skills, professional identity and improved status; they effectively counteracted the potential effects of complex and relatively isolated work settings.
Conclusion
This theory depicts how a remotely delivered supervision and support model addresses the place and practice challenges faced by different doctors, meeting their professional and non-professional needs. The participants felt valued as part of a special professional group delivering essential primary health care services in challenging locations. The theory could be adapted and applied to support other rural and remote doctors.
期刊介绍:
The Medical Journal of Australia (MJA) stands as Australia's foremost general medical journal, leading the dissemination of high-quality research and commentary to shape health policy and influence medical practices within the country. Under the leadership of Professor Virginia Barbour, the expert editorial team at MJA is dedicated to providing authors with a constructive and collaborative peer-review and publication process. Established in 1914, the MJA has evolved into a modern journal that upholds its founding values, maintaining a commitment to supporting the medical profession by delivering high-quality and pertinent information essential to medical practice.