Matthew R McGrail, Belinda G O'Sullivan, Patrick Giddings
{"title":"在远程职业培训计划中接受全科医生培训的医生的持续服务和长期留用。","authors":"Matthew R McGrail, Belinda G O'Sullivan, Patrick Giddings","doi":"10.5694/mja2.52448","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Objective</h3>\n \n <p>To explore continuity of service and longer term retention outcomes of participants of the Remote Vocational Training Scheme (RVTS).</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Design, setting, participants</h3>\n \n <p>Retrospective cohort study of all doctors who participated in the RVTS from 2000 to 2023, many of whom are international medical graduates and are expected to work in the same community for three to four years in remote (Modified Monash Model [MMM] categories 4–7) or rural Aboriginal Medical Services (AMS) streams while undertaking training towards general practice fellowship.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Main outcome measures</h3>\n \n <p>Continuity of service was measured in the pre-program period (period working in same practice before commencing) and during-program period (period completing the RVTS program in same practice as worked in before commencing the program). Retention was measured firstly within two years, and secondly beyond two years (up to 20 post-completion years) based on: working in the same community (relevant to both streams); working in the same region (Remote Stream only); working in any MMM4–7 community (Remote Stream only); or working anywhere rurally (both streams).</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>From 506 enrolled participants, 373 (73.7%) were international medical graduates. The approximate mean service continuity in the same practice was 1.6 years (standard deviation [SD], 2.2 years) for the pre-program period and 3.6 years (SD, 1.4 years) for the during-program period (mean total, 5.2 years). Two years after completion, 21 out of 43 Remote Stream doctors (49%) and four out of five AMS Stream doctors (80%) remained in the same community. Over the long term, retention in the same community stabilised to 44 out of 242 Remote Stream doctors (18.2%) and seven out of 27 AMS Stream doctors (26%); 72 Remote Stream doctors (29.8%) remained in the same region, 70 Remote Stream doctors (28.9%) were in an MMM4–7 community, and 11 AMS Stream doctors (41%) were in a rural (MMM2–7) community.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusion</h3>\n \n <p>Strong service continuity outcomes have been achieved by the RVTS, which supports mostly international medical graduates in locations typified by the highest workforce turnover. This suggests that continuity of service could be improved for remote and First Nations communities through place-based retention-focused programs like the RVTS.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":18214,"journal":{"name":"Medical Journal of Australia","volume":"221 S7","pages":"S9-S15"},"PeriodicalIF":6.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.5694/mja2.52448","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Continuity of service and longer term retention of doctors training as general practitioners in the Remote Vocational Training Scheme\",\"authors\":\"Matthew R McGrail, Belinda G O'Sullivan, Patrick Giddings\",\"doi\":\"10.5694/mja2.52448\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div>\\n \\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Objective</h3>\\n \\n <p>To explore continuity of service and longer term retention outcomes of participants of the Remote Vocational Training Scheme (RVTS).</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Design, setting, participants</h3>\\n \\n <p>Retrospective cohort study of all doctors who participated in the RVTS from 2000 to 2023, many of whom are international medical graduates and are expected to work in the same community for three to four years in remote (Modified Monash Model [MMM] categories 4–7) or rural Aboriginal Medical Services (AMS) streams while undertaking training towards general practice fellowship.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Main outcome measures</h3>\\n \\n <p>Continuity of service was measured in the pre-program period (period working in same practice before commencing) and during-program period (period completing the RVTS program in same practice as worked in before commencing the program). Retention was measured firstly within two years, and secondly beyond two years (up to 20 post-completion years) based on: working in the same community (relevant to both streams); working in the same region (Remote Stream only); working in any MMM4–7 community (Remote Stream only); or working anywhere rurally (both streams).</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Results</h3>\\n \\n <p>From 506 enrolled participants, 373 (73.7%) were international medical graduates. The approximate mean service continuity in the same practice was 1.6 years (standard deviation [SD], 2.2 years) for the pre-program period and 3.6 years (SD, 1.4 years) for the during-program period (mean total, 5.2 years). Two years after completion, 21 out of 43 Remote Stream doctors (49%) and four out of five AMS Stream doctors (80%) remained in the same community. Over the long term, retention in the same community stabilised to 44 out of 242 Remote Stream doctors (18.2%) and seven out of 27 AMS Stream doctors (26%); 72 Remote Stream doctors (29.8%) remained in the same region, 70 Remote Stream doctors (28.9%) were in an MMM4–7 community, and 11 AMS Stream doctors (41%) were in a rural (MMM2–7) community.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Conclusion</h3>\\n \\n <p>Strong service continuity outcomes have been achieved by the RVTS, which supports mostly international medical graduates in locations typified by the highest workforce turnover. This suggests that continuity of service could be improved for remote and First Nations communities through place-based retention-focused programs like the RVTS.</p>\\n </section>\\n </div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":18214,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Medical Journal of Australia\",\"volume\":\"221 S7\",\"pages\":\"S9-S15\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":6.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-06\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.5694/mja2.52448\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Medical Journal of Australia\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.5694/mja2.52448\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Medical Journal of Australia","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.5694/mja2.52448","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
Continuity of service and longer term retention of doctors training as general practitioners in the Remote Vocational Training Scheme
Objective
To explore continuity of service and longer term retention outcomes of participants of the Remote Vocational Training Scheme (RVTS).
Design, setting, participants
Retrospective cohort study of all doctors who participated in the RVTS from 2000 to 2023, many of whom are international medical graduates and are expected to work in the same community for three to four years in remote (Modified Monash Model [MMM] categories 4–7) or rural Aboriginal Medical Services (AMS) streams while undertaking training towards general practice fellowship.
Main outcome measures
Continuity of service was measured in the pre-program period (period working in same practice before commencing) and during-program period (period completing the RVTS program in same practice as worked in before commencing the program). Retention was measured firstly within two years, and secondly beyond two years (up to 20 post-completion years) based on: working in the same community (relevant to both streams); working in the same region (Remote Stream only); working in any MMM4–7 community (Remote Stream only); or working anywhere rurally (both streams).
Results
From 506 enrolled participants, 373 (73.7%) were international medical graduates. The approximate mean service continuity in the same practice was 1.6 years (standard deviation [SD], 2.2 years) for the pre-program period and 3.6 years (SD, 1.4 years) for the during-program period (mean total, 5.2 years). Two years after completion, 21 out of 43 Remote Stream doctors (49%) and four out of five AMS Stream doctors (80%) remained in the same community. Over the long term, retention in the same community stabilised to 44 out of 242 Remote Stream doctors (18.2%) and seven out of 27 AMS Stream doctors (26%); 72 Remote Stream doctors (29.8%) remained in the same region, 70 Remote Stream doctors (28.9%) were in an MMM4–7 community, and 11 AMS Stream doctors (41%) were in a rural (MMM2–7) community.
Conclusion
Strong service continuity outcomes have been achieved by the RVTS, which supports mostly international medical graduates in locations typified by the highest workforce turnover. This suggests that continuity of service could be improved for remote and First Nations communities through place-based retention-focused programs like the RVTS.
期刊介绍:
The Medical Journal of Australia (MJA) stands as Australia's foremost general medical journal, leading the dissemination of high-quality research and commentary to shape health policy and influence medical practices within the country. Under the leadership of Professor Virginia Barbour, the expert editorial team at MJA is dedicated to providing authors with a constructive and collaborative peer-review and publication process. Established in 1914, the MJA has evolved into a modern journal that upholds its founding values, maintaining a commitment to supporting the medical profession by delivering high-quality and pertinent information essential to medical practice.