欧盟和土耳其关于毒性测试中实验动物使用统计报告的比较。

IF 2.4 4区 医学 Q3 MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL
Atla-Alternatives To Laboratory Animals Pub Date : 2024-11-01 Epub Date: 2024-10-04 DOI:10.1177/02611929241286885
Cagri Caglar Sinmez, Aşkın Yaşar, Rene van den Hoven
{"title":"欧盟和土耳其关于毒性测试中实验动物使用统计报告的比较。","authors":"Cagri Caglar Sinmez, Aşkın Yaşar, Rene van den Hoven","doi":"10.1177/02611929241286885","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The data on the number of animals used for experimental purposes, with a particular focus on regulatory toxicity studies, in Turkey and EU member states plus Norway (EU+), were compared for the period 2015 to 2020 (UK data after Brexit for 2020 were included too). The total number of listed vertebrates used for regulatory toxicity testing in the full 6-year reporting period in Turkey was 3.6% of that reported for the EU+. However, these numbers showed an increasing trend over the reporting period in Turkey, while the trend decreased in the EU+. In the top three most-used species for regulatory toxicology purposes in Turkey, 41% were fish (68,758 animals), followed by rats (29%; 49,975 animals), and then mice (20%; 33,292 animals). Turkey used low numbers of cats and dogs, while the corresponding number for the EU+ was more than 70-fold higher. Non-human primates were not used at all in Turkey, whereas about 34,000 were used in EU+ laboratories. The majority of toxicity tests (57%) performed in Turkey were categorised as 'Other' toxicity tests, and 27% were acute and sub-acute toxicity tests. Successful replacement alternatives (e.g. <i>in vitro</i> and <i>in silico</i> approaches) are already used in a wide range of research areas. However, although this new research and testing paradigm is underpinned by scientific evidence, the legislation and pace of acceptance of these new techniques in Turkey is considerably lagging behind other countries.</p>","PeriodicalId":55577,"journal":{"name":"Atla-Alternatives To Laboratory Animals","volume":" ","pages":"301-315"},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A Comparison of European Union and Turkish Reports on the Statistics of Experimental Animal Use in Toxicity Testing.\",\"authors\":\"Cagri Caglar Sinmez, Aşkın Yaşar, Rene van den Hoven\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/02611929241286885\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>The data on the number of animals used for experimental purposes, with a particular focus on regulatory toxicity studies, in Turkey and EU member states plus Norway (EU+), were compared for the period 2015 to 2020 (UK data after Brexit for 2020 were included too). The total number of listed vertebrates used for regulatory toxicity testing in the full 6-year reporting period in Turkey was 3.6% of that reported for the EU+. However, these numbers showed an increasing trend over the reporting period in Turkey, while the trend decreased in the EU+. In the top three most-used species for regulatory toxicology purposes in Turkey, 41% were fish (68,758 animals), followed by rats (29%; 49,975 animals), and then mice (20%; 33,292 animals). Turkey used low numbers of cats and dogs, while the corresponding number for the EU+ was more than 70-fold higher. Non-human primates were not used at all in Turkey, whereas about 34,000 were used in EU+ laboratories. The majority of toxicity tests (57%) performed in Turkey were categorised as 'Other' toxicity tests, and 27% were acute and sub-acute toxicity tests. Successful replacement alternatives (e.g. <i>in vitro</i> and <i>in silico</i> approaches) are already used in a wide range of research areas. However, although this new research and testing paradigm is underpinned by scientific evidence, the legislation and pace of acceptance of these new techniques in Turkey is considerably lagging behind other countries.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":55577,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Atla-Alternatives To Laboratory Animals\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"301-315\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Atla-Alternatives To Laboratory Animals\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/02611929241286885\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/10/4 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Atla-Alternatives To Laboratory Animals","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/02611929241286885","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/10/4 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

对土耳其和欧盟成员国加挪威(EU+)在2015年至2020年期间用于实验目的的动物数量进行了比较(英国脱欧后2020年的数据也包括在内),尤其侧重于监管毒性研究。在整个6年报告期内,土耳其用于监管毒性测试的列名脊椎动物总数是欧盟+报告总数的3.6%。不过,在报告期内,土耳其的这些数量呈上升趋势,而欧盟+则呈下降趋势。在土耳其毒理学监管中使用最多的前三个物种中,41%是鱼(68,758只),其次是大鼠(29%;49,975只),然后是小鼠(20%;33,292只)。土耳其使用的猫和狗数量较少,而欧盟+的相应数量则高出 70 多倍。土耳其完全不使用非人灵长类动物,而欧盟+实验室则使用了约 34,000 只。土耳其进行的大多数毒性试验(57%)被归类为 "其他 "毒性试验,27%为急性和亚急性毒性试验。成功的替代方法(如体外和硅学方法)已被广泛应用于多个研究领域。然而,尽管这种新的研究和测试模式有科学依据,但土耳其在立法和接受这些新技术方面的步伐却大大落后于其他国家。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
A Comparison of European Union and Turkish Reports on the Statistics of Experimental Animal Use in Toxicity Testing.

The data on the number of animals used for experimental purposes, with a particular focus on regulatory toxicity studies, in Turkey and EU member states plus Norway (EU+), were compared for the period 2015 to 2020 (UK data after Brexit for 2020 were included too). The total number of listed vertebrates used for regulatory toxicity testing in the full 6-year reporting period in Turkey was 3.6% of that reported for the EU+. However, these numbers showed an increasing trend over the reporting period in Turkey, while the trend decreased in the EU+. In the top three most-used species for regulatory toxicology purposes in Turkey, 41% were fish (68,758 animals), followed by rats (29%; 49,975 animals), and then mice (20%; 33,292 animals). Turkey used low numbers of cats and dogs, while the corresponding number for the EU+ was more than 70-fold higher. Non-human primates were not used at all in Turkey, whereas about 34,000 were used in EU+ laboratories. The majority of toxicity tests (57%) performed in Turkey were categorised as 'Other' toxicity tests, and 27% were acute and sub-acute toxicity tests. Successful replacement alternatives (e.g. in vitro and in silico approaches) are already used in a wide range of research areas. However, although this new research and testing paradigm is underpinned by scientific evidence, the legislation and pace of acceptance of these new techniques in Turkey is considerably lagging behind other countries.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.80
自引率
3.70%
发文量
60
审稿时长
>18 weeks
期刊介绍: Alternatives to Laboratory Animals (ATLA) is a peer-reviewed journal, intended to cover all aspects of the development, validation, implementation and use of alternatives to laboratory animals in biomedical research and toxicity testing. In addition to the replacement of animals, it also covers work that aims to reduce the number of animals used and refine the in vivo experiments that are still carried out.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信