从产妇、亲属和医护人员的角度看医疗机构分娩时的临床决策:范围综述。

IF 2.6 3区 医学 Q1 NURSING
Signe Egenberg, Gry Skogheim, Margrethe Tangerud, Anne-Marie Sluijs, Yolentha M Slootweg, Heidi Elvemo, Mariam Barabara, Ingela Lundgren
{"title":"从产妇、亲属和医护人员的角度看医疗机构分娩时的临床决策:范围综述。","authors":"Signe Egenberg, Gry Skogheim, Margrethe Tangerud, Anne-Marie Sluijs, Yolentha M Slootweg, Heidi Elvemo, Mariam Barabara, Ingela Lundgren","doi":"10.1016/j.midw.2024.104192","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Problem: </strong>For health care providers to ensure appropriate decision-making in clinical settings during childbirth, facilitators and barriers must be identified.</p><p><strong>Background: </strong>Women who experience a sense of control by participating in the decision-making process, are more likely to have a positive birth experience. However, decision-making may involve hierarchies of close observation and control.</p><p><strong>Aim: </strong>The aim of the scoping review was to map and summarise existing literature on the process of clinical decision-making during childbirth from the perspective of labouring women, relatives and health care providers.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We carried out a scoping review in line with Joanna Briggs Institute scoping review methodology. The search identified studies in Scandinavian or English languages from 2010 - Jan 2023 comprising evidence at different levels of the pyramid, resulting in 18.227 hits. Following the PRISMA checklist, the final inclusion comprised 62 papers.</p><p><strong>Findings: </strong>Four main categories summarized the importance of the following factors: 1) Woman-caregiver relationship, with sub-categories The importance of communication and Midwifery care, 2) Consent and legal issues, 3) Organization, with sub-categories Medicalization, Working atmosphere, and Complexity, and 4) Decision-making tools and models, with sub-categories Shared decision-making, and Other tools and models for decision-making.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Balancing intuition and expertise of caregivers with evidence-based practices, is crucial to ensure women's participation in decision-making. Furthermore, a trusting relationship between the mother, partner, and health care provider is of utmost importance. Shared decision-making, which appeared to be the primary model for clinical decision-making regardless context, requires reflective practice and is a communication strategy.</p>","PeriodicalId":18495,"journal":{"name":"Midwifery","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Clinical decision-making during childbirth in health facilities from the perspectives of labouring women, relatives, and health care providers: A scoping review.\",\"authors\":\"Signe Egenberg, Gry Skogheim, Margrethe Tangerud, Anne-Marie Sluijs, Yolentha M Slootweg, Heidi Elvemo, Mariam Barabara, Ingela Lundgren\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.midw.2024.104192\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Problem: </strong>For health care providers to ensure appropriate decision-making in clinical settings during childbirth, facilitators and barriers must be identified.</p><p><strong>Background: </strong>Women who experience a sense of control by participating in the decision-making process, are more likely to have a positive birth experience. However, decision-making may involve hierarchies of close observation and control.</p><p><strong>Aim: </strong>The aim of the scoping review was to map and summarise existing literature on the process of clinical decision-making during childbirth from the perspective of labouring women, relatives and health care providers.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We carried out a scoping review in line with Joanna Briggs Institute scoping review methodology. The search identified studies in Scandinavian or English languages from 2010 - Jan 2023 comprising evidence at different levels of the pyramid, resulting in 18.227 hits. Following the PRISMA checklist, the final inclusion comprised 62 papers.</p><p><strong>Findings: </strong>Four main categories summarized the importance of the following factors: 1) Woman-caregiver relationship, with sub-categories The importance of communication and Midwifery care, 2) Consent and legal issues, 3) Organization, with sub-categories Medicalization, Working atmosphere, and Complexity, and 4) Decision-making tools and models, with sub-categories Shared decision-making, and Other tools and models for decision-making.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Balancing intuition and expertise of caregivers with evidence-based practices, is crucial to ensure women's participation in decision-making. Furthermore, a trusting relationship between the mother, partner, and health care provider is of utmost importance. Shared decision-making, which appeared to be the primary model for clinical decision-making regardless context, requires reflective practice and is a communication strategy.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":18495,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Midwifery\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-26\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Midwifery\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.midw.2024.104192\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"NURSING\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Midwifery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.midw.2024.104192","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

问题:医护人员要确保在临床环境中分娩时做出适当的决策,就必须找出促进因素和障碍:背景:通过参与决策过程体验到控制感的妇女更有可能获得积极的分娩体验。然而,决策过程可能会涉及到密切观察和控制的等级制度。目的:此次范围界定综述的目的是从产妇、亲属和医疗保健提供者的角度出发,对有关分娩过程中临床决策过程的现有文献进行梳理和总结:我们按照乔安娜-布里格斯研究所(Joanna Briggs Institute)的范围界定综述方法进行了范围界定综述。通过检索,我们找到了 2010 年至 2023 年 1 月期间用斯堪的纳维亚语或英语进行的研究,其中包括金字塔不同层次的证据,共有 18227 条检索结果。根据 PRISMA 检查表,最终纳入了 62 篇论文:四个主要类别概括了以下因素的重要性:1)妇女与护理人员的关系,包括沟通的重要性和助产护理两个子类别;2)同意和法律问题;3)组织,包括医疗化、工作氛围和复杂性三个子类别;4)决策工具和模式,包括共同决策和其他决策工具和模式两个子类别:结论:平衡护理人员的直觉和专业知识与循证实践,对于确保妇女参与决策至关重要。此外,母亲、伴侣和医疗服务提供者之间的信任关系也至关重要。无论在何种情况下,共同决策似乎都是临床决策的主要模式,它需要反思实践,也是一种沟通策略。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Clinical decision-making during childbirth in health facilities from the perspectives of labouring women, relatives, and health care providers: A scoping review.

Problem: For health care providers to ensure appropriate decision-making in clinical settings during childbirth, facilitators and barriers must be identified.

Background: Women who experience a sense of control by participating in the decision-making process, are more likely to have a positive birth experience. However, decision-making may involve hierarchies of close observation and control.

Aim: The aim of the scoping review was to map and summarise existing literature on the process of clinical decision-making during childbirth from the perspective of labouring women, relatives and health care providers.

Methods: We carried out a scoping review in line with Joanna Briggs Institute scoping review methodology. The search identified studies in Scandinavian or English languages from 2010 - Jan 2023 comprising evidence at different levels of the pyramid, resulting in 18.227 hits. Following the PRISMA checklist, the final inclusion comprised 62 papers.

Findings: Four main categories summarized the importance of the following factors: 1) Woman-caregiver relationship, with sub-categories The importance of communication and Midwifery care, 2) Consent and legal issues, 3) Organization, with sub-categories Medicalization, Working atmosphere, and Complexity, and 4) Decision-making tools and models, with sub-categories Shared decision-making, and Other tools and models for decision-making.

Conclusion: Balancing intuition and expertise of caregivers with evidence-based practices, is crucial to ensure women's participation in decision-making. Furthermore, a trusting relationship between the mother, partner, and health care provider is of utmost importance. Shared decision-making, which appeared to be the primary model for clinical decision-making regardless context, requires reflective practice and is a communication strategy.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Midwifery
Midwifery 医学-护理
CiteScore
4.50
自引率
7.40%
发文量
221
审稿时长
13.4 weeks
期刊介绍: Midwifery publishes the latest peer reviewed international research to inform the safety, quality, outcomes and experiences of pregnancy, birth and maternity care for childbearing women, their babies and families. The journal’s publications support midwives and maternity care providers to explore and develop their knowledge, skills and attitudes informed by best available evidence. Midwifery provides an international, interdisciplinary forum for the publication, dissemination and discussion of advances in evidence, controversies and current research, and promotes continuing education through publication of systematic and other scholarly reviews and updates. Midwifery articles cover the cultural, clinical, psycho-social, sociological, epidemiological, education, managerial, workforce, organizational and technological areas of practice in preconception, maternal and infant care. The journal welcomes the highest quality scholarly research that employs rigorous methodology. Midwifery is a leading international journal in midwifery and maternal health with a current impact factor of 1.861 (© Thomson Reuters Journal Citation Reports 2016) and employs a double-blind peer review process.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信