{"title":"根据可抛弃的肉体理论,永恒是有可能的,但系统的复杂性使其不太可能实现。","authors":"Christopher W. Rodriguez, Peter W. Reddien","doi":"10.1016/j.jtbi.2024.111958","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Although demographic studies have failed to find evidence of aging in certain animal species, classic evolutionary theories of aging struggle to explain how evolution could favor agelessness in such cases. Here, we develop mathematical models of the disposable soma theory to identify conditions in which agelessness would be evolutionarily favored. For any given type of damage that could accumulate and cause age-accelerating mortality risk, we find that evolution could select for its complete removal if the mortality risk it poses is severe enough and its repair does not pose too large of a penalty to reproduction. Environmental factors such as extrinsic mortality and the form of population density-dependent regulation also play a large role in determining the optimal rate of aging and whether agelessness should be evolutionarily favored. However, in a system with multiple sources of damage and multiple independent repair processes, avoiding aging is rarely evolutionarily favorable. Pleiotropic repair processes, such as those that could be present in asexual fissioning organisms, make agelessness more likely but do not guarantee it. Our results indicate that agelessness could be favored by evolution in narrow contexts but that multiple types of damage and repair make agelessness unlikely to arise in sufficiently complex organisms.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":54763,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Theoretical Biology","volume":"595 ","pages":"Article 111958"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Agelessness is possible under the disposable soma theory but system complexity makes it unlikely\",\"authors\":\"Christopher W. Rodriguez, Peter W. Reddien\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jtbi.2024.111958\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>Although demographic studies have failed to find evidence of aging in certain animal species, classic evolutionary theories of aging struggle to explain how evolution could favor agelessness in such cases. Here, we develop mathematical models of the disposable soma theory to identify conditions in which agelessness would be evolutionarily favored. For any given type of damage that could accumulate and cause age-accelerating mortality risk, we find that evolution could select for its complete removal if the mortality risk it poses is severe enough and its repair does not pose too large of a penalty to reproduction. Environmental factors such as extrinsic mortality and the form of population density-dependent regulation also play a large role in determining the optimal rate of aging and whether agelessness should be evolutionarily favored. However, in a system with multiple sources of damage and multiple independent repair processes, avoiding aging is rarely evolutionarily favorable. Pleiotropic repair processes, such as those that could be present in asexual fissioning organisms, make agelessness more likely but do not guarantee it. Our results indicate that agelessness could be favored by evolution in narrow contexts but that multiple types of damage and repair make agelessness unlikely to arise in sufficiently complex organisms.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":54763,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Theoretical Biology\",\"volume\":\"595 \",\"pages\":\"Article 111958\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Theoretical Biology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"99\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0022519324002431\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"数学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"BIOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Theoretical Biology","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0022519324002431","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"数学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"BIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Agelessness is possible under the disposable soma theory but system complexity makes it unlikely
Although demographic studies have failed to find evidence of aging in certain animal species, classic evolutionary theories of aging struggle to explain how evolution could favor agelessness in such cases. Here, we develop mathematical models of the disposable soma theory to identify conditions in which agelessness would be evolutionarily favored. For any given type of damage that could accumulate and cause age-accelerating mortality risk, we find that evolution could select for its complete removal if the mortality risk it poses is severe enough and its repair does not pose too large of a penalty to reproduction. Environmental factors such as extrinsic mortality and the form of population density-dependent regulation also play a large role in determining the optimal rate of aging and whether agelessness should be evolutionarily favored. However, in a system with multiple sources of damage and multiple independent repair processes, avoiding aging is rarely evolutionarily favorable. Pleiotropic repair processes, such as those that could be present in asexual fissioning organisms, make agelessness more likely but do not guarantee it. Our results indicate that agelessness could be favored by evolution in narrow contexts but that multiple types of damage and repair make agelessness unlikely to arise in sufficiently complex organisms.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Theoretical Biology is the leading forum for theoretical perspectives that give insight into biological processes. It covers a very wide range of topics and is of interest to biologists in many areas of research, including:
• Brain and Neuroscience
• Cancer Growth and Treatment
• Cell Biology
• Developmental Biology
• Ecology
• Evolution
• Immunology,
• Infectious and non-infectious Diseases,
• Mathematical, Computational, Biophysical and Statistical Modeling
• Microbiology, Molecular Biology, and Biochemistry
• Networks and Complex Systems
• Physiology
• Pharmacodynamics
• Animal Behavior and Game Theory
Acceptable papers are those that bear significant importance on the biology per se being presented, and not on the mathematical analysis. Papers that include some data or experimental material bearing on theory will be considered, including those that contain comparative study, statistical data analysis, mathematical proof, computer simulations, experiments, field observations, or even philosophical arguments, which are all methods to support or reject theoretical ideas. However, there should be a concerted effort to make papers intelligible to biologists in the chosen field.