{"title":"探索有言语和语言障碍的儿童在非单词重复中产生的元音错误。","authors":"Janet Vuolo, Taylor L. Gifford","doi":"10.1111/1460-6984.13120","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Background</h3>\n \n <p>Accurate nonword repetition (NWR) is contingent on many underlying skills, including encoding, memory and motor planning and programming. Though vowel errors are frequently associated with childhood apraxia of speech (CAS), several recent studies have found that children with developmental language disorder (DLD) produce high rates of vowel errors in NWR tasks.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Aims</h3>\n \n <p>This retrospective analysis explored whether the overall frequency and types of vowel errors produced in NWR distinguish children with DLD, children with CAS, children with speech sound disorder (SSD) and children with typical development (TD).</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods and Procedure</h3>\n \n <p>We present data for 24 children (six per DLD, CAS, SSD and TD groups), ranging in age from 50–92 months. Children with DLD, CAS and SSD showed similar articulation scores and children with DLD and children with CAS showed similar expressive language scores. Total vowel errors, total monophthong errors, monophthong substitutions, diphthongization errors, total diphthong errors, diphthong substitutions and diphthong reduction errors were calculated by syllable length and group. Repeated measures analyses of variance were used to examine group differences.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Outcomes and Results</h3>\n \n <p>Children with DLD and children with CAS produced a higher frequency of total vowel errors compared to children with TD. Children with DLD produced more total monophthong errors than children with TD. Children with DLD and children with CAS produced more total diphthong errors than children with TD. For children with DLD, these were characterised by diphthong substitutions. For children with CAS, these were characterised by diphthong substitutions and diphthong reduction errors. For all measures, error rates in children with SSD did not significantly differ from any of the other three groups.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusion</h3>\n \n <p>Preliminary evidence indicates that children with DLD and children with CAS both show high rates of vowel errors in NWR tasks and weaknesses in encoding and memory. For children with CAS, additional motor planning difficulties are associated with an increased likelihood to reduce diphthongs. Children with SSD show more mild processing difficulties than children with DLD and children with CAS, though they do not perform as well as TD peers. Future work should replicate and further specify the processing weaknesses that affect vowel accuracy in NWR tasks in a larger sample.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> WHAT THIS PAPER ADDS</h3>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> What is already known on the subject</h3>\n \n <div>\n <ul>\n \n <li>Nonword repetition (NWR) tasks are often included in diagnostic batteries to identify children with developmental language disorder (DLD). Poor performance on these tasks have historically been attributed to phonological working memory deficits in children with DLD. However, repeating nonwords relies on a number of underlying processing skills and many of these skills are affected to varying degrees in children with speech and language disorders. An in-depth analysis of vowel errors has the potential to reveal the shared as well as specific underlying processing weaknesses in children with DLD, children with childhood apraxia of speech (CAS) and children with speech sound disorder (SSD).</li>\n </ul>\n </div>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> What this paper adds to existing knowledge</h3>\n \n <div>\n <ul>\n \n <li>We found that children with DLD and children with CAS show low vowel competence compared to children with typical development. A nuanced examination of vowel error types further revealed that children with DLD and children with CAS show weaknesses in encoding and memory. Motor planning and programming weaknesses were unique to CAS. Children with SSD show more mild processing deficits and their performance did not significantly differ from any of the other three groups.</li>\n </ul>\n </div>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> What are the clinical implications of this work?</h3>\n \n <div>\n <ul>\n \n <li>Examining the types of vowel errors produced by children with DLD, children with CAS and children with SSD in NWR allows us to further specify the underlying processing weaknesses that differentiate these three groups. This research informs theoretical accounts of language processing in children with different types of speech and language disorders and has the potential to improve the diagnostic utility of NWR tasks.</li>\n </ul>\n </div>\n </section>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":49182,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Language & Communication Disorders","volume":"59 6","pages":"2896-2910"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/1460-6984.13120","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Exploring vowel errors produced in nonword repetition in children with speech and language disorders\",\"authors\":\"Janet Vuolo, Taylor L. Gifford\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/1460-6984.13120\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div>\\n \\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Background</h3>\\n \\n <p>Accurate nonword repetition (NWR) is contingent on many underlying skills, including encoding, memory and motor planning and programming. Though vowel errors are frequently associated with childhood apraxia of speech (CAS), several recent studies have found that children with developmental language disorder (DLD) produce high rates of vowel errors in NWR tasks.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Aims</h3>\\n \\n <p>This retrospective analysis explored whether the overall frequency and types of vowel errors produced in NWR distinguish children with DLD, children with CAS, children with speech sound disorder (SSD) and children with typical development (TD).</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Methods and Procedure</h3>\\n \\n <p>We present data for 24 children (six per DLD, CAS, SSD and TD groups), ranging in age from 50–92 months. Children with DLD, CAS and SSD showed similar articulation scores and children with DLD and children with CAS showed similar expressive language scores. Total vowel errors, total monophthong errors, monophthong substitutions, diphthongization errors, total diphthong errors, diphthong substitutions and diphthong reduction errors were calculated by syllable length and group. Repeated measures analyses of variance were used to examine group differences.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Outcomes and Results</h3>\\n \\n <p>Children with DLD and children with CAS produced a higher frequency of total vowel errors compared to children with TD. Children with DLD produced more total monophthong errors than children with TD. Children with DLD and children with CAS produced more total diphthong errors than children with TD. For children with DLD, these were characterised by diphthong substitutions. For children with CAS, these were characterised by diphthong substitutions and diphthong reduction errors. For all measures, error rates in children with SSD did not significantly differ from any of the other three groups.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Conclusion</h3>\\n \\n <p>Preliminary evidence indicates that children with DLD and children with CAS both show high rates of vowel errors in NWR tasks and weaknesses in encoding and memory. For children with CAS, additional motor planning difficulties are associated with an increased likelihood to reduce diphthongs. Children with SSD show more mild processing difficulties than children with DLD and children with CAS, though they do not perform as well as TD peers. Future work should replicate and further specify the processing weaknesses that affect vowel accuracy in NWR tasks in a larger sample.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> WHAT THIS PAPER ADDS</h3>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> What is already known on the subject</h3>\\n \\n <div>\\n <ul>\\n \\n <li>Nonword repetition (NWR) tasks are often included in diagnostic batteries to identify children with developmental language disorder (DLD). Poor performance on these tasks have historically been attributed to phonological working memory deficits in children with DLD. However, repeating nonwords relies on a number of underlying processing skills and many of these skills are affected to varying degrees in children with speech and language disorders. An in-depth analysis of vowel errors has the potential to reveal the shared as well as specific underlying processing weaknesses in children with DLD, children with childhood apraxia of speech (CAS) and children with speech sound disorder (SSD).</li>\\n </ul>\\n </div>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> What this paper adds to existing knowledge</h3>\\n \\n <div>\\n <ul>\\n \\n <li>We found that children with DLD and children with CAS show low vowel competence compared to children with typical development. A nuanced examination of vowel error types further revealed that children with DLD and children with CAS show weaknesses in encoding and memory. Motor planning and programming weaknesses were unique to CAS. Children with SSD show more mild processing deficits and their performance did not significantly differ from any of the other three groups.</li>\\n </ul>\\n </div>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> What are the clinical implications of this work?</h3>\\n \\n <div>\\n <ul>\\n \\n <li>Examining the types of vowel errors produced by children with DLD, children with CAS and children with SSD in NWR allows us to further specify the underlying processing weaknesses that differentiate these three groups. This research informs theoretical accounts of language processing in children with different types of speech and language disorders and has the potential to improve the diagnostic utility of NWR tasks.</li>\\n </ul>\\n </div>\\n </section>\\n </section>\\n </div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":49182,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Journal of Language & Communication Disorders\",\"volume\":\"59 6\",\"pages\":\"2896-2910\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-04\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/1460-6984.13120\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Journal of Language & Communication Disorders\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/1460-6984.13120\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"AUDIOLOGY & SPEECH-LANGUAGE PATHOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Language & Communication Disorders","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/1460-6984.13120","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"AUDIOLOGY & SPEECH-LANGUAGE PATHOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
背景:准确的非词重复(NWR)取决于许多基本技能,包括编码、记忆以及运动规划和编程。尽管元音错误经常与儿童语言障碍(CAS)有关,但最近的几项研究发现,发育性语言障碍(DLD)儿童在非词重复任务中产生元音错误的比率很高。目的:本回顾性分析探讨了在非词重复中产生元音错误的总体频率和类型是否区分了DLD儿童、CAS儿童、言语发声障碍(SSD)儿童和典型发育(TD)儿童:我们提供了 24 名儿童(DLD、CAS、SSD 和 TD 组各六人)的数据,他们的年龄在 50-92 个月之间。DLD 儿童、CAS 儿童和 SSD 儿童的发音得分相似,DLD 儿童和 CAS 儿童的语言表达得分相似。按音节长度和组别计算元音错误总数、单音错误总数、单音替换错误、双音化错误、双音错误总数、双音替换错误和双音减少错误。采用重复测量方差分析来检验组间差异:与 TD 儿童相比,DLD 儿童和 CAS 儿童出现总元音错误的频率更高。与 TD 儿童相比,DLD 儿童出现单音错误的频率更高。与 TD 儿童相比,DLD 儿童和 CAS 儿童出现双元音错误的频率更高。对于 DLD 儿童,这些错误的特点是双元音替换。对于 CAS 儿童来说,这些错误主要表现为双元音替换和双元音缩减错误。在所有测量中,SSD 儿童的错误率与其他三组儿童没有显著差异:初步证据表明,DLD 儿童和 CAS 儿童在 NWR 任务中的元音错误率都很高,而且在编码和记忆方面都存在缺陷。对于 CAS 儿童来说,额外的运动规划困难与减少双元音的可能性增加有关。与 DLD 儿童和 CAS 儿童相比,SSD 儿童表现出更轻微的处理困难,尽管他们的表现不如 TD 儿童。未来的工作应在更大的样本中复制并进一步明确影响元音准确性的处理缺陷:关于该主题的已知知识 非词重复(NWR)任务经常被纳入诊断电池中,用于识别患有发育性语言障碍(DLD)的儿童。在这些任务中表现不佳,历来被归因于发育性语言障碍儿童的语音工作记忆缺陷。然而,重复非单词依赖于许多基本的处理技能,而这些技能中有许多在患有言语和语言障碍的儿童身上都受到不同程度的影响。对元音错误的深入分析有可能揭示出 DLD 儿童、儿童语言障碍(CAS)儿童和言语发音障碍(SSD)儿童共同的以及特定的潜在处理弱点。本文对现有知识的补充 我们发现,与发育正常的儿童相比,DLD 儿童和 CAS 儿童的元音能力较低。对元音错误类型的细致研究进一步表明,DLD 儿童和 CAS 儿童在编码和记忆方面存在缺陷。运动规划和编程方面的缺陷是 CAS 儿童所特有的。患有 SSD 的儿童则表现出更轻微的处理缺陷,他们的表现与其他三组儿童没有显著差异。这项研究的临床意义是什么?通过研究 DLD 儿童、CAS 儿童和 SSD 儿童在 NWR 中产生的元音错误类型,我们可以进一步明确区分这三类儿童的潜在处理缺陷。这项研究为不同类型的言语和语言障碍儿童的语言处理提供了理论依据,并有可能提高 NWR 任务的诊断效用。
Exploring vowel errors produced in nonword repetition in children with speech and language disorders
Background
Accurate nonword repetition (NWR) is contingent on many underlying skills, including encoding, memory and motor planning and programming. Though vowel errors are frequently associated with childhood apraxia of speech (CAS), several recent studies have found that children with developmental language disorder (DLD) produce high rates of vowel errors in NWR tasks.
Aims
This retrospective analysis explored whether the overall frequency and types of vowel errors produced in NWR distinguish children with DLD, children with CAS, children with speech sound disorder (SSD) and children with typical development (TD).
Methods and Procedure
We present data for 24 children (six per DLD, CAS, SSD and TD groups), ranging in age from 50–92 months. Children with DLD, CAS and SSD showed similar articulation scores and children with DLD and children with CAS showed similar expressive language scores. Total vowel errors, total monophthong errors, monophthong substitutions, diphthongization errors, total diphthong errors, diphthong substitutions and diphthong reduction errors were calculated by syllable length and group. Repeated measures analyses of variance were used to examine group differences.
Outcomes and Results
Children with DLD and children with CAS produced a higher frequency of total vowel errors compared to children with TD. Children with DLD produced more total monophthong errors than children with TD. Children with DLD and children with CAS produced more total diphthong errors than children with TD. For children with DLD, these were characterised by diphthong substitutions. For children with CAS, these were characterised by diphthong substitutions and diphthong reduction errors. For all measures, error rates in children with SSD did not significantly differ from any of the other three groups.
Conclusion
Preliminary evidence indicates that children with DLD and children with CAS both show high rates of vowel errors in NWR tasks and weaknesses in encoding and memory. For children with CAS, additional motor planning difficulties are associated with an increased likelihood to reduce diphthongs. Children with SSD show more mild processing difficulties than children with DLD and children with CAS, though they do not perform as well as TD peers. Future work should replicate and further specify the processing weaknesses that affect vowel accuracy in NWR tasks in a larger sample.
WHAT THIS PAPER ADDS
What is already known on the subject
Nonword repetition (NWR) tasks are often included in diagnostic batteries to identify children with developmental language disorder (DLD). Poor performance on these tasks have historically been attributed to phonological working memory deficits in children with DLD. However, repeating nonwords relies on a number of underlying processing skills and many of these skills are affected to varying degrees in children with speech and language disorders. An in-depth analysis of vowel errors has the potential to reveal the shared as well as specific underlying processing weaknesses in children with DLD, children with childhood apraxia of speech (CAS) and children with speech sound disorder (SSD).
What this paper adds to existing knowledge
We found that children with DLD and children with CAS show low vowel competence compared to children with typical development. A nuanced examination of vowel error types further revealed that children with DLD and children with CAS show weaknesses in encoding and memory. Motor planning and programming weaknesses were unique to CAS. Children with SSD show more mild processing deficits and their performance did not significantly differ from any of the other three groups.
What are the clinical implications of this work?
Examining the types of vowel errors produced by children with DLD, children with CAS and children with SSD in NWR allows us to further specify the underlying processing weaknesses that differentiate these three groups. This research informs theoretical accounts of language processing in children with different types of speech and language disorders and has the potential to improve the diagnostic utility of NWR tasks.
期刊介绍:
The International Journal of Language & Communication Disorders (IJLCD) is the official journal of the Royal College of Speech & Language Therapists. The Journal welcomes submissions on all aspects of speech, language, communication disorders and speech and language therapy. It provides a forum for the exchange of information and discussion of issues of clinical or theoretical relevance in the above areas.