Eujin Chan, Simon K Goodall, Robert Finnegan, Paul Moorfoot, Michael Jameson, Leon Dunn
{"title":"直肠癌 PTV 内可变气腔的剂量学影响。","authors":"Eujin Chan, Simon K Goodall, Robert Finnegan, Paul Moorfoot, Michael Jameson, Leon Dunn","doi":"10.1002/acm2.14539","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>The aim of this study is to determine the impact of rectal air volume changes on treatment plan quality, and subsequently inform daily cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) evaluation constraints, in terms of acceptable rectal air volume during treatment.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Twelve rectal cancer patients who exhibited rectal air within the PTV on their planning CT were selected. A study was conducted to evaluate the deterioration in plan quality due to expanding air volume. For each case, the air cavity volume was isotropically expanded in three dimensions using predefined margins of 3, 5, 7, and 10 mm, while deforming bladder and rectum contours. A constraint was applied to the bony anatomy to restrict the deformation. Treatment plans were then generated for all twelve patients by recalculating the reference plan with the expanded air cavity volume.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>As the air cavity expanded, the maximum relative change in D98% coverage, compared to the reference plan, decreased by 10.8% ± 3.5%, while the D2% increased by 3.5% ± 0.9%. The positioning of the air cavity notably influenced the D98% variability with the 3 mm expansion. D98% coverage falls below 95% when the air cavity volume exceeds 17 cm<sup>3</sup>. On average, D2% coverage increased by 0.5% with each expansion. At the largest expansion, extensive coverage of 102% and 105% isodoses was observed compared to the reference plan.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Air cavity volumes above 17 cm<sup>3</sup> can potentially degrade the high-dose PTV coverage while increasing the regions covered by the 102% and 105% isodoses. Clinical CBCT guidelines were deduced, recommending a maximum threshold of 3.2 cm in diameter in any direction.</p>","PeriodicalId":14989,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Applied Clinical Medical Physics","volume":" ","pages":"e14539"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Dosimetric impact of variable air cavity within PTV for rectum cancer.\",\"authors\":\"Eujin Chan, Simon K Goodall, Robert Finnegan, Paul Moorfoot, Michael Jameson, Leon Dunn\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/acm2.14539\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>The aim of this study is to determine the impact of rectal air volume changes on treatment plan quality, and subsequently inform daily cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) evaluation constraints, in terms of acceptable rectal air volume during treatment.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Twelve rectal cancer patients who exhibited rectal air within the PTV on their planning CT were selected. A study was conducted to evaluate the deterioration in plan quality due to expanding air volume. For each case, the air cavity volume was isotropically expanded in three dimensions using predefined margins of 3, 5, 7, and 10 mm, while deforming bladder and rectum contours. A constraint was applied to the bony anatomy to restrict the deformation. Treatment plans were then generated for all twelve patients by recalculating the reference plan with the expanded air cavity volume.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>As the air cavity expanded, the maximum relative change in D98% coverage, compared to the reference plan, decreased by 10.8% ± 3.5%, while the D2% increased by 3.5% ± 0.9%. The positioning of the air cavity notably influenced the D98% variability with the 3 mm expansion. D98% coverage falls below 95% when the air cavity volume exceeds 17 cm<sup>3</sup>. On average, D2% coverage increased by 0.5% with each expansion. At the largest expansion, extensive coverage of 102% and 105% isodoses was observed compared to the reference plan.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Air cavity volumes above 17 cm<sup>3</sup> can potentially degrade the high-dose PTV coverage while increasing the regions covered by the 102% and 105% isodoses. Clinical CBCT guidelines were deduced, recommending a maximum threshold of 3.2 cm in diameter in any direction.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":14989,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Applied Clinical Medical Physics\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"e14539\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-03\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Applied Clinical Medical Physics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1002/acm2.14539\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Applied Clinical Medical Physics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/acm2.14539","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
Dosimetric impact of variable air cavity within PTV for rectum cancer.
Purpose: The aim of this study is to determine the impact of rectal air volume changes on treatment plan quality, and subsequently inform daily cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) evaluation constraints, in terms of acceptable rectal air volume during treatment.
Methods: Twelve rectal cancer patients who exhibited rectal air within the PTV on their planning CT were selected. A study was conducted to evaluate the deterioration in plan quality due to expanding air volume. For each case, the air cavity volume was isotropically expanded in three dimensions using predefined margins of 3, 5, 7, and 10 mm, while deforming bladder and rectum contours. A constraint was applied to the bony anatomy to restrict the deformation. Treatment plans were then generated for all twelve patients by recalculating the reference plan with the expanded air cavity volume.
Results: As the air cavity expanded, the maximum relative change in D98% coverage, compared to the reference plan, decreased by 10.8% ± 3.5%, while the D2% increased by 3.5% ± 0.9%. The positioning of the air cavity notably influenced the D98% variability with the 3 mm expansion. D98% coverage falls below 95% when the air cavity volume exceeds 17 cm3. On average, D2% coverage increased by 0.5% with each expansion. At the largest expansion, extensive coverage of 102% and 105% isodoses was observed compared to the reference plan.
Conclusion: Air cavity volumes above 17 cm3 can potentially degrade the high-dose PTV coverage while increasing the regions covered by the 102% and 105% isodoses. Clinical CBCT guidelines were deduced, recommending a maximum threshold of 3.2 cm in diameter in any direction.
期刊介绍:
Journal of Applied Clinical Medical Physics is an international Open Access publication dedicated to clinical medical physics. JACMP welcomes original contributions dealing with all aspects of medical physics from scientists working in the clinical medical physics around the world. JACMP accepts only online submission.
JACMP will publish:
-Original Contributions: Peer-reviewed, investigations that represent new and significant contributions to the field. Recommended word count: up to 7500.
-Review Articles: Reviews of major areas or sub-areas in the field of clinical medical physics. These articles may be of any length and are peer reviewed.
-Technical Notes: These should be no longer than 3000 words, including key references.
-Letters to the Editor: Comments on papers published in JACMP or on any other matters of interest to clinical medical physics. These should not be more than 1250 (including the literature) and their publication is only based on the decision of the editor, who occasionally asks experts on the merit of the contents.
-Book Reviews: The editorial office solicits Book Reviews.
-Announcements of Forthcoming Meetings: The Editor may provide notice of forthcoming meetings, course offerings, and other events relevant to clinical medical physics.
-Parallel Opposed Editorial: We welcome topics relevant to clinical practice and medical physics profession. The contents can be controversial debate or opposed aspects of an issue. One author argues for the position and the other against. Each side of the debate contains an opening statement up to 800 words, followed by a rebuttal up to 500 words. Readers interested in participating in this series should contact the moderator with a proposed title and a short description of the topic