活检标本中的 TILs-US 评分和 LPBC 对预测乳腺癌患者病理完全反应的诊断性能。

IF 2.4 3区 医学 Q3 ONCOLOGY
Hideo Shigematsu, Kayo Fukui, Akiko Kanou, Erika Yokoyama, Makiko Tanaka, Mutsumi Fujimoto, Kanako Suzuki, Haruka Ikejiri, Ai Amioka, Emiko Hiraoka, Shinsuke Sasada, Akiko Emi, Tetsuya Nakagiri, Koji Arihiro, Morihito Okada
{"title":"活检标本中的 TILs-US 评分和 LPBC 对预测乳腺癌患者病理完全反应的诊断性能。","authors":"Hideo Shigematsu, Kayo Fukui, Akiko Kanou, Erika Yokoyama, Makiko Tanaka, Mutsumi Fujimoto, Kanako Suzuki, Haruka Ikejiri, Ai Amioka, Emiko Hiraoka, Shinsuke Sasada, Akiko Emi, Tetsuya Nakagiri, Koji Arihiro, Morihito Okada","doi":"10.1007/s10147-024-02634-9","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes-ultrasonography (TILs-US) score is used to predict lymphocyte-predominant breast cancer (LPBC) in surgical specimens. We aimed to compare diagnostic performance of TILs-US score for predicting pathological complete response (pCR) with that of LPBC in biopsy specimens.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>TILs ≥ 50% in biopsy specimens was defined as biopsy-LPBC, and TILs-US score ≥ 4 was categorized as TILs-US score-high. Basic nomogram for pCR was developed using stepwise logistic regression based on the smallest Akaike Information Criterion, and biopsy-LPBC and TILs-US score nomograms were developed by integrating biopsy-LPBC or TILs-US scores into a basic nomogram. The diagnostic performance of the nomograms for pCR was compared using area under the curve (AUC), categorical net reclassification improvement (NRI), and integrated discrimination improvement (IDI).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>This retrospective study evaluated 118 patients with breast cancer, including 33 (28.0%) with biopsy-LPBC, 52 (44.1%) with TILs-US score-high, with 34 (28.8%) achieving pCR. The sensitivity, specificity, positive likelihood ratio, negative likelihood ratio, and AUC for predicting pCR were 0.53, 0.82, 2.96, 0.57, and 0.68, respectively, for biopsy-LPBC, and 0.76, 0.69, 2.47, 0.34, and 0.73, respectively, for TILs-US score. The biopsy-LPBC nomogram showed significant improvements in categorical NRI (p = 0.023) and IDI (p = 0.007) but not in AUC (p = 0.25), compared with the basic nomogram. The TILs-US nomogram exhibited significant improvements in AUC (p = 0.039), categorical NRI (p = 0.010), and IDI (p < 0.001).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The TILs-US score may serve as a novel marker for prediction of pCR in patients with breast cancer. An external validation study is warranted to confirm our findings.</p>","PeriodicalId":13869,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Clinical Oncology","volume":" ","pages":"1860-1869"},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11588827/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Diagnostic performance of TILs-US score and LPBC in biopsy specimens for predicting pathological complete response in patients with breast cancer.\",\"authors\":\"Hideo Shigematsu, Kayo Fukui, Akiko Kanou, Erika Yokoyama, Makiko Tanaka, Mutsumi Fujimoto, Kanako Suzuki, Haruka Ikejiri, Ai Amioka, Emiko Hiraoka, Shinsuke Sasada, Akiko Emi, Tetsuya Nakagiri, Koji Arihiro, Morihito Okada\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s10147-024-02634-9\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes-ultrasonography (TILs-US) score is used to predict lymphocyte-predominant breast cancer (LPBC) in surgical specimens. We aimed to compare diagnostic performance of TILs-US score for predicting pathological complete response (pCR) with that of LPBC in biopsy specimens.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>TILs ≥ 50% in biopsy specimens was defined as biopsy-LPBC, and TILs-US score ≥ 4 was categorized as TILs-US score-high. Basic nomogram for pCR was developed using stepwise logistic regression based on the smallest Akaike Information Criterion, and biopsy-LPBC and TILs-US score nomograms were developed by integrating biopsy-LPBC or TILs-US scores into a basic nomogram. The diagnostic performance of the nomograms for pCR was compared using area under the curve (AUC), categorical net reclassification improvement (NRI), and integrated discrimination improvement (IDI).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>This retrospective study evaluated 118 patients with breast cancer, including 33 (28.0%) with biopsy-LPBC, 52 (44.1%) with TILs-US score-high, with 34 (28.8%) achieving pCR. The sensitivity, specificity, positive likelihood ratio, negative likelihood ratio, and AUC for predicting pCR were 0.53, 0.82, 2.96, 0.57, and 0.68, respectively, for biopsy-LPBC, and 0.76, 0.69, 2.47, 0.34, and 0.73, respectively, for TILs-US score. The biopsy-LPBC nomogram showed significant improvements in categorical NRI (p = 0.023) and IDI (p = 0.007) but not in AUC (p = 0.25), compared with the basic nomogram. The TILs-US nomogram exhibited significant improvements in AUC (p = 0.039), categorical NRI (p = 0.010), and IDI (p < 0.001).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The TILs-US score may serve as a novel marker for prediction of pCR in patients with breast cancer. An external validation study is warranted to confirm our findings.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":13869,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Journal of Clinical Oncology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"1860-1869\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11588827/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Journal of Clinical Oncology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10147-024-02634-9\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/10/3 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"ONCOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Clinical Oncology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10147-024-02634-9","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/10/3 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:肿瘤浸润淋巴细胞超声造影(TILs-US)评分用于预测手术标本中淋巴细胞占优势的乳腺癌(LPBC)。我们旨在比较 TILs-US 评分预测病理完全反应(pCR)与活检标本中 LPBC 的诊断性能:方法:活检标本中TILs≥50%定义为活检-LPBC,TILs-US评分≥4分为TILs-US评分高。使用基于最小 Akaike 信息标准的逐步逻辑回归法绘制 pCR 基本提名图,并将活检-LPBC 或 TILs-US 评分整合到基本提名图中,绘制活检-LPBC 和 TILs-US 评分提名图。使用曲线下面积(AUC)、分类净重分类改进(NRI)和综合辨别改进(IDI)比较了提名图对 pCR 的诊断性能:这项回顾性研究评估了118例乳腺癌患者,其中33例(28.0%)活检为LPBC,52例(44.1%)TILs-US评分高,34例(28.8%)达到pCR。活检-LPBC预测pCR的灵敏度、特异性、阳性似然比、阴性似然比和AUC分别为0.53、0.82、2.96、0.57和0.68,TILs-US评分预测pCR的灵敏度、特异性、阳性似然比、阴性似然比和AUC分别为0.76、0.69、2.47、0.34和0.73。与基本提名图相比,活检-LPBC 提名图在分类 NRI(p = 0.023)和 IDI(p = 0.007)方面有显著改善,但在 AUC(p = 0.25)方面没有改善。TILs-US提名图在AUC(p = 0.039)、分类NRI(p = 0.010)和IDI(p 结论:TILs-US提名图的AUC、分类NRI和IDI均有显著改善:TILs-US 评分可作为预测乳腺癌患者 pCR 的新标记。为了证实我们的研究结果,有必要进行外部验证研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Diagnostic performance of TILs-US score and LPBC in biopsy specimens for predicting pathological complete response in patients with breast cancer.

Background: Tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes-ultrasonography (TILs-US) score is used to predict lymphocyte-predominant breast cancer (LPBC) in surgical specimens. We aimed to compare diagnostic performance of TILs-US score for predicting pathological complete response (pCR) with that of LPBC in biopsy specimens.

Methods: TILs ≥ 50% in biopsy specimens was defined as biopsy-LPBC, and TILs-US score ≥ 4 was categorized as TILs-US score-high. Basic nomogram for pCR was developed using stepwise logistic regression based on the smallest Akaike Information Criterion, and biopsy-LPBC and TILs-US score nomograms were developed by integrating biopsy-LPBC or TILs-US scores into a basic nomogram. The diagnostic performance of the nomograms for pCR was compared using area under the curve (AUC), categorical net reclassification improvement (NRI), and integrated discrimination improvement (IDI).

Results: This retrospective study evaluated 118 patients with breast cancer, including 33 (28.0%) with biopsy-LPBC, 52 (44.1%) with TILs-US score-high, with 34 (28.8%) achieving pCR. The sensitivity, specificity, positive likelihood ratio, negative likelihood ratio, and AUC for predicting pCR were 0.53, 0.82, 2.96, 0.57, and 0.68, respectively, for biopsy-LPBC, and 0.76, 0.69, 2.47, 0.34, and 0.73, respectively, for TILs-US score. The biopsy-LPBC nomogram showed significant improvements in categorical NRI (p = 0.023) and IDI (p = 0.007) but not in AUC (p = 0.25), compared with the basic nomogram. The TILs-US nomogram exhibited significant improvements in AUC (p = 0.039), categorical NRI (p = 0.010), and IDI (p < 0.001).

Conclusions: The TILs-US score may serve as a novel marker for prediction of pCR in patients with breast cancer. An external validation study is warranted to confirm our findings.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.80
自引率
3.00%
发文量
175
审稿时长
2 months
期刊介绍: The International Journal of Clinical Oncology (IJCO) welcomes original research papers on all aspects of clinical oncology that report the results of novel and timely investigations. Reports on clinical trials are encouraged. Experimental studies will also be accepted if they have obvious relevance to clinical oncology. Membership in the Japan Society of Clinical Oncology is not a prerequisite for submission to the journal. Papers are received on the understanding that: their contents have not been published in whole or in part elsewhere; that they are subject to peer review by at least two referees and the Editors, and to editorial revision of the language and contents; and that the Editors are responsible for their acceptance, rejection, and order of publication.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信