在机器人辅助脊柱侧弯手术中,创建地标凹坑对提高椎弓根螺钉插入准确性的影响。

IF 2.6 3区 医学 Q2 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Hiroki Oba, Shota Ikegami, Masashi Uehara, Terue Hatakenaka, Yoshinari Miyaoka, Daisuke Kurogochi, Takuma Fukuzawa, Shinji Sasao, Keisuke Shigenobu, Fumiaki Makiyama, Michihiko Koseki, Masashi Neo, Jun Takahashi
{"title":"在机器人辅助脊柱侧弯手术中,创建地标凹坑对提高椎弓根螺钉插入准确性的影响。","authors":"Hiroki Oba, Shota Ikegami, Masashi Uehara, Terue Hatakenaka, Yoshinari Miyaoka, Daisuke Kurogochi, Takuma Fukuzawa, Shinji Sasao, Keisuke Shigenobu, Fumiaki Makiyama, Michihiko Koseki, Masashi Neo, Jun Takahashi","doi":"10.1007/s00586-024-08506-0","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>This study evaluated the impact of the Landmark Crater (LC) method on pedicle perforation rates in robot-guided surgery for pediatric scoliosis for each pedicle diameter.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Seventy-six scoliosis patients underwent robot-assisted posterior spinal fusion. The cohort consisted of 19 male and 57 female patients, with a mean ± standard deviation age of 17.5 ± 7.7 years and a preoperative Cobb angle of 57.0 ± 18.5°. The LC method is a method in which craters that serves as a landmark are created in advance at the planned PS insertion site of all pedicles within the intraoperative CT imaging area. The patients were divided into the LC group, in which PS insertion was performed using the LC method, and the control group using the conventional PS insertion method. Overall and pedicle perforation rates for each pedicle outer diameter were compared between the groups by Fisher's exact test.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The LC group exhibited a significantly lower pedicle major perforation rate than did the control group (2.7% vs. 6.2%, P = 0.001). The perforation rates in pedicles with a pedicle outer diameter > 6 mm, 4-6 mm, 2-4 mm, and < 2 mm were 0.61%, 1.6%, 5.1%, and 21%, in the LC group and 0.75%, 4.1%, 12%, and 50% in the control group, respectively.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>In robot-assisted surgery for pediatric scoliosis, the LC method enabled significantly lower pedicle perforation rates over the conventional method. Both the LC and conventional methods exhibited higher perforation rates for smaller pedicle diameters.</p>","PeriodicalId":12323,"journal":{"name":"European Spine Journal","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Impact of landmark crater creation on improving accuracy of pedicle screw insertion in robot-assisted scoliosis surgery.\",\"authors\":\"Hiroki Oba, Shota Ikegami, Masashi Uehara, Terue Hatakenaka, Yoshinari Miyaoka, Daisuke Kurogochi, Takuma Fukuzawa, Shinji Sasao, Keisuke Shigenobu, Fumiaki Makiyama, Michihiko Koseki, Masashi Neo, Jun Takahashi\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s00586-024-08506-0\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>This study evaluated the impact of the Landmark Crater (LC) method on pedicle perforation rates in robot-guided surgery for pediatric scoliosis for each pedicle diameter.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Seventy-six scoliosis patients underwent robot-assisted posterior spinal fusion. The cohort consisted of 19 male and 57 female patients, with a mean ± standard deviation age of 17.5 ± 7.7 years and a preoperative Cobb angle of 57.0 ± 18.5°. The LC method is a method in which craters that serves as a landmark are created in advance at the planned PS insertion site of all pedicles within the intraoperative CT imaging area. The patients were divided into the LC group, in which PS insertion was performed using the LC method, and the control group using the conventional PS insertion method. Overall and pedicle perforation rates for each pedicle outer diameter were compared between the groups by Fisher's exact test.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The LC group exhibited a significantly lower pedicle major perforation rate than did the control group (2.7% vs. 6.2%, P = 0.001). The perforation rates in pedicles with a pedicle outer diameter > 6 mm, 4-6 mm, 2-4 mm, and < 2 mm were 0.61%, 1.6%, 5.1%, and 21%, in the LC group and 0.75%, 4.1%, 12%, and 50% in the control group, respectively.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>In robot-assisted surgery for pediatric scoliosis, the LC method enabled significantly lower pedicle perforation rates over the conventional method. Both the LC and conventional methods exhibited higher perforation rates for smaller pedicle diameters.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":12323,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"European Spine Journal\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-04\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"European Spine Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-024-08506-0\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Spine Journal","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-024-08506-0","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:本研究评估了Landmark Crater(LC)方法对机器人引导的小儿脊柱侧凸手术中每种椎弓根直径的椎弓根穿孔率的影响:76名脊柱侧凸患者接受了机器人辅助后路脊柱融合术。其中男性患者19例,女性患者57例,平均年龄(标准差)为(17.5±7.7)岁,术前Cobb角为(57.0±18.5)°。LC法是一种在术中CT成像区域内所有椎弓根的计划PS插入部位提前创建作为地标的火山口的方法。患者被分为 LC 组和对照组,前者使用 LC 方法插入 PS,后者使用传统的 PS 插入方法。通过费舍尔精确检验比较了两组患者的总体穿孔率和各椎弓根外径的椎弓根穿孔率:结果:LC 组的椎弓根主要穿孔率明显低于对照组(2.7% 对 6.2%,P = 0.001)。椎弓根外径大于 6 毫米、4-6 毫米、2-4 毫米和结论:在小儿脊柱侧凸的机器人辅助手术中,LC方法的椎弓根穿孔率明显低于传统方法。对于较小的椎弓根直径,LC和传统方法的穿孔率都较高。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Impact of landmark crater creation on improving accuracy of pedicle screw insertion in robot-assisted scoliosis surgery.

Purpose: This study evaluated the impact of the Landmark Crater (LC) method on pedicle perforation rates in robot-guided surgery for pediatric scoliosis for each pedicle diameter.

Methods: Seventy-six scoliosis patients underwent robot-assisted posterior spinal fusion. The cohort consisted of 19 male and 57 female patients, with a mean ± standard deviation age of 17.5 ± 7.7 years and a preoperative Cobb angle of 57.0 ± 18.5°. The LC method is a method in which craters that serves as a landmark are created in advance at the planned PS insertion site of all pedicles within the intraoperative CT imaging area. The patients were divided into the LC group, in which PS insertion was performed using the LC method, and the control group using the conventional PS insertion method. Overall and pedicle perforation rates for each pedicle outer diameter were compared between the groups by Fisher's exact test.

Results: The LC group exhibited a significantly lower pedicle major perforation rate than did the control group (2.7% vs. 6.2%, P = 0.001). The perforation rates in pedicles with a pedicle outer diameter > 6 mm, 4-6 mm, 2-4 mm, and < 2 mm were 0.61%, 1.6%, 5.1%, and 21%, in the LC group and 0.75%, 4.1%, 12%, and 50% in the control group, respectively.

Conclusion: In robot-assisted surgery for pediatric scoliosis, the LC method enabled significantly lower pedicle perforation rates over the conventional method. Both the LC and conventional methods exhibited higher perforation rates for smaller pedicle diameters.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
European Spine Journal
European Spine Journal 医学-临床神经学
CiteScore
4.80
自引率
10.70%
发文量
373
审稿时长
2-4 weeks
期刊介绍: "European Spine Journal" is a publication founded in response to the increasing trend toward specialization in spinal surgery and spinal pathology in general. The Journal is devoted to all spine related disciplines, including functional and surgical anatomy of the spine, biomechanics and pathophysiology, diagnostic procedures, and neurology, surgery and outcomes. The aim of "European Spine Journal" is to support the further development of highly innovative spine treatments including but not restricted to surgery and to provide an integrated and balanced view of diagnostic, research and treatment procedures as well as outcomes that will enhance effective collaboration among specialists worldwide. The “European Spine Journal” also participates in education by means of videos, interactive meetings and the endorsement of educative efforts. Official publication of EUROSPINE, The Spine Society of Europe
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信