多多马地区初级卫生保健管理人员在决策中使用常规卫生数据的情况及其相关因素。

IF 2.7 3区 医学 Q2 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
Fatuma Yusuph, Julius Edward Ntwenya, Ally Kinyaga, Nyasiro Sophia Gibore
{"title":"多多马地区初级卫生保健管理人员在决策中使用常规卫生数据的情况及其相关因素。","authors":"Fatuma Yusuph, Julius Edward Ntwenya, Ally Kinyaga, Nyasiro Sophia Gibore","doi":"10.1186/s12913-024-11658-w","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Data demand and use culture have a tremendous impact on the proper allocation of scarce resources and evidence-based decision making. However, primary healthcare managers in the majority of Sub-Saharan African countries continue to struggle with using routine health data for decision-making.</p><p><strong>Purpose/objective: </strong>This study aimed to assess routine health data use for decision making among primary healthcare managers in Dodoma region.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Cross-sectional study design involved 188 primary healthcare managers from Dodoma City Council, Kondoa Town Council and Bahi District Council was conducted. A self-administered questionnaire adapted from the Performance of Routine Information System Management (PRISM) tools was used to collect the data. Data was analysed by using the Statistical Package for Social Science (SPSS) program. Principal Component Analysis was used to find the level of routine health data use, binary logistic regression analysis was used to determine factors associated with routine health data use for decision making among primary healthcare managers. The study was conducted from May to June, 2022.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The level of adequate routine health data use for decision making among healthcare managers was 63.30%. Factors associated with adequate routine health data use for decision making among healthcare managers were; respondents characteristics: years of working experience (OR = 1.955, 95% CI= [0.892,4.287]), district surveyed (OR = 4.760, 95%CI= [1.412,16.049]), level of health facility (OR = 3.867, 95%CI= [1.354,7.122]) and male gender (OR = 1.901, 95%CI= [1.027,3.521]). Individual factors: comparing data with strategic objectives (OR = 2.986, 95%CI= [1.233-7.229]), decision based on health needs (OR = 7.330, 95%CI= [1.968-27.295]) and decision based on detection of outbreak (OR = 3.769, 95%CI= [1.091-13.019]). Technical factors: ability to check data accuracy (OR = 3.120, 95%CI= [1.682-5.789]), ability to explain findings and its implication (OR = 2.443, 95%CI= [1.278-4.670]) and ability to use information to identity gaps and targets (OR = 2.621, 95%CI= [1.381-4.974]). Organizational factors: organizational support (OR = 3.530, CI= [1.397-8.919]), analyse data regularly (OR = 2.026, 95%CI= [1.075-3.820]) and displays information on key performance indicators (OR = 3.464, 95%CI= [1.525-7.870]).</p><p><strong>Conclusion and recommendation: </strong>The level of routine health data use for decision making among primary healthcare managers was found to be modest. The level of data demand and use culture may increase more quickly if capacity building is strengthened and issues that de-motivate primary health care managers from using data are addressed.</p>","PeriodicalId":9012,"journal":{"name":"BMC Health Services Research","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11447978/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Routine health data use for decision making and its associated factors among primary healthcare managers in dodoma region.\",\"authors\":\"Fatuma Yusuph, Julius Edward Ntwenya, Ally Kinyaga, Nyasiro Sophia Gibore\",\"doi\":\"10.1186/s12913-024-11658-w\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Data demand and use culture have a tremendous impact on the proper allocation of scarce resources and evidence-based decision making. However, primary healthcare managers in the majority of Sub-Saharan African countries continue to struggle with using routine health data for decision-making.</p><p><strong>Purpose/objective: </strong>This study aimed to assess routine health data use for decision making among primary healthcare managers in Dodoma region.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Cross-sectional study design involved 188 primary healthcare managers from Dodoma City Council, Kondoa Town Council and Bahi District Council was conducted. A self-administered questionnaire adapted from the Performance of Routine Information System Management (PRISM) tools was used to collect the data. Data was analysed by using the Statistical Package for Social Science (SPSS) program. Principal Component Analysis was used to find the level of routine health data use, binary logistic regression analysis was used to determine factors associated with routine health data use for decision making among primary healthcare managers. The study was conducted from May to June, 2022.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The level of adequate routine health data use for decision making among healthcare managers was 63.30%. Factors associated with adequate routine health data use for decision making among healthcare managers were; respondents characteristics: years of working experience (OR = 1.955, 95% CI= [0.892,4.287]), district surveyed (OR = 4.760, 95%CI= [1.412,16.049]), level of health facility (OR = 3.867, 95%CI= [1.354,7.122]) and male gender (OR = 1.901, 95%CI= [1.027,3.521]). Individual factors: comparing data with strategic objectives (OR = 2.986, 95%CI= [1.233-7.229]), decision based on health needs (OR = 7.330, 95%CI= [1.968-27.295]) and decision based on detection of outbreak (OR = 3.769, 95%CI= [1.091-13.019]). Technical factors: ability to check data accuracy (OR = 3.120, 95%CI= [1.682-5.789]), ability to explain findings and its implication (OR = 2.443, 95%CI= [1.278-4.670]) and ability to use information to identity gaps and targets (OR = 2.621, 95%CI= [1.381-4.974]). Organizational factors: organizational support (OR = 3.530, CI= [1.397-8.919]), analyse data regularly (OR = 2.026, 95%CI= [1.075-3.820]) and displays information on key performance indicators (OR = 3.464, 95%CI= [1.525-7.870]).</p><p><strong>Conclusion and recommendation: </strong>The level of routine health data use for decision making among primary healthcare managers was found to be modest. The level of data demand and use culture may increase more quickly if capacity building is strengthened and issues that de-motivate primary health care managers from using data are addressed.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":9012,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"BMC Health Services Research\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-03\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11447978/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"BMC Health Services Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12913-024-11658-w\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMC Health Services Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12913-024-11658-w","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:数据需求和使用文化对稀缺资源的合理分配和循证决策具有巨大影响。然而,大多数撒哈拉以南非洲国家的初级卫生保健管理人员仍在努力将常规卫生保健数据用于决策:本研究旨在评估多多马地区初级卫生保健管理人员在决策中使用常规卫生保健数据的情况:研究采用横断面研究设计,涉及来自多多马市议会、Kondoa 镇议会和 Bahi 区议会的 188 名初级医疗保健管理人员。在收集数据时,使用了根据常规信息系统管理绩效(PRISM)工具改编的自填式问卷。数据使用社会科学统计软件包 (SPSS) 程序进行分析。主成分分析用于确定常规健康数据的使用水平,二元逻辑回归分析用于确定与基层医疗管理人员在决策中使用常规健康数据相关的因素。研究于 2022 年 5 月至 6 月进行:结果:医疗保健管理人员充分使用常规健康数据进行决策的比例为 63.30%。与医疗管理人员充分使用常规医疗数据进行决策相关的因素有:受访者特征:工作年限(OR = 1.955,95%CI= [0.892,4.287])、调查地区(OR = 4.760,95%CI= [1.412,16.049])、医疗机构级别(OR = 3.867,95%CI= [1.354,7.122])和男性性别(OR = 1.901,95%CI= [1.027,3.521])。个人因素:将数据与战略目标进行比较(OR = 2.986,95%CI= [1.233-7.229]),根据健康需求做出决策(OR = 7.330,95%CI= [1.968-27.295]),根据发现疫情做出决策(OR = 3.769,95%CI= [1.091-13.019])。技术因素:检查数据准确性的能力(OR = 3.120,95%CI= [1.682-5.789])、解释调查结果及其影响的能力(OR = 2.443,95%CI= [1.278-4.670])以及利用信息找出差距和目标的能力(OR = 2.621,95%CI= [1.381-4.974])。组织因素:组织支持(OR=3.530,95%CI= [1.397-8.919])、定期分析数据(OR=2.026,95%CI= [1.075-3.820])和显示关键绩效指标信息(OR=3.464,95%CI= [1.525-7.870]):研究发现,基层医疗管理人员在决策过程中使用常规健康数据的水平并不高。如果加强能力建设,并解决阻碍基层医疗管理人员使用数据的问题,数据需求和使用文化的水平可能会提高得更快。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Routine health data use for decision making and its associated factors among primary healthcare managers in dodoma region.

Background: Data demand and use culture have a tremendous impact on the proper allocation of scarce resources and evidence-based decision making. However, primary healthcare managers in the majority of Sub-Saharan African countries continue to struggle with using routine health data for decision-making.

Purpose/objective: This study aimed to assess routine health data use for decision making among primary healthcare managers in Dodoma region.

Methods: Cross-sectional study design involved 188 primary healthcare managers from Dodoma City Council, Kondoa Town Council and Bahi District Council was conducted. A self-administered questionnaire adapted from the Performance of Routine Information System Management (PRISM) tools was used to collect the data. Data was analysed by using the Statistical Package for Social Science (SPSS) program. Principal Component Analysis was used to find the level of routine health data use, binary logistic regression analysis was used to determine factors associated with routine health data use for decision making among primary healthcare managers. The study was conducted from May to June, 2022.

Results: The level of adequate routine health data use for decision making among healthcare managers was 63.30%. Factors associated with adequate routine health data use for decision making among healthcare managers were; respondents characteristics: years of working experience (OR = 1.955, 95% CI= [0.892,4.287]), district surveyed (OR = 4.760, 95%CI= [1.412,16.049]), level of health facility (OR = 3.867, 95%CI= [1.354,7.122]) and male gender (OR = 1.901, 95%CI= [1.027,3.521]). Individual factors: comparing data with strategic objectives (OR = 2.986, 95%CI= [1.233-7.229]), decision based on health needs (OR = 7.330, 95%CI= [1.968-27.295]) and decision based on detection of outbreak (OR = 3.769, 95%CI= [1.091-13.019]). Technical factors: ability to check data accuracy (OR = 3.120, 95%CI= [1.682-5.789]), ability to explain findings and its implication (OR = 2.443, 95%CI= [1.278-4.670]) and ability to use information to identity gaps and targets (OR = 2.621, 95%CI= [1.381-4.974]). Organizational factors: organizational support (OR = 3.530, CI= [1.397-8.919]), analyse data regularly (OR = 2.026, 95%CI= [1.075-3.820]) and displays information on key performance indicators (OR = 3.464, 95%CI= [1.525-7.870]).

Conclusion and recommendation: The level of routine health data use for decision making among primary healthcare managers was found to be modest. The level of data demand and use culture may increase more quickly if capacity building is strengthened and issues that de-motivate primary health care managers from using data are addressed.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
BMC Health Services Research
BMC Health Services Research 医学-卫生保健
CiteScore
4.40
自引率
7.10%
发文量
1372
审稿时长
6 months
期刊介绍: BMC Health Services Research is an open access, peer-reviewed journal that considers articles on all aspects of health services research, including delivery of care, management of health services, assessment of healthcare needs, measurement of outcomes, allocation of healthcare resources, evaluation of different health markets and health services organizations, international comparative analysis of health systems, health economics and the impact of health policies and regulations.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信