中国碳峰值和碳中和背景下环境变化的健康共同效益。

Health data science Pub Date : 2024-10-02 eCollection Date: 2024-01-01 DOI:10.34133/hds.0188
Feifei Zhang, Chao Yang, Fulin Wang, Pengfei Li, Luxia Zhang
{"title":"中国碳峰值和碳中和背景下环境变化的健康共同效益。","authors":"Feifei Zhang, Chao Yang, Fulin Wang, Pengfei Li, Luxia Zhang","doi":"10.34133/hds.0188","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Importance: </strong>Climate change mitigation policies aimed at limiting greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions would bring substantial health co-benefits by directly alleviating climate change or indirectly reducing air pollution. As one of the largest developing countries and GHG emitter globally, China's carbon-peaking and carbon neutrality goals would lead to substantial co-benefits on global environment and therefore on human health. This review summarized the key findings and gaps in studies on the impact of China's carbon mitigation strategies on human health.</p><p><strong>Highlights: </strong>There is a wide consensus that limiting the temperature rise well below 2 °C would markedly reduce the climate-related health impacts compared with high emission scenario, although heat-related mortalities, labor productivity reduction rates, and infectious disease morbidities would continue increasing over time as temperature rises. Further, hundreds of thousands of air pollutant-related mortalities (mainly due to PM<sub>2.5</sub> and O<sub>3</sub>) could be avoided per year compared with the reference scenario without climate policy. Carbon reduction policies can also alleviate morbidities due to acute exposure to PM<sub>2.5</sub>. Further research with respect to morbidities attributed to nonoptimal temperature and air pollution, and health impacts attributed to precipitation and extreme weather events under current carbon policy in China or its equivalent in other developing countries is needed to improve our understanding of the disease burden in the coming decades.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This review provides up-to-date evidence of potential health co-benefits under Chinese carbon policies and highlights the importance of considering these co-benefits into future climate policy development in both China and other nations endeavoring carbon reductions.</p>","PeriodicalId":73207,"journal":{"name":"Health data science","volume":"4 ","pages":"0188"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11446102/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Health Co-Benefits of Environmental Changes in the Context of Carbon Peaking and Carbon Neutrality in China.\",\"authors\":\"Feifei Zhang, Chao Yang, Fulin Wang, Pengfei Li, Luxia Zhang\",\"doi\":\"10.34133/hds.0188\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Importance: </strong>Climate change mitigation policies aimed at limiting greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions would bring substantial health co-benefits by directly alleviating climate change or indirectly reducing air pollution. As one of the largest developing countries and GHG emitter globally, China's carbon-peaking and carbon neutrality goals would lead to substantial co-benefits on global environment and therefore on human health. This review summarized the key findings and gaps in studies on the impact of China's carbon mitigation strategies on human health.</p><p><strong>Highlights: </strong>There is a wide consensus that limiting the temperature rise well below 2 °C would markedly reduce the climate-related health impacts compared with high emission scenario, although heat-related mortalities, labor productivity reduction rates, and infectious disease morbidities would continue increasing over time as temperature rises. Further, hundreds of thousands of air pollutant-related mortalities (mainly due to PM<sub>2.5</sub> and O<sub>3</sub>) could be avoided per year compared with the reference scenario without climate policy. Carbon reduction policies can also alleviate morbidities due to acute exposure to PM<sub>2.5</sub>. Further research with respect to morbidities attributed to nonoptimal temperature and air pollution, and health impacts attributed to precipitation and extreme weather events under current carbon policy in China or its equivalent in other developing countries is needed to improve our understanding of the disease burden in the coming decades.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This review provides up-to-date evidence of potential health co-benefits under Chinese carbon policies and highlights the importance of considering these co-benefits into future climate policy development in both China and other nations endeavoring carbon reductions.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":73207,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Health data science\",\"volume\":\"4 \",\"pages\":\"0188\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11446102/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Health data science\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.34133/hds.0188\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Health data science","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.34133/hds.0188","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

重要性:旨在限制温室气体(GHG)排放的减缓气候变化政策将直接缓解气候变化或间接减少空气污染,从而带来巨大的共同健康效益。作为全球最大的发展中国家和温室气体排放国之一,中国的碳平衡和碳中和目标将为全球环境带来巨大的共同利益,从而为人类健康带来巨大的共同利益。本综述总结了中国碳减排战略对人类健康影响研究的主要发现和不足:与高排放情景相比,将气温升幅限制在2 °C以下将显著减少与气候相关的健康影响,这一点已达成广泛共识,尽管随着气温升高,与高温相关的死亡率、劳动生产率下降率和传染病发病率将继续增加。此外,与没有气候政策的参考情景相比,每年可避免数十万例与空气污染有关的死亡(主要是 PM2.5 和 O3 导致的死亡)。减碳政策还可减轻因急性接触 PM2.5 而导致的发病率。为了更好地了解未来几十年的疾病负担,我们需要进一步研究在中国或其他发展中国家现行碳政策下,非最佳温度和空气污染导致的发病率,以及降水和极端天气事件对健康的影响:本综述提供了中国碳政策下潜在健康共同效益的最新证据,并强调了中国和其他致力于碳减排的国家在制定未来气候政策时考虑这些共同效益的重要性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Health Co-Benefits of Environmental Changes in the Context of Carbon Peaking and Carbon Neutrality in China.

Importance: Climate change mitigation policies aimed at limiting greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions would bring substantial health co-benefits by directly alleviating climate change or indirectly reducing air pollution. As one of the largest developing countries and GHG emitter globally, China's carbon-peaking and carbon neutrality goals would lead to substantial co-benefits on global environment and therefore on human health. This review summarized the key findings and gaps in studies on the impact of China's carbon mitigation strategies on human health.

Highlights: There is a wide consensus that limiting the temperature rise well below 2 °C would markedly reduce the climate-related health impacts compared with high emission scenario, although heat-related mortalities, labor productivity reduction rates, and infectious disease morbidities would continue increasing over time as temperature rises. Further, hundreds of thousands of air pollutant-related mortalities (mainly due to PM2.5 and O3) could be avoided per year compared with the reference scenario without climate policy. Carbon reduction policies can also alleviate morbidities due to acute exposure to PM2.5. Further research with respect to morbidities attributed to nonoptimal temperature and air pollution, and health impacts attributed to precipitation and extreme weather events under current carbon policy in China or its equivalent in other developing countries is needed to improve our understanding of the disease burden in the coming decades.

Conclusions: This review provides up-to-date evidence of potential health co-benefits under Chinese carbon policies and highlights the importance of considering these co-benefits into future climate policy development in both China and other nations endeavoring carbon reductions.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信