翻修全关节成形术中随机对照试验患者人群的特征和潜在相关性:系统回顾。

IF 1.6 4区 医学 Q3 ORTHOPEDICS
Jonathan Yu, Vidushi Tripathi, Patrick Magahis, Michael Ast, Peter K Sculco, Ajay Premkumar
{"title":"翻修全关节成形术中随机对照试验患者人群的特征和潜在相关性:系统回顾。","authors":"Jonathan Yu, Vidushi Tripathi, Patrick Magahis, Michael Ast, Peter K Sculco, Ajay Premkumar","doi":"10.1055/a-2428-1058","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Randomized controlled trial (RCT) studies in revision total joint arthroplasty (rTJA) are essential to investigate the effectiveness of interventions. However, there has been limited research investigating how patient cohorts comprising rTJA RCT samples resemble the US patient population undergoing rTJA in terms of demographic and clinical characteristics. Thus, the purpose of this systematic review was to compare the patient characteristics of rTJA RCT cohorts with the characteristics of national patient database cohorts.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>RCT studies for rTJA were aggregated. Patient demographics in this group were compared against HCUP NIS and ACS-NSQIP patient cohorts.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Forty-six RCTs met inclusion criteria. There were 3,780 total patients across 46 RCTs. The average age of patients in the rTJA RCT cohort was 66.4 9.4 while the NIS cohort was 67.3 11.1 (d=0.08, effect size=small). The average BMI of the rTJA RCT cohort was 31.1 5.7 while the NSQIP cohort was 31.7 8.3 (d=0.08, effect size=small). For rTJA, effect sizes for age, BMI, sex, ethnicity, smoking, and diabetes were all small or very small.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Overall, the rTJA RCT patient cohort does not differ significantly compared to the general patient population undergoing rTJA. Differences in demographic and clinical characteristics between the rTJA RCT cohort and database cohorts were minimal to small, indicating that these differences are unlikely to impact clinical outcomes.</p>","PeriodicalId":48798,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Knee Surgery","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Characterization and Potential Relevance of Randomized Controlled Trial Patient Populations in Revision Total Joint Arthroplasty: A Systematic Review.\",\"authors\":\"Jonathan Yu, Vidushi Tripathi, Patrick Magahis, Michael Ast, Peter K Sculco, Ajay Premkumar\",\"doi\":\"10.1055/a-2428-1058\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Randomized controlled trial (RCT) studies in revision total joint arthroplasty (rTJA) are essential to investigate the effectiveness of interventions. However, there has been limited research investigating how patient cohorts comprising rTJA RCT samples resemble the US patient population undergoing rTJA in terms of demographic and clinical characteristics. Thus, the purpose of this systematic review was to compare the patient characteristics of rTJA RCT cohorts with the characteristics of national patient database cohorts.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>RCT studies for rTJA were aggregated. Patient demographics in this group were compared against HCUP NIS and ACS-NSQIP patient cohorts.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Forty-six RCTs met inclusion criteria. There were 3,780 total patients across 46 RCTs. The average age of patients in the rTJA RCT cohort was 66.4 9.4 while the NIS cohort was 67.3 11.1 (d=0.08, effect size=small). The average BMI of the rTJA RCT cohort was 31.1 5.7 while the NSQIP cohort was 31.7 8.3 (d=0.08, effect size=small). For rTJA, effect sizes for age, BMI, sex, ethnicity, smoking, and diabetes were all small or very small.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Overall, the rTJA RCT patient cohort does not differ significantly compared to the general patient population undergoing rTJA. Differences in demographic and clinical characteristics between the rTJA RCT cohort and database cohorts were minimal to small, indicating that these differences are unlikely to impact clinical outcomes.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48798,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Knee Surgery\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Knee Surgery\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1055/a-2428-1058\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"ORTHOPEDICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Knee Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1055/a-2428-1058","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

简介:翻修全关节置换术(rTJA)的随机对照试验(RCT)研究对于研究干预措施的有效性至关重要。然而,就人口统计学和临床特征而言,对构成翻修全关节成形术 RCT 样本的患者群与接受翻修全关节成形术的美国患者群相似性的研究十分有限。因此,本系统性综述的目的是比较 rTJA RCT 队列的患者特征与国家患者数据库队列的特征:方法:汇总 rTJA 的 RCT 研究。方法:将rTJA的RCT研究汇总,将该组患者的人口统计学特征与HCUP NIS和ACS-NSQIP患者队列进行比较:结果:46 项 RCT 研究符合纳入标准。46项研究共有3780名患者。rTJA RCT队列中患者的平均年龄为66.4 9.4岁,而NIS队列中患者的平均年龄为67.3 11.1岁(d=0.08,效应大小=小)。rTJA RCT队列的平均体重指数为31.1 5.7,而NSQIP队列为31.7 8.3(d=0.08,效应大小=小)。对于 rTJA,年龄、体重指数、性别、种族、吸烟和糖尿病的效应大小都很小或非常小:总体而言,rTJA RCT 患者群与接受 rTJA 的普通患者群相比没有显著差异。rTJA RCT 队列与数据库队列在人口统计学和临床特征方面的差异极小或很小,表明这些差异不太可能影响临床结果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Characterization and Potential Relevance of Randomized Controlled Trial Patient Populations in Revision Total Joint Arthroplasty: A Systematic Review.

Introduction: Randomized controlled trial (RCT) studies in revision total joint arthroplasty (rTJA) are essential to investigate the effectiveness of interventions. However, there has been limited research investigating how patient cohorts comprising rTJA RCT samples resemble the US patient population undergoing rTJA in terms of demographic and clinical characteristics. Thus, the purpose of this systematic review was to compare the patient characteristics of rTJA RCT cohorts with the characteristics of national patient database cohorts.

Methods: RCT studies for rTJA were aggregated. Patient demographics in this group were compared against HCUP NIS and ACS-NSQIP patient cohorts.

Results: Forty-six RCTs met inclusion criteria. There were 3,780 total patients across 46 RCTs. The average age of patients in the rTJA RCT cohort was 66.4 9.4 while the NIS cohort was 67.3 11.1 (d=0.08, effect size=small). The average BMI of the rTJA RCT cohort was 31.1 5.7 while the NSQIP cohort was 31.7 8.3 (d=0.08, effect size=small). For rTJA, effect sizes for age, BMI, sex, ethnicity, smoking, and diabetes were all small or very small.

Conclusions: Overall, the rTJA RCT patient cohort does not differ significantly compared to the general patient population undergoing rTJA. Differences in demographic and clinical characteristics between the rTJA RCT cohort and database cohorts were minimal to small, indicating that these differences are unlikely to impact clinical outcomes.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.50
自引率
5.90%
发文量
139
期刊介绍: The Journal of Knee Surgery covers a range of issues relating to the orthopaedic techniques of arthroscopy, arthroplasty, and reconstructive surgery of the knee joint. In addition to original peer-review articles, this periodical provides details on emerging surgical techniques, as well as reviews and special focus sections. Topics of interest include cruciate ligament repair and reconstruction, bone grafting, cartilage regeneration, and magnetic resonance imaging.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信