Matthieu Lalevee, Mo Saffarini, Floris van Rooij, Luca Nover, Alexis Nogier, Philippe Beaudet
{"title":"使用轴跖骨截骨手术治疗外翻后长期随访的复发率:系统回顾和荟萃分析。","authors":"Matthieu Lalevee, Mo Saffarini, Floris van Rooij, Luca Nover, Alexis Nogier, Philippe Beaudet","doi":"10.1530/EOR-23-0093","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Recurrence of hallux valgus (HV) following corrective surgery is a frequent concern. A recent systematic review estimated recurrence of HV in only 4.9%, which may be an underestimation, as most included studies had short- to mid-term follow-up. The purpose of this systematic review and meta-analysis was to synthesize and critically appraise the literature on the long-term outcomes of shaft osteotomies of the first metatarsal (M1) to treat HV without inflammatory disease or degenerative arthritis, and to assess the long-term HV recurrence rates of studies with a minimum follow-up of 5 years.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This systematic review conforms to the PRISMA guidelines. The authors conducted a search using PubMed, Embase®, and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials databases. Studies that report outcomes of shaft osteotomies of the M1 for non-inflammatory and non-degenerative HV having a minimum follow-up of 5 years were included. We found five eligible studies comprising six datasets, all assessed Scarf osteotomies with a mean follow-up that ranged from 8 to 14 years.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The HV recurrence rate was 40%, considering the threshold of >15° hallux valgus angle (HVA), 30% having >20°, and 2% having >25°.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>At a minimum follow-up of 8 years following shaft osteotomies of M1, the HVA was 15.9°, the intermetatarsal angle (IMA) was 7.7°, and the DMAA was 8.3°. Furthermore, the recurrence rates considering the various thresholds of HVA were: 40% having >15°, 20% having >20°, and 2% having >25°.</p><p><strong>Level of evidence: </strong>Meta-analysis, Level IV.</p>","PeriodicalId":48598,"journal":{"name":"Efort Open Reviews","volume":"9 10","pages":"933-940"},"PeriodicalIF":4.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11457806/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Recurrence rates with long-term follow-up after hallux valgus surgical treatment using shaft metatarsal osteotomies: a systematic review and meta-analysis.\",\"authors\":\"Matthieu Lalevee, Mo Saffarini, Floris van Rooij, Luca Nover, Alexis Nogier, Philippe Beaudet\",\"doi\":\"10.1530/EOR-23-0093\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Recurrence of hallux valgus (HV) following corrective surgery is a frequent concern. A recent systematic review estimated recurrence of HV in only 4.9%, which may be an underestimation, as most included studies had short- to mid-term follow-up. The purpose of this systematic review and meta-analysis was to synthesize and critically appraise the literature on the long-term outcomes of shaft osteotomies of the first metatarsal (M1) to treat HV without inflammatory disease or degenerative arthritis, and to assess the long-term HV recurrence rates of studies with a minimum follow-up of 5 years.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This systematic review conforms to the PRISMA guidelines. The authors conducted a search using PubMed, Embase®, and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials databases. Studies that report outcomes of shaft osteotomies of the M1 for non-inflammatory and non-degenerative HV having a minimum follow-up of 5 years were included. We found five eligible studies comprising six datasets, all assessed Scarf osteotomies with a mean follow-up that ranged from 8 to 14 years.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The HV recurrence rate was 40%, considering the threshold of >15° hallux valgus angle (HVA), 30% having >20°, and 2% having >25°.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>At a minimum follow-up of 8 years following shaft osteotomies of M1, the HVA was 15.9°, the intermetatarsal angle (IMA) was 7.7°, and the DMAA was 8.3°. Furthermore, the recurrence rates considering the various thresholds of HVA were: 40% having >15°, 20% having >20°, and 2% having >25°.</p><p><strong>Level of evidence: </strong>Meta-analysis, Level IV.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48598,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Efort Open Reviews\",\"volume\":\"9 10\",\"pages\":\"933-940\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-03\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11457806/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Efort Open Reviews\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1530/EOR-23-0093\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ORTHOPEDICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Efort Open Reviews","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1530/EOR-23-0093","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
目的:外翻矫正手术后的复发是人们经常关注的问题。最近的一项系统性综述估计,HV的复发率仅为4.9%,这可能是低估了HV的复发率,因为大多数纳入的研究都是短期到中期的随访。本系统综述和荟萃分析的目的是综合并批判性地评估第一跖骨(M1)轴截骨术治疗无炎症或退行性关节炎的HV的长期疗效,并评估至少随访5年的研究的长期HV复发率:本系统综述符合 PRISMA 指南。作者使用 PubMed、Embase® 和 Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials 数据库进行了检索。纳入的研究报告了 M1 轴截骨术治疗非炎症性和非退行性 HV 的结果,且随访时间至少为 5 年。我们找到了五项符合条件的研究,包括六个数据集,所有研究都对疤痕截骨术进行了评估,平均随访时间从 8 年到 14 年不等:结果:以拇指外翻角度(HVA)大于15°为临界值,HV复发率为40%,大于20°的复发率为30%,大于25°的复发率为2%:M1轴截骨术后至少随访8年,HVA为15.9°,跖骨间角度(IMA)为7.7°,DMAA为8.3°。此外,考虑到 HVA 的不同阈值,复发率分别为:40% >15°,20% >15°,20% >15°:40%>15°,20%>20°,2%>25°:Meta分析,IV级。
Recurrence rates with long-term follow-up after hallux valgus surgical treatment using shaft metatarsal osteotomies: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Purpose: Recurrence of hallux valgus (HV) following corrective surgery is a frequent concern. A recent systematic review estimated recurrence of HV in only 4.9%, which may be an underestimation, as most included studies had short- to mid-term follow-up. The purpose of this systematic review and meta-analysis was to synthesize and critically appraise the literature on the long-term outcomes of shaft osteotomies of the first metatarsal (M1) to treat HV without inflammatory disease or degenerative arthritis, and to assess the long-term HV recurrence rates of studies with a minimum follow-up of 5 years.
Methods: This systematic review conforms to the PRISMA guidelines. The authors conducted a search using PubMed, Embase®, and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials databases. Studies that report outcomes of shaft osteotomies of the M1 for non-inflammatory and non-degenerative HV having a minimum follow-up of 5 years were included. We found five eligible studies comprising six datasets, all assessed Scarf osteotomies with a mean follow-up that ranged from 8 to 14 years.
Results: The HV recurrence rate was 40%, considering the threshold of >15° hallux valgus angle (HVA), 30% having >20°, and 2% having >25°.
Conclusion: At a minimum follow-up of 8 years following shaft osteotomies of M1, the HVA was 15.9°, the intermetatarsal angle (IMA) was 7.7°, and the DMAA was 8.3°. Furthermore, the recurrence rates considering the various thresholds of HVA were: 40% having >15°, 20% having >20°, and 2% having >25°.
期刊介绍:
EFORT Open Reviews publishes high-quality instructional review articles across the whole field of orthopaedics and traumatology. Commissioned, peer-reviewed articles from international experts summarize current knowledge and practice in orthopaedics, with the aim of providing systematic coverage of the field. All articles undergo rigorous scientific editing to ensure the highest standards of accuracy and clarity.
This continuously published online journal is fully open access and will provide integrated CME. It is an authoritative resource for educating trainees and supports practising orthopaedic surgeons in keeping informed about the latest clinical and scientific advances.
One print issue containing a selection of papers from the journal will be published each year to coincide with the EFORT Annual Congress.
EFORT Open Reviews is the official journal of the European Federation of National Associations of Orthopaedics and Traumatology (EFORT) and is published in partnership with The British Editorial Society of Bone & Joint Surgery.