与肺部和心脏有关的吸烟史可提高城市中社会经济条件较差患者的戒烟率。

IF 4.3 2区 医学 Q1 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
Journal of General Internal Medicine Pub Date : 2025-03-01 Epub Date: 2024-10-02 DOI:10.1007/s11606-024-09071-4
Zain Khera, Nicholas Illenberger, Scott E Sherman
{"title":"与肺部和心脏有关的吸烟史可提高城市中社会经济条件较差患者的戒烟率。","authors":"Zain Khera, Nicholas Illenberger, Scott E Sherman","doi":"10.1007/s11606-024-09071-4","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Tobacco use continues to take the lives of many, and targeted interventions can counter this health burden. One possible target population is patients who have had a smoking-related diagnosis, as they may have a greater drive to quit.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To assess whether patients with previous cardiac or pulmonary conditions directly attributable to smoking have greater rates of abstinence post-discharge from hospitalization in the CHART-NY trial.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>CHART-NY was a randomized comparative effectiveness trial comparing a more intensive versus a less intensive smoking cessation intervention after hospital discharge. We divided the 1618 CHART-NY participants into a smoking-related history group of 597 and a nonsmoking-related history group of 1021 based on cardiac or pulmonary conditions in a retrospective chart review. We conducted chi-squared analyses on baseline characteristics. Using follow-up survey data, we conducted chi-squared analyses on abstinence outcomes and made logistic regression models for the predictive value of smoking-related conditions on abstinence.</p><p><strong>Participants: </strong>A total of 1059 and 1084 participants in CHART-NY who completed both 2- and 6-month follow-up surveys respectively.</p><p><strong>Main measures: </strong>Self-reported 30-day abstinence at 2- and 6-month follow-up and survey data for baseline characteristics.</p><p><strong>Key results: </strong>Those abstinent at 6-month follow-up were more likely to have a smoking-attributable history (OR = 1.40, 95% CI 1.09-1.81). When stratified based on intervention, only the intensive counseling group was significant (OR = 1.53, 95% CI 1.08-2.17). The regression model using a smoking-related comorbidity score was significant at 6 months (OR = 1.29, p = 0.03), and the multivariate logistic regression model analyzing each smoking-related condition separately demonstrated significance for myocardial infarction at 6 months (OR = 1.66, p = 0.03).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>People who smoke who have experienced smoking-related conditions may be more likely to benefit from smoking cessation interventions, especially intensive telephone-based counseling. Multiple conditions had an additive effect in predicting long-term abstinence after intervention, and myocardial infarction had the greatest predictive value.</p>","PeriodicalId":15860,"journal":{"name":"Journal of General Internal Medicine","volume":" ","pages":"749-755"},"PeriodicalIF":4.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11914687/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Pulmonary and Cardiac Smoking-Related History Improves Abstinence Rates in an Urban, Socioeconomically Disadvantaged Patient Population.\",\"authors\":\"Zain Khera, Nicholas Illenberger, Scott E Sherman\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s11606-024-09071-4\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Tobacco use continues to take the lives of many, and targeted interventions can counter this health burden. One possible target population is patients who have had a smoking-related diagnosis, as they may have a greater drive to quit.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To assess whether patients with previous cardiac or pulmonary conditions directly attributable to smoking have greater rates of abstinence post-discharge from hospitalization in the CHART-NY trial.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>CHART-NY was a randomized comparative effectiveness trial comparing a more intensive versus a less intensive smoking cessation intervention after hospital discharge. We divided the 1618 CHART-NY participants into a smoking-related history group of 597 and a nonsmoking-related history group of 1021 based on cardiac or pulmonary conditions in a retrospective chart review. We conducted chi-squared analyses on baseline characteristics. Using follow-up survey data, we conducted chi-squared analyses on abstinence outcomes and made logistic regression models for the predictive value of smoking-related conditions on abstinence.</p><p><strong>Participants: </strong>A total of 1059 and 1084 participants in CHART-NY who completed both 2- and 6-month follow-up surveys respectively.</p><p><strong>Main measures: </strong>Self-reported 30-day abstinence at 2- and 6-month follow-up and survey data for baseline characteristics.</p><p><strong>Key results: </strong>Those abstinent at 6-month follow-up were more likely to have a smoking-attributable history (OR = 1.40, 95% CI 1.09-1.81). When stratified based on intervention, only the intensive counseling group was significant (OR = 1.53, 95% CI 1.08-2.17). The regression model using a smoking-related comorbidity score was significant at 6 months (OR = 1.29, p = 0.03), and the multivariate logistic regression model analyzing each smoking-related condition separately demonstrated significance for myocardial infarction at 6 months (OR = 1.66, p = 0.03).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>People who smoke who have experienced smoking-related conditions may be more likely to benefit from smoking cessation interventions, especially intensive telephone-based counseling. Multiple conditions had an additive effect in predicting long-term abstinence after intervention, and myocardial infarction had the greatest predictive value.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":15860,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of General Internal Medicine\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"749-755\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-03-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11914687/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of General Internal Medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11606-024-09071-4\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/10/2 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of General Internal Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11606-024-09071-4","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/10/2 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:吸烟继续夺走许多人的生命,有针对性的干预措施可以减轻这一健康负担。一个可能的目标人群是曾被诊断为吸烟相关疾病的患者,因为他们可能有更大的戒烟动力:目的:评估在CHART-NY试验中,曾患有与吸烟直接相关的心脏或肺部疾病的患者出院后的戒烟率是否更高:设计:CHART-NY 是一项随机比较效果试验,比较了出院后加强戒烟干预与降低戒烟干预的效果。我们根据回顾性病历审查结果,将 1618 名 CHART-NY 参与者分为与吸烟相关的病史组(597 人)和非吸烟相关的病史组(1021 人)。我们对基线特征进行了卡方分析。利用随访调查数据,我们对戒烟结果进行了卡方分析,并就吸烟相关情况对戒烟的预测价值建立了逻辑回归模型:CHART-NY 共有 1059 名和 1084 名参与者,他们分别完成了 2 个月和 6 个月的跟踪调查:主要测量指标:2个月和6个月随访时自我报告的30天戒烟情况以及基线特征调查数据:随访 6 个月时戒烟者更有可能有吸烟史(OR = 1.40,95% CI 1.09-1.81)。如果根据干预措施进行分层,只有强化咨询组具有显著性(OR = 1.53,95% CI 1.08-2.17)。使用吸烟相关合并症评分的回归模型在6个月时具有显著性(OR = 1.29,P = 0.03),而分别分析每种吸烟相关情况的多变量逻辑回归模型在6个月时对心肌梗死具有显著性(OR = 1.66,P = 0.03):结论:经历过吸烟相关情况的吸烟者更有可能从戒烟干预中获益,尤其是基于电话的强化咨询。多种情况在预测干预后长期戒烟方面具有叠加效应,而心肌梗死的预测价值最大。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Pulmonary and Cardiac Smoking-Related History Improves Abstinence Rates in an Urban, Socioeconomically Disadvantaged Patient Population.

Background: Tobacco use continues to take the lives of many, and targeted interventions can counter this health burden. One possible target population is patients who have had a smoking-related diagnosis, as they may have a greater drive to quit.

Objective: To assess whether patients with previous cardiac or pulmonary conditions directly attributable to smoking have greater rates of abstinence post-discharge from hospitalization in the CHART-NY trial.

Design: CHART-NY was a randomized comparative effectiveness trial comparing a more intensive versus a less intensive smoking cessation intervention after hospital discharge. We divided the 1618 CHART-NY participants into a smoking-related history group of 597 and a nonsmoking-related history group of 1021 based on cardiac or pulmonary conditions in a retrospective chart review. We conducted chi-squared analyses on baseline characteristics. Using follow-up survey data, we conducted chi-squared analyses on abstinence outcomes and made logistic regression models for the predictive value of smoking-related conditions on abstinence.

Participants: A total of 1059 and 1084 participants in CHART-NY who completed both 2- and 6-month follow-up surveys respectively.

Main measures: Self-reported 30-day abstinence at 2- and 6-month follow-up and survey data for baseline characteristics.

Key results: Those abstinent at 6-month follow-up were more likely to have a smoking-attributable history (OR = 1.40, 95% CI 1.09-1.81). When stratified based on intervention, only the intensive counseling group was significant (OR = 1.53, 95% CI 1.08-2.17). The regression model using a smoking-related comorbidity score was significant at 6 months (OR = 1.29, p = 0.03), and the multivariate logistic regression model analyzing each smoking-related condition separately demonstrated significance for myocardial infarction at 6 months (OR = 1.66, p = 0.03).

Conclusions: People who smoke who have experienced smoking-related conditions may be more likely to benefit from smoking cessation interventions, especially intensive telephone-based counseling. Multiple conditions had an additive effect in predicting long-term abstinence after intervention, and myocardial infarction had the greatest predictive value.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of General Internal Medicine
Journal of General Internal Medicine 医学-医学:内科
CiteScore
7.70
自引率
5.30%
发文量
749
审稿时长
3-6 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of General Internal Medicine is the official journal of the Society of General Internal Medicine. It promotes improved patient care, research, and education in primary care, general internal medicine, and hospital medicine. Its articles focus on topics such as clinical medicine, epidemiology, prevention, health care delivery, curriculum development, and numerous other non-traditional themes, in addition to classic clinical research on problems in internal medicine.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信