Song-Yun Chu, Fen Peng, Jie Wang, Lin Liu, Jing Zhao, Xiao-Ning Han, Wen-Hui Ding
{"title":"预测射血分数轻度减低和保留的心力衰竭患者心源性死亡的睾酮。","authors":"Song-Yun Chu, Fen Peng, Jie Wang, Lin Liu, Jing Zhao, Xiao-Ning Han, Wen-Hui Ding","doi":"10.1002/ehf2.15107","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aims: </strong>Endogenous catecholamine release-inhibitory peptide catestatin has been associated with heart failure (HF). This subgroup analysis of our cohort of HF compared the different effects of catestatin as a predictor for cardiac outcomes in patients with HF with reduced (HFrEF), mildly reduced (HFmrEF) or preserved (HFpEF) ejection fraction.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Plasma catestatin was measured in the HF patient cohort of 228 cases with a whole spectrum of ejection fraction. The cardiac deaths were analysed according to prespecified subgroups.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Over a median follow-up of 52.5 months, the association between plasma catestatin and cardiac death was different in patients with HFrEF, HFmrEF or HFpEF [hazard ratio (HR) 1.53, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.99-2.37 and HR 2.73, 95% CI 1.56-4.75, respectively; interaction P = 0.022]. Patients with HFmrEF/HFpEF were older and more likely to be female, with non-ischaemic cardiomyopathy and atrial fibrillation but lower levels of plasma B-type natriuretic peptide (BNP). Similar adverse cardiac events occurred in patients with HFmrEF/HFpEF as in HFrEF. Plasma catestatin was a better predictor for cardiovascular death in the HFmrEF/HFpEF patients [area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) = 0.72, 95% CI 0.45-0.74] than in the HFrEF patients (AUC = 0.59, 95% CI 0.587-0.849). The optimal cut point of plasma catestatin level of 0.86 ng/mL predicted a 2.80-fold elevated risk for cardiac death in HFmrEF/HFpEF.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Elevated plasma catestatin might be a more sensitive predictor for cardiac outcome in patients with HFmrEF/HFpEF than in HFrEF.</p>","PeriodicalId":11864,"journal":{"name":"ESC Heart Failure","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Catestatin as a predictor for cardiac death in heart failure with mildly reduced and preserved ejection fraction.\",\"authors\":\"Song-Yun Chu, Fen Peng, Jie Wang, Lin Liu, Jing Zhao, Xiao-Ning Han, Wen-Hui Ding\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/ehf2.15107\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Aims: </strong>Endogenous catecholamine release-inhibitory peptide catestatin has been associated with heart failure (HF). This subgroup analysis of our cohort of HF compared the different effects of catestatin as a predictor for cardiac outcomes in patients with HF with reduced (HFrEF), mildly reduced (HFmrEF) or preserved (HFpEF) ejection fraction.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Plasma catestatin was measured in the HF patient cohort of 228 cases with a whole spectrum of ejection fraction. The cardiac deaths were analysed according to prespecified subgroups.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Over a median follow-up of 52.5 months, the association between plasma catestatin and cardiac death was different in patients with HFrEF, HFmrEF or HFpEF [hazard ratio (HR) 1.53, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.99-2.37 and HR 2.73, 95% CI 1.56-4.75, respectively; interaction P = 0.022]. Patients with HFmrEF/HFpEF were older and more likely to be female, with non-ischaemic cardiomyopathy and atrial fibrillation but lower levels of plasma B-type natriuretic peptide (BNP). Similar adverse cardiac events occurred in patients with HFmrEF/HFpEF as in HFrEF. Plasma catestatin was a better predictor for cardiovascular death in the HFmrEF/HFpEF patients [area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) = 0.72, 95% CI 0.45-0.74] than in the HFrEF patients (AUC = 0.59, 95% CI 0.587-0.849). The optimal cut point of plasma catestatin level of 0.86 ng/mL predicted a 2.80-fold elevated risk for cardiac death in HFmrEF/HFpEF.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Elevated plasma catestatin might be a more sensitive predictor for cardiac outcome in patients with HFmrEF/HFpEF than in HFrEF.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":11864,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"ESC Heart Failure\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-03\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"ESC Heart Failure\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1002/ehf2.15107\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ESC Heart Failure","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/ehf2.15107","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
目的:内源性儿茶酚胺释放抑制肽卡他汀与心力衰竭(HF)有关。本研究对我们的心力衰竭队列进行了亚组分析,比较了作为射血分数减低(HFrEF)、轻度减低(HFmrEF)或保留(HFpEF)的心力衰竭患者心脏预后预测指标的促肾上腺皮质激素的不同作用:方法:对228例射血分数全谱的高血压患者进行血浆促胰蛋白酶测定。结果:在52.5年的中位随访中,有89人死亡:在中位随访52.5个月期间,HFrEF、HFmrEF或HFpEF患者的血浆睾酮与心脏死亡之间存在差异[危险比(HR)分别为1.53,95%置信区间(CI)为0.99-2.37和HR为2.73,95%置信区间(CI)为1.56-4.75;交互作用P = 0.022]。HFmrEF/HFpEF患者年龄较大,更可能是女性,患有非缺血性心肌病和心房颤动,但血浆B型钠尿肽(BNP)水平较低。HFmrEF/HFpEF患者与HFrEF患者发生的不良心脏事件相似。与 HFrEF 患者(AUC = 0.59,95% CI 0.587-0.849)相比,HFmrEF/HFpEF 患者的血浆促胰蛋白酶能更好地预测心血管死亡[接收器操作特征曲线下面积 (AUC) = 0.72,95% CI 0.45-0.74]。血浆促性腺激素水平的最佳切点为0.86纳克/毫升,这预示着HFmrEF/HFpEF患者的心脏死亡风险会升高2.80倍:结论:血浆促性腺激素升高可能是预测 HFmrEF/HFpEF 患者心脏预后的一个比 HFrEF 更敏感的指标。
Catestatin as a predictor for cardiac death in heart failure with mildly reduced and preserved ejection fraction.
Aims: Endogenous catecholamine release-inhibitory peptide catestatin has been associated with heart failure (HF). This subgroup analysis of our cohort of HF compared the different effects of catestatin as a predictor for cardiac outcomes in patients with HF with reduced (HFrEF), mildly reduced (HFmrEF) or preserved (HFpEF) ejection fraction.
Methods: Plasma catestatin was measured in the HF patient cohort of 228 cases with a whole spectrum of ejection fraction. The cardiac deaths were analysed according to prespecified subgroups.
Results: Over a median follow-up of 52.5 months, the association between plasma catestatin and cardiac death was different in patients with HFrEF, HFmrEF or HFpEF [hazard ratio (HR) 1.53, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.99-2.37 and HR 2.73, 95% CI 1.56-4.75, respectively; interaction P = 0.022]. Patients with HFmrEF/HFpEF were older and more likely to be female, with non-ischaemic cardiomyopathy and atrial fibrillation but lower levels of plasma B-type natriuretic peptide (BNP). Similar adverse cardiac events occurred in patients with HFmrEF/HFpEF as in HFrEF. Plasma catestatin was a better predictor for cardiovascular death in the HFmrEF/HFpEF patients [area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) = 0.72, 95% CI 0.45-0.74] than in the HFrEF patients (AUC = 0.59, 95% CI 0.587-0.849). The optimal cut point of plasma catestatin level of 0.86 ng/mL predicted a 2.80-fold elevated risk for cardiac death in HFmrEF/HFpEF.
Conclusions: Elevated plasma catestatin might be a more sensitive predictor for cardiac outcome in patients with HFmrEF/HFpEF than in HFrEF.
期刊介绍:
ESC Heart Failure is the open access journal of the Heart Failure Association of the European Society of Cardiology dedicated to the advancement of knowledge in the field of heart failure. The journal aims to improve the understanding, prevention, investigation and treatment of heart failure. Molecular and cellular biology, pathology, physiology, electrophysiology, pharmacology, as well as the clinical, social and population sciences all form part of the discipline that is heart failure. Accordingly, submission of manuscripts on basic, translational, clinical and population sciences is invited. Original contributions on nursing, care of the elderly, primary care, health economics and other specialist fields related to heart failure are also welcome, as are case reports that highlight interesting aspects of heart failure care and treatment.