Danilo Armbrust, Guilherme Peixoto Tinoco Arêas, Carlos Luques Fonseca, Fernando Zanela da Silva Arêas, Natália de Almeida Carvalho Duarte, Silvia Ataíde Alves Santana, Arislander Jonathan Lopes Dumont, Hugo Pasin Neto, Claudia Santos Oliveira
{"title":"经颅直流电刺激对慢性腰背痛患者的整骨疗法效果:双盲、随机安慰剂对照试验。","authors":"Danilo Armbrust, Guilherme Peixoto Tinoco Arêas, Carlos Luques Fonseca, Fernando Zanela da Silva Arêas, Natália de Almeida Carvalho Duarte, Silvia Ataíde Alves Santana, Arislander Jonathan Lopes Dumont, Hugo Pasin Neto, Claudia Santos Oliveira","doi":"10.1177/02692155241274718","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To evaluate the effectiveness of osteopathic manipulative treatment (OMT) associated with transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) in reducing pain, disability, and improving quality of life in participants with non-specific chronic low back pain.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>A randomised double-blind clinical trial.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>Clinical outpatient unit.</p><p><strong>Subjects: </strong>72 participants with non-specific chronic low back pain were randomised into three groups: active tDCS + OMT (<i>n</i> = 24), sham tDCS + sham OMT (<i>n</i> = 24), and sham tDCS + OMT (<i>n</i> = 24).</p><p><strong>Interventions: </strong>Evaluations were performed before, after the intervention, and one month post-intervention. tDCS consisted of ten 20-minute sessions over two weeks (five sessions per week). OMT was administered once per week, with two sessions conducted before the first and sixth tDCS sessions.</p><p><strong>Main measures: </strong>Pain, disability, and quality of life were assessed at baseline, after two weeks, and at one month of follow-up.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The visual analogue scale showed a significant decrease in all groups (<i>p</i> < 0.001). However, tDCS + OMT and sham tDCS + OMT demonstrated a clinically significant reduction compared to the sham combination (effect size <i>n</i>² = 0.315). Roland-Morris scores decreased across all groups without specific group effects. EuroQoL 5-Dimension 3-Level improvement was observed only in the tDCS + OMT and sham tDCS + OMT groups (significant difference between T2 and T0, <i>p</i> = 0.002).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The combination of OMT and tDCS did not provide clinically significant improvement over OMT alone in participants with non-specific chronic low back pain.</p>","PeriodicalId":10441,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Rehabilitation","volume":" ","pages":"1609-1621"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Effects of osteopathic manipulative treatment associated with transcranial direct current stimulation in individuals with chronic low back pain: A double-blind, randomised placebo-controlled trial.\",\"authors\":\"Danilo Armbrust, Guilherme Peixoto Tinoco Arêas, Carlos Luques Fonseca, Fernando Zanela da Silva Arêas, Natália de Almeida Carvalho Duarte, Silvia Ataíde Alves Santana, Arislander Jonathan Lopes Dumont, Hugo Pasin Neto, Claudia Santos Oliveira\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/02692155241274718\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To evaluate the effectiveness of osteopathic manipulative treatment (OMT) associated with transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) in reducing pain, disability, and improving quality of life in participants with non-specific chronic low back pain.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>A randomised double-blind clinical trial.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>Clinical outpatient unit.</p><p><strong>Subjects: </strong>72 participants with non-specific chronic low back pain were randomised into three groups: active tDCS + OMT (<i>n</i> = 24), sham tDCS + sham OMT (<i>n</i> = 24), and sham tDCS + OMT (<i>n</i> = 24).</p><p><strong>Interventions: </strong>Evaluations were performed before, after the intervention, and one month post-intervention. tDCS consisted of ten 20-minute sessions over two weeks (five sessions per week). OMT was administered once per week, with two sessions conducted before the first and sixth tDCS sessions.</p><p><strong>Main measures: </strong>Pain, disability, and quality of life were assessed at baseline, after two weeks, and at one month of follow-up.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The visual analogue scale showed a significant decrease in all groups (<i>p</i> < 0.001). However, tDCS + OMT and sham tDCS + OMT demonstrated a clinically significant reduction compared to the sham combination (effect size <i>n</i>² = 0.315). Roland-Morris scores decreased across all groups without specific group effects. EuroQoL 5-Dimension 3-Level improvement was observed only in the tDCS + OMT and sham tDCS + OMT groups (significant difference between T2 and T0, <i>p</i> = 0.002).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The combination of OMT and tDCS did not provide clinically significant improvement over OMT alone in participants with non-specific chronic low back pain.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":10441,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Clinical Rehabilitation\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"1609-1621\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Clinical Rehabilitation\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/02692155241274718\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/10/3 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"REHABILITATION\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical Rehabilitation","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/02692155241274718","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/10/3 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"REHABILITATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
Effects of osteopathic manipulative treatment associated with transcranial direct current stimulation in individuals with chronic low back pain: A double-blind, randomised placebo-controlled trial.
Objective: To evaluate the effectiveness of osteopathic manipulative treatment (OMT) associated with transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) in reducing pain, disability, and improving quality of life in participants with non-specific chronic low back pain.
Design: A randomised double-blind clinical trial.
Setting: Clinical outpatient unit.
Subjects: 72 participants with non-specific chronic low back pain were randomised into three groups: active tDCS + OMT (n = 24), sham tDCS + sham OMT (n = 24), and sham tDCS + OMT (n = 24).
Interventions: Evaluations were performed before, after the intervention, and one month post-intervention. tDCS consisted of ten 20-minute sessions over two weeks (five sessions per week). OMT was administered once per week, with two sessions conducted before the first and sixth tDCS sessions.
Main measures: Pain, disability, and quality of life were assessed at baseline, after two weeks, and at one month of follow-up.
Results: The visual analogue scale showed a significant decrease in all groups (p < 0.001). However, tDCS + OMT and sham tDCS + OMT demonstrated a clinically significant reduction compared to the sham combination (effect size n² = 0.315). Roland-Morris scores decreased across all groups without specific group effects. EuroQoL 5-Dimension 3-Level improvement was observed only in the tDCS + OMT and sham tDCS + OMT groups (significant difference between T2 and T0, p = 0.002).
Conclusion: The combination of OMT and tDCS did not provide clinically significant improvement over OMT alone in participants with non-specific chronic low back pain.
期刊介绍:
Clinical Rehabilitation covering the whole field of disability and rehabilitation, this peer-reviewed journal publishes research and discussion articles and acts as a forum for the international dissemination and exchange of information amongst the large number of professionals involved in rehabilitation. This journal is a member of the Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE)