使用医生改良的内移植物进行血管内主动脉修补术的技能掌握和学习曲线分析。

IF 0.6 Q4 PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASE
Annals of vascular diseases Pub Date : 2024-09-25 Epub Date: 2024-06-27 DOI:10.3400/avd.oa.24-00037
Hiroshi Mitsuoka, Yasuhiko Terai, Yuta Miyano, Takahiro Ozawa, Takahiro Suzuki
{"title":"使用医生改良的内移植物进行血管内主动脉修补术的技能掌握和学习曲线分析。","authors":"Hiroshi Mitsuoka, Yasuhiko Terai, Yuta Miyano, Takahiro Ozawa, Takahiro Suzuki","doi":"10.3400/avd.oa.24-00037","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Objectives:</b> This study aims to delineate the unique learning curve for fenestrated endovascular aortic repair (FEVAR) at our institution. <b>Materials and Methods:</b> We measured the FEVAR-specific procedure time (FSPT) as the duration from device deployment to bridging stent completion. To maintain consistency in technical complexity, the study focused on 38 cases with four-fenestration FEVAR for juxtarenal abdominal aortic aneurysms, selected from 103 of all FEVAR procedures between June 2011 and February 2024. In these cases, superior mesenteric and bilateral renal arteries were preserved with fenestration with bridging stents insertion, while celiac arteries fenestrations without fenestrations. Learning curve and cumulative sum (CUSUM) analyses assessed FSPT reduction against increased FEVAR experiences. <b>Results:</b> A significant learning curve was observed, with the procedure time (y) and experience (X) correlation given by y = -39.95 log(X) + 283.6 (R<sup>2</sup> = 0.5758). CUSUM indicated that 30 to 50 cases were required for skill stabilization and maturation. <b>Conclusion:</b> Our endovascular team required 30-50 cases to establish reliable FEVAR proficiency. Beyond cumulative experiences, pivotal elements in the learning trajectory seemed to include technological advancements and team augmentation.</p>","PeriodicalId":7995,"journal":{"name":"Annals of vascular diseases","volume":"17 3","pages":"264-269"},"PeriodicalIF":0.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11444836/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Skill Mastery and Learning Curve Analysis in Fenestrated Endovascular Aortic Repair with Physician-Modified Endograft.\",\"authors\":\"Hiroshi Mitsuoka, Yasuhiko Terai, Yuta Miyano, Takahiro Ozawa, Takahiro Suzuki\",\"doi\":\"10.3400/avd.oa.24-00037\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p><b>Objectives:</b> This study aims to delineate the unique learning curve for fenestrated endovascular aortic repair (FEVAR) at our institution. <b>Materials and Methods:</b> We measured the FEVAR-specific procedure time (FSPT) as the duration from device deployment to bridging stent completion. To maintain consistency in technical complexity, the study focused on 38 cases with four-fenestration FEVAR for juxtarenal abdominal aortic aneurysms, selected from 103 of all FEVAR procedures between June 2011 and February 2024. In these cases, superior mesenteric and bilateral renal arteries were preserved with fenestration with bridging stents insertion, while celiac arteries fenestrations without fenestrations. Learning curve and cumulative sum (CUSUM) analyses assessed FSPT reduction against increased FEVAR experiences. <b>Results:</b> A significant learning curve was observed, with the procedure time (y) and experience (X) correlation given by y = -39.95 log(X) + 283.6 (R<sup>2</sup> = 0.5758). CUSUM indicated that 30 to 50 cases were required for skill stabilization and maturation. <b>Conclusion:</b> Our endovascular team required 30-50 cases to establish reliable FEVAR proficiency. Beyond cumulative experiences, pivotal elements in the learning trajectory seemed to include technological advancements and team augmentation.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":7995,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Annals of vascular diseases\",\"volume\":\"17 3\",\"pages\":\"264-269\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-25\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11444836/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Annals of vascular diseases\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3400/avd.oa.24-00037\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/6/27 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annals of vascular diseases","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3400/avd.oa.24-00037","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/6/27 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

研究目的本研究旨在描述本院开展的带孔主动脉瓣修复术(FEVAR)的独特学习曲线。材料与方法:我们测量了 FEVAR 特定手术时间(FSPT),即从设备部署到桥接支架完成的持续时间。为了保持技术复杂性的一致性,研究重点从 2011 年 6 月至 2024 年 2 月期间的 103 例 FEVAR 手术中挑选了 38 例四瓣膜 FEVAR 治疗并arenal 腹主动脉瘤的病例。在这些病例中,肠系膜上动脉和双侧肾动脉在插入桥接支架的情况下保留了瓣膜,而腹腔动脉在没有瓣膜的情况下保留了瓣膜。学习曲线和累积总和(CUSUM)分析评估了 FSPT 的减少与 FEVAR 经验增加的关系。结果:观察到一条明显的学习曲线,手术时间(y)与经验(X)的相关性为 y = -39.95 log(X) + 283.6 (R2 = 0.5758)。CUSUM 表明,需要 30 至 50 个病例才能使技能稳定和成熟。结论:我们的血管内团队需要 30-50 个病例才能建立可靠的 FEVAR 熟练程度。除了积累经验,学习轨迹中的关键因素似乎还包括技术进步和团队扩充。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Skill Mastery and Learning Curve Analysis in Fenestrated Endovascular Aortic Repair with Physician-Modified Endograft.

Objectives: This study aims to delineate the unique learning curve for fenestrated endovascular aortic repair (FEVAR) at our institution. Materials and Methods: We measured the FEVAR-specific procedure time (FSPT) as the duration from device deployment to bridging stent completion. To maintain consistency in technical complexity, the study focused on 38 cases with four-fenestration FEVAR for juxtarenal abdominal aortic aneurysms, selected from 103 of all FEVAR procedures between June 2011 and February 2024. In these cases, superior mesenteric and bilateral renal arteries were preserved with fenestration with bridging stents insertion, while celiac arteries fenestrations without fenestrations. Learning curve and cumulative sum (CUSUM) analyses assessed FSPT reduction against increased FEVAR experiences. Results: A significant learning curve was observed, with the procedure time (y) and experience (X) correlation given by y = -39.95 log(X) + 283.6 (R2 = 0.5758). CUSUM indicated that 30 to 50 cases were required for skill stabilization and maturation. Conclusion: Our endovascular team required 30-50 cases to establish reliable FEVAR proficiency. Beyond cumulative experiences, pivotal elements in the learning trajectory seemed to include technological advancements and team augmentation.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Annals of vascular diseases
Annals of vascular diseases PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASE-
自引率
0.00%
发文量
41
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信